Search

Purpose: An increased value of tibiofemoral rotation is frequently observed in patients with patellofemoral instability or maltracking. Nevertheless, the appropriate approach for addressing this parameter remains unclear so far. One potential approach for correcting tibiofemoral rotation is femoral rotational osteotomy. We hypothesized that femoral rotational osteotomy affects tibiofemoral rotation., Methods: All patients who underwent femoral rotational osteotomy between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this study. Pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral rotation and the degree of femoral rotation were measured using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements. The effect of femoral rotation on tibiofemoral rotation was assessed., Results: Forty knees (18 right and 22 left) of 36 patients (28 females and 8 males) were included. Mean preoperative femoral torsion was 32.1 ± 10.1° in 2D and 30.8 ± 10.1° in 3D. Femoral rotation was performed by -14.1 ± 8.3° using 2D measurements and -15.0 ± 8.0° using 3D measurements. Tibiofemoral rotation changed from 9.9 ± 6.2° to 9.7 ± 6.0° (p = n.s.) in 2D, and from 10.2 ± 5.5° to 9.4 ± 5.4° (p = n.s.) in 3D., Conclusion: Tibiofemoral rotation showed no significant changes after femoral rotational osteotomy. Hence, femoral rotational osteotomy cannot be used to correct tibiofemoral rotation in addition to correcting the femoral version. Other surgical techniques need to be evaluated if correction of tibiofemoral rotation is required., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2024 The Authors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.)

Purpose: The multifactorial nature of patellofemoral instability requires a comprehensive assessment of the affected patients. While an association between tibial tuberosity (TT) torsion and patellofemoral instability is known, its specific effect has not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of TT torsion on patellofemoral instability., Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent surgical intervention for patellofemoral instability and asymptomatic controls. TT torsion was measured in addition to other commonly assessed risk factors for patellofemoral instability using standardised computed tomography (CT) data of the lower extremities. The diagnostic performances of the assessed parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated., Results: The patellofemoral instability group consisted of 79 knees, compared to 72 knees in the asymptomatic control group. Both groups differed significantly in all assessed parameters (p < 0.001), except for tibial torsion (n.s.). Among all parameters, TT torsion presented the best diagnostic performance for predicting patellar instability with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 17.7° yielded a 0.87 sensitivity and 0.89 specificity to predict patellar instability (OR, 55.2; 95% CI, 20.5-148.6; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Among the evaluated risk factors, TT torsion had the highest predictive value for patellofemoral instability. Patients with TT torsions ≥ 17.7° showed a 55-fold increased probability of patellofemoral instability. Therefore, TT torsion should be included in the assessment of patients with patellofemoral instability., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2024 The Authors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.)

Objective: Three-dimensional correction of the bony alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane of the proximal tibia; surgery is performed via an open- or closing-wedge osteotomy to improve ligament stability and reduce joint degeneration., Indications: Chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) instability and ligament revision surgeries; subjective knee instability in patients who are ambitious athletes and people who do physical labor; moderate joint degeneration with meniscus and cartilage damage, post-traumatic deformities., Contraindications: Time pressure (immediate meniscus surgery, since planning and production of patient-specific tools is time-consuming), lack of compliance (need for partial weight bearing, crutches), excessive smoking, vascular pathologies., Surgical Technique: Planning based on computed tomography (CT) data, determination of the axis of rotation with open or closing wedge, or dome osteotomy; production of corresponding patient-specific cutting blocks. Surgery is performed using the known standard approaches for a high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Exact positioning of cutting guides on the exposed bone. Sawing and adjusting the correction using an osteotomy chisel so that the reduction guide can be attached. Fixation of the achieved correction with angle-stable plate fixator., Postoperative Management: Partial weight bearing based on the extent of the correction for 6 weeks, free range of motion if no additional ligamentous reconstruction was performed. Subsequent full weight bearing after X‑ray and, if necessary, CT control., Results: No general results can be presented, since the surgical procedure, the indication, and the patient group are extremely heterogeneous. Accuracy of the cutting blocks used has been presented in other studies and is given as 0.8° ± 1.5° in relation to the frontal axis. However, the intraoperative change in the correction and adaptation to the surgical site that is presented depends on the surgeon and can greatly influence the extent of correction in terms of accuracy in complex corrections., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: This study aimed to quantify the effect of lower limb rotational parameters on the difference in the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove (TTTG) distance when assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with patellar instability. It was hypothesized that an increased native knee rotation angle significantly contributes to an underestimation of TTTG by MRI., Methods: Forty patients with patellar instability who had undergone standard radiographs, MRI and CT scans were included in this retrospective study. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all imaging for TTTG, femoral and tibial rotation, knee rotation and flexion angle, and trochlear dysplasia. ΔTTTG was defined as the TTTG measured on MRI subtracted from the TTTG measured on CT. Statistical analysis determined the effect of these parameters on the calculated difference between TTTG when measured on CT and MRI., Results: Equal knee flexion in MRI and CT resulted in a ΔTTTG of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm compared to 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in patients with different knee flexion angles in both imaging acquisitions (p = 0.036). The knee rotation angle measured on CT (native knee rotation angle) was negatively correlated with ΔTTTG (r = - 0.365; p = 0.002), while neither tibial nor femoral rotation showed any associations with TTTG (n.s.). Trochlear dysplasia did not show any significant correlation with ΔTTTG, regardless of classification by Dejour or Lippacher (n.s.). Both the native knee rotation angle and the MRI knee flexion angle were independent predictors of ΔTTTG, yet with an opposing effect (knee rotation: 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for β - 0.468 to - 0.154, p < 0.001; knee flexion 95% CI for β 0.292 to 0.587, p < 0.001). Patients with a native knee rotation angle > 20° showed a ΔTTTG of - 5.8 ± 4.0 mm (MRI rather overestimates TTTG) compared to 0.9 ± 4.1 mm Δ TTTG (MRI rather underestimates TTTG) in patients with < 20° native knee rotation angle., Conclusion: The native knee rotation angle is an independent, inversely correlated predictor of ΔTTTG, thus opposing the effect of knee flexion during MRI acquisition. Consequently, these results suggest that not only knee flexion but also knee rotation should be appreciated when assessing TTTG during patellar instability diagnostic evaluation as it can potentially lead to a false estimation of the TTTG distance on MRI., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Rotation of the tibia relative to the femur was recently identified as a contributing risk factor for patellar instability, and correlated with its severity. The hypothesis was that in patellofemoral dysplastic knees, an increase in femorotibial rotation can be reliably detected on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs by an overlap of the lateral femoral condyle over the lateral tibial eminence., Methods: Sixty patients (77 knees) received low-dose computed tomography (CT) of the lower extremity for assessment of torsional malalignment due to recurrent patellofemoral instability. Three-dimensional (3D) surface models were created to assess femorotibial rotation and its relationship to other morphologic risk factors of patellofemoral instability. On weight-bearing AP knee radiographs, a femoral condyle/lateral tibial eminence superimposition was defined as a positive winking sign. Using digitally reconstructed radiographs of the 3D models, susceptibility of the winking sign to vertical/horizontal AP knee radiograph malrotation was investigated., Results: A positive winking sign was present in 30/77 knees (39.0%) and indicated a 6.3 ± 1.4° increase in femorotibial rotation (p < 0.001). Femoral condyle/tibial eminence superimposition of 1.9 mm detected an increased femorotibial rotation (> 15°) with 43% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.72; p = 0.002). A positive winking sign (with 2 mm overlap) disappeared in case of a 10° horizontally or 15° vertically malrotated radiograph, whereas a 4 mm overlap did not disappear at all, regardless of the quality of the radiograph. In absence of a winking sign, on the other hand, no superimposition resulted within 20° of vertical/horizontal image malrotation. Femorotibial rotation was positively correlated to TT-TG (R 2  = 0.40, p = 0.001) and patellar tilt (R 2  = 0.30, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: The winking sign reliably indicates an increased femorotibial rotation on a weight-bearing AP knee radiograph and could prove useful for day-by-day clinical work. Future research needs to investigate whether femorotibial rotation is not only a prognostic factor but a potential surgical target in patients with patellofemoral disorders., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Increased external tibial torsion and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG) affect patellofemoral instability and can be corrected by tibial rotational osteotomy and tibial tuberosity transfer. Thus far, less attention has been paid to the combined correction of tibial torsion and TTTG by supratuberositary osteotomy., Purpose: To quantify the effect of a supratuberositary torsional osteotomy on TTTG., Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study., Methods: Seven patients who underwent supratuberositary osteotomy to treat patellofemoral instability and an additional 13 patients with increased TTTG were included (N = 20). With 3-dimensional (3D) surface models, supratuberositary rotational osteotomies were simulated with predefined degrees of rotation. Concomitant 3D TTTG was measured by a novel and validated measurement method. In addition, all operated patients underwent 2-dimensional (2D) radiographic evaluation with pre- and postoperative computed tomography data. Absolute differences among simulated, predicted, and achieved postoperative corrections were compared., Results: A total of 500 supratuberositary osteotomies were simulated. The linear regression estimate yielded a change of -0.68 mm (95% CI, -0.72 to -0.63; P < .0001) in 3D TTTG per degree of tibial rotation, and 2D and 3D TTTG measurements in the operated patients were comparable in pre- and postoperative measurements (preoperative, 19.8 ± 2.5 mm and 20.0 ± 2.4 mm; postoperative, 13.6 ± 3.8 mm and 14.6 ± 3.4 mm, respectively). Postoperative 2D TTTG deviated in absolute terms from predicted (regression) and simulated TTTG by 1.4 ± 1.0 mm and 1.5 ± 0.6 mm. Inter- and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) for radiological and simulated measurements ranged between 0.883 and 0.996 and were almost perfect., Conclusion: In supratuberositary osteotomy, TTTG changes by -0.68 mm per degree of internal tibial rotation. The absolute mean difference between postoperative predicted TTTG and 2D TTTG was only 1.4 mm. Thus, TTTG correction can be successfully predicted by the degree of tibial rotation., Clinical Relevance: TTTG correction can be successfully predicted by the degree of tibial rotation. Therefore, in selected cases, tibial torsional deformity and TTTG can be corrected by 1 osteotomy. However, isolated rotations have been performed, and unintended translational movements during tibial rotation may alter the postoperative results.