Search

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediately loaded zygomatic implants combined with anterior regular implants (hybrid zygoma) for the fixed rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study and treated with the hybrid zygoma concept by an experienced surgeon. Followup visits were planned after 1 week, 3 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, then annually. At the last follow-up appointment (mean: 36 months after surgery; range: 24 to 52 months), the prostheses were unscrewed and the implants and periimplant tissues were examined. The primary outcome evaluated was implant success. Following the criteria proposed by Aparicio et al, implant success was classified in five grades, with grade I representing the best condition and grade V representing a failure. At the annual check-up, patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with their oral rehabilitation. Results: A total of 80 implants (34 zygomatic and 46 regular) were inserted. One zygomatic implant was lost in one patient, and two regular implants failed in two other patients. Of the zygomatic implants, 24 (70.6%) presented a success grade I, 9 (26.5%) a success grade II, and 1 (2.9%) a grade V. Sinusitis was the most common biologic complication, occurring in two patients (5.6%). Two patients showed unilateral upper lip paresthesia that was persistent at the last follow-up appointment. According to the annual follow-up visit questionnaire data, 72%, 89%, and 94% of patients declared that they were satisfied with their phonetic ability, chewing ability, and esthetics, respectively. Conclusion: Although zygomatic implants combined with anterior regular implants present a higher risk of complications than traditional implantology, they allow for immediately loaded full-arch fixed rehabilitation of patients with advanced atrophy of the posterior maxilla, which provides satisfactory chewing ability, esthetics, and phonetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present report was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of edentulous jaws rehabilitated with the Brånemark Novum protocol over a 16-year period. Between April and November 2001, four patients (three males, one female) were rehabilitated with fixed full-arch rehabilitations supported by three immediately loaded implants following the Brånemark Novum protocol. Cumulative survival rates (CSRs) of the implants and prosthesis, bleeding on probing (BOP), Plaque Index (PI), probing depth (PD), implant stability quotient (ISQ; as measured through resonance frequency analysis [RFA]), and peri-implant bone resorption were evaluated over time, up to the 16-year follow-up. At 16 years of follow-up, no implant failed (CSR 100%) and no prosthesis needed to be substituted (CSR 100%). During the period between the 11th and 16th year of follow-up, bone level (mean: 2.2 mm at 16 years) and RFA values remained stable. At the 16-year follow-up, the implants presented high PI (79.2%) but low BOP (10.4%) values. Mean PD was 3.30 mm (range: 2 to 6 mm). One biologic complication was detected on a central implant (crater-form bone destruction), and several prosthodontic complications occurred during the 16 years (fractures of resin or teeth), the majority of which were registered on the same parafunctional patient. This is the first description of the Brånemark Novum protocol rehabilitation with a 16-year followup. The outcomes demonstrated very good long-term outcomes for this protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective study reports the 6-year outcomes for patients rehabilitated with an immediate loading protocol of the maxilla (Columbus Bridge Protocol). In this study, 164 implants were inserted in 37 patients and loaded within 24 to 36 hours. Four implants failed during the first 6 months. At the 6-year follow-up, a mean bone loss of 1.52 mm was found. Significantly (P < .0083) less bone loss was found next to tapered implants compared with cylindric implants and next to machined collar implants compared with full acid-etched implants (P < .0083). No significant differences in bone loss were found in tilted versus upright implants or in mesial versus distal implant sites. In addition, there were no significant differences relating to either the degree of abutment angulation or the reason for tooth loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare survival rates and radiographic outcomes of immediate and delayed implant loading in edentulous maxillae.Materials and Methods: Forty-nine patients in need of maxillary full-arch treatment were randomized into two groups: test group (n = 34) treated following the Columbus Bridge Protocol with 4 to 6 implants loaded within 24 hours and a control group (n = 15) treated following the ad modum Branemark protocol with 6 to 9 implants loaded a mean 8.75 months after surgery. Two hundred sixty implants (test: n = 163, control: n = 97) were placed, and subjects were treated with screw-retained full-arch prostheses. Bone levels were measured at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 years and analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results: All patients appeared at all scheduled recall visits. No differences in cumulative survival rates were found between groups at 36 months. Ten implants (6.1%) failed in the test group; four (4.1%) failed in the control group. At 36 months, no prosthetic failures were detected. Significantly less bone loss was found in the test group at all time intervals (P < .001). The average bone level from the implant-abutment connection was 1.3 mm in the test group and 1.9 mm in the control group at 12 months, 1.5 mm and 2.2 mm at 24 months, and 1.6 mm and 2.3 mm at 36 months, respectively.Conclusion: In the edentulous maxilla, the Columbus Bridge Protocol involving immediate loading of implants placed in both healed and fresh extraction sites exhibited equivalent implant survival and less marginal bone loss at 3 years compared to the conventional two-stage delayed loading protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:294-302. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]