Search

Purpose Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common cause of adult valvular heart disease. In the past decade, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat AS has gained popularity, especially if performed in combination with rapid deployment valves (RDVs), which shorten cross-clamp time (XCT). This study examines specific outcomes and related costs of aortic valve replacement (AVR) before and after the introduction of RDVs. Methods We used the AVR simulator, an economic model developed to correlate cost and resource utilization associated with the adoption of RDVs, to compare 2 scenarios: (1) a current scenario based on standard AVR practices and (2) a proposed scenario based on increasing use of RDVs and an MIS approach. Both scenarios involved 3 subgroups of patients treated with (1) conventional AVR, (2) MIS, and (3) AVR combined with a coronary artery bypass graft. The current scenario (status quo) involved patients treated with traditional biological valves, and the proposed scenario involved patients who underwent implantation with an RDV. The AVR simulator was fed with real-world input data to estimate complication rates and resource consumption in the proposed scenario. Real-world input data for this analysis were obtained from patients diagnosed with a symptomatic heart valve disease between 2015 and 2018, at Clinica-San-Gaudenzio, Novara, Italy. Lastly, the AVR simulator estimated hospital savings by comparing the 2 scenarios. Findings A total of 132 patients underwent implantation with a traditional biological valve, and 107 were treated with a commercial valve system. The RDV was associated with an increase of 52% of patients undergoing MIS, which generated a 6.1-h reduction of XCT and a total savings of €6695. RDVs also reduced intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital ward length of stay (LOS), leading to savings of €677 and €595 per patient, respectively. Mortality and blood transfusions also improved. The savings for the hospital (related to shorter XCT, hospital ward LOS, and ICU LOS) amounted to €144.111. Our findings were consistent with data gathered from our real-word setting, and results of a sensitivity analysis indicate that our findings were robust across different possible situations. Implications Switching to RDVs and MIS procedures for AVRs was associated with a reduction of costs related to XCT, hospital ward LOS, and ICU LOS. Hospitals can upload literature- and experience-based clinical and cost values to the AVR simulator to estimate a hospital's performance with the introduction of RDVs compared with standard biological valves. This study was not randomized, so more extensive studies could confirm our results in the future.

The paper illustrates a pilot study involving nurses and paramedic staff to evaluate a mobile platform for rendering and distributing emergengy care protocols. Its specific features were developed to simplify the consultation and reduce the factors that negatively affect the adherence to standards. The study was planned to last one month and two questionnaires are administered to the participants: one at the starting phase, pre-intervention, and one at the end, post-intervention. Here we report the results and considerations coming from the first administration.

Brustia, Raffaele, Giulia Enrione, Bruna Catuzzo, Luca Cavoretto, Massimo Pesenti Compagnoni, Enrico Visetti, Emmanuel Cauchy, Stefanie Ziegler, and Guido Giardini. Results of a prospective observational study on mountaineering emergencies in Western Alps: mind your head. High Alt Med Biol. 17:116-121, 2016.-In the northern Italian district Valle d'Aosta district during winter and summer season the population can increase up to 170% of the resident population. A prospective monocentric observational registry was held to obtain a precise picture of seasonal mountain-related medical and traumatic major events.From 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2013 all patients admitted to the Aosta Regional Hospital Emergency Room for any event occurred above 2500 m were screened: all those affected by High Altitude Illness, Acute Illness in High Altitude, Trauma, or Cold disease were prospectively included. Activity incidence rate is expressed as the occurrence of mountain-related events per 1000 hours of mountain activity. Event Incidence rate is expressed as the occurrence of new cases per 1000 hours of mountain activity.Two hundred two patients were included during the study period. Trauma (65.1% vs. 24.6%, p 0.001) and head commotive injury (48.1% vs. 15.1%, p 0.001) were more frequent during winter compared to the summer season. High altitude illness (36.9% vs. 9.3%, p 0.001) and cold pathologies (15.1% vs. 0.1%, p 0.001) occurred more frequently in summer than in winter. Patients (51.4%) were immediately discharged from emergency room, 8.4% after a 24-hour observation period, and 30.6% required hospitalization. During summer, the event risk is 0.013 per person and 1000 hours of mountain activity, while in winter, event risk amounts to 0.005 per person and 1000 hours of mountain activity.High altitude medical events or trauma represent1% of pathologies observed in the emergency room department of a mountain district in the western Alps. Head commotive injury is the most observed mountain-related event in high altitude, in winter and during ski practice. High altitude illness and cold injuries are observed more frequently in summer, during trekking or climbing activities.