Search

The presence of necrosis or microvascular proliferation was previously the hallmark for glioblastoma (GBM) diagnosis. The 2021 WHO classification now considers IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic tumors without the histological features of glioblastoma (that would have otherwise been classified as grade 2 or 3) as molecular GBM (molGBM) if they harbor any of the following molecular abnormalities: TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, or chromosomal + 7/-10 copy changes. We hypothesize that these tumors are early histological GBM and will eventually develop the classic histological features.Medical records from 65 consecutive patients diagnosed with molGBM at three tertiary-care centers from our institution were retrospectively reviewed from November 2017-October 2021. Only patients who underwent reoperation for tumor recurrence and whose tissue at initial diagnosis and recurrence was available were included in this study. The detailed clinical, histopathological, and radiographic scenarios are presented.Five patients were included in our final cohort. Three (60%) patients underwent reoperation for recurrence in the primary site and 2 (40%) underwent reoperation for distal recurrence. Microvascular proliferation and pseudopalisading necrosis were absent at initial diagnosis but present at recurrence in 4 (80%) patients. Radiographically, all tumors showed contrast enhancement, however none of them showed the classic radiographic features of GBM at initial diagnosis.In this manuscript we present preliminary data for a hypothesis that molGBMs are early histological GBMs diagnosed early in their natural history of disease and will eventually develop necrosis and microvascular proliferation. Further correlative studies are needed in support of this hypothesis.

Histological diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) was determined by the presence of necrosis or microvascular proliferation (histGBM). The 2021 WHO classification now considers IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic tumors without the histological features of glioblastoma (that would have otherwise been classified as grade 2 or 3) as molecular GBM (molGBM, WHO grade 4) if they harbor any of the following molecular abnormalities: TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, or chromosomal + 7/- 10 copy changes. The objective of this study was to explore and compare the survival outcomes between histGBM and molGBM.Medical records for patients diagnosed with GBM at the three tertiary care academic centers of our institution from November 2017 to October 2021. Only patients who underwent adjuvant chemoradiation were included. Patients without molecular feature testing or with an IDH mutation were excluded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate progression-free (PFS) and overall- survival (OS).708 consecutive patients were included; 643 with histGBM and 65 with molGBM. Median PFS was 8 months (histGBM) and 13 months (molGBM) (p = 0.0237) and median OS was 21 months (histGBM) versus 26 months (molGBM) (p = 0.435). Multivariable analysis on the molGBM sub-group showed a worse PFS if there was contrast enhancement on MRI (HR 6.224 [CI 95% 2.187-17.714], p 0.001) and a superior PFS on patients with MGMT methylation (HR 0.026 [CI 95% 0.065-0.655], p = 0.007).molGBM has a similar OS but significantly longer PFS when compared to histGBM. The presence of contrast enhancement and MGMT methylation seem to affect the clinical behavior of this subset of tumors.