Search

Background: Some common modified vascular risk factors remain poorly controlled among stroke survivors, and educational programs may help improve these conditions., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a planned web-based educational intervention based on the health belief model (HBM) in promoting secondary prevention among patients with ischemic stroke., Methods: An evaluation-blinded quasi-experimental trial with a historical control group was conducted. Patients admitted from March to June 2020 were assigned to the historical control group, and patients admitted from July to October 2020 were assigned to the intervention group. The control group received routine health management. The intervention group received 6 additional sessions based on the HBM via Tencent Meeting, an audio and video conferencing application, within 3 months after discharge. Sessions were held every 2 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 40 minutes. These sessions were conducted in small groups, with about 8 to 10 people in each group. The primary outcomes were changes in blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and the proportion of patients achieving the treatment target. The secondary outcomes were medication adherence, assessed with the Morisky Medicine Adherence Scale (MMAS), and disability, assessed with the modified Rankin scale., Results: In total, 315 patients experiencing their first-ever stroke were analyzed. More patients in the intervention group had controlled BP (41.9% vs 28.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.93; P=.01), LDL-C (83.1% vs 67.7%; aOR 2.66; P=.001), and HbA1c (91.9% vs 83.9%; aOR: 3.37; P=.04) levels as well as a significant postintervention decrease in the systolic BP (adjusted β -3.94; P=.02), LDL-C (adjusted β -0.21; P=.008), and HbA1c (adjusted β -0.27; P<.001), compared with control groups. Significant between-group differences were observed in medication adherence (79.4% vs 63.2%; aOR 2.31; P=.002) but not in favorable functional outcomes., Conclusions: A web-based education program based on the HBM may be more effective than current methods used to educate patients having strokes on optimal vascular risk factors and medication adherence., (© Zhuo Liu, Xin Sun, Zhen-Ni Guo, Ye Sun, Yi Yang, Xiuli Yan. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org).)

Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been widely used for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the safety and efficacy of treating AIS with tirofiban combined with EVT remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate this treatment. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared treatment with tirofiban combined with EVT and EVT alone were included in our meta-analysis. Those published from inception to March 31, 2020, were searched using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Safety was assessed based on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence and 3-month mortality. Efficacy was assessed based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months post-EVT and recanalization rates. Data were analyzed using either the random-effects or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity of studies. In total, one RCT, six prospective studies, and four retrospective studies (2387 AIS cases) were assessed. Our meta-analysis showed that tirofiban combined with EVT did not increase sICH risk (RR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.42; P = 0.72) and 3-month mortality (RR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Recanalization rates were not significantly different between patients treated with tirofiban combined with EVT and those treated with EVT alone (RR, 1.04; 95%CI, 1.00 to 1.08; P = 0.07), but tirofiban combined with EVT was significantly associated with favorable functional outcomes (mRS score, 0-2) in AIS patients (RR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.02 to 1.25; P = 0.02). Tirofiban combined with EVT appears to be safe and potentially effective in treating AIS.

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common among patients with stroke. However, the incidence of DVT in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytic therapy and the risk factors associated with this condition are unknown. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of DVT after thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Settings and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent ultrasonic examination after intravenous thrombolysis between April 2017 and December 2019 at the stroke center of the First Hospital of Jilin University, China. Color duplex ultrasound was used to diagnosis DVT in all patients within 72 h after intravenous thrombolysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for DVT. Results: Overall, 474 patients were included in the study. Of these, 75 (15.8%) developed DVT (95% confidence interval 12.5– 19.1). Older age was the risk factor that most significantly affected the development of DVT (p = 0.001). Compared to patients younger than 60 years old, those aged 60– 69 years and ≥ 70 years had a higher risk of DVT, at rates of 2.201 (95% CI: 1.033– 4.689; p < 0.05) and 4.241 (95% CI: 2.016– 8.922; p < 0.001) times higher, respectively. Patients with higher triglyceride levels (odds ratio 0.545, 95% CI: 0.372– 0.799, p = 0.002) and longer activated partial thromboplastin time (OR 0.927, 95% CI: 0.862– 0.996, p = 0.040) were less likely to have DVT. Conclusion: DVT is a common complication among patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis after acute ischemic stroke. Advanced age may increase the occurrence of DVT to some extent. For these patients, safe antiplatelet therapy should be explored and implemented as soon as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: From 2017, the Stroke Health Manager Training Project was carried out by the Chinese Government to strengthen health management and follow-up intervention after ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate whether after the intervention of the stroke health manager, the control of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glucose level, and the use of secondary prevention medications improved 3 months after discharge from our center following ischemic stroke. Methods: The study used a history-controlled approach. Patients who received stroke health manager intervention from May 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019, were considered as the intervention group; those from May 1, 2017, to April 30, 2018, were enrolled as the control group. Stroke health manager intervention included health education, discharge advice, online WeChat public group follow-up, and clinical consultation. Results: In total, 642 patients with ischemic stroke were enrolled in this study (277 in the control group, 365 in the intervention group). At 3 months, the blood pressure, LDL-C and glucose control in the intervention group were better than in the control group (all P < 0.05). At the same time, the overall persistence for secondary prevention medications at 3 months after discharge increased from 201/277 (72.56%) to 303/365 (83.01%, P = 0.001). The persistence for patients taking antiplatelet, hypoglycemic and statins were significantly higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Stroke health manager intervention improved the control of blood pressure, LDL-C, glucose levels and the persistence for secondary prevention medications 3 months after discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ischemic stroke is one of the most common cerebrovascular diseases and is the leading cause of disability all over the world. It is well known that cerebral blood flow (CBF) is disturbed or even disrupted when ischemic stroke happens. The imbalance between demand and shortage of blood supply makes ischemic stroke take place or worsen. The search for treatments that can preserve CBF, especially during the acute phase of ischemic stroke, has become a research hotspot. Animal and clinical experiments have proven that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a beneficial therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ischemic stroke. However, the mechanism by which RIC affects CBF has not been fully understood. This review aims to discuss several possible mechanisms of RIC on the cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic stroke, such as the improvement of cardiac function and collateral circulation of cerebral vessels, the protection of neurovascular units, the formation of gas molecules, the effect on the function of vascular endothelial cells and the nervous system. RIC has the potential to become a therapeutic treatment to improve CBF in ischemic stroke. Future studies are needed to highlight our understanding of RIC as well as accelerate its clinical translation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]