Search

Background and Objectives: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <10 is unclear because this subpopulation has been substantially excluded from large clinical trials. The aim of our study was to determine whether MT ± IV thrombolysis (IVT) improves functional outcomes compared with IVT alone in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score <10., Methods: We emulated a hypothetical trial including adult patients with BAO, a baseline NIHSS score <10, and prestroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-2, comparing MT (±IVT) with IVT alone. We acquired data from patients receiving MT (±IVT) within 24 hours of onset from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke and data from patients treated only with IVT within 9 hours of symptom onset from the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register, from 2011 until 2021. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted for prespecified covariates to weight each individual's contribution to the outcome. The primary outcome was 90-day mRS scores 0-2. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS scores 0-1, 90-day mRS scores 4-5, mortality at 90 days, in-hospital death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage., Results: Among the 764 patients recruited from the 2 databases (477 men [62.4%]; mean age [±SD] 67.88 [±13.9] years), 410 (53.7%) received MT±IVT and 354 (46.3%) only IVT. After applying IPW, our population was composed of 710 MT and 707 IVT patients. Of these, 454 MT-treated (63.9%) and 383 IVT-treated (54.2%) patients had a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.56 [95% CI 1.04-2.03]). MT was also associated with a higher rate of mRS scores 0-1 (aOR 2.01 [95% CI 1.37-2.95]) and a lower rate of in-hospital death (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.25-0.78]). Among the subgroups tested, MT had a larger effect on 90-day mRS scores 0-2 for patients with NIHSS scores 6-9 than for patients with a NIHSS score <6 ( p for interaction 0.02)., Discussion: In a large-scale target trial emulation on patients with stroke from BAO and a NIHSS score <10, MT was associated with better functional outcomes compared with IVT alone. Further research is needed to confirm the benefit of MT in patients with a NIHSS score <6., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that MT ± intravenous thrombolysis is associated with better 90-day functional outcomes in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score < 10 compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was found to be beneficial in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior tandem occlusion (a-TO). Instead, little is known about the effectiveness of MT in stroke patients with posterior tandem occlusion (p-TO). We aimed to compare MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data of patients registered in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS) who were treated with MT within 24 h from last known well time for acute ischemic stroke with p-TO (n = 275) or a-TO (n = 1853)., Results: After adjustment for unbalanced pre-procedure variables (year 2015-2021, age, sex, NIHSS score, ASPECTS, and time strata for puncture groin) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, p-TO was significantly associated with lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.415, 95% CI 0.268-0.644) and with higher risk of death (OR 2.813, 95% CI 2.080-3.805) at 3 months. After adjustment for unbalanced procedural and post-procedure variables (IVT, general anesthesia, TICI 3, and 24-h HT) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, association between p-TO and lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.444, 95% CI 0.304-0.649) and association between p-TO and with higher risk of death (OR 2.971, 95% CI 1.993-4.429) remained significant., Conclusions: MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO was associated with worse outcomes at 3 months., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite successful recanalization, some patients remain disabled after 3 months. Mechanisms that can cause futile recanalization (FR) are still largely unknown. We investigated if stress hyperglycemia might be associated with FR., Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with successful recanalization treated in four participating centers between January 2021 and December 2022. According to the modified Rankin scale (mRS) status at 3 months, patients were divided into two groups: FR, if mRS score >2, and useful recanalization (UR), if mRS score ⩽2. Stress hyperglycemia was estimated by the glucose-to-glycated hemoglobin ratio (GAR) index., Results: A total of 691 subjects were included. At 3 months, 403 patients (58.3%) were included in the FR group, while the remaining 288 patients (41.7%) were included in the UR group. At the multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with FR were the following: age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, p  < 0.001), GAR index (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, p  = 0.003), NIHSS at admission (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.22; p  < 0.001), and procedure length (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; p  = 0.009). We observed that the model combining age, GAR index, NIHSS at admission, and procedure length had good predictive accuracy (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.81)., Conclusions: Stress hyperglycemia predicts FR in patients with successful recanalization after MT. Further studies should explore if managing stress hyperglycemia may reduce futile recanalization. Additionally, we recommend paying close attention to AIS patients with a GAR index greater than 24.8 who exhibit a high risk of FR., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: We aim to assess the association between procedural time and outcomes in patients in unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation acute stroke., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data from patients with M1 and/or M2 segment of middle cerebral artery occlusion with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 0-1 at the end of procedure. Primary outcome was 90-day poor outcome. Secondary outcomes were early neurological deterioration (END), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to ECASS II and sICH according to SITS-MOST., Results: Among 852 patients, after comparing characteristics of favourable and poor outcome groups, logistic regression analysis showed age (OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001), previous TIA/stroke (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.12-0.74; p = 0.009), M1 occlusion (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.13-2.50; p = 0.01), baseline NIHSS (OR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.06-1.13; p < 0.001) and procedural time (OR:1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.003) as independent predictors poor outcome at 90 days. Concerning secondary outcomes, logistic regression analysis showed NIHSS (OR:0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.008), general anaesthesia (OR:2.59; 95%CI: 1.52-4.40; p < 0.001), procedural time (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.002) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 1.89; 95%CI: 1.02-3.52; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of END. Bridging therapy (OR:2.93; 95%CI: 1.21-7.09; p = 0.017) was associated with sICH per SITS-MOST criteria whereas M1 occlusion (OR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.18-0.69; p = 0.002), bridging therapy (OR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.07-3.82; p = 0.03) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 5.55; 95%CI: 2.72-11.31; p < 0.001) were independently associated with sICH per ECASS II criteria. No significant association was found between the number of MT attempts and analyzed outcomes., Conclusions: Regardless of the number of MT attempts and intraprocedural complications, procedural time was associated with poor outcome and END. We suggest a deeper consideration of procedural time when treating anterior circulation occlusions refractory to MT., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: There is a lack of data regarding patients aged 90 years or older undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and their predictors of futile recanalization., Aims: We sought to evaluate the predictors of futile recanalization in patients ≥ 90 years with large vessel occlusion undergoing mechanical thrombectomy., Methods: This multi-center observational retrospective study included patients ≥ 90 years consecutively treated with mechanical thrombectomy in four thrombectomy capable centers between January 1st, 2016 and 30th March 2023. Futile recanalization was defined as large vessel occlusion patients experiencing a 90-day poor outcome (mRS 3-6) despite successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) after mechanical thrombectomy., Results: Our cohort included 139 patients ≥ 90 years with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. One hundred seventeen of one hundred thirty-nine patients ≥ 90 years who achieved successful recanalization were included in the analysis (seventy-six female (64.9%)), of whom thirty-one (26.49%) experienced effective recanalization and eighty-six (73.51%) experienced futile recanalization. Patients with futile recanalization had higher NIHSS on admission (p < 0.001); they were less frequently treated with intravenous thrombolysis (p = 0.048), had more often general anesthesia (p = 0.011), and longer door to groin puncture delay (p = 0.002). Univariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.29, 95% CI 0.02-0.79, p = 0.034) and site of occlusion distal vs proximal (0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.97, p = 0.044) were associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization while NIHSS on admission (1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.45, p < 0.001), NIHSS at 24 h (1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.25, p = 0.002), type of anesthesia used (4.18, 95% CI 1.57-11.08, p = 0.004), and door to groin puncture time (1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.005) were associated with increased probability of futile recanalization. Multivariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.44, 95% CI 0.09-0.88, p = 0.039) was associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization., Conclusion: Our study seems to suggest that mechanical thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis is associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization in a multi-center cohort of patients aged 90 years or older., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation., Methods: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments., Results: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45-1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28-2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35-5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53-20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.88]; P interaction =0.009)., Conclusions: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings., Competing Interests: Disclosures Disclosures provided by Dr Nguyen in compliance with American Heart Association annual Journal Editor Disclosure Questionnaire are available at https://www.ahajournals.org/editor-coi-disclosures. Dr Arnold reports compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Covidien, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and Amgen for consultant services. Dr Lester reports a provisional patent for Methods and compositions for disrupting tau aggregates. Dr Touze reports compensation from Elsevier for other services and employment by Caen. J.E. Kaufman reports grants from Goldschmidt Jacobson-Stiftung. Dr Traenka reports travel support from Bayer Healthcare. Dr Aguiar de Sousa reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Fundação Bial for other services; compensation from the University of British Columbia for data and safety monitoring services; compensation from Organon & Co for consultant services. Dr Rosa reports grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation. Dr Field reports compensation from HLS Therapeutics, AstraZeneca Canada, and Roche for consultant services; service as a board member for Destine Health; and compensation from the Canadian Medical Protective Association for expert witness services; and grants from Bayer. Dr Leker reports compensation from Medtronic, Ischemaview, Bayer, Abbott Diabetes Care, Biogen, Janssen Biotech, and Boehringer Ingelheim for other services. Dr Nolte reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals for consultant services; and compensation from AstraZeneca, Abbott Canada, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Novartis, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, and Novartis for other services. Dr Poppe reports grants from Foundation Brain Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and Stryker; and compensation from Roche for other services. Dr Liebeskind reports compensation from Medtronic, Genentech, Cerenovus, Stryker, and Rapid Medical Ltd, for consultant services. B. Mac Grory reports grants from the National Institutes of Health; employment by Duke University Medical Center; compensation from Bayer for other services; grants from the American Heart Association, Duke Bass Connections, and the Duke Office of Physician Scientist Development. Dr Al Kasab reports compensation from Stryker for other services and employment by Medical University of South Carolina. Dr Kicielinski reports compensation from Stryker, Penumbra Inc, Medtronic, and MicroVention Inc, for other services; travel support from MicroVention Inc; and employment by Medical University of South Carolina and Elsevier. Dr de Havenon reports stock options in TitinKM and Certus; grants from the National Institutes of Health; and compensation from Novo Nordisk for consultant services. Dr Siegler reports grants from Philips and employment by the University of Chicago. Dr Willey reports compensation from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Abbott Fund for end point review committee services; compensation from Uptodate for other services; and compensation from the Abbott Laboratories for consultant services. Dr Sharma reports a provisional patent for a stroke etiology classifier algorithm and grants from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Dr Martins reports compensation from Pfizer, Medtronic, Servier Affaires Medicales, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Penumbra Inc, and Boehringer Ingelheim for other services. Dr Simpkins reports grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Stretz reports grants from Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr Furie reports compensation from Janssen Biotech for consultant services. The other authors report no conflicts

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the second most important cardiac risk factor for stroke after atrial fibrillation (AF). Few data are available on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with HF., Methods: The source of data is the multicentre Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). All AIS patients ≥ 18 years receiving MT were categorised in two groups: HF and no-HF. Baseline clinical and neuroradiological findings on admission were analysed., Results: Of 8924 patients, 642 (7.2%) had HF. Compared to the no-HF group, HF patients had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Rate of complete recanalisation (TICI 2b-3) was 76.9% in HF vs 78.1% in no-HF group (p = 0.481). Rate of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage at 24-h non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) was 7.6% in HF vs 8.3% in no-HF patients (p = 0.520). At 3 months, 36.4% of HF patients and 48.2% of no-HF patients (p < 0.001) had mRS 0-2, and mortality was, respectively, 30.7% and 18.5% (p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, HF was independently associated with mortality at 3 months (OR 1.53, 1.24-1.88 95% CI, p < 0.001). In multivariate ordinal regression, HF patients had a probability of transitioning to a higher mRS level of 1.23 (1.05-1.44 95% CI, p = 0.012). The propensity score analysis of two groups matched for age, sex, and NIHSS at admission yielded the same results., Conclusion: MT is safe and effective in HF patients with AIS. Patients with HF and AIS suffered from higher 3-month mortality and unfavourable outcome regardless of acute treatments., (© 2023. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Introduction: Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke., Patients and Methods: We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups., Results: Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39-4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12-4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63-3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67-3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73-3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85-7.16)., Discussion and Conclusion: People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have no conflict of interest related to this work. Relevant disclosures outside the submitted work: MP received honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. VC received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. SS reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Allergan, Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Bayer, Pfizer, Medtronic, Starmed, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. SR reports nonfinancial support from Bayer. AZ declares consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Alexion and CLS Behring, and declares grant from the Italian Ministry of Health as principal investigator for clinical trial (RF-2019-12370834). DT reports fees for advisory board and speaker honoraria from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Pfizer. All other authors have nothing to declare., (© European Stroke Organisation 2022.)

Introduction: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020, our stroke network shifted from a drip-and-ship strategy (transport of acute ischemic stroke patients to the nearest primary stroke centers) toward a mothership model (direct transportation to the Comprehensive Stroke Center). We retrospectively analyzed stroke network performances comparing the two models., Patients and Methods: All spoke-district patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) between 15th March-15th June 2019 (drip-and-ship) and 2020 (mothership) were considered. We compared onset-to-groin time (OGT) and onset-to-needle time (ONT) between the two periods. Secondarily, we investigated other performances parameters (percentage of IV thrombolysis, timing of diagnostic and treatment) and clinical outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale)., Results: Twenty-four spoke-district patients in 2019 (drip-and-ship) and 26 in 2020 (mothership) underwent EVT. The groups did not differ for age, sex, risk factors, pre-stroke mRS 0-1, NIHSS, and ASPECTS distribution. The MS model showed a significant decrease of the OGT (162.5 min vs 269 min, p = 0.001) without significantly affecting the ONT (140.5 min vs 136 min, p = 0.853), ensuring a higher number of IV thrombolysis in combination with EVT (p = 0.030). The mothership model showed longer call-to-door time (median + 23 min, p < 0.005), but shorter door-to-needle (median - 31 min, p = 0.001), and door-to-groin time (- 82.5 min, p < 0.001). We found no effects of the stroke network model on the 3-month mRS (ordinal shift analysis, p = 0.753)., Conclusions: The shift to the mothership model during the COVID-19 pandemic guaranteed quicker EVT without significantly delaying IVT., (© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background/Objectives: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have recently become available on EVT effects in people with LVO-related large core stroke (ASPECTS 0–5). Here, we provide an updated meta-analysis of the EVT effect on functional neurological status in people with large-core stroke. Methods: The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched for RCTs comparing EVT vs. best medical treatment (BMT) in large-core LVO stroke. The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale; mRS 0–2). The secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), good functional outcome (mRS 0–3) and excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1). EVT vs. BMT was compared through random effect meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 and Q test and risk of bias reported according to the RoB2 tool. Results: Six RCTs were included (n = 1656 patients). All studies had a moderate risk of bias, with blinding bias due to the nature of the intervention, potential allocation bias and incomplete outcome reporting. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in the EVT vs. BMT group (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.52–4.03, p < 0.001). sICH rates (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.01–3.11, p = 0.04) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.72–2.81, p < 0.001) were more frequent in the EVT vs. BMT group, while the rates of mRS 0–1 did not differ. Conclusions: In patients with large-core stroke and LVO, EVT plus BMT as compared to BMT alone carries a significant increase in independent ambulation and good functional outcome at 3 months despite the marginal increase in sICH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Predictors of radiological complications attributable to reperfusion injury remain unknown when baseline setting is optimal for endovascular treatment and procedural setting is the best in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aims: To identify clinical and radiological/procedural predictors for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and cerebral edema (CED) at 24 hr in patients obtaining complete recanalization in one pass of thrombectomy for ischemic stroke ⩽ 6 h from symptom onset with intra-cranial anterior circulation LVO and ASPECTS ⩾ 6. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data from 1400 patients enrolled in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke. Results: HT was reported in 248 (18%) patients and early CED was reported in 260 (19.2%) patients. In the logistic regression model including predictors from a first model with clinical variables and from a second model with radiological/procedural variables, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio (OR) = 1.832, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.201–2.795), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (OR = 1.076, 95% CI = 1.044–1.110), lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECTS) (OR = 0.815, 95% CI = 0.694–0.957), and longer onset-to-groin time (OR = 1.005, 95% CI = 1.002–1.007) were predictors of HT, whereas general anesthesia was inversely associated with HT (OR = 0.540, 95% CI = 0.355–0.820). Higher NIHSS (OR = 1.049, 95% CI = 1.021–1.077), lower ASPECTS (OR = 0.700, 95% CI = 0.613–0.801), intravenous thrombolysis (OR = 1.464, 95% CI = 1.061–2.020), longer onset-to-groin time (OR = 1.002, 95% CI = 1.001–1.005), and longer procedure time (OR = 1.009, 95% CI = 1.004–1.015) were predictors of early CED. After repeating a fourth logistic regression model including also good collaterals, the same variables remained predictors for HT and/or early CED, except diabetes mellitus and thrombolysis, while good collaterals were inversely associated with early CED (OR = 0.385, 95% CI = 0.248–0.599). Conclusions: Higher NIHSS, lower ASPECTS, and longer onset-to-groin time were predictors for both HT and early CED. General anesthesia and good collaterals were inversely associated with HT and early CED, respectively. Longer procedure time was predictor of early CED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an ASPECTs ≥ 6. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become available on effect of EVT in patients with LVO-related large core infarct stroke (ASPECTS 0–5). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials on patients with large core infarct treated with thrombectomy compared to best medical therapy (BMT).The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale mRS < 3). Secondary endpoints were 3-month moderate disability (mRS < 4), excellent outcome (mRS < 2) and change in mRS (shift analysis). Safety outcomes were: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1964 patients. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in EVT vs BMT group (19.4% vs 8%; OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 2.06–3.61, pheterogeneity = 0.08; I2: 47%). Moderate outcome was also more prevalent in EVT group (OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.61 – 2.48, pheterogeneity = 0.17; I2: 46%) as well as excellent outcome (OR: 1.54, 95%CI = 1.07 – 2.22, pheterogeneity = 0.13; I2: 40%). Shift analysis was also significant with OR 1.59 (CI = 1.33–1.82 and p < 0.001). Finally sICH, that occurred in 68 patients, was more frequent in EVT (OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 0.99 – 2.69, pheterogeneity = 0.68; I2: 0%) while 3 m mortality was reduced in EVT (31% vs 37,1%, OR 0.76 CI = 0.62–0.92).This updated pooled data show that, in LVO-stroke patients with a large core infarct, EVT plus BMT (as compared to BMT alone) increases significantly the chances of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days and reduces the 3- month mortality despite a marginal increase in acute sICH.Methods: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an ASPECTs ≥ 6. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become available on effect of EVT in patients with LVO-related large core infarct stroke (ASPECTS 0–5). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials on patients with large core infarct treated with thrombectomy compared to best medical therapy (BMT).The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale mRS < 3). Secondary endpoints were 3-month moderate disability (mRS < 4), excellent outcome (mRS < 2) and change in mRS (shift analysis). Safety outcomes were: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1964 patients. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in EVT vs BMT group (19.4% vs 8%; OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 2.06–3.61, pheterogeneity = 0.08; I2: 47%). Moderate outcome was also more prevalent in EVT group (OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.61 – 2.48, pheterogeneity = 0.17; I2: 46%) as well as excellent outcome (OR: 1.54, 95%CI = 1.07 – 2.22, pheterogeneity = 0.13; I2: 40%). Shift analysis was also significant with OR 1.59 (CI = 1.33–1.82 and p < 0.001). Finally sICH, that occurred in 68 patients, was more frequent in EVT (OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 0.99 – 2.69, pheterogeneity = 0.68; I2: 0%) while 3 m mortality was reduced in EVT (31% vs 37,1%, OR 0.76 CI = 0.62–0.92).This updated pooled data show that, in LVO-stroke patients with a large core infarct, EVT plus BMT (as compared to BMT alone) increases significantly the chances of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days and reduces the 3- month mortality despite a marginal increase in acute sICH.Results: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an ASPECTs ≥ 6. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become available on effect of EVT in patients with LVO-related large core infarct stroke (ASPECTS 0–5). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials on patients with large core infarct treated with thrombectomy compared to best medical therapy (BMT).The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale mRS < 3). Secondary endpoints were 3-month moderate disability (mRS < 4), excellent outcome (mRS < 2) and change in mRS (shift analysis). Safety outcomes were: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1964 patients. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in EVT vs BMT group (19.4% vs 8%; OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 2.06–3.61, pheterogeneity = 0.08; I2: 47%). Moderate outcome was also more prevalent in EVT group (OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.61 – 2.48, pheterogeneity = 0.17; I2: 46%) as well as excellent outcome (OR: 1.54, 95%CI = 1.07 – 2.22, pheterogeneity = 0.13; I2: 40%). Shift analysis was also significant with OR 1.59 (CI = 1.33–1.82 and p < 0.001). Finally sICH, that occurred in 68 patients, was more frequent in EVT (OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 0.99 – 2.69, pheterogeneity = 0.68; I2: 0%) while 3 m mortality was reduced in EVT (31% vs 37,1%, OR 0.76 CI = 0.62–0.92).This updated pooled data show that, in LVO-stroke patients with a large core infarct, EVT plus BMT (as compared to BMT alone) increases significantly the chances of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days and reduces the 3- month mortality despite a marginal increase in acute sICH.Conclusions: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an ASPECTs ≥ 6. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become available on effect of EVT in patients with LVO-related large core infarct stroke (ASPECTS 0–5). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials on patients with large core infarct treated with thrombectomy compared to best medical therapy (BMT).The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale mRS < 3). Secondary endpoints were 3-month moderate disability (mRS < 4), excellent outcome (mRS < 2) and change in mRS (shift analysis). Safety outcomes were: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1964 patients. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in EVT vs BMT group (19.4% vs 8%; OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 2.06–3.61, pheterogeneity = 0.08; I2: 47%). Moderate outcome was also more prevalent in EVT group (OR = 2.00; 95%CI = 1.61 – 2.48, pheterogeneity = 0.17; I2: 46%) as well as excellent outcome (OR: 1.54, 95%CI = 1.07 – 2.22, pheterogeneity = 0.13; I2: 40%). Shift analysis was also significant with OR 1.59 (CI = 1.33–1.82 and p < 0.001). Finally sICH, that occurred in 68 patients, was more frequent in EVT (OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 0.99 – 2.69, pheterogeneity = 0.68; I2: 0%) while 3 m mortality was reduced in EVT (31% vs 37,1%, OR 0.76 CI = 0.62–0.92).This updated pooled data show that, in LVO-stroke patients with a large core infarct, EVT plus BMT (as compared to BMT alone) increases significantly the chances of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days and reduces the 3- month mortality despite a marginal increase in acute sICH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effect of the COVID pandemic on stroke network performance is unclear, particularly with consideration of drip&ship vs. mothership models. Aims: We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed variations in stroke admissions, rate and timing of reperfusion treatments during the first wave COVID pandemic vs. the pre-pandemic timeframe depending on stroke network model adopted. Summary of findings: The systematic review followed registered protocol (PROSPERO-CRD42020211535), PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until 9 October 2020 for studies reporting variations in ischemic stroke admissions, treatment rates, and timing in COVID (first wave) vs. control-period. Primary outcome was the weekly admission incidence rate ratio (IRR = admissions during COVID-period/admissions during control-period). Secondary outcomes were (i) changes in rate of reperfusion treatments and (ii) time metrics for pre- and in-hospital phase. Data were pooled using random-effects models, comparing mothership vs. drip&ship model. Overall, 29 studies were included in quantitative synthesis (n = 212,960). COVID-period was associated with a significant reduction in stroke admission rates (IRR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.61–0.79), with higher relative presentation of large vessel occlusion (risk ratio (RR) = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.24–2.12). Proportions of patients treated with endovascular treatment increased (RR = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.02–1.28). Intravenous thrombolysis decreased overall (IRR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.54–0.96) but not in the mothership model (IRR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.43–1.52). Onset-to-door time was longer for the drip&ship in COVID-period compared to the control-period (+32 min, 95%CI = 0–64). Door-to-scan was longer in COVID-period (+5 min, 95%CI = 2–7). Door-to-needle and door-to-groin were similar in COVID-period and control-period. Conclusions: Despite a 35% drop in stroke admissions during the first pandemic wave, proportions of patients receiving reperfusion and time-metrics were not inferior to control-period. Mothership preserved the weekly rate of intravenous thrombolysis and the onset-to-door timing to pre-pandemic standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability for adults. Endovascular therapy is the standard of care for severe acute ischemic stroke, caused by large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation; however, the optimal anaesthetic management during the procedure is still a matter of debate. The best anesthetic treatment should mainly be related to patients' clinical conditions and the site of arterial occlusion. With this article, we share our experience based on the use of ketamine as the choosen hypnotic drug for general anesthesia, in order to avoid a sudden drop in blood pressure. The core of our proposal approach is the general anesthesia management by the medical emergency team with skills on both time-dependent diseases and neurocritical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]