Search

Background and Purpose: The best management of acute ischemic stroke patients with a minor stroke and large vessel occlusion is still uncertain. Specific clinical and radiological data may help to select patients who would benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) subitems for predicting the potential benefit of providing EVT after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; "bridging treatment") versus IVT alone., Methods: We extracted demographic, clinical, risk factor, radiological, revascularization and outcome data of consecutive patients with M1 or proximal M2 middle cerebral artery occlusion and admission NIHSS scores of 0-5 points, treated with IVT ± EVT between May 2005 and March 2021, from nine prospectively constructed stroke registries at seven French and two Swiss comprehensive stroke centers. Adjusted interaction analyses were performed between admission NIHSS subitems and revascularization modality for two primary outcomes at 3 months: non-excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 2-6) and difference in NIHSS score between 3 months and admission., Results: Of the 533 patients included (median age 68.2 years, 46% women, median admission NIHSS score 3), 136 (25.5%) initially received bridging therapy and 397 (74.5%) received IVT alone. Adjusted interaction analysis revealed that only facial palsy on admission was more frequently associated with excellent outcome in patients treated by IVT alone versus bridging therapy (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.91; p = 0.013). Regarding NIHSS difference at 3 months, no single NIHSS subitem interacted with type of revascularization., Conclusions: This retrospective multicenter analysis found that NIHSS subitems at admission had little value in predicting patients who might benefit from bridging therapy as opposed to IVT alone. Further research is needed to identify better markers for selecting EVT responders with minor strokes., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background Immediate non-contrast post-interventional flat-panel detector CT (FPDCT) has been suggested as an imaging tool to assess complications after endovascular therapy (EVT). We systematically investigated a new imaging finding of focal hyperdensities correlating with remaining distal vessel occlusion after EVT. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted for all acute ischemic stroke patients admitted between July 2020 and December 2022 who underwent EVT and immediate post-interventional FPDCT. A blinded core lab performed reperfusion grading on post-interventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images and evaluated focal hyperdensities on FPDCT (here called the distal occlusion tracker (DOT) sign). DOT sign was defined as a tubular or punctiform, vessel confined, hyperdense signal within the initial occlusion target territory. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of the DOT sign when compared with DSA findings. Results The median age of the cohort (n=215) was 74 years (IQR 63-82) and 58.6% were male. The DOT sign was positive in half of the cohort (51%, 110/215). The DOT sign had high specificity (85%, 95% CI 72% to 93%), but only moderate sensitivity (63%, 95% CI 55% to 70%) for detection of residual vessel occlusions. In comparison to the core lab, operators overestimated complete reperfusion in a quarter of the entire cohort (25%, 53/215). In more than half of these cases (53%, 28/53) there was a positive DOT sign, which could have mitigated this overestimation. Conclusion The DOT sign appears to be a frequent finding on immediate post-interventional FPDCT. It correlates strongly with incomplete reperfusion and indicates residual distal vessel occlusions. In the future, it may be used to complement grading of reperfusion success and may help mitigating overestimation of reperfusion in the acute setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]