1. Magnetite geochemistry of the Heijianshan Fe–Cu (–Au) deposit in Eastern Tianshan: Metallogenic implications for submarine volcanic-hosted Fe–Cu deposits in NW China.
- Author
-
Zhao, Liandang, Chen, Huayong, Zhang, Li, Li, Dengfeng, Zhang, Weifeng, Wang, Chengming, Yang, Juntao, and Yan, Xuelu
- Subjects
- *
MAGNETITE , *GEOCHEMISTRY , *IRON ores , *COPPER ores , *GOLD ores , *HYDROTHERMAL alteration - Abstract
Abstract The Heijianshan Fe–Cu (− Au) deposit is located in the Aqishan–Yamansu belt in Eastern Tianshan, NW China. As a typical Fe–Cu deposit in the region, Heijianshan is hosted in the Upper Carboniferous Matoutan Formation submarine volcanic/volcaniclastic rocks. Alteration styles, mineral assemblages and vein crosscutting relationships divide the hydrothermal alteration and mineralization processes into seven stages, namely the chromite (Stage I), epidote (Stage II), magnetite (Stage III), pyrite (Stage IV), Cu (–Au) (Stage V), late veins (Stage VI) and supergene (Stage VII) alteration/mineralization stages. Magnetite mineralization comprises the hematite (Stage III–A) and main magnetite (Stage III–B) mineralization sub-stages. The Heijianshan magnetite ores consist of massive (with mushketovite (MOM) or sulfides (MOS)), disseminated (DO) and magnetite clasts (with chromite (MWC) or without chromite (MNC)) ores. Magnetite in massive- and disseminated ores is featured by (1) depletion in Zr, Nb and Ta; (2) low Ti (< 2 wt.%) and Al (< 1 wt.%); and (3) Ni/Cr ≥ 1, which all reflect a hydrothermal origin. Moreover, magnetite in massive- and disseminated ores has lower Cr (MOM: 0–13.2 ppm; MOS: 0–12.9 ppm; DO: 3.57–133 ppm) than magnetite clasts ores (MNC: 849–2544 ppm; MWC: 835–44,132 ppm). However, the high Cr in the magnetite clasts ores may have been inherited from the chromite they replaced. From the magnetite clasts to disseminated/massive ores, formation temperature decreased and f O 2 increased, which may represent the major controls on the formation of the various magnetite ore types. Compositions of the ore fluids and host rocks, formation of coexisting minerals and other physicochemical parameters (such as T and f O 2) may have variably influenced the magnetite geochemistry in the different Heijianshan ore types, with fluid compositions probably playing the most important role. Discrimination diagrams, for instance, Cr vs. Co/Ni, Cr vs. Ti, V vs. Cr and Ni vs. Cr, may be useful for magnetite mineralization type differentiation in other submarine volcanic-hosted Fe/Fe–Cu deposits in the Aqishan–Yamansu belt. Geochemical discrimination diagrams, alteration and mineralization paragenesis indicate that the Heijianshan Fe–Cu (–Au) deposit is best classified as an IOCG-like deposit, which offers a new insight for classifying and characterizing ore genetic types for similar Fe and Fe–Cu deposits in Eastern Tianshan. Graphical abstract Image 1 Highlights • The Heijianshan magnetite from the massive-, disseminated- and most magnetite clasts ores are hydrothermal. • The Cr vs. Co/Ni, Cr vs. Ti, V vs. Cr and Ni vs. Cr diagrams can discriminate the different magnetite ores. • Temperature, f O2 and other factors control the element distribution in magnetite. • The Heijianshan Fe–Cu (–Au) deposit can be classified as an IOCG-like deposit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF