Search

Background: Emergency oral tracheal intubations in the pre-hospital setting can be more difficult because the rescuer's position with respect to a patient lying on the ground may not provide optimal conditions for intubation. Since optimal visualisation of the larynx often depends on the force generated during laryngoscopy, we measured the pressure required for intubation (P(i)) as well as the maximum pressure (P(max)) that can be generated with the laryngoscopy blade in seven intubator positions., Methods: Nineteen hospital personnel with intubation experience participated in this study. A modified #3 Macintosh laryngoscope blade was used to measure the pressure exerted on the tongue of a manikin placed on the ground during intubation. The following positions were studied: standard, sitting, prone, kneeling, left and right lateral decubitus and straddling., Results: Intubating in the straddling position required the lowest P(i), as a percent of P(max) (68+/-14%). This was significantly less than the prone, right lateral decubitus and sitting positions. (Tukey's W procedure, P<0.05), Conclusion: The straddling position affords the intubator significantly more reserve force than the prone, right lateral decubitus or sitting position. We suggest that the straddling position may be an advantageous position for pre-hospital intubations especially when visualisation of the glottis is difficult.

Objective: To examine the ease of endotracheal intubation on the ground for various rescuer positions., Methods: Six female and 18 male emergency medical technicians were asked to intubate a Laerdal Megacode Trainer placed on the ground. Rescuers assumed the following positions in random order: prone, sitting, kneeling at the mannequin's head, and straddling the chest. The authors measured times 1) for changing from mask ventilation to assuming intubation position and 2) from touching the laryngoscope to putting it down. Incidences of esophageal tube placement and clicks (possible tooth damage) were noted. The rescuers rated their satisfaction with each position on a six-point scale (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient). Total intubation times of the other three positions were compared with that for prone by rank order test for paired observations. Handling, esophageal positions, and clicks of the other three positions were compared with those for prone by sign test for paired observations. A Bonferroni correction (factor 12) was applied., Results: Mean total intubation times (in seconds) were 11.8 +/- 3.3 for prone, 13.9 +/- 4.7 for sitting, 11.4 +/- 4.5 for kneeling, and 16.2 +/- 5.8 for straddling. The difference between straddling and prone was statistically significant (p < 0.005). For handling, the results were for prone 3.0 +/- 1.4, for sitting 3.1 +/- 1.1, for kneeling 2.2 +/- 0.6, and for straddling 2.8 +/- 1.4. Esophageal positions occurred for prone 1, for sitting 1, for kneeling 2, and for straddling 3. Clicks were counted for prone 2, for sitting 1, for kneeling 1, and for straddling 0., Conclusions: All tested positions provide satisfactory conditions for intubation on the ground. The straddling position requires statistically, but not clinically, significantly more time for intubation than does prone and may be an important backup position if access from behind the patient's head is impossible.