Search

Case formulation is considered important in both the development of the therapeutic relationship and in starting the process of therapeutic change. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) describes the developmental origins and maintenance of a client's problems in both written (reformulation letter) and diagrammatic form (sequential diagrammatic reformulation). This study aimed to investigate the effects of these reformulation tools on insight and symptom change. A small‐N repeated measures design was employed with quantitative and qualitative measures collected from six therapist/client dyads. Participating therapists kept a record of their delivery of CAT reformulation tools. Participating clients completed the insight subscale of the Self‐Reflection and Insight Scale every fourth session and the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation‐10 every session. Qualitative data from client change interviews regarding their experiences of CAT and attributions of change was explored using template analysis. Participants demonstrated improvements (symptom reduction and insight increases) over the course of the intervention. Administration of reformulation tools did not consistently result in significant changes on insight and symptom measures. However, the tools were identified by participants as leading to insight and emotional change within the context of a good therapeutic relationship. These findings suggest that a genuine therapeutic relationship is an important change mechanism operating through, and strengthened by, CAT‐specific tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The evidence is that therapy only works for some. This study aimed to explore clients' subjective experience of non‐improvement; specifically how do participants who feel they have not benefitted from psychological therapy describe the experience and make sense of their therapy? Method: Eight people from a National Health Service Psychological Therapies Department in the UK who felt their therapy had not resulted in improvement took part in semi‐structured interviews, later analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Participants described a process, beginning with their difficulties, negative feelings about themselves, and initial hopes and anxieties for therapy. Once in therapy, participants described overwhelming fears of losing control and being judged. They described attempts to manage this, using self‐censoring and compliance. After therapy, while most could identify some gain, they felt disappointed and that they were having to ‘make do’. The sense of not having succeeded or being sufficiently deserving of further input, in turn, reinforced participants' initial negative self‐beliefs. Conclusion: Although participants identified themselves as not having improved through therapy, the accounts suggested more complexity. All participants reported detrimental effects and accounts contained qualified, thoughtful descriptions of these experiences: participants acknowledged some gains, even though they felt that therapy had not met their expectations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]