Search

Background and Clinical Significance: We wished to review the use of arterial embolization with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) to treat large high-flow vascular malformations due to its rapid polymerization and ability to permanently occlude large and small vessels. Case Presentation: A 52-year-old male presented with a two-year history of progressively worsening pain and swelling in the right gluteal area. Imaging techniques (color Doppler ultrasonography, CT, DSA, and MRI) were utilized for the diagnosis of a large high-flow intramuscular hemangioma. The mass displaced the surrounding tissues but showed no signs of lymphadenopathy or distant metastasis. The treatment involved targeting different arterial feeders over several sessions. Each procedure used NBCA–Lipiodol under fluoroscopic guidance, progressively reducing the malformation's size and alleviating his symptoms. After the final embolization, the patient showed significant pain relief and a reduction in the size of the malformation, confirmed by follow-up imaging, demonstrating NBCA embolization's effectiveness. The protocol's safety and efficacy in this context are discussed. Conclusions: Arterial embolization with NBCA is a promising treatment for large high-flow vascular malformations, providing symptom relief and reductions in lesion size. While this case report highlights the procedure's efficacy, further research is needed for a broader understanding of its long-term outcomes and potential complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This technical report illustrates the technique to perform computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsies in the body and dens of the axis (C2 vertebra) through a posterior transpedicular approach with the use of preoperative contrast-enhanced scans to highlight the course of the vertebral artery. The technique is presented through two exemplification cases: a pediatric patient with osteoblastoma and secondary aneurysmal bone cyst and one adult patient with melanoma metastasis. This case highlights the potential of the CT-guided posterolateral/transpedicular approach for performing safe and effective biopsies in the body and dens of C2, even in pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While nowadays, CT-guided bone biopsy represents the gold standard tool for histopathological and microbiological diagnosis of skeletal lesions, the role of US-guided bone biopsy has not yet been fully explored. US-guided biopsy offers several advantages, such as the absence of ionizing radiation, fast acquisition time, as well as good intra-lesional echo, and structural and vascular characterization. Despite that, a consensus in regard to its applications in bone neoplasms has not been established. Indeed CT-guided technique (or fluoroscopic ones) still represents the standard choice in clinical practice. This review article aims to review the literature data about US-guided bone biopsy, underlying clinical-radiological indications, advantages of the procedure and future perspectives. Bone lesions taking the best advantages of the US-guided biopsy are osteolytic, determining the erosion of the overlying bone cortex and/or with an extraosseous soft-tissue component. Indeed, osteolytic lesions with extra-skeletal soft-tissue involvement represent a clear indication for US-guided biopsy. Moreover, even lytic bone lesions with cortical thinning and/or cortical disruption, especially located in the extremities or pelvis, can be safely sampled with US guidance with very good diagnostic yield. US-guided bone biopsy is proven to be fast, effective and safe. Additionally, it offers real-time needle evaluation, an advantage when compared to CT-guided bone biopsy. In the current clinical settings, it seems relevant to select the exact eligibility criteria for this imaging guidance since the effectiveness can vary depending on the type of lesion and body site involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. a literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) were included. The results were organized according to the treated anatomical site: knee, hip, foot and ankle, shoulder, hand and wrist, sacroiliac joints. Data about treatment efficacy were extracted. The main outcome was change in pain intensity using the 0–10 visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 1 month. Additional timepoints at 3, 6 and 12 months were assessed. Change in functional status was evaluated. Pooled estimates were calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval relative to baseline. The meta-analyses of RCTs and NRSI were conducted separately. of the 4599 retrieved articles, 164 were included in the review and, considering all the established timepoints, 111 (38 RCTs and 73 NRSI) were selected for the meta-analysis. Only one article described patients with inflammatory arthritis. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, one month after the procedure, MD in VAS was -3.98 (-4.41 to -3.55; k = 21) for knee RFA, and -3.18 (-3.96 to -2.39; k = 8) for sacroiliac joints RFA. In the meta-analysis of NRSI, MD in VAS was -4.12 (-4.63 to -3.61; k = 23) for knee RFA, -3.84 (-4.77 to -2.92; k = 7) for knee TAE, -4.34 (-4.96 to -3.71; k = 2) for hip RFA, -3.83 (-4.52 to -3.15; k = 3) for shoulder RFA and -4.93 (-5.58 to -4.28; k = 14) for sacroiliac joints RFA. Significant decrease in pain intensity was found also at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, functional status improved at all the assessed timepoints. minimally invasive interventional procedures can improve pain and functional status of patients affected by OA or chronic sacroiliac pain of degenerative origin. Further research is warranted in the field of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]