Search

Objective(s): To describe how medical school rank may be associated with matriculation into otolaryngology residency programs., Methods: A list of medical students who matched into otolaryngology residencies in 2020, 2021, and 2022 was obtained from Otomatch (Otomatch.com). For each student, their medical school, U.S. News & World Report Best Medical School (Research) ranking, and region based on the U.S. Census divisions were recorded. The medical schools were divided into four Tiers according to rank: 1-40 (Tier 1), 41-80 (Tier 2), 81-124 (Tier 3), and 125-191 (Tier 4). Residency programs were also grouped by region, whether they were large (>3 residents/year) or small (<3 residents/year), and their Doximity reputation ranking: 1-31 (Tier 1), 32-61 (Tier 2), 62-91 (Tier 3), and 92-125 (Tier 4)., Results: Nine hundred and ninety-five medical students were included in this study. The majority of residency matriculants were MDs (N = 988, 99.3%) who came from Tier 1 (N = 410, 41.2%) or Tier 2 (N = 313, 31.5%) medical schools. Those who attended higher-tier medical schools were more likely to match into higher-tier residency programs (p < 0.001). 57.8% (N = 237) of the applicants who attended Tier 1 medical schools matriculated into a Tier 1 residency program, whereas only 24.7% (N = 42) of the applicants from Tier 4 medical schools matriculated into a Tier 1 residency program., Conclusion: Applicants who attend top-tier medical schools represent significantly more residents at top-tier otolaryngology residency programs than those from lower tier medial schools., Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 133:3353-3357, 2023., (© 2023 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: To determine what prospective residency applicants look for on otolaryngology residency program websites., Study Design: Survey., Setting: The survey was distributed in a virtual format through Google Forms. A link to the survey was given at the University at Buffalo Otolaryngology Chautauqua, sent to Otolaryngology program directors with requests to forward to PGY1 residents and Otolaryngology interest groups, sent to medical school Otolaryngology interest group leaders, posted on Twitter through several accounts, and on otomatch.com., Methods: A 45 item survey was given to fourth year medical students applying to otolaryngology, re-applicants applying to otolaryngology, and first year otolaryngology residents who had recently matched. Data collected included participant's age, sex, race and ethnicity, current status in school/residency program, and their type of medical degree (MD or DO). Participants were then asked to mark the components listed that they wished to see. Components were separated into 5 categories: Application/Selection Criteria, Employment Aspects, Program Features, Social/Community, and Faculty/Contact Information. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests when appropriate. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: One hundred one surveys were collected. Sixty-four (63.4%) participants were fourth-year medical students, 32 (31.7%) were first-year residents, and 5 (5.0%) were re-applicants. Thirteen of the items on the survey were sought by 80% or more of respondents. Ninety-nine (98.0%) of the participants wanted to see a current resident list with photos and 97 (96.0%) wanted to see the intern year schedule online. Eighty-five percent agreed that salary and benefits information would be valuable on residency websites. Women expressed significantly more interest in salary ( P  = .034), benefits ( P  = .026), and parking information ( P  = .048)., Conclusion: Our study provides insight on key items to include on residency program websites. Websites that contain information that applicants want to use can be helpful for application decisions in the future.