Search

The objective of this study was to assess non-adherence (NA) and non-persistence (NP) to long-acting asthma medications in Germany by differentiating between measurement of NA in periods of therapy continuation and measurement of NP in therapy-naïve patients.We analyzed treatment adherence to long-acting asthma medication using German claims data for periods of treatment continuation based on the medication possession ratio (MPR) and the proportion of days covered. Persistence was assessed in treatment-naïve patients. Outcomes were observed from the date of the first to the last prescription within a 12-month period. Both NA and NP analyses considered prescription supply, using either defined daily dosages, or prescribed daily dosages derived from a medical chart review.We identified 52,508 asthma patients (mean age: 40.1, 58.4% female) who received at least two long-acting asthma prescriptions within 12 months; 50,660 treatment-naïve patients were included in the NP analysis (mean age: 39.7, 58.8% female). The mean 12-month MPR was 38.5% (89.4% NA according to MPR ≤ 80%) and the average proportion of days covered was 40.4% (85.9% NA). Agent-specific MPR and NA rates varied between 31.8% (91.8% NA) and 56.2% (71.6% NA). The average weighted-MPR increased to 53.1% when using the prescribed daily dosage. Based onHigh levels of treatment NA and NP indicate a substantial need to improve adherence and persistence to long-acting asthma medication in Germany.

Background This study analyzes the impact of skeletal-related events (SRE) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs incurred by patients with bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors (ST), who are therapy-naïve to bone targeting agents (BTAs). Methods German claims data from 01/01/2010 to 30/06/2018 were used to conduct a retrospective comparative cohort analysis of BTA-naive patients with a BM diagnosis and preceding ST diagnosis. HCRU and treatment-related costs were compared in two matched cohorts of patients with and without a history of SREs, defined as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and radiation to bone. The first SRE was defined as the patient-individual index date. Conversely, for the non-SRE patients, index dates were assigned randomly. Results In total, 45.20% of 9,832 patients reported experiencing at least one SRE (n = 4444) while 54.80% experienced none (n = 5388); 2,434 pairs of SRE and non-SRE patients were finally matched (mean age: 70.87/71.07 years; females: 39.07%/38.58%). Between SRE and non-SRE cohorts, significant differences in the average number of hospitalization days per patient-year (35.80/30.80) and associated inpatient-care costs (14,199.27€/10,787.31€) were observed. The total cost ratio was 1.16 (p Conclusion The underutilization of BTAs within a clinical setting poses an ongoing challenge in the real-world treatment of BM patients throughout Germany. Ultimately, the economic burden of treating SREs in patients with BM from ST was found to be considerable, resulting in higher direct healthcare costs and increased utilization of inpatient care facilities.

Background The objective of this study was to describe the real-world treatment and overall survival (OS) of German patients with a diagnosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), and to explore factors associated with the real-world mortality risk. Methods This was a retrospective German claims data analysis of incident aNSCLC patients. Data were available from 01/01/2011 until 31/12/2016. Identification of eligible patients took place between 01/01/2012–31/12/2015, to allow for at least 1-year pre-index and follow-up periods. Inpatient and outpatient mutation test procedures after aNSCLC diagnosis were observed. Further, prescribed treatments and OS since first (incident) aNSCLC diagnosis and start of respective treatment lines were described both for all patients and presumed EGFR/ALK/ROS-1-positive patients. Factors associated with OS were analyzed in multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results Overall, 1741 aNSCLC patients were observed (mean age: 66·97 years, female: 29·87%). The mutation test rate within this population was 26·31% (n = 458), 26·6% of these patients (n = 122) received a targeted treatment and were assumed to have a positive EGFR/ALK/ROS-1 test result. Most often prescribed treatments were pemetrexed monotherapy as 1 L (21·23% for all and 11·11% for mutation-positive patients) and erlotinib monotherapy as 2 L (25·83%/38·54%). Median OS since incident diagnosis was 351 days in all and 571 days in mutation-positive patients. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, higher age, a stage IV disease, a higher number of chronic drugs in the pre-index period and no systemic therapy increased the risk of early death since first aNSCLC diagnosis. On the other hand, female gender and treatment with therapies other than chemotherapy were associated with a lower risk of early death. Conclusions Despite the introduction of new treatments, the real-world survival prognosis for aNSCLC patients remains poor if measured based on an unselected real-world population of patients. Still, the majority of German aNSCLC patients do not receive a mutation test.

Thomas Wilke,1 Burkhard Weisser,2 Hans-Georg Predel,3 Roland Schmieder,4 Sven Wassmann,5 Anton Gillessen,6 Jörg Blettenberg,7 Ulf Maywald,8 Olaf Randerath,9 Sabrina Mueller,10 Michael Böhm11 1Institut für Pharmakoökonomie und Arzneimittellogistik (IPAM)/Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Logistics, Wismar, Germany; 2Institute of Sports Science, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; 3Institute of Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany; 4Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; 5Faculty of Medicine, Cardiology Pasing, Munich and University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany; 6Department of Internal Medicine, Herz-Jesu-Hospital, Münster, Germany; 7Practice Dr. J. Blettenberg, Lindlar, Germany; 8AOK PLUS – The Health Insurance for Sachsen und Thüringen; GB Medicines/Remedies, Dresden, Germany; 9Medical Department, APONTIS PHARMA GmbH & Co.KG, Monheim, Germany; 10Ingress-Health HWM GmbH, Wismar, Germany; 11Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Clinic of Saarland, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, GermanyCorrespondence: Thomas Wilke, Institute of Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics, University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, Wismar, 23966, Germany, Tel +4938417581014, Fax +4938417581011, Email Thomas.wilke@ipam-wismar.deAim: Current guidelines for the treatment of arterial hypertension (AH) or cardiovascular (CV) prevention recommend combination drug treatments with single pill combinations (SPC) to improve adherence to treatment. We aimed to assess whether the SPC concept is clinically superior to multi pill combination (MPC) with identical drugs.Methods and Results: In an explorative study, we analyzed anonymized claims data sets of patients treated with CV drugs for hypertension and/or CV disorders who were insured by the German AOK PLUS statutory health fund covering 01/07/2012-30/06/2018. Patients at age ≥ 18 years who received either a SPC or MPC with identical drugs were followed for up to one year. A one to one propensity score matching (PSM) was applied within patient groups who started identical drug combinations, and results were reported as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) as well as hazard ratios (HRs). After PSM, data from 59,336 patients were analyzed. In 30 out of 56 IRR analyses, superiority of SPC over MPC was shown. In 5 out of 7 comparisons, the HR for the composite outcome of all-cause death and all-cause hospitalizations was in favor of the SPC regimen (SPC versus MPC): valsartan/amlodipine: HR=0.87 (95% CI: 0.84– 0.91, p ≤ 0.001); candesartan/amlodipine: 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65– 0.90, p = 0.001); valsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide: HR=0.68 (95% CI: 0.61– 0.74, p ≤ 0.001); ramipril/amlodipine: HR=0.80 (95% CI: 0.77– 0.83, p ≤ 0.001); acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/atorvastatin/ramipril: HR=0.64 (95% CI: 0.47– 0.88, p = 0.005).Conclusion: SPC regimens are associated with a lower incidence of CV events and lower all-cause mortality in clinical practice. SPC regimens should generally be preferred to improve patient’s prognosis.Keywords: single pill, adherence, cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, prognosis, clinical practice

Sabrina Mueller,1 Antje Groth,1 Stefan G Spitzer,2,3 Anja Schramm,4 Andreas Pfaff,5 Ulf Maywald6 1Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics, University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany; 2Praxisklinik Herz und Gefäße Dresden, Academic Educational Practice Clinic, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; 3Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany; 4AOK Bayern, Regensburg, Germany; 5AOK Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany; 6AOK PLUS, Dresden, Germany Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA)-based treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of an anonymized claims dataset from 3 German health insurance funds covering the period from January 01, 2010 to June 30, 2014, with a minimum observation time of 12 months. All continuously insured patients with at least 2 outpatient AF diagnoses and/or 1 inpatient respective diagnosis who received at least 1 outpatient prescription of a NOAC or VKA were included. Outcomes and measures: Death, ischemic strokes (IS), non-specified strokes, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), myocardial infarctions (MIs), arterial embolism (AE), hemorrhagic strokes, severe bleedings, and composite outcomes. Main comparisons were done based on propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts. Results were reported as incidence rate ratios and hazard ratios (HRs). Results: We assigned 37,439 AF patients to each PSM cohort (NOAC cohort: mean age 78.2 years, mean CHA2DS2VASc score 2.96, mean follow-up 348.5 days; VKA cohort: mean age 78.2 years, mean CHA2DS2VASc 2.95, mean follow-up 365.5 days). NOAC exposure was associated with significantly higher incidence rate ratios; 95% CI/HRs; 95% CI for the following outcomes: death (1.22; 1.17–1.28/1.22; 1.17–1.28), IS (1.90; 1.69–2.15/1.92; 1.69–2.19), non-specified strokes (2.04; 1.16–3.70/1.93; 1.13–3.32), TIAs (1.52; 1.29–1.79/1.44; 1.21–1.70), MIs (1.26; 1.10–1.15/1.31; 1.13–1.52), AE (1.75; 1.32–2.32/1.81; 1.36–2.34) and severe bleeding (1.92; 1.71–2.15/1.95; 1.74–2.20). Multivariable Cox regression analyses and additional sensitivity analysis, including analysis of PSM-matched NOAC/VKA treatment-naive patients, only confirmed the above results. The study was documented under clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02657616). Conclusion and relevance: A VKA therapy seems to be more effective and safer than a NOAC therapy in a real-world cohort of German AF patients. Keywords: atrial fibrillation, AF, anticoagulation, NOAC, VKA, cohort study

Sabrina Müller,1 Thomas Wilke,1 Andreas Fuchs,2 Ulf Maywald,2 Jan-Paul Flacke,3 Harald Heinisch,4 Klaus Krüger5 1Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics, University of Wismar, Wismar, 2AOK PLUS, Dresden, 3Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, 4Chugai Pharma Europe Ltd, Frankfurt/M, 5Praxiszentrum St Bonifatius, Munich, Germany Objective: This study aimed to assess the level of nonpersistence (NP) and nonadherence (NA) to methotrexate (MTX) therapy in German patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and methods: Based on German claims data, RA patients who received a MTX therapy (subgroup: treatment-naive patients) were analyzed. NP was defined as treatment gap >12weeks. Regarding NA, it is the overall medication possession ratio (MPR) during an observational period of 12 or 24months after therapy, and the MPR is calculated only for the periods of therapy continuation; NA was defined as MPR

The aim of this study was to describe persistence with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment in German atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and to identify factors which may be associated with early discontinuation of VKA therapy. We did a retrospective cohort study based on an anonymized German claims dataset with VKA treatment-naive AF patients, who received at least one VKA prescription. VKA therapy discontinuation was defined as a gap >180 days. We identified 38,076 VKA patients who started a VKA therapy (mean age 76.13 years; 56.08% female; mean CHA2DS2-VASc-Score 4.49; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 3.91). After four quarters since start of VKA treatment, 14,889 (39.10%) of observed patients had discontinued their VKA treatment (after eight quarters: 54.61%). Mean time until treatment discontinuation was 390.55 days. Risk of VKA discontinuation increased with the diagnosis of dementia within the first two quarters of VKA treatment [HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.29–1.40)], diagnosed alcohol or drug abuse in the baseline period [HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.18–1.33)], female gender [HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05–1.10)], higher age (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.03–1.03), higher CCI (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04–1.05), any prescription of NSAID (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04–1.10), and number of surgeries in the first two quarters of VKA treatment (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04–1.05). At least one yearly visit to a cardiologist since start of VKA treatment decreased the risk of non-persistence [HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93] and a cancer diagnosis in the baseline period (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89–0.96). Non-persistence related to VKA therapy is common in AF patients. Older more comorbid female patients as well as patients who face surgeries and who do not visit a cardiologist regularly face a higher therapy discontinuation risk.

Objectives The aim of this claims-based data analysis was to describe the care of German T2DM patients and to determine which subgroups could be differentiated in terms of the achieved T2DM-related treatment results, the underlying comorbidities, and the achieved comorbidity-related treatment results. Methods We included all T2DM patients insured by a large sickness fund in 2010/2011. We defined 12 subgroups according to observed HbA 1 C , blood pressure and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). For each subgroup, available sociodemographic and clinical information were reported. Different treatment variables were described. T2DM-related events leading to acute hospitalisations were reported. Results We included 394,828 T2DM patients in our analysis; for 228,703 patients’ detailed data as basis for subgroup classification were available. For 4.5% of these patients, a HbA 1C >9% was observed. 21,833 of the T2DM patients were affected by a T2DM-related event; the risk was 5.53% per patient year; 1.74% of the patients suffered from more than one event. Most frequent event types were hospitalisation with T2DM as primary diagnosis (2.39%), vascular interventions/stent implantations (1.92%), and ischaemic stroke (1.19%). There were significant differences between the observed subgroups in terms of T2DM-related event risk. Conclusion Overall, our data indicate that the typically treated T2DM patient has a number of comorbidities and thus treatment focused solely on T2DM is neither possible nor clinically meaningful. Particularly those patients who reached HbA 1 C goals, but had also achieved relevant additional treatment goals reached low yearly T2DM event rates whereas subgroups failing to achieve one or several treatment goals are facing much higher event risks.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) with either new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) is recommended by guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a moderate to high risk of stroke. Based on a claims-based data set the aim of this study was to quantify the stroke-risk dependent OAC utilization profile of German AF patients and possible causes of OAC under-use. Our claims-based data set was derived from two German statutory health insurance funds for the years 2007–2010. All prevalent AF-patients in the period 2007–2009 were included. The OAC-need in 2010 was assumed whenever a CHADS2- or CHA2DS2-VASC-score was >1 and no factor that disfavored OAC use existed. Causes of OAC under-use were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. 108,632 AF-prevalent patients met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 75.43 years, average CHA2DS2-VASc-score was 4.38. OAC should have been recommended for 56.1/62.9 % of the patients (regarding factors disfavouring VKA/NOAC use). For 38.88/39.20 % of the patient-days in 2010 we could not observe any coverage by anticoagulants. Dementia of patients (OR 2.656) and general prescription patterns of the treating physician (OR 1.633) were the most important factors increasing the risk of OAC under-use. Patients who had consulted a cardiologist had a lower risk of being under-treated with OAC (OR 0.459). OAC under-use still seems to be one of the major challenges in the real-life treatment of AF patients. Our study confirms that both patient/disease characteristics and treatment environment/general prescribing behaviour of physicians may explain the OAC under-use in AF patients.

Experimental studies point to an interplay between hypercholesterolemia and hypertension, acting through the renin angiotensin system. In a crossover study design with 8 healthy subjects, the authors tested the hypothesis that statin treatment exerts renin angiotensin system-modulating effects in veins by down-regulation of AT1-receptors, resulting in reduced Angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced venoconstriction and by increasing the pleiotropic Ang II-metabolite Ang-(1-7). Irbesartan was used as positive control. Ang II-induced venoconstriction was 49% +/- 9% before and 64% +/- 10% after 30 days of atorvastatin treatment compared to 50% +/- 8% before and 15% +/- 9% after irbesartan (P = .004). Plasma angiotensin levels significantly increased only after irbesartan treatment (Ang II: 35 +/- 4 vs 329 +/- 101 pg/mL [P = .02]; Ang-(1-7): 10 +/- 3 vs 35 +/- 6 pg/mL [P = .01]) compared to atorvastatin treatment (Ang II: 26 +/- 5 vs 31 +/- 4 pg/mL [P = ns]; Ang-(1-7): 9 +/- 2 vs 11 +/- 3 pg/mL [P = ns]). The data indicate that atorvastatin does not inhibit Ang II-induced venoconstriction in vivo and point toward a supportive role of Ang-(1-7) in contributing to the antihypertensive and beneficial vascular effects of irbesartan.

This analysis was conducted to investigate urinary tract infection (UTI) incidence among Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Germany in a real-world setting and to identify risk factors associated with UTI incidence/recurrence.Our cohort study was conducted based on an anonymized dataset from a regional German sickness fund (2010-2012). A UTI event was mainly identified through observed outpatient/inpatient UTI diagnoses. We reported the number of UTI events per 1000 patient-years. Furthermore, the proportion of patients affected by ≥1 and ≥2 UTI events in the observational period was separately reported. Finally, three multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors that may be associated with UTI event risk or recurrent UTI event risk.A total of 456,586 T2DM-prevalent patients were identified (mean age 72.8years, 56.1% female, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 7.3). Overall, the UTI event rate was 87.3 events per 1000 patient-years (111.8/55.8 per 1000 patient-years for women/men (p0.001)). The highest UTI event rates were observed for those aged89years. After 730days after first observed T2DM diagnosis, the proportion of women/men still UTI-event-free was 80.9%/90.2% (p0.001). Most important factors associated with UTI risk in our three models were older age (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.56-1.70 for79years), female gender (HR=1.38-1.57), UTIs in the previous two years (HR=2.77-5.94), number of comorbidities as measured by the CCI (HR=1.32-1.52 for CCI6) and at least one cystoscopy in the previous year (HR=2.06-5.48). Furthermore, high HbA1c values in the previous year (HR=1.29-1.4 referring to HbA1c9.5%) and a poor kidney function (HR=1.11-1.211 referring to glomerular filtration rate (GFR)60ml/min) increased the UTI event risk.Our study confirms that UTI event risk is high in T2DM patients. Older female patients having experienced previous UTIs face an above-average UTI risk, especially if these risk factors are associated with poor glycemic control and poor kidney function.

Background The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in AF patients in the practices of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany and to investigate possible causal factors which influence OAC quality. Methods We conducted a multi-center, non-interventional, prospective observational cohort study among general practitioners (GPs) in Germany. To assess the quality of OAC on the basis of the prospectively documented international normalized ratio (INR) values, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated using the Rosendaal linear trend method. The causes of poor OAC quality were identified by a multivariate analysis model (logistical regression; poor OAC quality: TTR Results and conclusions For 525 OAC patients (66.8%; patients with at least 2 prospectively documented INR values) the average TTR (target range of 2.0–3.0) was 67.6%. About 34.7% of the patients had a TTR None of the variables representing characteristics of the medical practices were capable of explaining the occurrence of poor OAC quality. However, with regard to care provision-based variables, the existence of a brief discontinuation of medication was important. As the existence of adherence barriers increased, the probability of poor anticoagulation quality increased. In conclusion, the provision of OAC in the German health care system is to be regarded as good, but far from ideal. Our causal analysis shows that patient-based factors should be addressed through the provision of improved training and that the rationale behind the interruption of OAC treatment should be critically examined.

Introduction Our main aim was to assess the level of persistence and adherence to therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, also by comparing once- (OD) with twice-a-day (BID) therapy. Methods We used two large retrospective datasets: a German claims dataset and the UK General Practitioner (GP)-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) dataset (2010–2012). All continuously insured T2DM patients with at least one outpatient/inpatient T2DM diagnosis were observed starting with the first prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Non-persistence (NP) was defined as treatment gap >90 days. Non-adherence (NA) was defined as medication possession ratio 90 days) only. Results In the UK sample, 1905 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (mean age: 55.5 years, 47.2% female). In the German sample, 1627 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (mean age: 56.6 years, 51.4% female). Percentage of NP patients after 12 months was 29.5% in the UK and 36.4% in the German sample. In both countries, a BID treatment was associated with a higher probability to discontinue a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists earlier than an OD treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.431 in UK and HR = 1.314 in Germany). The percentages of patients considered NA were 20.2%/20.0%/20.5% (all/OD/BID) for the UK sample, and 19.9%/19.2%/21.8% (all/OD/BID) for the German sample. Conclusion NP and NA to treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists in both UK and Germany appear to be similar. Persistence to OD treatment is higher than to BID treatment in both the UK and Germany. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0149-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background We compared all-cause mortality, major macrovascular events (MACE) and diabetes-related hospitalizations in T2DM-incident patients newly treated with metformin (MET) versus sulphonylureas (SU) monotherapy and in T2DM-prevalent patients newly treated with MET+SU versus MET+DPP4-inhibitor combination therapy. Methods We analysed anonymized data obtained from a German health fund. Patients were included when they had started MET versus SU therapy or MET+SU versus MET+DPP4 therapy between 01/07/2010 and 31/12/2011. Observation started with the first MET/SU prescription or the first prescription of the second agent of a MET+SU/MET+DPP4 combination therapy. Follow-up time lasted until the end of data availability (a minimum of 12 months), death or therapy discontinuation. Results In total, 434,291 T2DM-prevalent and 35,661 T2DM-incident patients were identified. Of the identified T2DM-incident patients, 904/7,874 started SU/MET monotherapy, respectively, with a mean age of 70.1/61.4 years (54.6/50.3 % female; Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 1.4/2.2; 933/7,350 observed SU/MET patient years). 4,157/1,793 SU+MET/DPP4+MET therapy starters had a mean age of 68.1/62.2 years (53.4/50.8 % female; CCI 2.8/2.6; 4,556/1,752 observed SU+MET/ DPP4+MET patient years). In a propensity score matched (PSM) comparison, the HRs (95 % CIs) associated with SU monotherapy compared to MET monotherapy exposure were 1.4 (0.9–2.3) for mortality, 1.4 (0.9–2.2) for MACE, 4.1 (1.5–10.9) for T2DM hospitalizations and 1.6 (1.2–2.3) for composite event risk. In a multivariable Cox regression model, SU monotherapy was associated with higher mortality (aHR 2.0; 1.5–2.6), higher MACE (aHR 1.3; 1.0–1.7) and higher T2DM hospitalizations (aHR 2.8; 1.8–4.4), which corresponded with a higher composite event risk (aHR 1.8; 1.5–2.1). No significant differences in event rates were observed in the PSM comparison between DPP4+MET/SU+MET combination therapy starters and in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Conclusions Our results show that SU monotherapy may be associated with increased mortality, MACE and T2DM hospitalizations, compared to MET monotherapy. When considering SU therapy, the associated cardiovascular risk should also be taken into account. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40200-016-0251-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective In clinical studies with diabetic patients thiazolidinediones have been shown to restore abnormal vascular function which might be attributed to improved blood sugar control or to restoration of vascular endothelium and smooth muscle responsiveness. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether rosiglitazone modulates vascular responsiveness to different vasoactive agents and exerts renin-angiotensin-system (RAS)-inhibiting properties in healthy subjects in vivo. Methods 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive either rosiglitazone or placebo. Venoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) and phenylephrine, and endothelium-dependent response to histamine and insulin, and endothelium-independent response to glyceroltrinitrate were compared using the dorsal hand vein compliance method. Effects on the RAS were investigated by plasma level determinations of Ang II and angiotensin-(1-7). Treatment effects on the systemic arterial system were investigated by standardized pulse-wave-analysis. Results Rosiglitazone significantly inhibited venoconstrictor responses to Ang II by 19% (-70% vs. -51% constriction, p = 0.034) and in the presence of rosiglitazone the ED80 for phenylephrine was increased (ED80: 317 A+/- 86 ng vs. 531 A+/- 102 ng; p = 0.010). Rosiglitazone treatment was without effect on endothelium-dependent dilation, blood pressure, pulse-wave-velocity and plasma angiotensin peptide levels. Conclusions The data of the present study in veins of healthy subjects are consistent with data from in vitro and animal studies supporting a direct effect of rosiglitazone on venous tone by modulation of the vascular smooth muscle response via AT1-receptor-downregulation.

Background The aim of this study was to analyse which factors predict the real-world macro-/microvascular event, hospitalisation and death risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate whether there exists both an under- and over-treatment risk of these patients. Methods We used a German claims/clinical data set covering the years 2010–12. Diabetes-related events were defined as (1) macro-, (2) microvascular events leading to inpatient hospitalisation, (3) other hospitalisations with type 2 diabetes mellitus as main diagnosis, (4) all-cause death and (5) a composite outcome including all event categories 1–4. Factors associated with event risk were analysed by a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and by multivariable Cox regression models. Results 229,042 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 70.2 years; mean CCI 6.03) were included. Among factors that increased the event risk were patients’ age, male gender, the adapted Charlson Comorbidity Index, the adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index, previous events, and number of prescribed chronic medications. For systolic blood pressure/HbA1C, a double-J/U-curve pattern was detected: HbA1C of 6–6.5% (42-48 mmol/mol) and systolic blood pressure of 130-140 mmHg (17.3-18.7kPa) were associated with the lowest event risk, values below/above that range were associated with higher risk. However, this pattern was mainly driven by the death risk and was much less clearly observed for the macrovascular/microvascular/hospitalization risk and for young/less comorbid patients. Conclusions Both blood pressure and HbA1C seem to be very important treatment targets, especially in comorbid old patients. It is of particular clinical importance that both over- and under-treatment pose a threat to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12933-015-0179-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.