4 results on '"Tomoko Handa"'
Search Results
2. Adult-onset autoimmune diabetes identified by glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies: a retrospective cohort study
- Author
-
Tamaki Kinoshita, Mariko Furukawa, Masaaki Ito, Tomoko Kobayashi, Ryoichi Banno, Takayuki Okuji, Hiroshi Arima, Hidetaka Suga, Mariko Sugiyama, Motomitsu Goto, Daisuke Hagiwara, Shintaro Iwama, Eri Wada, Hiroshi Takagi, Ayaka Hayase, Tomoko Handa, and Takeshi Onoue
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Glutamate decarboxylase ,Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ,Type 2 diabetes ,Autoimmune Diseases ,Body Mass Index ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal Medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,Insulin ,Aged ,Autoantibodies ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Retrospective Studies ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Glutamate Decarboxylase ,Autoantibody ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Blood pressure ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Female ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Patients with GAD antibodies (GADAb) showing clinical features of type 2 diabetes typically exhibit progression to an insulin-dependent state in several months or years. This condition is diagnosed as slowly progressive insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus (SPIDDM) or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, a subtype of adult-onset autoimmune diabetes. However, some patients diagnosed with adult-onset autoimmune diabetes do not progress to an insulin-dependent state. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes among those diagnosed with adult-onset autoimmune diabetes using measurable indicators in routine clinical practice. We surveyed data from the electronic medical records of all patients with GADAb from eight medical centres in Japan for selecting and analysing patients who matched the diagnostic criteria of SPIDDM. Overall, 345 patients were analysed; of these, 162 initiated insulin therapy (insulin therapy group), whereas 183 did not (non-insulin therapy group) during the follow-up period (median 3.0 years). Patients in the non-insulin therapy group were more likely to be male and presented a later diabetes onset, shorter duration of diabetes, higher BMI, higher blood pressure levels, lower HbA1c levels, lower GADAb levels and lesser antidiabetic agent use than those in the insulin therapy group when GADAb was first identified as positive. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that BMI, HbA1c levels and GADAb levels were independent factors for progression to insulin therapy. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed that 86.0% of the patients with diabetes having GADAb who presented all three factors (BMI ≥ 22 kg/m2, HbA1c
- Published
- 2021
3. SAT-648 Flash Glucose Monitoring Helps Achieve Better Glycemic Control Than Conventional Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Norio Okada, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Takayuki Okuji, Hiroshi Takagi, Mariko Furukawa, Tomoko Handa, Shintaro Iwama, Taku Tsunekawa, Hiroshi Arima, Ryoichi Banno, Daisuke Hagiwara, Takeshi Onoue, Ayaka Hayase, Hidetaka Suga, Mariko Sugiyama, Tomoko Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Ito, Eri Wada, Motomitsu Goto, Masahiko Ando, and Masaaki Ito
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system diseases ,business.industry ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Insulin ,medicine.medical_treatment ,nutritional and metabolic diseases ,Type 2 diabetes ,Diabetes Technology ,medicine.disease ,Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism ,law.invention ,Flash (photography) ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Self-monitoring ,business ,AcademicSubjects/MED00250 ,Glycemic - Abstract
Background and aims: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is a novel system with which glucose levels are monitored and has been reported to improve glucose variability and glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of FGM and conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Reseach design and Methods: In this 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1), parallel group study, non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients at 5 hospitals in Japan were randomly assigned to the FGM (n = 49) or SMBG (n = 51) groups and were provided FGM or SMBG devices for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. This trial is registered with UMIN-CTR (UMIN000026452). Results: Forty-eight participants in the FGM group and 45 in the SMBG group completed the study. The mean HbA1c levels were 7·83% (SD 0·25) in the FGM group and 7·84% (SD 0·27) in the SMBG group at baseline, and the values were reduced in both FGM (−0·43%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0·57 to −0·28; p < 0·0001) and SMBG groups (−0·30%; 95% CI −0·48 to −0·13; p = 0·001) at 12 weeks. On the other hand, HbA1c was significantly decreased from baseline values in the FGM group, but not in the SMBG group at 24 weeks (FGM: −0·46%, 95% CI −0·59 to −0·32, p < 0·0001; SMBG: −0·17%, 95% CI −0·05 to 0·11, p = 0·124); a significant between-group difference was also observed (difference −0·29%, 95% CI −0·54 to −0·05; p = 0·022). Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire score was significantly improved, and the mean glucose levels, standard deviation of glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and duration of hyperglycemia were significantly decreased in the FGM group compared with the SMBG group. Conclusions: Glycemic control was better with FGM than with SMBG after cessation of glucose monitoring in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients.
- Published
- 2020
4. Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Taku Tsunekawa, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Hiroshi Arima, Ayaka Hayase, Hiroshi Takagi, Masaaki Ito, Takeshi Onoue, Yoshihiro Ito, Daisuke Hagiwara, Takayuki Okuji, Tomoko Handa, Mariko Sugiyama, Motomitsu Goto, Tomoko Kobayashi, Norio Okada, Shintaro Iwama, Mariko Furukawa, Ryoichi Banno, Eri Wada, Masahiko Ando, and Hidetaka Suga
- Subjects
Research design ,Blood Glucose ,medicine.medical_specialty ,HbA1c ,endocrine system diseases ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Type 2 diabetes ,Glycemic Control ,law.invention ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Randomized controlled trial ,Japan ,law ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,Glycemic ,business.industry ,Insulin ,Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ,nutritional and metabolic diseases ,Emerging Technologies, Pharmacology and Therapeutics ,medicine.disease ,glucose monitoring ,Glucose ,education and behavioral interventions ,chemistry ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Self-monitoring ,clinical trial(s) ,Glycated hemoglobin ,business - Abstract
IntroductionThe present study aimed to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsIn this 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1), parallel-group study, patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes at five hospitals in Japan were randomly assigned to the FGM (n=49) or SMBG (n=51) groups and were provided each device for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and was compared using analysis of covariance model that included baseline values and group as covariates.ResultsForty-eight participants in the FGM group and 45 in the SMBG group completed the study. The mean HbA1c levels were 7.83% (62.1 mmol/mol) in the FGM group and 7.84% (62.2 mmol/mol) in the SMBG group at baseline, and the values were reduced in both FGM (−0.43% (−4.7 mmol/mol), pConclusionsGlycemic control was better with FGM than with SMBG after cessation of glucose monitoring in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.Trial registration numberUMIN000026452, jRCTs041180082.
- Published
- 2019
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.