Search

Patient survival with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has improved with the use of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy. Given the potential activity of these agents in treating brain metastases, the role of aggressive local management with surgery and/or radiation may diminish. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of aggressive local therapy for RCC brain metastasis in the setting of molecular targeted agents and/or checkpoint inhibitor therapy. A retrospective single-center review between 2011-2018 identified patients that developed brain metastasis from RCC. Data analyzed included demographic information, systemic treatments, intracranial interventions, progression free survival and overall survival (OS). Of 1194 patients, 108(9.0%) were diagnosed with brain metastasis from RCC. OS from diagnosis of brain metastasis (OSBM) was 12.3 months. OSBM was analyzed based on three treatment groups: systemic therapy (ST) only (2.0 months, n = 23), systemic and radiotherapy (RT + ST) (12.3 months, n = 52), and systemic and radiotherapy plus resection (Surg + RT + ST) (21.7 months, n = 33). Survival benefit was seen with Surg + RT + ST compared to ST (P = 0.001), but not RT + ST (P = 0.081). Progression free survival was significantly prolonged with Surg + RT + ST compared to RT + ST (10.9 vs 5.9 months, respectively, P = 0.04). Variables such as performance status and number of brain metastases at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis did not differ significantly. In the setting of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy, resection may benefit the appropriate surgical candidate. Prospective clinical trials are necessary to better understand the role of aggressive RCC brain metastasis treatment. Micro Abstract • Renal cell brain metastasis is often excluded from studies and brain metastases effect a large portion of RCC patients. • Retrospective study of 1194 RCC patients, 108 patients had brain metastasis, determination of the role of surgical resection in the setting of recent advances in checkpoint inhibitors. • A benefit was seen in overall survival in patients that had surgical while undergoing radiation therapy and systemic therapies. • In the setting of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy, resection may benefit the appropriate surgical candidate(s).

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) focuses on areas impacted by recently emerging data, including sections describing MCC risk factors, diagnosis, workup, follow-up, and management of advanced disease with radiation and systemic therapy. Included in these sections are discussion of the new recommendations for use of Merkel cell polyomavirus as a biomarker and new recommendations for use of checkpoint immunotherapies to treat metastatic or unresectable disease. The next update of the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for MCC will include more detailed information about elements of pathology and addresses additional aspects of management of MCC, including surgical management of the primary tumor and draining nodal basin, radiation therapy as primary treatment, and management of recurrence.

Summary Background Previous studies combining PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the VEGF pathway have been characterised by excess toxicity, precluding further development. We hypothesised that axitinib, a more selective VEGF inhibitor than others previously tested, could be combined safely with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) and yield antitumour activity in patients with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods In this ongoing, open-label, phase 1b study, which was done at ten centres in the USA, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older who had advanced renal cell carcinoma (predominantly clear cell subtype) with their primary tumour resected, and at least one measureable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, controlled hypertension, and no previous systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Eligible patients received axitinib plus pembrolizumab in a dose-finding phase to estimate the maximum tolerated dose, and additional patients were enrolled into a dose-expansion phase to further establish safety and determine preliminary efficacy. Axitinib 5 mg was administered orally twice per day with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg given intravenously every 3 weeks. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab; antitumour activity was assessed in all patients who received study treatment and had an adequate baseline tumour assessment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed dose-limiting toxicity during the first two cycles (6 weeks) to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02133742. Findings Between Sept 23, 2014, and March 25, 2015, we enrolled 11 patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma to the dose-finding phase and between June 3, 2015, and Oct 13, 2015, we enrolled 41 patients to the dose-expansion phase. All 52 patients were analysed together. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Three dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the 11 patients treated during the 6-week observation period (dose-finding phase): one patient had a transient ischaemic attack and two patients were only able to complete less than 75% of the planned axitinib dose because of treatment-related toxicity. At the data cutoff date (March 31, 2017), 25 (48%) patients were still receiving study treatment. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34 (65%) patients; the most common included hypertension (n=12 [23%]), diarrhoea (n=5 [10%]), fatigue (n=5 [10%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (n=4 [8%]). The most common potentially immune-related adverse events (probably related to pembrolizumab) included diarrhoea (n=15 [29%]), increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (n=9 [17%]) or aspartate aminotransferase concentration (n=7 [13%]), hypothyroidism (n=7 [13%]), and fatigue (n=6 [12%]). 28 (54%) patients had treatment-related serious adverse events. At data cutoff, 38 (73%; 95% CI 59·0–84·4) patients achieved an objective response (complete or partial response). Interpretation The treatment combination of axitinib plus pembrolizumab is tolerable and shows promising antitumour activity in patients with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma. Whether or not the combination works better than a sequence of VEGF pathway inhibition followed by an anti-PD-1 therapy awaits the completion of a phase 3 trial comparing axitinib plus pembrolizumab with sunitinib monotherapy (NCT02853331). Funding Pfizer Inc.

Purpose Cabozantinib is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, MET, and AXL and is a standard second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This randomized phase II multicenter trial evaluated cabozantinib compared with sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had untreated clear cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and were intermediate or poor risk per International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cabozantinib (60 mg once per day) or sunitinib (50 mg once per day; 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety were secondary end points. Results From July 2013 to April 2015, 157 patients were randomly assigned (cabozantinib, n = 79; sunitinib, n = 78). Compared with sunitinib, cabozantinib treatment significantly increased median PFS (8.2 v 5.6 months) and was associated with a 34% reduction in rate of progression or death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95; one-sided P = .012). ORR was 33% (95% CI, 23% to 44%) for cabozantinib versus 12% (95% CI, 5.4% to 21%) for sunitinib. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 67% for cabozantinib and 68% for sunitinib and included diarrhea (cabozantinib, 10% v sunitinib, 11%), fatigue (6% v 15%), hypertension (28% v 22%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (8% v 4%), and hematologic adverse events (3% v 22%). Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in PFS and ORR over standard-of-care sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC.

Purpose: mAbs including cetuximab can induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and cytokine production mediated via innate immune cells with the ability to recognize mAb-coated tumors. Preclinical modeling has shown that costimulation of natural killer (NK) cells via the Fc receptor and the IL12 receptor promotes NK-cell–mediated ADCC and production of cytokines. Patients and Methods: This phase I/II trial evaluated the combination of cetuximab with IL12 for the treatment of EGFR-expressing head and neck cancer. Treatment consisted of cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. every 2 weeks with either 0.2 mcg/kg or 0.3 mcg/kg IL12 s.c. on days 2 and 5 of the 2-week cycle, beginning with cycle 2. Correlative studies from blood draws obtained prior to treatment and during therapy included measurement of ADCC, serum cytokine, and chemokine analysis, determination of NK cell FcγRIIIa polymorphisms, and an analysis of myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) frequency in peripheral blood. Results: The combination of cetuximab and IL12 was well tolerated. No clinical responses were observed, however, 48% of patients exhibited prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; average of 6.5 months). Compared with patients that did not exhibit clinical benefit, patients with PFS >100 days exhibited increased ADCC as therapy continued compared with baseline, greater production of IFNγ, IP-10, and TNFα at the beginning of cycle 8 compared with baseline values and had a predominance of monocytic MDSCs versus granulocytic MDSCs prior to therapy. Conclusions: Further investigation of IL12 as an immunomodulatory agent in combination with cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is warranted.

Approximately 7% of deceased donors have unknown cancer at the time of organ procurement. More than half of these have no apparent contraindication to organ donation. The commonest transmitted malignancy is renal cell cancer (19%), followed by melanoma (17%). Donor transmission of melanoma has been fatal in most cases as it is commonly metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Till date, there have been only a few cases with remission of melanoma following transplant nephrectomy and withdrawal of immunosuppression. To our knowledge, the evidence presented here is only the second case of donor-derived melanoma that was successfully treated with Ipilimumab. Our patient has the longest disease-free survival (five years) reported in the literature to date.

Summary Background Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Treatment options after checkpoint inhibitor therapy include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF-R) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, although no prospective data regarding their use in this setting exist. Axitinib is a VEGF-R inhibitor with clinical data supporting increased activity with dose titration. We aimed to investigate the activity of dose titrated axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were previously treated with checkpoint inhibitor. Methods We did a multicentre, phase 2 trial of axitinib given on an individualised dosing algorithm. Patients at least 18 years of age with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histology, a Karnofsky Performance Status of 70% or more, and measurable disease who received checkpoint inhibitor therapy as the most recent treatment were eligible. There was no limit on number of previous therapies received. Patients received oral axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily with dose titration every 14 days in 1 mg increments (ie, 5 mg twice daily to 6 mg twice daily, up to 10 mg twice daily maximum dose) if there was no axitinib-related grade 2 or higher mucositis, diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome, or fatigue. If one or more of these grade 2 adverse events occurred, axitinib was withheld for 3 days before the same dose was resumed. Dose reductions were made if recurrent grade 2 adverse events despite treatment breaks or grade 3–4 adverse events occurred. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Analyses were done per protocol in all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib. Recruitment has been completed and the trial is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClincalTrials.gov , number NCT02579811 . Findings Between Jan 5, 2016 and Feb 21, 2018, 40 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. With a median follow-up of 8·7 months (IQR 3·7–14·2), the median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 5·7–16·6). Fatigue (83%) and hypertension (75%) were the most common all-grade adverse events. The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (24 patients [60%]). There was one (3%) grade 4 adverse event (elevated lipase) and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Serious adverse events that were likely related to therapy occurred in eight (20%) patients; the most common were dehydration (n=4) and diarrhoea (n=2). Interpretation Individualised axitinib dosing in patients with metastatic renal cell inoma previously treated with checkpoint inhibitors did not meet the prespecified threshold for progression free survival, but these data show that this individualised titration scheme is feasible and has robust clinical activity. These prospective results warrant consideration of axitinib in this setting. Funding Pfizer.

PURPOSE Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer often caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus. Clinical trials of programmed cell death-1 pathway inhibitors for advanced MCC (aMCC) demonstrate increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with historical chemotherapy data. However, response durability and overall survival (OS) data are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter phase II trial (Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network-09/Keynote-017), 50 adults naïve to systemic therapy for aMCC received pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for up to 2 years. Radiographic responses were assessed centrally per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. RESULTS Among 50 patients, the median age was 70.5 years, and 64% had Merkel cell polyomavirus–positive tumors. The objective response rate (ORR) to pembrolizumab was 56% (complete response [24%] plus partial response [32%]; 95% CI, 41.3% to 70.0%), with ORRs of 59% in virus-positive and 53% in virus-negative tumors. Median follow-up time was 14.9 months (range, 0.4 to 36.4+ months). Among 28 responders, median response duration was not reached (range, 5.9 to 34.5+ months). The 24-month PFS rate was 48.3%, and median PFS time was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.6 months to not estimable). The 24-month OS rate was 68.7%, and median OS time was not reached. Although tumor viral status did not correlate with ORR, PFS, or OS, there was a trend toward improved PFS and OS in patients with programmed death ligand-1–positive tumors. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (28%) of 50 patients and led to treatment discontinuation in seven (14%) of 50 patients, including one treatment-related death. CONCLUSION Here, we present the longest observation to date of patients with aMCC receiving first-line anti–programmed cell death-1 therapy. Pembrolizumab demonstrated durable tumor control, a generally manageable safety profile, and favorable OS compared with historical data from patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.

BackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer associated with poor survival. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors have shown high rates of durable tumor regression compared with chemotherapy for MCC. The current study was undertaken to assess baseline and on-treatment factors associated with MCC regression and 3-year survival, and to explore the effects of salvage therapies in patients experiencing initial non-response or tumor progression after response or stable disease following first-line pembrolizumab therapy on Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network-09/KEYNOTE-017.MethodsIn this multicenter phase II trial, 50 patients with advanced unresectable MCC received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Patients were followed for a median of 31.8 months.ResultsOverall response rate to pembrolizumab was 58% (complete response 30%+partial response 28%; 95% CI 43.2 to 71.8). Among 29 responders, the median response duration was not reached (NR) at 3 years (range 1.0+ to 51.8+ months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 4.6 to 43.4) and the 3-year PFS was 39.1%. Median OS was NR; the 3-year OS was 59.4% for all patients and 89.5% for responders. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, greater per cent tumor reduction, completion of 2 years of treatment and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with response and longer survival. Among patients with initial disease progression or those who developed progression after response or stable disease, some had extended survival with subsequent treatments including chemotherapies and immunotherapies.ConclusionsThis study represents the longest available follow-up from any first-line anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapy in MCC, confirming durable PFS and OS in a proportion of patients. After initial tumor progression or relapse following response, some patients receiving salvage therapies survived. Improving the management of anti-PD-(L)1-refractory MCC remains a challenge and a high priority.Trial registration numberNCT02267603.

Prime-boost vaccination with recombinant (r) vaccinia(V)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM (triad of co-stimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3) and rFowlpox(F)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM infect antigen-presenting cells and direct expression of co-stimulatory molecules. We hypothesized that co-administration of vaccine with GM-CSF and interferon alpha (IFN-α) would have efficacy in CEA-expressing cancers. Patients with CEA-expressing cancers received the rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM vaccine subcutaneously (s.c.) on day 1 followed by GM-CSF s.c. to the injection site on days 1-4. In Cycle 1, patients received thrice weekly s.c. injections of IFN-α-2b the week after rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM. In Cycles 2-4, patients received thrice weekly s.c. injections of IFN-α-2b the same week that rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM was given. The first cohort received no IFN followed by dose escalation of IFN-α in subsequent cohorts. Thirty-three patients were accrued (mean 59.8 years). Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue and hyperglycemia. Grade 4-5 adverse events (unrelated to treatment) were confusion (1), elevated aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) (1), and sudden death (1). No patients had a partial response, and eight patients exhibited stable disease of ≥3 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 1.8 and 6.3 months, respectively. Significantly higher serum CD27 levels were observed after vaccine therapy (p = 0.006 post 1-2 cycles, p = 0.003 post 3 cycles, p = 0.03 post 4-7 cycles) and 42 % of patients assayed developed CEA-specific T cell responses. Pre-treatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlated with overall survival (p = 0.04). Administration of IFN-α led to significantly increased OS (p = 0.02) compared to vaccine alone. While the vaccine regimen produced no clinical responses, IFN-α administration was associated with improved survival.

Background Patients with metastatic or locally aggressive cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) have historically had limited and noneffective treatment options. The mainstay treatment has been surgery, which can be disfiguring and may not be technically feasible for larger lesions. Patients and Methods A retrospective review of 18 patients treated with nivolumab (n = 17) or pembrolizumab (n = 1) anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors for metastatic or locally advanced cSCC from March 2015 to present was performed. Results Three patients had metastatic disease, 5 patients had locally aggressive plus regional nodal disease, 8 patients had locally advanced disease, and 2 had multifocal skin disease. Seventeen patients had undergone at least 1 surgery, 12 also had received radiotherapy, 8 had disease that had failed to respond to other systemic treatments, and 2 had chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Of 18 patients treated, 14 had dramatic responses with improvement in clinical symptoms and impressive tumor reduction with equally impressive duration. Objectively, 4 patients had complete response, 10 had partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 patient had progression of disease. Three patients died, 1 from an ischemic cerebrovascular incident possibly related to treatment, 1 likely not related to neither treatment nor disease, and 1 due to disease progression. Therapy was otherwise well tolerated, and 10 patients currently continue to receive the therapy. Thirteen patients continue to have stable or no new disease at a median time of 12 months since the start of treatment. Conclusion PD-1 blocking agents may provide clinically meaningful and palliative therapy for patients with aggressive cSCC who are not surgical candidates.

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the recent updates/changes in these guidelines, and updates include axitinib as first-line treatment option for patients with clear cell renal carcinoma, new data to support pazopanib as subsequent therapy for patients with clear cell carcinoma after first-line treatment with another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and guidelines for follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Purpose Cabozantinib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and AXL, increased progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–targeted therapy in the phase III METEOR trial. Because bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity in patients with RCC, bone-related outcomes were analyzed in METEOR. Patients and Methods Six hundred fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 60 mg cabozantinib or 10 mg everolimus. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS, OS, and ORR were conducted in patients grouped by baseline bone metastases status per independent radiology committee (IRC). Additional end points included bone scan response per IRC, skeletal-related events, and changes in bone biomarkers. Results For patients with bone metastases at baseline (cabozantinib [n = 77]; everolimus [n = 65]), median PFS was 7.4 months for cabozantinib versus 2.7 months for everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.51]). Median OS was also longer with cabozantinib (20.1 months v 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.84]), and ORR per IRC was higher (17% v 0%). The rate of skeletal-related events was 23% with cabozantinib and 29% with everolimus, and bone scan response per IRC was 20% versus 10%, respectively. PFS, OS, and ORR were also improved with cabozantinib in patients without bone metastases. Changes in bone biomarkers were greater with cabozantinib than with everolimus. The overall safety profiles of cabozantinib and everolimus in patients with bone metastases were consistent with those observed in patients without bone metastases. Conclusion Cabozantinib treatment was associated with improved PFS, OS, and ORR when compared with everolimus treatment in patients with advanced RCC and bone metastases and represents a good treatment option for these patients.

Background The randomised phase 2 CABOSUN trial comparing cabozantinib with sunitinib as initial therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk met the primary end-point of improving progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by investigator. We report PFS by independent radiology review committee (IRC) assessment, ORR per IRC and updated overall survival (OS). Patients and methods Previously untreated patients with advanced RCC of intermediate or poor risk by IMDC criteria were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib 60 mg daily or sunitinib 50 mg daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Stratification was by risk group and presence of bone metastases. Results A total of 157 patients were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib (n = 79) or sunitinib (n = 78). Median PFS per IRC was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8–14.0) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.0–8.2) for cabozantinib versus sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.31–0.74]; two-sided p = 0.0008), and ORR per IRC was 20% (95% CI 12.0–30.8) versus 9% (95% CI 3.7–17.6), respectively. Subgroup analyses of PFS by stratification factors and MET tumour expression were consistent with results for the overall population. With a median follow-up of 34.5 months, median OS was 26.6 months (95% CI 14.6–not estimable) with cabozantinib and 21.2 months (95% CI 16.3–27.4) with sunitinib (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.53–1.21]. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 68% for cabozantinib and 65% for sunitinib. Conclusions In this phase 2 trial, cabozantinib treatment significantly prolonged PFS per IRC compared with sunitinib as initial systemic therapy for advanced RCC of poor or intermediate risk. Trial Registration Number NCT01835158 .

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the most common first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) remains the only agent that provides durable complete responses. The optimal sequence of these agents remains uncertain. This retrospective multi-institutional study examined the safety and efficacy of HD-IL2 following TKI therapy. After IRB approval at 7 HD-IL2 centers, data relating to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics among 40 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with HD-IL2 after at least 1 prior TKI therapy were retrospectively collected. The most common cardiac adverse events were grade 3 hypotension and vascular leak syndrome. Six patients (15%) experienced other grade ≥3 cardiac adverse events. There were 2 treatment-related deaths due to congestive heart failure, occurring in 1 patient with short TKI to HD-IL2 interval and another patient with an abnormal baseline cardiac stress test. Best responses included 2 CRs (5%, duration 40+ and 62+ mo), 3 PRs (8%, duration 6, 11, and 24 mo), 13 SD (32%, median duration 12 mo), 20 PD (50%), and 2 not evaluable patients. Median overall survival was 22 months. Administration of HD-IL2 could be safe and effective after TKI therapy; however, careful selection of patients is critical. We recommend baseline cardiac risk factor assessment, screening with both cardiac stress test and echocardiogram, and allowing a TKI to HD-IL2 interval of at least 2 months.

Unlike in other types of cancer, in metastatic nonmelanoma, there are few dedicated oncologists to care for patients with unresectable skin cancers and little reliable clinical evidence to craft a therapeutic strategy. In his presentation at the NCCN 19th Annual Conference, Dr. Thomas Olencki offered a glimpse of some of the therapeutic regimens tried in the past for these rare skin cancers and briefly reviewed some of the more promising agents for advanced squamous cell, basal cell, and Merkel cell carcinomas, although the current evidence base is limited.

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) followed by sorafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Biomarkers relevant to the antitumor effects of IL-2 that may be altered by sorafenib including the percentages of natural T-regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) in T cells were evaluated. We hypothesized that the proposed treatment schedule is feasible and safe and may lead to enhanced tumor response. A phase I dose escalation trial was conducted in patients with either metastatic RCC or MM. HD IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg IV q8h × 8-12 doses) was administered on days 1-5 and 15-19, followed by sorafenib on days 29-82. The sorafenib dose was escalated. The percentage of Tregs, MDSC, and pSTAT5 in T cells were evaluated in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Twelve of the 18 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The treatment-related toxicity was predictable and did not seem to be additive with this schedule of administration. Partial responses were seen in 3 patients. No significant changes in the percentage of circulating Treg and MDSC were observed, whereas sorafenib did not adversely affect the ability of IL-2 to induce pSTAT5 in T cells. HD IL-2 followed by sorafenib was safe and feasible in patients with MM and RCC and did not adversely affect T-cell signaling through STAT5 in response to IL-2.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight treatment recommendations and updates specific to the management of patients with advanced non-clear cell carcinoma included in the 2014 version of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Kidney Cancer.

O1 Combinatorial CD8+ and PD-L1+ cell densities correlate with response and improved survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with durvalumab #### Sonja Althammer1, Keith Steele2, Marlon Rebelatto2, Tze Heng Tan1, Tobias Wiestler1, Guenter Schmidt1, Brandon Higgs2, Xia

Immunotherapy has produced durable clinical benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). In the past, patients treated with interferon-alpha (IFN) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have achieved complete responses, many of which have lasted for multiple decades. More recently, a large number of new agents have been approved for RCC, several of which attack tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and VEGF receptors (VEGFR), as well as tumor metabolism, inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Additionally, a new class of immunotherapy agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, is emerging and will play a significant role in the treatment of patients with RCC. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a Task Force, which met to consider the current role of approved immunotherapy agents in RCC, to provide guidance to practicing clinicians by developing consensus recommendations and to set the stage for future immunotherapeutic developments in RCC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-016-0180-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin is the most common cancer, with a higher incidence than all other malignancies combined. Although it is rare to metastasize, patients with multiple or frequently recurring BCC can suffer substantial comorbidity and be difficult to manage. Assessment of risk is a key element of management needed to inform treatment selection. The overall management of BCC primarily consists of surgical approaches, with radiation therapy as an alternate or adjuvant option. Many superficial therapies for BCC have been explored and continue to be developed, including topicals, cryosurgery, and photodynamic therapy. Two hedgehog pathway inhibitors were recently approved by the FDA for systemic treatment of advanced and metastatic BCC, and others are in development. The NCCN Guidelines for Basal Cell Skin Cancer, published in full herein, include recommendations for selecting among the various surgical approaches based on patient-, lesion-, and disease-specific factors, as well as guidance on when to use radiation therapy, superficial therapies, and hedgehog pathway inhibitors.

Bevacizumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor, an agent with proangiogenic effects in melanoma. Interferon alpha (IFN-α) has antiangiogenic properties through its ability to downregulate basic-fibroblast growth factor levels. We hypothesized that the coadministration of these agents would lead to tumor regression. Patients with metastatic melanoma received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of the 2-week cycle. IFN-α was administered thrice weekly at 5 MU/m subcutaneously during cycle 1 and was increased to 10 MU/m during cycle 2. Patients were restaged every 6 cycles. Patients with stable disease or a response continued with therapy. Baseline serum vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor were measured. Twenty-five patients were accrued. Mean age was 58.4 years. Eleven patients required IFN-α dose reductions due to toxicity. Common grade 3 toxicities associated with IFN-α included fatigue and myalgia. Bevacizumab administration was associated with grade 2-3 proteinuria in 6 patients. Grade 4 adverse events were pulmonary embolus (1), myocardial infarction (1), and stroke (1). Six patients had a partial response, and 5 patients exhibited stable disease that lasted more than 24 weeks (range: 30 to 122 wk). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 and 17 months, respectively. Significantly lower fibroblast growth factor levels were observed in patients with a partial response compared to those with stable or progressive disease (P=0.040). Administration of bevacizumab with IFN led to a clinical response in 24% of patients with stage IV melanoma and stabilization of disease in another 20% of patients. This regimen has activity in advanced melanoma.

Interferon (IFN)-β in preclinical studies, compared to IFN-α2, bound with higher affinity to its receptor, induced to higher levels of IFN-stimulated gene products, induced more apoptosis in melanoma cells, and had antitumor effects against melanoma. A maximally tolerated dose of 12 × 10(6) international units/m(2) after 2 weeks subcutaneously daily with dose escalation to 18 × 10(6) international units/m(2) was thus used in a phase II trial of IFN-β1a in cutaneous metastatic melanoma (n = 17) and uveal melanoma (n = 4). It resulted in expected but reversible drug-related severe (grade 3) adverse events in 13/21 patients; anorexia and fatigue were mostly of mild or moderate severity and infrequently needed dose reduction. Although a single patient had a sustained regression, overall IFN-β1a did not have clinical benefit (response rate10%; median progression-free survival 1.8 months). Effective and potent induction in peripheral blood cells and into serum of products of IFN-stimulated genes such as the pro-apoptotic cytokine, TRAIL, and the immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic chemokines, CXCL10 and CCL8, confirmed gene regulatory actions. To probe further anti-angiogenic mechanisms, both VEGF-A and CXCL-5 were assessed; compared to before treatment, both proteins decreased. Continued improvements in understanding of antitumor mechanisms will enhance usefulness of IFNs for nodal or distant metastases from melanoma.

Brain metastases from radioresistant histologies are perceived to be less responsive to WBRT compared to other histologies, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may provide better local control. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of patients with 1-4 brain metastasis from radioresistant histologies (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma) treated with SRS alone. Thirty-eight patients with 1-4 radioresistant brain metastases (66 lesions) were treated with SRS alone. The median age was 55 years. Fourteen and 24 patients had renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma brain metastases, respectively. Distribution of number of lesions was as follows: one lesion, 22 patients; 2 lesions, 8 patients; 3 lesions, 5 patients; and 4 lesions, 3 patients. Distribution of RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes was as follows: II, 37 patients and III, 1 patient. The median marginal dose was 20 Gy. The median follow-up was 6.1 months. The 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 18-month local control (LC) rates were 87.9, 81.4, 67.9, 67.9, and 60.3%, respectively. The corresponding free-from-distant-brain failure (FFDBF) rates were 71.3, 58.1, 49.8, 40.2, and 27.6%. The corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 55.3, 41.9, 33, 23.3, and 13.3%. RCC histology was associated with better LC (P = 0.0055). Although SRS alone could yield reasonable LC in patients with 1-4 radioresistant brain metastases, the risk of distant brain failure was substantial. The approach of routine omission of WBRT outside of a trial setting should be used judiciously.

4517Background: Standard of care treatment in mRCC after checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy includes VEGFR TKIs, though no prospective data have been published. Axitinib (Axi) is a VEGF-R inhibitor...

4573Background: Aldesleukin (recombinant human interleukin-2, IL-2) has been an FDA-approved treatment for mRCC since 1992 with a 5-10% rate of durable complete response. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) i...

e14017Background: In this Phase I study, we evaluated the ability of the DNA alkylating agent, bendamustine (BD), to serve as a radiosensitizer in patients receiving stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)...

582 Background: The randomized phase 2 CABOSUN trial (NCT01835158) compared cabozantinib (C) with sunitinib (S) as initial systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RCC of intermediate or poor risk. Compared with S, C improved both PFS and ORR as assessed by independent radiology review committee (IRC). Median PFS per IRC was 8.6 mo for C vs 5.3 mo for S (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74 two-sided p = 0.0008), and ORR per IRC was 20% vs 9%. Methods: 157 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive C (60 mg qd) or S (50 mg qd, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off) stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group and the presence of bone metastases. Subgroup analyses of PFS per IRC and ORR per IRC are presented based on stratification factors, age, sex, baseline ECOG status, and MET tumor expression by immunohistochemistry. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. PFS and ORR were evaluated by IRC in a post-hoc analysis. Results: 45% of pts were ≥65 years, 78% were male, 54% were ECOG 1 or 2, 19% were poor risk, and 36% had bone metastases. MET status was determined in 131 pts; of these 47% were MET positive. The HR for PFS per IRC favored C over S across all subgroups analyzed (Table). Subgroups with poor prognostic characteristics (poor risk, ECOG 1 or 2, presence of bone metastases) had shorter median PFS for both C and S. Odds ratios for ORR also favored C over S, with the highest C ORR in the MET positive subgroup (34% C vs 10% S). Conclusions: C was associated with improved PFS and ORR compared with S in previously untreated pts with advanced RCC irrespective of baseline characteristics. Clinical trial information: NCT01835158. [Table: see text]

Preclinical studies had determined that tamoxifen and interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) synergistically inhibited growth of both estrogen-receptor positive and negative murine tumor xenografts and had combined antiangiogenic effects and that tamoxifen potentiated IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. A phase I trial in 26 patients was conducted using the combination to define tolerance and potentiation of ISG expression. IFN- alpha2b at a dose of 3 x 10(6) units/m(2) daily was given subcutaneously (s.c.), and tamoxifen was initiated as a loading dose of 150 mg/m(2) and then 60 mg/m(2) twice daily on day 8. At this initial dose, reduction of dose of IFN- alpha2b was required in 4 of 11 patients, primarily because of fatigue. Another group of patients was treated with an identical tamoxifen dose but with IFN-alpha2b reduced to 2 x 10(6)/m(2) U; this was better tolerated. As the projected serum tamoxifen level to reduplicate preclinical effects was 300 mg/m(2), dose escalation in a third cohort was undertaken; it had to be discontinued secondary to grade III or IV toxicity in 2 of 2 patients. Increases in products of transcriptionally regulated ISGs, beta (2)-microglobulin, neopterin, and ISG15 were assessed. All ISGs increased after IFN-alpha2b, but only ISG15 had a further significant rise after initiation of tamoxifen. Because at doses not limited by unacceptable toxicities, no marked potentiation of ISGs by tamoxifen could be identified, clinical evaluation of the combination was terminated.

Background A pilot study was conducted to investigate the toxicity and tolerance to low-dose subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL-2) for patients with resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk for recurrent disease (TNM stages III and IV resected distant metastases). Patients and Methods Patients with surgically resected locally advanced (T3-4 or N1-2) or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups that received different dose levels and schedules of subcutaneous IL-2 as follows: dose level 1, 4 MIU/m 2 per day, every other week for 24 weeks (n = 10); dose level 2, 8 MIU/m 2 per day, every other week for 24 weeks (n = 9); dose level 3, 4 MIU/m 2 per day, weeks 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 (n = 11); and dose level 4, 8 MIU/m 2 per day, weeks 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 (n = 10). Interleukin-2 was administered in 2 daily doses on days 1-5 of each week indicated. A dose level was considered tolerable if no more than 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. Results Forty-one patients were entered in the study and 40 were evaluable for toxicity. Therapy was well tolerated at all dose levels and schedules, with most patients (98%) experiencing mild-to-moderate constitutional symptoms. Grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 8 patients (20%). Interleukin-2 dose reductions were required in 7 patients, and no patient discontinued therapy secondary to toxicity. Of 39 patients evaluable for efficacy, 31 have experienced relapse (79%), and 15 have died (38%). Median survival was 1.4 years, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 33%. Median overall survival has not been reached; however, the 3-year survival rate was 70%. There was no statistically significant difference between any of the treatment arms with respect to disease-free survival or 3-year survival ( P > 0.54 and P ≥ 0.09 for all pairwise comparisons), schedules (dose level 1/2 vs. 3/4; P = 0.46 and P = 0.5), or dose of IL-2 administered (dose level 1/3 vs. 2/4; P = 0.99 and P = 0.1). Conclusion Subcutaneous IL-2 was well tolerated for 6 months in patients with surgically resected RCC at high risk of recurrence. Future adjuvant trials in this setting are not likely to include IL-2 in view of the clinical efficacy and favorable toxicity profiles of selected multitargeted kinase inhibitors.

Summary Background: The treatment of advanced renal cell cancer remains unsatisfactory, therefore new combination regimens such as thalidomide and IL-2 are of interest. A phase I trial of SC IL-2 and oral thalidomide was performed to identify the toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary clinical activity of this regimen. Methods: 33 patients with advanced/metastatic RCC were enrolled. An established 8-week outpatient schedule of subcutaneously administered IL-2 in escalating doses, days 1–5, for 6 weeks with a 2 week rest was utilized with daily oral thalidomide. Cohorts of 4–6 patients were treated at 4 dose levels. Results: Toxicity was moderate to severe and related to dose level. All patients developed fever, chills and fatigue. 29/33 patients developed ≤ Grade 2 desquamation of hands and feet and/or rash. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) included Grade 3 neutropenia and pulmonary embolus. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IL-2 and thalidomide was 9.0 MIU/m 2 SC days 1–5, weeks 1 to 6 and 100 mg po daily, respectively. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered (range 1–9). 2/33 patients responded (1 CR—prior IL-2 therapy, 1 PR—no prior therapy) with an overall response of 6% (95% CI, 1–20%). One minimal response was converted to a surgical CR (remains disease free at 24 + months). Conclusion: Outpatient administration of IL-2 and thalidomide is possible with acceptable toxicity. Further evaluation of this regimen is underway.

BACKGROUND A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. METHODS Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 400 mg/m2; Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2; and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m2and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. RESULTS Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27–77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0–1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3–4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III). CONCLUSIONS Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:170–8. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10991

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically changed the prognosis for patients with metastatic melanoma. However, not all patients respond to therapy and toxicities can be severe leaving need for reliable clinical predictive markers. Methods: We examined primary tumor characteristics including ulceration, BRAF mutation status, and Breslow depth in patients who subsequently developed stage IV disease and were treated with ipilimumab at 3 institutions. Patients in this study were not treated on clinical trials. To investigate the relationship between patient characteristics at the time of diagnosis and survival following melanoma diagnosis we utilized Cox proportional hazards models, accounting for delayed entry into the study cohort. Cox models estimate the age and institution adjusted hazard ratios for risk of death. Results: Of patients (n= 385) treated with ipilimumab for stage IV melanoma, 302 met inclusion criteria. The complete response to ipilimumab was 5%, partial response was 13%, 18% had stable disease, 62% had progressive disease, and 5 unknown. The median overall survival rate was 2.03 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13, 3.05]. Primary tumor Breslow depth, lymphovascular invasion, BRAF status, and ulceration did not predict sensitivity to ipilimumab. In this study patient cohort, BRAF mutation (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.98, 2.07) and presence of ulceration (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.26) contributed to an increased risk of death. Conclusions: The presence of ulceration did not correlate with sensitivity to ipilimumab. Ulceration of the primary tumor and a BRAF mutation were moderately associated with worse survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab.

440 Background: Aldesleukin (recombinant human interleukin-2) has been an FDA-approved treatment for mRCC since 1992, based on a 5-10% rate of durable complete remissions. Autophagy is a protective mechanism that enables cells to survive the metabolic stress of cancer therapy. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibits cellular autophagy and has shown synergy with interleukin-2 in animal tumor models. We hypothesized that this combination would be tolerable and active in patients with mRCC. Methods: The Cytokine Working Group initiated a study of high-dose aldesleukin in combination with oral HCQ for patients with mRCC. Subjects receive up to 6 cycles of aldeskleukin, 600,000 International Units per kg, on a standard schedule. HCQ is administered orally starting 2 weeks prior to the first dose of aldesleukin and continuing up to one year. The initial HCQ dose was 600 mg daily, with a planned dose escalation to 1200 mg daily after safety was demonstrated in five subjects. Subjects were monitored for safety and tolerability as well as response per RECIST 1.1. Results: Five subjects were treated at the first dose level of 600 mg daily HCQ plus aldesleukin with no unexpected toxicity. Thirteen subjects were then treated at HCQ 1200 mg daily with aldesleukin. Of these, two experienced hypotension and tachycardia and 1 patient died from pulmonary emboli. The cardiac events were consistent with aldesleukin toxicity, but were observed earlier in the course of treatment than anticipated for aldesleukin alone. HCQ dose was therefore de-escalated to 600 mg daily, and 8 additional subjects have been enrolled with no unexpected toxicity. In 26 of 39 planned subjects, there has been 1 complete response (CR) and 1 partial response (near CR), both in the 600 mg cohort. As of Oct 24, 2016, after a median of 36.6 months of follow-up, seven out of 26 subject have died, with median overall survival not yet obtained (95% C.I. = (29.6 months,unknown)). Conclusions: HCQ in combination with aldesleukin was found to be tolerable at a dose of 600 mg daily, with expected toxicities. Clinical responses have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01550367.

Purpose: The present study was designed to determine the toxicity and maximum tolerated doses of oral intermittent oral capecitabine and subcutaneous (s.c.) rHuIFNα2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites were also investigated. Methods: A total of 27 patients were treated at four dose levels of capecitabine (825 or 1000 mg/m2 twice daily orally, days 1–14, 22–36) and rHuIFNα2a (1.5 or 3.0 MU/m2 s.c. three times weekly). Unchanged capecitabine and its metabolites were analyzed in plasma using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in ten patients. Results: The toxicity of combined capecitabine and rHuIFNα2a was moderate. Patients experienced mild nausea/vomiting (70%) and diarrhea (63%). The hand-foot syndrome was seen in 67% of patients and was generally mild, as was hematologic toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity included diarrhea, mucositis, neutropenia and the hand-foot syndrome. The dose level recommended for further trials included capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and rHuIFNα2a 3.0 MU/m2 three times weekly. One patient had a partial response of a liver lesion (duration >200 days). Pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine and its metabolites (5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, 5-fluorouracil and α-fluoro-β-alanine) were similar to those reported by other authors. There was rapid conversion to 5′-deoxyuridine. The peak plasma concentrations of capecitabine occurred between 0.5 and 3.0 h. Conclusions: The combination of capecitabine and rHuIFNα2a was well tolerated. The recommended dose levels for phase II trials are: rHuIFNα2a 3.0 MU/m2 s.c. three times weekly and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks. No evidence of an effect of rHuIFNα2a on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine or its metabolites was apparent. A phase II trial in untreated patients with metastatic RCC is planned.

Background: In advanced cancers, transforming growth factor-beta (TGFb) promotes tumor growth and metastases and suppresses host antitumor immunity. GC1008 is a human anti-TGFb monoclonal antibody that neutralizes all isoforms of TGFb. Here, the safety and activity of GC1008 was evaluated in patients with advanced malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Methods: In this multi-center phase I trial, cohorts of patients with previously treated malignant melanoma or renal cell carcinoma received intravenous GC1008 at 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, or 15 mg/kg on days 0, 28, 42, and 56. Patients achieving at least stable disease were eligible to receive Extended Treatment consisting of 4 doses of GC1008 every 2 weeks for up to 2 additional courses. Pharmacokinetic and exploratory biomarker assessments were performed. Results: Twenty-nine patients, 28 with malignant melanoma and 1 with renal cell carcinoma, were enrolled and treated, 22 in the dose-escalation part and 7 in a safety cohort expansion. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum dose, 15 mg/kg, was determined to be safe. The development of reversible cutaneous keratoacanthomas/squamous-cell carcinomas (4 patients) and hyperkeratosis was the major adverse event observed. One malignant melanoma patient achieved a partial response, and six had stable disease with a median progression-free survival of 24 weeks for these 7 patients (range, 16.4–44.4 weeks). Conclusions: GC1008 had no dose-limiting toxicity up to 15 mg/kg. In patients with advanced malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, multiple doses of GC1008 demonstrated acceptable safety and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, warranting further studies of single agent and combination treatments. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00356460

The possibility that cytokine administration could enhance the antitumor effects of proteasome inhibition was explored. It was found that coadministration of bortezomib and interferon-α (IFN-α) induced synergistic apoptosis in human melanoma cell lines and prolonged survival in a murine model of melanoma. A phase I study was conducted to determine the tolerability and the maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib when administered in combination with IFN-α-2b to patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were treated on a 5-week cycle. In week 1 of cycle 1, patients received 5 million U/m(2) IFN-α subcutaneously thrice weekly. During weeks 2-4 of cycle 1, bortezomib was administered intravenously weekly along with IFN-α thrice weekly. There was a treatment break during week 5. After cycle 1, bortezomib was administered in combination with IFN-α. Bortezomib was administered in escalating doses (1.0, 1.3, or 1.6 mg/m) to cohorts of 3 patients. Sixteen patients were treated (8 women, 8 men; median age 59 y). Common grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (5), vomiting (3), and diarrhea (3). Grade 4 toxicities included fatigue (3) and lymphopenia (1). The maximum tolerated dose for bortezomib was 1.3 mg/m(2). One patient had a partial response, and 7 had stable disease. Progression-free survival was 2.5 months, and overall survival was 10.3 months. Bortezomib administration did not augment the ability of IFN-α to induce phosphorylation of STAT1 in circulating immune cells; however, it did lead to reduced plasma levels of proangiogenic cytokines. The combination of bortezomib and IFN-α can be safely administered to melanoma patients.

A phase II trial was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, to assess the clinical efficacy and immunoregulatory effects of continuous-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) (9.0 x 10(6) IU/m2/day on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26) and subcutaneously administered recombinant human interferon-alpha 2b (rHuIFN alpha 2b) (10.0 x 10(6) U/m2/day TIW). Thirty-six patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, performance status of 0-1, and measurable disease who had not received prior rIL-2, rHuIFN alpha 2b, or chemotherapy were treated. Patients with CNS metastases, active infections, history of another malignancy within 3 years, and those requiring corticosteroids were ineligible. Cycles of rIL-2 and rHuIFN alpha 2b were administered in the outpatient department every 6-8 weeks in stable or responding patients until patient tolerance or a complete response were reached. Doses were modified for grade III or IV toxicity. Ancillary studies included three-color immunocytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes, repetitive tumor biopsies for immunohistologic analysis of infiltrating cells and proliferative responses of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and preliminary studies of changes in peripheral blood T-lymphocyte signal transduction molecules [T-cell receptor (TCR)-zeta, p56ick, p59fyn]. Thirty-six eligible patients were treated, with 6 of 36 patients (17%, 95% confidence interval 6-33%) responding (3 complete response, 3 partial response). In two of the partial responders, and in an additional three patients with either minimal tumor regression (one patient) or stable disease (two patients), surgical removal of residual disease was undertaken. The median survival of all patients was 14 months. The toxicity of this regimen was severe, but outpatient administration was possible in most instances. Immunoregulatory effects on T-cell subsets included increases in various CD3+ CD25+/- HLADr+/- subsets unrelated to response. Tumor biopsies before and/or during therapy were obtained in 17 patients, and no consistent alterations in the degree of T-lymphocyte or macrophage infiltrates could be detected. In a subset of patients, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte proliferative responses and levels of peripheral blood T-cell signal transduction molecules (TCR-zeta, p56lck, p59fyn) were investigated. Abnormalities were found in selected patients, which improved during rIL-2/rHuIFN alpha 2b therapy. This cytokine combination produces tumor regression in selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Surrogate immunologic markers associated with response were not identified; however, preliminary studies demonstrate investigation of immune defects and their reversal with cytokine therapy is possible.

BACKGROUND Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that is involved in the differentiation and proliferation of various hematopoietic precursors. It also has been reported to enhance the antitumor activity of various mature effector cells. Previous reports have noted preclinical antitumor activity in a murine model utilizing genetically engineered tumor cells and instances of tumor regression in patients with solid tumors receiving GM-CSF. In the present study, a Phase II trial of human recombinant GM-CSF (GM-CSFrh) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted to investigate further the potential antitumor activity of this cytokine. METHODS Twenty-six eligible patients with metastatic RCC received 3 μg/kg of GM-CSFrh subcutaneously for 14 days, with cycles repeated every 28 days. RESULTS Two of 26 patients (8%; 95% confidence interval 1–25%) demonstrated partial tumor responses during GM-CSFrh therapy. Both individuals who responded had received prior therapy. A median of three cycles per patient were administered, and toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS GM-CSFrh may mediate tumor regression in patients with metastatic RCC; however, the level of activity in previously treated patients is low. Cancer 1996;77:1149-53.