1. Transit time flow measurement of coronary bypass grafts before and after protamine administration
- Author
-
Gabriele Di Giammarco, Stuart J. Head, Dror B. Leviner, John D. Puskas, Carlo Maria Rosati, Miriam von Mücke Similon, Andrea Amabile, Daniel Wendt, Daniel J F M Thuijs, Gregory D. Trachiotis, Teresa M. Kieser, A. Pieter Kappetein, David P. Taggart, and Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,RD1-811 ,Medizin ,Coronary artery bypass grafting ,Bypass grafts ,Transit time ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology ,Internal medicine ,Coronary Circulation ,Medicine ,Humans ,RD78.3-87.3 ,Protamines ,Registries ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Vascular Patency ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,biology ,business.industry ,Heparin Antagonists ,Quality control ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Protamine ,Cardiac surgery ,Clinical trial ,Intraoperative graft flow measurement ,030228 respiratory system ,Bypass surgery ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,biology.protein ,Ultrasound imaging ,Cardiology ,Surgery ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Blood Flow Velocity ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Intraoperative graft assessment with tools like Transit Time Flow Measurement (TTFM) is imperative for quality control in coronary surgery. We investigated the variation of TTFM parameters before and after protamine administration to identify new benchmark parameters for graft quality assessment. Methods The database of the REQUEST (“REgistry for QUality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery”) study was retrospectively reviewed. A per graft analysis was performed. Only single grafts (i.e., no sequential nor composite grafts) where both pre- and post-protamine TTFM values were recorded with an acoustical coupling index > 30% were included. Grafts with incomplete data and mixed grafts (arterio-venous) were excluded. A second analysis was performed including single grafts only in the same MAP range pre- and post- protamine administration. Results After adjusting for MAP, we found a small increase in MGF (29 mL/min to 30 mL/min, p = 0.009) and decrease in PI (2.3 to 2.2, p Conclusion The small changes in TTFM parameters observed before and after protamine administration seem to be clinically irrelevant, despite being statistically significant in aggregate. Our data do not support a need to perform TTFM measurements both before and after protamine administration. A single TTFM measurement taken either before or after protamine may suffice to achieve reliable data on each graft’s performance. Depending on the specific clinical situation and intraoperative changes, more measurements may be informative. Trial registration Clinical Trials Number: NCT02385344, registered February 17th, 2015.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF