Search

In this phase I, dose-escalation study, we sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase/c-ROS oncogene 1 receptor (ALK/ROS1) inhibitor ceritinib in combination with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were characterization of the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of these combinations, and identification of potential biomarkers of efficacy. Ceritinib was combined with gemcitabine (Arm 1), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Arm 2) or gemcitabine/cisplatin (Arm 3). Drug concentrations in plasma were measured by tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS). We analyzed archival tumor tissue for ALK, ROS1, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) expression by immunohistochemistry. Arm 2 closed early secondary to toxicity. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). There was one DLT in Arm 1 (grade 3 ALT increase) and three DLTs in Arm 3 (grade 3 acute renal failure, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 dyspnea). The MTD of ceritinib was determined to be 600 mg (Arm 1) and 450 mg orally daily (Arm 3). Main toxicities were hematologic, constitutional and gastrointestinal as expected by the chemotherapy backbone. The apparent clearance for ceritinib decreased substantially after repeated dosing; cisplatin did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of ceritinib. The overall response rate was 20%; the median progression-free survival was 4.8 months. Three out of five response-evaluable cholangiocarcinoma patients had clinical benefit. Increased expression of c-MET was associated with a lack of clinical benefit. Ceritinib in combination with gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin has a manageable toxicity profile. Further development of this strategy in tumors with ALK or ROS1 fusions is warranted.

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

Lessons Learned Androgen receptor as assessed by immunohistochemistry is expressed in a high proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Enzalutamide at 160 mg orally daily is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC but has no single-agent antitumor activity. Enzalutamide, a CYP3A4 inducer, at a standard dose of 160 mg reduces the exposure of sorafenib, a CYP3A4 substrate. Enzalutamide and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC, but the addition of enzalutamide to sorafenib did not enhance the antitumor activity of sorafenib. Background Androgen receptor (AR) interference is deleterious to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in preclinical models. Methods This is a multicenter, phase Ib study of enzalutamide ± sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. In part 1, a 3 + 3 dose de-escalation design with expansion established the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of enzalutamide in patients in whom sorafenib treatment had failed. In part 2, a 3 + 3 dose escalation with expansion established the safety of enzalutamide with sorafenib in treatment-naive patients with HCC. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), and determination of AR expression by immunohistochemistry. A 7-day run-in with sorafenib alone in part 2 allowed assessment of the impact of enzalutamide on sorafenib pharmacokinetics. Results In part 1, 16 patients received enzalutamide 160 mg daily. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred; 1 patient required dose reduction. Responses were not observed; median PFS and OS were 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–3.6) and 7 (95% CI: 3.6 to not reached [NR]) months, respectively. In part 2, patients received sorafenib 400 mg daily (4) or twice a day (8) both with enzalutamide at the recommended phase II dose—no DLTs were observed. ORR was 10% (95% CI: 0.3–44.5), and median PFS and OS were 2.9 (95% CI: 1.6 to NR) and 6.7 (95% CI: 4.6 to NR) months, respectively. Enzalutamide reduced sorafenib exposure by 60%. Tumor AR expression did not associate with outcome. Conclusion Enzalutamide is ineffective in HCC; further development is not supported by this study.

Background Woodchucks (Marmota monax) are a well-accepted animal model for the investigation of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As HCC tumors obtain nutrient blood supply exclusively from the hepatic artery, hepatic artery infusion (HAI) has been applied to HCC. However, there is a scarcity of experimental animal models to standardize drug regimens and examine novel agents. The purpose of this study was to establish an HAI model in woodchucks. Materials and methods HAI ports were placed in the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) of 11 woodchucks. The ports were infused with either a vehicle (dextrose 5% in water) or an experimental drug, CBL0137, once a week for 3 wk. Technical success rates, anatomical variation, morbidity and mortality, and tumor responses between groups were analyzed. Results The GDA access was feasible and reproducible in all woodchucks (11/11). The average operation time was 95 ± 20 min with no increase in the levels of liver enzymes detected from either infusate. The most common morbidity of CBL0137 therapy was anorexia after surgery. One woodchuck died due to hemorrhage at the gallbladder removal site from hepatic coagulopathy. Significantly higher CBL0137 concentrations were measured in the liver compared with blood after each HAI. Tumor growth was suppressed after multiple CBL0137 HAI treatments which corresponded to greater T cell infiltration and increased tumor cell apoptosis. Conclusions HAI via GDA was a feasible and reproducible approach with low morbidity and mortality in woodchucks. The described techniques serve as a reliable platform for the identification and characterization of therapeutics for HCC.

Background Antiangiogenic-targeting agents have low response rates in patients with nonpancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Nintedanib is an oral antiangiogenic agent that has inhibitory effects on the fibroblast growth factor receptor, which is highly expressed in NETs. The authors hypothesized that nintedanib would be active in patients with nonpancreatic NETs. Methods Patients with advanced, grade 1 or 2, nonpancreatic NETs who were receiving a stable dose of somatostatin analogue were enrolled. Nintedanib was administered at a dose of 200 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Results Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and 30 were evaluable for the primary outcome. Most had radiographic disease progression within 12 months before enrollment. The 16-week PFS rate was 83%, and the median PFS and overall survival were 11.0 months and 32.7 months, respectively. Nintedanib was well tolerated and delayed deterioration in quality of life. The baseline serotonin level had a strong, positive correlation with activated but exhausted T cells. Conclusions Nintedanib is active in nonpancreatic NETs. The immunosuppressive effect of serotonin should be targeted in future clinical trials.

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related death. It is a highly vascular tumour with multiple angiogenic factors, most importantly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), involved in HCC progression. Tivozanib is an oral inhibitor of VEGFR-1/2/3 with promising activity against HCC in vivo.MethodsWe conducted a phase 1b/2 study of tivozanib in patients with advanced HCC. The safety, dosing, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antineoplastic efficacy of tivozanib were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received at least one dose of tivozanib. Using a 3+3 design, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of tivozanib was determined to be 1 mg per os once daily, 21 days on–7 days off. The median progression-free and overall survival were 24 weeks and 9 months, respectively, for patients treated at RP2D. The overall response rate was 21%. Treatment was well tolerated. A significant decrease in soluble plasma VEGFR-2 was noted, assuring adequate target engagement.ConclusionsAlthough this study did not proceed to stage 2, there was an early efficacy signal with a very favourable toxicity profile. A phase 1/2 trial of tivozanib in combination with durvalumab is currently underway.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01835223, registered on 15 April 2013.

Purpose: We evaluated the antitumor efficacy of cetuximab in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with RAS wild-type (RASwt), metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC). Patients and Methods: In this phase Ib/II study, cetuximab was combined with pembrolizumab in patients with RASwt mCRC with ≥ one prior line of therapy for advanced disease. We analyzed baseline on-treatment tumor tissues for changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), using flow cytometry and multispectral immunofluorescence. Results: Forty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. The study was negative for the primary efficacy endpoint [overall response rate: 2.6%, 6-month progression-free survival (PFS): 31%; P = 0.52]. Median PFS was 4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9–5.5 months]. No increase in adverse effects was identified. We observed favorable immunomodulation with 47% increase in the number of intratumoral CTLs posttreatment (P = 0.035). These changes were more pronounced in patients with tumor shrinkage (P = 0.05). The TME was characterized by high numbers of TIM3+ and CTLA4+ cells; there were few activated OX40+ cells. PD-L1 expression was higher in pretreatment tumor cells from metastatic sites versus primary tumor samples (P < 0.05). Higher numbers of PD-L1+ tumor cells at baseline were associated with tumor shrinkage (P = 0.04). Analysis of immune populations in the blood demonstrated decreases in PD-1+ memory effector cells (P = 0.04) and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.03), with simultaneous increases in CD4+/CTLA4+ cells (P = 0.01). Conclusions: The combination of cetuximab and pembrolizumab is inactive in patients with RASwt mCRC, despite its partial local immunologic efficacy. Further development of immuno-oncology combinations with enhanced efficacy and/or targeting additional or alternative immune checkpoints merits investigation.

Background/aim Typical carcinoids (TC) and atypical carcinoids (AC) are rare diseases. A paucity of randomized studies and disagreements among various guidelines makes the management challenging. Patients and methods Using codes for TC (8240) and AC (8249) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), all surgically resected cases from 2004-2014 were included to evaluate the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. Results A total of 6,673 cases were included, 88% were TCs and 12% were ACs. From 2004 to 2014, the proportion of TCs went up from 1.3% to 1.8% and ACs from 0.1% to 0.3% of all lung malignancies. TC patients did well with surgery alone in all stages. AC patients with stage I [5-year overall survival (OS) - 84% vs. 52%; S vs. S+CT] and stage II disease (5-year OS - 81% vs. 55%; S vs. S+CT) showed better OS trend with surgery alone, while stage III patients showed some benefit with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (5-year OS - 46% vs. 54%; S vs. S+CT). These results supported the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Conclusion No benefit was seen from adjuvant chemotherapy in TCs. While the adjuvant therapy may add benefit in stage III AC, the numbers are small and did not reach statistical significance.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare pancreatic exocrine malignancy. Compared with the more common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), PACC is more common in younger White men, has earlier stages and a lower mean age (56 vs 70 years) at the time of presentation, and has a better prognosis. In addition to differences in demographic, histologic, and clinical characteristics, PACC has a genomic profile distinct from PDAC, with only rare mutations in TP53, KRAS, and p16 that are commonly found in PDAC. This case report presents a man aged 81 years who presented with a pancreatic body mass with peripancreatic lymph node enlargement. Biopsy of the mass showed acinar cell carcinoma. The patient underwent upfront surgical resection, followed by one cycle of adjuvant gemcitabine, with stoppage of therapy due to poor tolerance. Lower-dose gemcitabine was reintroduced after disease progression 6 months later. Nab-paclitaxel was added to gemcitabine after 6 cycles because of a continued increase in the size of peripancreatic lymph nodes. Combination chemotherapy was stopped after 4 cycles because of further disease progression with new liver metastasis. Molecular testing showed the presence of an SEL1L-NTRK1 fusion. Targeted therapy was started with the oral neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) inhibitor larotrectinib at a dosage of 100 mg twice daily. At the time of writing, the patient has been on therapy for 13 months with an exceptional radiographic response and has not experienced any grade 3 adverse effects. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of an NTRK gene fusion in a patient with PACC. This case study highlights the significance of tumor molecular profiling in patients with pancreatic tumors, especially rare histologies.

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer worldwide and carries a poor prognosis. Historically, sorafenib was the only available systemic treatment for advanced HCC. However, in recent years, 6 new treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): regorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, and nivolumab. Data are lacking regarding the most appropriate sequencing pathway for these agents. Our objective was to conduct a comprehensive cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of different 1st- and 2nd-line treatment pathways for HCC reflecting all new drug approvals, and then use our data to provide guidance for clinicians on which pathway is the most cost-effective. Materials and Methods: Markov models were used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 8 different 1st- and 2nd-line treatment sequences. The model allowed for 9 possible states. Cost effectiveness ratios (CER) and incremental CER (ICER) were calculated to compare costs between different pathways and against a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Efficacy and toxicity data were extracted from the landmark trials for each agent. All agents except ramucirumab were included. The cost of each agent was based on the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) in USD as of June 2019. Monte-Carlo methods were used to simulate the experience of 1,000,000 patients per treatment sequence for a 12-month period. Results: The pathway with the lowest CER was sorafenib, followed by pembrolizumab (USD 227,741.03/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]). ICER analysis supported implementing 2nd-line pembrolizumab-based pathways at a higher WTP threshold of 300,000/quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analysis did not substantially change these results. Conclusions: The most cost-effective strategy was 1st-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy followed by 2nd-line immunotherapy. All pathways exceeded a commonly accepted WTP of USD 100–150,000/QALY. Our preliminary results warrant further studies to best inform real-world practices.

Objectives Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression, seen in 42% to 76% of biliary tract cancers (BTCs), correlates with poor survival. We explored the safety/efficacy and potential biomarkers for bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine-capecitabine in advanced BTCs. Patients and methods Inoperable stage III/IV BTC patients in our prospective study were given 1000 mg/m of gemcitabine (on days 1, 8), 650 mg/m of capecitabine (on days 1 to 14), and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab (on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Circulating tumor cells and quality of life were assessed at baseline and before cycle 2 and 3. Results In total, 50 patients with gallbladder cancer (22%), intrahepatic (58%), and extrahepatic (20%) cholangiocarcinoma, received a median of 8 treatment cycles for median treatment duration of 5.8 months. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (20%), infections (14%), and hand-foot syndrome (10%). There were 12 partial response (24%), 24 stable disease (48%) with clinical benefit rate of 72%. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.3-9.9). Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5-13.7). Circulating tumor cells were identified at baseline in 21/46 patients (46%), who had lower median overall survival compared with those without (9.4 vs. 13.7 mo; P=0.29). Patients with quality of life scores greater than the group median by the end of first cycle of treatment had improved survival compared with those who did not (13.3 vs. 9.4 mo; P=0.39). Conclusions Addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine/capecitabine did not improve outcome in an unselected group of patients with advanced BTC compared with historical controls. The selective benefit of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition in BTC remains to be explored.

Background: Gemcitabine with capecitabine (gem-cap) is an established regimen for advanced biliary cancer (ABC) supported by our previously reported phase II trial. Here, we provide our updated experience. Methods: Single institution, retrospective study from 2005 to 2015 of ABC treated with gem-cap. Results: A total of 372 patients with ABC were identified, of whom 227 (61.0%) were treated with chemotherapy. 153 patients (67.4%) received gem-cap, of which 129 (56.8%) received it in the first line. Thirty two point six percent (42/129) were locally advanced, 67.4% (87/129) had metastatic disease, and 18.6% (24/129) received it as adjuvant therapy. Disease sites included 48.8% [63] intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), 24.0% [31] extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and 27.1% [35] gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Median follow-up was 49.7 months (mo). The median PFS and OS were 8.0 mo [95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.0–9.3] and 13.0 mo (95% CI: 10.7–17.4), respectively. Overall, 53.5% (69/129) experienced a grade 3/4 toxicity. The most common (35.7%) was a hematologic toxicity (neutropenia or thrombocytopenia) followed by infection (25.6%). Conclusions: Gem-cap provides similar survival outcomes to gemcitabine/cisplatin based on historical comparison to the ABC-2 trial (median PFS =8.0 mo and OS =11.7 mo). Gem-cap may offer the advantage of fewer adverse events compared to the levels reported in ABC-2 (grade 3/4 events 70.7%).

Clinical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies heavily on radiological imaging. However, information pertaining to liver cancer treatment such as the proliferation status is lacking. Imaging tumor proliferation can be valuable in patient management. This study investigated 18F-labeled clofarabine ([18F]CFA) targeting deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) for PET imaging of dCK-dependent proliferation in HCC. Since clinical PET scans showed a high liver background uptake of [18F]CFA, the aim of this study was to reduce this liver background uptake. A clinically relevant animal model of spontaneously developed HCC in the woodchucks was used for imaging experiments. Several modifiers were tested and compared with the baseline PET scan: Forodesine, probenecid, and cold clofarabine, all applied before the hot [18F]CFA injection to evaluate the reduction in liver background uptake. Application of forodesine before hot [18F]CFA injection did not reduce the background uptake. Instead, it increased the background by 11.6&ndash, 36.3%. Application of probenecid also increased the liver background uptake by 16.6&ndash, 32.1%. Cold CFA application did reduce the liver background uptake of [18F]CFA, comparing to the baseline scan. Combining cold CFA with [18F]CFA for PET imaging of liver cancers is a promising strategy, worthy of further clinical evaluation.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of pralatrexate plus oxaliplatin in advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC), analyze the impact of polymorphisms in folate metabolism pathway genes on toxicity and efficacy of pralatrexate, and to evaluate microRNA profile of tumor epithelium as a predictive biomarker. This was a two-stage trial with a safety lead in cohort and a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR). Patients received biweekly intravenous oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and pralatrexate (Dose level 1 [D1], 120 mg/m2; dose level-1 [D-1] 100 mg/m2). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in genes encoding proteins involved in pralatrexate metabolism were evaluated in germline DNA. microRNA profiling of the tumor epithelium was performed. ORR was 26%. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 4 patients at D1 and none at D-1. The T>C polymorphism in DHFR rs11951910 was significantly associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS; P ≤ 0.01), whereas the presence of the SLC19A1 rs2838957 G>A polymorphism was associated with improved PFS (P = 0.02). Presence of the GGH rs3780130 A>T and SLC19A1 rs1051266 G>A polymorphisms were significantly associated with better overall survival (OS; P = 0.01), whereas GGH rs7010484 T>C polymorphism was associated significantly with reduced OS (P = 0.04). There was no correlation between epithelial microRNA expression profile with disease progression or response. We conclude that the combination of oxaliplatin and pralatrexate is safe, is well tolerated, and has modest efficacy in advanced EGC. Pharmacogenomic analysis may be relevant to the use of pralatrexate in combination with platinum agents.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the fastest growing causes of cancer-related death. Guidelines recommend obtaining a screening ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) every 6 months in at-risk adults. AFP as a screening biomarker is plagued by low sensitivity/specificity, prompting interest in discovering alternatives. Mass spectrometry-based techniques are promising in their ability to identify potential biomarkers. This study aimed to use machine learning utilizing spectral data and AFP to create a model for early detection. Serum samples were collected from three separate cohorts, and data were compiled to make Development, Internal Validation, and Independent Validation sets. AFP levels were measured, and Deep MALDI® analysis was used to generate mass spectra. Spectral data were input into the VeriStrat® classification algorithm. Machine learning techniques then classified each sample as “Cancer” or “No Cancer”. Sensitivity and specificity of the test were &gt, 80% to detect HCC. High specificity of the test was independent of cause and severity of underlying disease. When compared to AFP, there was improved cancer detection for all tumor sizes, especially small lesions. Overall, a machine learning algorithm incorporating mass spectral data and AFP values from serum samples offers a novel approach to diagnose HCC. Given the small sample size of the Independent Validation set, a further independent, prospective study is warranted.

124 Background: Microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer and CRCLM are highly resistant to current immunotherapeutic approaches. Understanding the TME and the impact of standard chemotherapeutics is of utmost importance in developing optimal therapeutic strategies. Data is limited on the impact of NACT in the TME. In this study, we sought to explore the effects of chemotherapy on the proportions of different immune cell populations [Total leukohematopoetic cells, CD45+, T cell markers, CD3+, CD8+, and macrophage (M) markers, CD163+, CD68+)], as well as to assess their prognostic capacity. Methods: CRCLM pts who underwent liver resection were divided in 2 groups: pts who had NACT within 4 months of liver resection [NACT (+)] and no NACT [NACT (-)]. Whole slide staining of metastatectomy specimen for CD3, CD8, CD68, CD163, and CD45 was done. Cellular density within representative tumor core sections was analyzed. Retrospective chart review was done to obtain clinical data. Disease free (DFS), relapse free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan Meir methods. Association between markers and outcomes was evaluated using Cox Regression Models. Results: A total of 43 pts were studied [NACT (+), n= 14; NACT (-), n=29). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including age, primary site, T stage, N stage, and grade. Median OS was 48 months. Outcomes were not significantly different with use of NACT. Within the NACT (+) CRCLM significant increases were seen in densities of CD3, CD8, CD45 and CD163 cells. Densities of CD8 cells were strongly correlated to CD163 cell densities ([r] 0.77, p < .0001). The NACT (+) cohort saw significantly increased ratios of T-cells/macrophages as compared to NACT (-) (CD3/CD68, CD3/CD163, CD8/CD163). High CD45 density was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.28, p = 0.006). CD3, CD8, CD68, and CD163 were not independently associated with OS. However, both the ratio of CD3/CD68 and CD3/163 were associated with improved OS (HR 0.44, p=0.03 and HR 0.27, p=0.03 respectively). Conversely, CD68/45 and CD163/CD45 ratios were associated with a worse OS (HR 1.42, p=0.05 and HR 1.43, p=0.03 respectively). No difference was seen in cellular populations based on the type of NACT received: oxaliplatin vs irinotecan. Conclusions: Our study highlights that the administration of NACT is associated with favorable changes in LM TME. While there is a general increase in leukocytes (CD45), the density of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells is particularly increased. Further, this increase is proportionately greater than the concurrent increases on monocytoid populations, reflected by increased CD3/CD163 and CD8/CD163 ratios. Ratios of T-cells/ macrophages are predictive of survival. This study was partly supported by the American Cancer Society Grant, 126771-IRG-14-194-11-IRG.

Introduction: Cer is an oral ALK/ROS1 inhibitor. Aberrancies in ALK and ROS1 have been observed in many cancer types and ALK inhibition has synergistic effects with chemotherapy in ALK or ROS1 rearranged tumors in preclinical models. We launched a Phase I study of Cer in combination with Gem-based chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors. Herein we present initial results of this study. Methods: Phase I, dose-escalation study of Cer in combination with A1: Gem 1000 mg IV D1/8/15 q28 days; A2: Gem 1000 mg IV + nanoparticle albumin-bound Paclitaxel 125 mg IV both D1/8/15 q28 days; A3: Gem 1000 mg IV + Cisplatin 60 mg IV D1/8 q21 days in pts with advanced, solid malignancies until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used starting at Cer 450 mg once daily (DL1) in all arms; DL2 was 600 mg once daily. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Cer. Key inclusion criteria: diagnosis of advanced solid malignancy for which Gem-based treatment was appropriate, >18 years old, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate bone marrow/renal/liver function. Key exclusion criteria: interstitial lung fibrosis/disease, recent acute coronary event, CHF NYHA III/IV, corrected QTc > 450 ms. Pts in A3 could have up to 2 prior lines of therapy. Prior use of ALK inhibitors allowed. Plasma was collected for PK on C1D1, C2D1, and C1D15. Archival tumor tissue was tested for ALK/ROS1/JNK/MET by IHC. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled with 21 evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in A1 and A3. A2 (n=4) closed to accrual for toxicity. Median age was 61 years. Seven pts (41%) had cholangiocarcinoma. A1 had one DLT (G3 ALT increase) in DL2; MTD was 600 mg. A3 had one DLT in DL1 (G3 acute renal failure) and two DLTs in DL2 (G3 thrombocytopenia and G3 dyspnea); MTD was 450 mg. G3-5 AEs in all pts: anemia (A1: 3/19, A3: 2/15), nausea (A1: 1/19, A3: 2/15), emesis (A1: 1/19, A3: 1/15), neutropenia (A1: 2/19, A3: 8/15), thrombocytopenia (A1: 1/19, A3: 4/15), hyperbilirubinemia (A3: 3/15), pneumonia (A1: 2/19), acute renal failure (A3: 1/15), fatigue (A3: 2/15). Fifteen patients were evaluable for response; the overall response rate was 20% with two PR (pt with head and neck carcinoma in A1 and pt with carcinoma of unknown primary in A3) - and one CR in a pt with cholangiocarcinoma (A3) lasting 10.3 months. Overall, disease control rate was 47%. Of 5 evaluable pts with cholangiocarcinoma 3 had clinical benefit. Median PFS 3.4 mo (A1)/4.8 mo (A3) and OS 13.7 mo (A1)/29.1 mo (A3). PK and IHC data will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: The MTD of Cer is 600 mg in combination with Gem and 450 mg in combination with Gem/Cisplatin. Further evaluation of Cer plus Gem-based chemotherapy is planned in ALK/ROS1 positive cholangiocarcinomas. Citation Format: Christos Fountzilas, Alex Adjei, Mateusz Opyrchal, Rachel Evans, Kristopher Attwood, Andrew Goey, John Wilton, Wen Wee Ma, Renuka Iyer. Ceritinib (Cer) in combination with gemcitabine (Gem)-based chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, a phase I study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT139.

...

e16599 Background: VEGFR TKIs and checkpoint inhibitors are current standards of care in HCC as single agents, however treatment options are limited, and significant unmet need remains. A recent ph3 study combining bevacizumab (VEGF-A Mab) with a PDL1 inhibitor have shown promising improvements in OS demonstrating that a combination of VEGF and PDL1 inhibition can improve patient outcomes over single agent treatment. Tivozanib (T, a potent and selective VEGFR 1, 2 & 3 TKI) and durvlaumab (D, a PD-L1 antibody) have both demonstrated single agent activity in HCC and have been combined safely with other therapies to enhance patient outcomes in other tumor types. It is hypothesized that more complete inhibition of the VEGF pathway by tivozanib compared to bevacizumab combined with PDL1 inhibition may further enhance patient outcomes. The ph1 portion of this study combines T with D to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and provide preliminary safety and efficacy data. Methods: Major eligibility criteria are adults with documented advanced HCC, Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG 0 or 1, creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min. Major exclusion criteria are co-infection with HBV and either HDV or HCV and significant organ dysfunction. Six patients with untreated advanced HCC will be treated with the combination of T 1 mg orally for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment and D 1500 mg intravenously every 28 days. A DLT is generally defined as the occurrence of any Grade ≥3 immune or non-immune AE in Cycle 1 that is at least possibly related to the investigational regimen other than any grade of vitiligo or alopecia or Grade 3 controllable hypertension. If two or more patients have a DLT then the dose of tivozanib will be reduced to 1 mg every other day without interruption for the second cohort. In the Phase 2 portion of the study an additional 30 patients will be treated at the RP2D. The primary objective is to establish the RP2D and the safety and tolerability for this combination in patients with advanced HCC. Secondary objectives are to assess the objective response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival in this population. Patients will be treated until progression of disease, unacceptable side effects, or death. Outcome measures will be adverse events per CTCAE v.5 and cross-sectional imaging performed every 8 weeks. Results: Phase 1 safety and efficacy findings for this novel combination will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Phase 1 safety and efficacy findings for this novel combination will be reported at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03970616 .

TPS275 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in US. The majority of US patients (pts) receive first-line therapy (Rx) with FOLFOX [Folinic acid (FA), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (Ox)] + a biologic, making FOLFIRI [FA+ 5-FU+ irinotecan (Iri)] + bevacizumab (Bev) a common second-line Rx. This regimen has a median progression-free survival (PFS) of approximately 6 months (mo) and overall survival (OS) of 12 mo. Further gains are desperately needed. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral combination Rx of a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue, FTD, and a phosphorylase inhibitor, TPI. FTD/TPI has a distinct mechanism of action from 5-FU and in preclinical models can overcome 5-FU resistance via DNA incorporation, base excision repair pathway and glycosylation responses to DNA damage. Further, there is an additive effect in combination with Iri. FTD/TPI was FDA approved for use in refractory metastatic CRC (mCRC) based on phase III RECOURSE trial. Phase I data showed combination of FTD/TPI, Iri and Bev to be safe, and an efficacy signal was seen in dose-expansion cohort (NCT01916447). A 12.5% response rate, 83.4 % disease control rate and PFS of 7.9 mo was achieved. As this study largely assessed refractory pts, one might expect a greater efficacy in Iri naïve pts. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a multi-center phase II study of FTD/TPI, Iri and Bev as second-line Rx in mCRC pts. Methods: Eligible pts have mCRC and received first-line Ox based Rx. Rx to be given in 28-day cycles: Iri (180 mg/m2) and Bev (5 mg/kg) on D1 & 15, and FTD/TPI (25 mg/m2) twice daily on D2-6 & 16-20. Response assessment via CT/MRI to be done q8 wks (RECIST 1.1). Rx to continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to estimate PFS. Secondary objectives include ORR, OS, and safety. Final analysis to be done either 12 mo after enrollment of the final pt or once all pts have progression, whichever occurs earlier. A total of 40 pts to be accrued, and enrollment to start in January 2020. This study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Taiho Oncology, Inc.

TPS636 Background: The incidence of GEP HG-NEC is increasing and the prognosis is poor. Etoposide–platinum (EP) combination is considered the standard (std) therapy (Rx), but survival is less than 1 year. There is an unmet need for an optimal 2nd line Rx in these patients (pts). Nal-IRI has shown efficacy in small cell lung cancer (pathologically similar to HG-NEC) and in 2nd line pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In a retrospective study, HG-NEC pts with progression on 1st line EP when treated with 2nd line FOLFIRI (FA+5-FU+ IRI) had a good response and a tolerable safety profile (Hentic et al, 2012). Based on this data and the fact that no std 2nd line Rx option exists in HG-NEC, we are evaluating the efficacy of nal-IRI+ 5-FU/FA in a prospective single-arm multicenter study. Methods: Advanced GEP or unknown origin HG-NEC pts with progressive disease/intolerance to 1st line Rx with EP or temozolomide/capecitabine; ECOG PS 0-2 would receive nal-IRI 70 mg/m2, FA 400 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 on D1 & 15 of 28-days cycle. Rx to continue till disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessment by CT/MRI per RECIST 1.1 q6 wks. Primary end point is to measure ORR (CR+PR). Secondary endpoints include PFS, TTP, OS, safety and QOL changes. Assuming a historic ORR of 15% with std Rx, 37 pts (upto 41 pts considering non-evaluable pts) are required to show an ORR of 30% at a power of 80% at 1-sided significance of α = 0.1. In stage 1, n1= 18 pts will be enrolled. If 3 or more responses are seen, an additional n2= 19 pts to be enrolled. If 8 or more responses are observed of the n = 37 evaluable pts, the Rx would be considered promising for further study. Genomic mutational profiling to be conducted on pre-study tumor samples and correlated with circulating tumor DNA (CT DNA). CT DNA level, assessed serially, will be correlated with Rx response and disease recurrence. We plan to accrue over 3 years at 3 sites. As of August 2019, 1-patient has been enrolled. The trial is funded by Ipsen Pharmaceuticals and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society through the Clinical Investigator Scholarship. Clinical trial information: NCT03736720.

TPS596 Background: SOR has been the backbone of advanced HCC therapy with poor outcome. Anti-PD-1 therapy is approved as a second-line treatment option in HCC due to its promising efficacy and safety. Our preclinical work showed that SOR is immunomodulatory and may be synergistic when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Guided by this data, we initiated this multicenter study of SOR and PEM in advanced HCC patients (pts). Methods: Pts who have Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG PS of 0/1, biopsy-proven measurable HCC that is unresectable or metastatic, are included. Pts must not receive either SOR or anti-PD-1 therapy before. A total of 27 pts will be enrolled from 2 sites. Pts must have the following lab values: ANC ≥ 1,500/ mc; Hgb ≥ 8.5 g/dL; Plts ≥75,000/ mcL; serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; AST/ALT ≤ 5 X ULN; serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 X ULN. Pts with active hep B must be on antiviral therapy. Pts would be on a 4-week run-in of SOR alone at 400mg BID to ensure tolerability and stable dose (minimum 200 BID) before beginning PEM 200mg IV q3 weeks. Both drugs would be administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity with response assessment q6 weeks by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Primary endpoint: response rate. Secondary endpoints: safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Correlative Endpoints: Pre-treatment levels of immunosuppressive cells and the functional activity of effector T cells would be compared to post-treatment blood and tumor samples. The first 6 pts who completed 4 weeks of SOR-only treatment and began the combination therapy (addition of PEM at a fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W) would comprise the safety lead-in. Pts who withdrew before initiation of combination therapy (for reasons other than DLT) would be replaced. Dose-Limiting toxicity was defined as any ≥ grade 3 clinically significant toxicity, which is deemed possibly treatment-related and occurs within the first cycle of combination therapy. Toxicity would be assessed by NCI CTCAEV4.0. Status: First patient enrollment on 12/19/2017. On 11/28/2018, our 6th patient completed the SOR lead-in phase and began combination treatment with SOR and PEM. As of Sept 12, 2019, thirteen pts have enrolled, and 9 pts have received combination treatment. Support: Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT03211416.

TPS464 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery is a standard approach for localized EGAC. Despite multimodality treatment, 5-year overall survival (OS) is less than 50%, with pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of 20%. Achievement of pCR is associated with an improved OS. We propose to use a novel combination of FTD/TPI and oxaliplatin as IC. We hypothesize that IC before CRT will increase the pCR rate in localized EGAC. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Patients (pts) with potentially resectable loco-regional EGAC are eligible. Pts. should have adequate organ function, ECOG performance status of 0 –1, age < 76 years, and endoscopic ultrasound-determined node-positive disease with any T-stage, or T3-T4a with any N stage. Pts. with T4b or M1 disease will be excluded. Pts. will receive three cycles of IC with FTD/TPI and oxaliplatin. Based on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) observed in a phase I trial, FTD/TPI will be administered 35 mg/m² BID, days 1–5 every 14 days, with a fixed dose of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² (day 1). Pts will then undergo concurrent CRT (standard radiation dose of 5040 cGY will be utilized) with weekly Carboplatin (AUC 2) and Paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) for 6 weeks followed by surgery. Our primary objective is to evaluate the pCR rate. The secondary objectives include evaluation of 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), 2-year OS, and assessment of toxicities of the IC. As a correlative endpoint, circulating tumor DNA level will be correlated with disease recurrence and metabolic response on PET CT. Assuming a historic pCR rate of 20% with standard CRT, 41 pts (enrollment of up to 45 pts accounting for non-evaluable pts) are needed to show a 15% increase in pCR with IC with 80% power at one-sided significance level of α = 0.1. In stage 1, n1= 22 evaluable pts will be enrolled. If there is 5 or more pCRs, an additional n2= 19 pts will be enrolled in stage 2. If 12 or more pCRs are observed in the total n = 41 evaluable pts, then the proposed treatment regimen will be considered promising for further study. We anticipate accrual over a 2-year period from 3 sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04097028.

Background There is limited literature about the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of rare histologic variants of gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods Using SEER database, surgically managed GBC patients with microscopically confirmed adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous/squamous cell carcinoma and papillary carcinoma were identified from 1988 to 2009. Patients with second primary cancer and distant metastasis at presentation were excluded. The effect of clinicopathological variables on overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards modeling. All associations were considered statistically significant at an alpha error of 0.01. Results Out of 4738 cases, 217 adenosquamous/squamous (4.6%), 367 papillary (7.7%), and 4154 adenocarcinomas (87.7%) were identified. Median age was 72 years. Higher tumor grade (grade 2, 3, 4 versus grade 1), higher T stage (T2, T3, T4 versus T1), lymph node positivity (N1 versus N0) and adenosquamous/squamous histology (versus adenocarcinoma) had worse OS and DSS (p < .001). Papillary GBC had better OS and DSS than adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.7; p < .001). Radical surgery (versus simple cholecystectomy) had better OS (HR = 0.83, p = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. OS rates at 3 and 5 years were 0.56 and 0.44 for papillary, 0.3 and 0.22 for adenocarcinoma, and 0.14 and 0.12 for adenosquamous/squamous histology, while DSS rates at 3 and 5 years were 0.67 and 0.61 for papillary, 0.38 and 0.31 for adenocarcinoma, and 0.17 and 0.16 for adenosquamous/squamous subtypes respectively. Conclusion Papillary GBC had better survival outcomes while adenosquamous/squamous GBC had worse survival outcomes compared to gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

The primary tumor side is emerging as a prognostic factor for patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a combined analysis of data from 2 randomized studies, the addition of selective internal radiation therapy to first-line chemotherapy in patients with mCRC was associated with statistically and clinically significant overall survival gains for patients with a right-sided primary tumor. Background: The primary tumor side is emerging as a major prognostic factor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the survival data from 2 randomized studies to determine whether the outcomes differ between patients with mCRC with right-sided primary (RSP) tumors and those with left-sided primary (LSP) tumors after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) plus mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid [leucovorin], 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone. Patients and Methods: Separate and combined analyses were performed on the data from the SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE global trials, which compared chemotherapy plus SIRT with chemotherapy alone for patients with mCRC liver metastases. The primary tumor side data were prospectively collected. The principal outcome measure was overall survival (OS) stratified by treatment and primary tumor side. Results: In the combined analysis of all 739 patients enrolled, SIRT had no effect on OS (median OS, 24.3 vs. 24.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.021; P = .810). For the 179 patients (24.2%) with a RSP tumor, OS was improved with the addition of SIRT (median, 22.0 vs. 17.1 months HR, 0.641; P = .008). The addition of SIRT was not associated with a significant difference in OS among the 540 patients with a LSP tumor (median, 24.6 vs. 26.6 months; HR, 1.120; P = .264). A test of treatment interaction by primary tumor side was statistically significant for RSP and SIRT (P = .002). Conclusion: The addition of SIRT for patients with RSP tumors, but not for those with LSP tumors, was associated with a statistically and clinically significant OS gain. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a grim prognosis. In 2007, gemcitabine with erlotinib emerged as an appropriate treatment option for patients with advanced inoperable or metastatic disease (APC). In this phase II trial we sought to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib monotherapy in patients with APC who had disease refractory to or ineligibility for gemcitabine-based therapy. Eligible patients who had received 0 or 1 non-EGFR inhibitor containing gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for APC were recruited prospectively and treated with erlotinib 150 mg orally daily until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Correlations of clinical response with smoking, rash, steady-state concentration of erlotinib and its metabolite (OSI-420) as well as the nicotine metabolite cotinine were performed. The trial was terminated early for futility. Eighteen of the 34 planned subjects were recruited. Median PFS and OS were 42 and 95 days, respectively. Best response was stable disease (21%). There was a trend for improved PFS and OS in never smokers compared to current and past smokers (128.5, 39, 42 days and 173, 100, 88 days, respectively). Past/current smokers had lower steady-state concentrations of erlotinib and OSI-420 compared to never smokers. There was evidence of recent smoking exposure in 30% of patients self-identified as past smokers. Rash was infrequent, with no cases of grade III/IV rash and it was not related to treatment outcomes. Overall, erlotinib monotherapy failed to improve outcomes compared to historical controls in patients with APC after 0–1 prior systemic therapies. There was a trend for improved PFS and OS in never smokers.

Hepatobiliary cancers include a spectrum of invasive carcinomas arising in the liver (hepatocellular carcinoma), gall bladder, and bile ducts (cholangiocarcinomas). Gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinomas are collectively known as biliary tract cancers. Gallbladder cancer is the most common and aggressive type of all the biliary tract cancers. Cholangiocarcinomas are diagnosed throughout the biliary tree and are typically classified as either intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are more common than intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. This manuscript focuses on the clinical management of patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinomas (intrahepatic and extrahepatic).

The NCCN Guidelines for Occult Primary tumors provide recommendations for the evaluation, workup, management, and follow-up of patients with occult primary tumors (cancers of unknown primary). These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize major discussion points of the 2014 NCCN Occult Primary panel meeting. The panel discussed gene expression profiling (GEP) for the identification of the tissue of origin and concluded that, although GEP has a diagnostic benefit, a clinical benefit has not been demonstrated. The panel recommends against GEP as standard management, although 20% of the panel believes the diagnostic benefit of GEP warrants its routine use. In addition, the panel discussed testing for actionable mutations (eg, ALK) to help guide choice of therapy, but declined to add this recommendation.

BACKGROUND Phase 3 studies of bevacizumab in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APCA) demonstrated no improvement in outcome. To the authors' knowledge, no validated predictive biomarkers for bevacizumab exist, although emerging data suggest that subsets of patients with APCA may benefit from treatment with bevacizumab. The authors evaluated baseline serum albumin (b-alb) as a predictive biomarker in a pooled analysis from 7 prospective clinical trials of gemcitabine-based therapy with or without bevacizumab. METHODS Data were collected from individual databases from 7 prospective clinical trials. Patients were grouped by exposure to bevacizumab and by b-alb level (≥ 3.4 g/L or

Background: Early detection is critical to improve outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite inadequate sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP), abdominal ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are considered methods of choice for HCC surveillance. As less than 30% of patients (pts) are diagnosed early enough for resection or transplantation, a test with improved SS and SP is needed. A test to detect HCC in a high-risk population from 10 uL serum, combining MALDI mass spectrometry and AFP data was developed using a dropout-regularized hierarchical machine learning approach designed to minimize overfitting in small development sets. It was previously validated in 293 high risk pts (158 HCC, 135 non-HCC) with SS/SP of 83%/84% in development and 81%/79% in validation across various etiologies and Child-Pugh classification [1]. Methods: The test was applied to an independent validation cohort of 156 pts (97 HCC, 59 non-HCC healthy controls), blinded to clinical data, the performance was assessed by SS, SP. Sub-group analyses were performed by grade and stage. Performance was compared with that of AFP by area under the curve (AUC), using the test output prior to the predefined thresholding which yields the final binary cancer/benign test result. Results: Table 1.HCC patient demographics in the independent validation setClinical characteristicsIndependent validationPatients with HCC (N=97)Median age (range), years62 (38 - 89)Median AFP (range), ng/mL4.0 (less than 1.5 - 10,000)Gender, male / female85% / 16%Hepatitis B / C / No virus / not available (NA)3% / 27% / 20% / 51%Grade I / II / III / NA17% / 22% / 12% / 50%Stage I / II / III / IV / NA12% / 14% / 33% / 26% / 14%Previous liver directed or systemic therapy yes/no44% / 54%ECOG PS 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / NA13% / 20% / 11% / 5% / 51% In independent validation, AUC for the test output prior to thresholding was 0.979, significantly better than AFP AUC 0.915 (P Citation Format: Sunyoung S. Lee, Kristopher Attwood, Heinrich Roder, Senait Asmellash, Krista Meyer, Stylianos Kakolyris, Carlos Oliveira, Joanna Roder, Julia Grigorieva, Leonidas Chelis, Renuka Iyer, Devalingam Mahalingam. An independent validation of a screening test using mass spectrometry for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4530.

With refinements and advances in hemodialysis techniques, survival for patients with end-stage renal disease has improved significantly. To our knowledge, however, no prospective trials have been performed in patients receiving hemodialysis who are also diagnosed with cancer and are candidates for chemotherapy. We describe a 73-year-old man who was diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, metastatic to the bone and lymph nodes, and was undergoing hemodialysis. Although cisplatin is more commonly used in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine cancers, it may not be the best option in patients who suffer from renal insufficiency. Carboplatin is a second-generation, nonnephrotoxic platinum analog that can be hemodialyzed, although no formal guidelines are available regarding the dosing for patients receiving hemodialysis. This case describes a patient who was treated with five cycles of combination carboplatin 115 mg/m(2) on day 1 and etoposide 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 3 of a 28-day cycle. Dialysis was performed for 3.5 hours starting 90 minutes after completion of carboplatin on day 1. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed at 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours after chemotherapy infusion on day 1 of cycle 1. Total carboplatin concentrations in plasma and platinum ultrafiltrate were measured. The plasma concentration of free platinum at the end of the infusion was 31,000 ng/ml, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 2.9 minute·mg/ml. No significant carboplatin-related toxicities were reported. This case report indicates that carboplatin can be safely administered in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Tissue factor (TF), the physiologic initiator of coagulation, is over-expressed in pancreatic cancer, and is associated with a pro-coagulant and pro-angiogenic state. We hypothesized that in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers (PBC), elevated circulating microparticle-associated TF (MP-TF) activity would be associated with thrombosis and worsened survival.Clinical data and plasma were obtained for consecutive patients with PBC seen at Roswell Park Cancer Institute from 2005-08. MP-TF activity levels were measured using a TF-dependent FXa generation assay.The study population comprised 117 patients, including pancreatic (n=80), biliary (n=34) or unknown primary histologically consistent with PBC (n=3). Of these, 52 patients (44.5%) experienced thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism (n=15), deep venous thrombosis (n=21) and other arterial or venous events (n=32). Mean TF was 2.15 (range 0.17- 31.01) pg/mL. Median survival was 98.5 days for MP-TF activity ≥ 2.5 pg/mL versus 231 days for MP-TF activity2.5 pg/mL (p0.0001). In multivariate analysis, elevated MP-TF activity was associated with both VTE (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) and mortality (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.5).Elevated circulating MP-TF activity is associated with thrombosis and worsened survival in patients with PBC. MP-TF activity as a prognostic biomarker warrants further prospective evaluation.

Purpose: Elderly patients with esophageal cancer who are not candidates for chemoradiation may benefit from targeted agents; hence erlotinib combined with radiotherapy was evaluated in this trial. Materials and Methods: Patients >65 years with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who were not eligible for platinum-based treatment received erlotinib daily for 1 year starting on day 1 of radiotherapy [50.4 Gy days 1-28 (Mon-Fri) at 1.8 Gy per fraction]. Response was assessed by endoscopy and computed tomography. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were complete response, progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Results: The ECOG performance status in the 17 study patients was 0,1 and 2 in 2, 12 and 3 patients, respectively; 1, 5, 7 and 4 patients were in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively; adenocarcinoma was noted in 16 patients and squamous cell carcinoma in 1; there were 3 current, 12 past and 2 never smokers. Median OS was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 3.8-22.3) with 14 deaths. There were 2 mucosal complete responses, 1 residual carcinoma in situ and 3 partial endoscopic responses in 9 patients who had endoscopy after radiotherapy. Estimated PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.4-7.3). Progression was distant (n = 3), locoregional (n = 6), unknown (n = 5) and too early (n = 3). Estimated 1-year survival was 29% (95% CI: 11-51%), 5 patients lived >12 months. Treatment-related toxicities of grade 3-4 occurred in 5 patients. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and never smokers had the longest OS (22.3 and 16.6 months, respectively). Conclusions: Erlotinib with radiotherapy is tolerable and warrants further biomarker-driven evaluation in this population.

Background Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score (Khorana score). We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized study. Methods Cancer patients with Khorana score ≥ 3 starting a new systemic regimen were screened for VTE and if negative randomized to dalteparin 5000 units daily or observation for 12 weeks. Subjects were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study and with chest CT at 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was all VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated early due to low accrual. Results Of 117 enrolled patients, 10 (8.5%) had VTE on baseline screening and were not randomized. Of 98 randomized patients, VTE occurred in 12% (N = 6/50) of patients on dalteparin and 21% (N = 10/48) on observation (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23–1.89). Major bleeding was similar (N = 1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in dalteparin arm (N = 7 versus 1 on observation) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2–131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of VTE and significantly increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during treatment. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) metastatic to the liver are treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However the criteria for patient selection are not well defined. We sought to determine if Ki67 score could help select patients for one therapy over the other in the management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.Single institution analysis of patients treated with Y-90 or TACE between 2001 and 2014. Pathologists blinded to clinical information performed Ki67 staining. Data were analyzed using multivariate association for survival outcomes.Amongst 72 patients (male: 39, female: 33, median age: 57 years) with metastatic NET, the most common site of origin was small bowel (n=35, 49%), while pancreas constituted 32% (n=23). Forty-four patients were treated with Y-90 (61%) and 28 patients received TACE (39%). Ki67 score was available in 28 patients (64%) treated with Y-90 and 16 patients (57%) with TACE. Within Y-90 group, there was greater use of Sandostatin (95% vs. 75%, P=0.02) and less number of total treatments completed (89% vs. 46%, P0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between Y-90 and TACE when used without selection (median, 69 vs. 82 months, P=0.47). When adjusted for Ki67, patients with Ki67 score ≥3% had better OS with Y-90 compared to TACE (HR, 0.1; CI, 0.01-0.9), however for Ki673%, OS was better when treated with TACE compared to Y-90 (HR, 13.5; CI, 1.22-148.87).There is significant interaction between Ki-67 score and liver-directed treatment benefit in patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases. Ki-67 score ≥3% predicts greater benefit with Y-90 and a Ki-67 score3% predicts greater benefit with TACE.

To evaluate the safety/efficacy and explore biomarkers for a rationally designed combination of sunitinib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in a prospective phase 2 study of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Inoperable HCC patients with Child-Pugh A disease received 37.5 mg sunitinib from days 1 to 7 followed by TACE on day 8. Sunitinib was resumed from days 15 to 36 followed by 2 weeks off. Patients received subsequent sunitinib cycles of 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and circulating soluble biomarkers were assessed at baseline, day 8, day 10, and day 36. Sixteen patients with liver only (n=10) and extrahepatic disease (n=6) were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 2 partial responses, 11 stable disease, and 3 clinical deteriorations were seen for a clinical benefit rate of 81%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI, 4.3-9.3) and overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI, 6.3-27.1). Eleven of 16 patients (69%) had grade 3/4 toxicities attributable to sunitinib, the most frequent being thrombocytopenia, amylase/lipase elevations, lymphopenia, and fatigue. Mean Ktrans (volume transfer constant) and viable tumor percent in consented patients decreased by 27% and 14.8%, respectively, with combination therapy. Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (sVEGFR2) levels, cytokines (interleukin-8, interleukin-21), and monocytes decreased with combination therapy. Estimated sunitinib IC50 values of 15 and 10 ng/mL modulated Ktrans and AUC90. sVEGFR2 levels decreased with Ktrans and AUC90. Encouraging progression-free survival and overall survival were seen with acceptable toxicity in our study of sunitinib and TACE combination in advanced HCC. Potential imaging and serum biomarkers showed increased benefit with combination therapy.

Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous, rare malignancies that arise most commonly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. They often secrete vasoactive substances resulting in carcinoid syndrome and the tumor cells exclusively express somatostatin receptors. Octreotide and lanreotide are the two synthetic somatostatin analogs used for the control of carcinoid symptoms and tumor progression in advanced inoperable disease. Recent pivotal trials (PROMID and CLARINET studies) established their antitumor activity. We discuss the available data to support their use as symptom controlling and antiproliferative agents. This article also reviews the guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network and North American Neuro Endocrine Tumor Society), cost-analysis (suggesting the cost-effectiveness of lanreotide autogel compared to higher doses of octreotide long acting release formulation in refractory patients), and future directions of somatostatin analogs in the management of patients refractory to conventional doses of octreotide and lanreotide.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of malignancies that originated from neuroendocrine cells, with the most common sites being lungs and the gastrointestinal tract. Lung NETs comprise 25% of all lung malignancies. Small cell lung cancer is the most common form of lung NETs, and other rare forms include well-differentiated typical carcinoids (TCs) and poorly differentiated atypical carcinoids (ACs). Given the paucity of randomized studies, rational treatment is challenging. Therefore, it is recommended that these decisions be made using a multidisciplinary collaborative approach. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, when feasible. Following surgery, various guidelines offer different recommendations in the adjuvant setting. In this paper, we describe the adjuvant management of lung NETs, as recommended by different guidelines, and highlight their differences. In addition to that, we also discuss the management of metastatic lung NETS, including the use of peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy.

e16122Background: Therapeutic approaches and prognosis in cancer depend on the baseline performance status and comorbidities. The first line therapy for iHCC has been sorafenib since 2007, the only...

364 Background: Sorafenib has been the only FDA-approved medication for inoperable HCC (iHCC) as first line. Agents with better tolerability and potential to improve progression-free-survival (PFS) are needed. Tivozanib (TIVO) is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase, inhibiting angiogenesis critical in HCC. Methods: This is a phase 1b/2 study with HCC patients (pts) having a measurable disease, Child-Pugh class A, and no prior systemic therapy. Phase 1b portion followed a modified 3 + 3 design; phase 2 portion was a two-stage, single arm, un-blinded study. Adverse events were categorized based on CTCAE, and tumor imaging was assessed per RECIST. Results: At 3 centers with IRB approval, 21 eligible pts were enrolled. In phase 1b, 8 pts were enrolled at a starting dose of 1mg once daily q21days with one week off. Upon escalation to 1.5mg, two pts had dose limiting toxicities (DLTs, grade 3 mucositis and hypertension) and came off study without completing the DLT period. The dose of TIVO was de-escalated to 1 mg, and the accrual of remaining patients to phase 2 portion occurred at 1 mg. In a total of 19 pts, median follow up was 16.9 months (mo). The primary endpoint of median PFS was 5.5 mo. Partial response (PR) was seen in 4/19 (21%) and stable disease (SD) in 8/19 (42%): disease control rate was 63%. Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 mo was 58% and 25%. Median OS was 7.5 mo. Three pts have remained on TIVO for > 2 years. Viral loads of hepatitis B and C remained stable during the study. Adverse events (AEs) related to TIVO included grade 3 fatigue (15.7%), decreased appetite (5.3%), pulmonary embolism (5.3%), hand-foot syndrome (5.3%), elevated LFT (10.5%), and grade 4 hypertension (5.3%). Conclusions: TIVO is tolerable at 1 mg in iHCC. In few pts, TIVO had deep and durable responses. Biomarker driven studies of TIVO in the context of immunotherapy are warranted. Acknowledgment: We appreciate support from NCCN. Clinical trial information: NCT01835223.

The purpose of this report is to describe the management and outcome of an unusual complication of a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. Gemcitabine is a known risk factor for hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which can often have a rapidly fatal clinical course despite intervention with steroids, plasmapheresis and hemodialysis.A retrospective report of the first case of gemcitabine-related HUS, in a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, treated with a variety of standard therapies in addition to rituximab is presented. The hematologic response parameters and clinical outcomes to each of the therapies given are described.Chemotherapy-induced HUS was aggressively treated with plasmapheresis, high-dose steroids, vincristine and rituximab. Platelet recovery and clinical improvement coincided with administration of rituximab. In addition, aggressive supportive measures to manage renal failure (hemodialysis) and labile hypertension, allowed this patient to have an extended survival as a result of successful therapy for this complication despite an underlying rapidly fatal malignancy.This case highlights the importance of timely application of aggressive measures even in patients with known diagnosis of a fatal malignancy as these interventions can prolong life and be of palliative benefit.

To determine the clinical benefit response (CBR), time to tumor progression (TTP), overall survival, and effect on quality of life (QOL) of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (650 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days) were administered and repeated every 21 days. All patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Pancreatic Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-C30-PAN 26) questionnaire on day 1 of each cycle. Cumulative QOL scores were calculated. The two-stage design required 17 patients to evaluate the confirmed response at nine weeks. Twelve patients with a median age of 54 years were enrolled. A median of eight cycles per patient were completed. With a median follow-up of 18.2 months, the CBR (two partial response and five stable disease) was 58% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28–85%]. Four out of seven patients with CBR had no decline in QOL with chemotherapy. The probability of survival at one year was 0.58. Median TTP and overall survival were 9.0 and 14.0 months, respectively. Nine patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. Gemcitabine and capecitabine at this dose and schedule are well tolerated and effective and may offer clinical benefit and maintain QOL in patients with advanced biliary cancer. This regimen merits further investigation in the neoadjuvant setting.

AIM: To evaluate systemic treatment choices in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and provide consensus treatment recommendations. METHODS: Systemic treatment options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have expanded in recent years to include somatostatin analogs, angiogenesis inhibitors, inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin and cytotoxic agents. At this time, there is little data to guide treatment selection and sequence. We therefore assembled a panel of expert physicians to evaluate systemic treatment choices and provide consensus treatment recommendations. Treatment appropriateness ratings were collected using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process. After studying the literature, a multidisciplinary panel of 10 physicians assessed the appropriateness of various medical treatment scenarios on a 1-9 scale. Ratings were done both before and after an extended discussion of the evidence. Quantitative measurements of agreement were made and consensus statements developed from the second round ratings. RESULTS: Specialties represented were medical and surgical oncology, interventional radiology, and gastroenterology. Panelists had practiced for a mean of 15.5 years (range: 6-33). Among 202 rated scenarios, disagreement decreased from 13.2% (26 scenarios) before the face-to-face discussion of evidence to 1% (2) after. In the final ratings, 46.5% (94 scenarios) were rated inappropriate, 21.8% (44) were uncertain, and 30.7% (62) were appropriate. Consensus statements from the scenarios included: (1) it is appropriate to use somatostatin analogs as first line therapy in patients with hormonally functional tumors and may be appropriate in patients who are asymptomatic; (2) it is appropriate to use everolimus, sunitinib, or cytotoxic chemotherapy therapy as first line therapy in patients with symptomatic or progressive tumors; and (3) beyond first line, these same agents can be used. In patients with uncontrolled secretory symptoms, octreotide LAR doses can be titrated up to 60 mg every 4 wk or up to 40 mg every 3 or 4 wk. CONCLUSION: Using the Delphi process allowed physician experts to systematically obtain a consensus on the appropriateness of a variety of medical therapies in patients with PNETs.

Background and aim Combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma (CHCC) is an infrequent primary hepatic malignancy with no clearly defined diagnostic criteria, poorly studied natural history, and no guidelines regarding therapy. In this study we attempted to address this need and review our experience. Methods and results We performed a retrospective review of all CHCC cases at our institute over the last 10 yr. Eight cases were identified; histological and immunohistochemical criteria used for diagnosis were defined. Patients characteristics were: median age 65 yr (range 47-80); five females; risk factors-cholelithiasis (n = 4) and cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis B and C (n = 1). Abdominal pain (n = 6), hepatomegaly (n = 4), and elevated CA 19-9 >40 U/mL (n = 4/5) were frequent. Early TNM stage (I and II) compared with advanced disease (III and IV) correlated with higher overall survival on univariate analyses [37 and 6 mo respectively (p = 0.011)]. Median overall survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent potentially curative resection (23 mo, range 4-48+) compared with patients who underwent non-surgical therapies such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and chemotherapy (2 mo, range 1-8) (p = 0.0357, one-sided exact log-rank test). Conclusions Chronic inflammation and cirrhosis may play a role in pathogenesis of CHCC. Surgical resection and early stage at diagnosis predict longer survival.

Massive hyperdiploidy (>50 chromosomes) and tetraploidy (4n) are rare cytogenetic abnormalities in myelocytic malignancies, and their significance is unknown. We report on 11 patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and two patients with a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with massive hyperdiploidy (10 patients) or tetraploidy (3 patients) seen at our institution over a 12-year period. Eleven patients were male and two were female. Age range was 44–84 years (median, 70 years). Only one AML patient had a previous MDS, and no patient had therapy-related disease. One or more copies of chromosomes 8 and 19 were gained in eight patients each; other frequently gained chromosomes included 13, 15, and 21. Eight patients had structural abnormalities in addition to chromosome gain; del(5q) was most common (five patients). Eleven patients received induction chemotherapy, but only four achieved complete remission. Survival ranged from 1 to 22 months, with a median of 6 months. We conclude that massive hyperdiploidy and tetraploidy are infrequent abnormalities in AML and MDS, are seen primarily in de novo disease in older male patients and are associated with a low remission rate and short survival. Massive hyperdiploidy and tetraploidy define a prognostically unfavorable cytogenetic group in de novo AML.

TPS507 Background: No effective therapy is available for patients (pts) with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CC) after disease progression on first-line chemotherapy. In Phase I studies, pembrolizumab (pem) showed activity in pts with advanced CC. Interferon alpha-2b was shown to increase tumor immune infiltrates. In order to improve the response rate (RR) of pts with CC to pem, we propose to combine sylatron with pem in an open-label, single-arm, multicenter Phase II study. Methods: To be eligible for study, pts must have CC, manifesting as either intrahepatic, extrahepatic or gallbladder cancer that is unresectable, metastatic, and has either failed to respond to or demonstrated progression on frontline chemotherapy. Forty-four pts will be enrolled on study to receive SC sylatron (200 mg) weekly for 12 weeks, and IV pem (200mg) once every 3 weeks, starting on week 4 (at the same time as the 4th dose of sylatron), until pts experience disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or withdraw consent. CT scans will be performed every 9 weeks. The primary endpoints are overall RR (ORR) and the safety and tolerability of combined pem and sylatron therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, and ORR by irRECIST. An initial 3-week window will exist in which to evaluate the effect of sylatron alone (following prior chemotherapy) on the tumor microenvironment: one biopsy (biopsy 1) will be obtained before the start of sylatron therapy, and another (biopsy 2) after the third but before the fourth injection of sylatron (and the initiation of pem plus sylatron combination therapy). The effect of sylatron on the CC immune microenvironment will be studied by comparing biopsies 1 and 2. Immune microenvironment in pem + sylatron responders will be compared with non-responders. The study will assess whether the addition of sylatron improves the RR of pem from 17% to 35% in pts with advanced CC. Simon’s two-stage optimum design will be used to test the null hypothesis that P ≤ 0.17 vs. the alternative hypothesis that P ≥ 0.350. This study design provides 80% power (one-sided significance level of 0.05). The time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

473 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being utilized for locally advanced (LAPC)/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC); however, long term follow up data is sparse. At our institution, we use FOLFIRINOX as the regimen of choice. Gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-Paclitaxel (Abraxane) is utilized in patients not suited for FOLFIRINOX or if they have poor radiographic response and/or develop significant toxicities to FOLFIRINOX. The aim of this study was to report our institutional experience with neoadjuvant therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with BRPC or LAPC who received FOLFIRINOX (or a modified regimen), Gem/nab-Paclitaxel, or both prior to surgical resection. FOLFIRINOX was typically given for 4 – 6 cycles while gem/nab-Paclitaxel was given for 2 cycles. Results: From January 2011 to December 2015, 39 patients were identified who met the study criteria. Eight patients received FOLFIRINOX alone (median age 62), 20 patients received FOLFIRINOX + Gem/nab-Paclitaxel, and 11 received only Gem/nab-Paclitaxel (median age 72). Eighteen patients (46%) completed the intended cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty two patients had a radiologic and/or biomarker response. Exploration was performed in 25 of 39 (64%) patients of whom 20 (51%) underwent curative resection. Of the 20 resected patients, there were no post-operative deaths. The median tumor size, median lymph node ratio, and R0 resection rates were 2.4 cm, 0, and 85% for the entire cohort. Median follow up was 20.7 months. The median overall survival for the resected cohort was not reached vs 13.5 months in the no resection group; two year overall survival for the resection vs. no resection groups was 87% vs 16% (p < .001). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX and/or Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy for LAPC/BRPC is fairly well tolerated, leads to appreciable rates of margin negative surgical resection, and a significant overall survival advantage.