Search

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) regulates mitotic checkpoints and cell division. PLK1 overexpression is reported in numerous cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and is associated with poor prognosis. Volasertib is a selective, potent cell-cycle kinase inhibitor that targets PLK to induce mitotic arrest and apoptosis. This phase 1 trial investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-leukemic activity of volasertib in combination with decitabine in AML patients aged ≥ 65 years. Thirteen patients were treated with escalating volasertib doses (3 + 3 design; 300 mg, 350 mg, and 400 mg) plus standard-dose decitabine. Dose-limiting toxicity was reported in one patient in cycle 1; the MTD of volasertib in combination with decitabine was determined as 400 mg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and decreased appetite. Objective response rate was 23%. The combination was well tolerated, and the adverse event profile was in line with previous findings.

Background:In patients with SLE, activation of the CD40–CD40L pathway results in stimulation and proliferation of B cells and other inflammatory cell types. The subsequent generation of autoantibodies and their deposition in the kidney, as well as activation of myeloid and resident kidney cells, result in local inflammation and eventually, kidney injury. Thus, CD40 is an appealing therapeutic target in lupus nephritis (LN). BI 655064 is a humanised anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that blocks the CD40 pathway in a nanomolar range and downregulates activated B cells.Objectives:To assess the efficacy and safety over 52 weeks of three doses of subcutaneous BI 655064 compared with placebo, as add-on to mycophenolate and steroids, in patients with active proliferative LN (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02770170).Methods:Overall, 121 patients with LN were randomised, double blind, in a 2:1:1:2 ratio to placebo or BI 655064 120 mg, 180 mg or 240 mg, and received a weekly loading dose for the first 3 weeks, followed by dosing every 2 weeks for the 120 and 180 mg doses, and weekly (120 mg) for the 240 mg group. Key inclusion criteria included an active ISN/RPS class III or IV (±V) renal biopsy within 3 months prior to screening and a screening protein/creatinine ratio of ≥1 mg/mg. Randomisation was stratified based on race (Asian vs non-Asian) and screening protein/creatine (UP/UC) ratio (Results:The placebo response in this trial was higher than expected (48.3%; Table 1); none of theBI 655064 doses increased rates of CRR at Week 52 compared with placebo. However, CRR at Week 52 based on creatinine-adjusted proteinuria, assessed using spot urine, showed a better response in the 180 mg group (50%) vs placebo (42.5%), and the 180 mg dose showed a greater change from baseline over time vs placebo from Week 4. Time to CRR was shorter in the 180 mg group (17.3 weeks) vs placebo (20.4 weeks). The 180 mg group also showed improvement vs placebo in total SLEDAI (SELENA) and its subscores.The unexpected high placebo response prompted a post hoc analysis evaluating confirmed CRR (cCRR), whereby confirmation of the endpoint was required at both Weeks 46 (penultimate visit on treatment) and 52. A 15.2% higher cCRR in the 180 mg group (44.3%) vs placebo (29.1%) was observed (p=0.26).While based on a small sample size, there were more reports of infection-related severe and serious adverse events and neutropenia in the 240 mg group compared with placebo. Of note, in those who experienced neutropenia, a clinical impact (e.g. increase in infections) was not established. Aside from these observations, safety data were comparable across treatment groups.Larger decreases from baseline were observed in the percentage of CD27−IgD−CD95+, CD27−IgD+CD95+, CD27+IgD+CD95+ and CD27+IgD−CD95+ B-cell subsets in the 180 and 240 mg groups compared with placebo.Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were detected in five patients treated with BI 655054, all at low titre, and in one who received placebo; ADAs had no impact on pharmacokinetics or safety.Conclusion:The trial did not meet its primary CRR endpoint. However, when confirmation of CRR was required at both Weeks 46 and 52, the resultant decrease in the placebo response generated an effect size of 15.2% and 9.1% in favour of 180 mg and 240 mg BI 655064, respectively.Table 1.Efficacy endpoints at Week 52Placebo (n=40)BI 655064120 mg (n=21)180 mg (n=20)240 mg (n=40)Observed CRR, n208918Adjusted* CRR, %48.338.34544.6Observed cCRR, n135916Adjusted* cCRR, %29.122.544.338.2Mean change from baseline in SLEDAITotal score−6.5−6.1−9.7−8.2Non-renal score−1.4−3.0−2.8−3.1Renal score−5.1−3.7−6.8−5.0Clinical score−5.7−3.9−7.9−6.5CRR based on 24 h proteinuria; cCRR based on UP/UC (spot urine) at Weeks 46 and 52. *Logistic regression model including treatment and the covariates race and proteinuria at screening.Disclosure of Interests:David Jayne Consultant of: DRJ has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, Novartis, and Roche, Juergen Steffgen Employee of: JS is employed by Boehringer Ingelheim., Juanita Romero-Diaz Consultant of: JRD has received research consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hirofumi Amano Grant/research support from: HA has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Kajohnsak Noppakun Consultant of: KN has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Jansen, AstraZeneca, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Abbott, Sanofi and Novo Nordisk, Grant/research support from: KN has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, Visterra Inc., Kalbe Genexine Biologics, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Omeros Corporation., Harold Michael Gomez Speakers bureau: HMG has received speaker’s fees for Pfizer, MSD, Unilab, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rhona Recto: None declared, Valérie Belsack Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Nora Fagan Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Steven Padula Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ivette Revollo Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Jing Wu Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Sudha Visvanathan Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Richard Furie Consultant of: RF has received research consulting fees, Grant/research support from: RF has received clinical trial support

Background We recently reported improved glycemic control with reduced insulin dose in subjects with type 1 diabetes treated with the sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin. To further characterize the effects, we analyzed diurnal glycemic patterns by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Methods In an 8-week single-arm open-label pilot study of empagliflozin, we compared ambulatory glucose profiles produced from CGM data during 2-week intervals in a placebo run-in baseline period, end-of-treatment, and post-treatment. Change in glycemic exposure was evaluated by area under the median curve according to time of day (AUCTOTAL 12:00am-11:55pm; AUCDAY 7:05am-10:55pm, AUCNIGHT 11:00pm-7:00am), as well as glycemic variability, glycemic stability and time-in-target (≥70 to ≤140mg/dL). Results The 40 patients (26 on insulin pump) were aged 24±5 years and BMI 24.5±3.2 kg/m2. Consistent with the observed HbA1c decrease (8.0±0.9% to 7.6±0.9%, p

OBJECTIVE Adjunctive-to-insulin therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition may improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We evaluated the glycemic efficacy and safety of empagliflozin 25 mg daily in 40 patients treated for 8 weeks in a single-arm open-label proof-of-concept trial (NCT01392560). RESULTS Mean A1C decreased from 8.0 ± 0.9% (64 ± 10 mmol/mol) to 7.6 ± 0.9% (60 ± 10 mmol/mol) (P < 0.0001), fasting glucose from 9.0 ± 4.3 to 7.0 ± 3.2 mmol/L (P = 0.008), symptomatic hypoglycemia ( CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept study strongly supports a randomized clinical trial of adjunctive-to-insulin empagliflozin in patients with T1D.

Background— The primary objective of this mechanistic open-label, stratified clinical trial was to determine the effect of 8 weeks’ sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition with empagliflozin 25 mg QD on renal hyperfiltration in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Methods and Results— Inulin (glomerular filtration rate; GFR) and paraaminohippurate (effective renal plasma flow) clearances were measured in individuals stratified based on having hyperfiltration (T1D-H, GFR ≥ 135 mL/min/1.73m 2 , n=27) or normal GFR (T1D-N, GFR 90–134 mL/min/1.73m 2 , n=13) at baseline. Renal function and circulating levels of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system mediators and NO were measured under clamped euglycemic (4–6 mmol/L) and hyperglycemic (9–11 mmol/L) conditions at baseline and end of treatment. During clamped euglycemia, hyperfiltration was attenuated by −33 mL/min/1.73m 2 with empagliflozin in T1D-H, (GFR 172±23–139±25 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P P P ≤0.04). Conclusions— In conclusion, short-term treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin attenuated renal hyperfiltration in subjects with T1D, likely by affecting tubular-glomerular feedback mechanisms. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01392560.

Background Individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus are at high risk for the development of hypertension, contributing to cardiovascular complications. Hyperglycaemia-mediated neurohormonal activation increases arterial stiffness, and is an important contributing factor for hypertension. Since the sodium glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin lowers blood pressure and HbA1c in type 1 diabetes mellitus, we hypothesized that this agent would also reduce arterial stiffness and markers of sympathetic nervous system activity. Methods Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability (HRV) and circulating adrenergic mediators were measured during clamped euglycaemia (blood glucose 4–6 mmol/L) and hyperglycaemia (blood glucose 9–11 mmol/L) in 40 normotensive type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Studies were repeated after 8 weeks of empagliflozin (25 mg once daily). Results In response to empagliflozin during clamped euglycaemia, systolic blood pressure (111 ± 9 to 109 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.02) and augmentation indices at the radial (-52% ± 16 to -57% ± 17, p = 0.0001), carotid (+1.3 ± 1 7.0 to -5.7 ± 17.0%, p