Search

Nilotinib is used as standard treatment in managing chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). A 23-year-old man with CML and on nilotinib was admitted to the intensive care unit due to respiratory failure. Three years prior, he developed pleural effusion from dasatinib therapy thus, his CML regimen was changed to nilotinib. Although the pleural effusion had once improved, the chest imaging revealed left-dominant bilateral pleural effusion. Endotracheal intubation and left thoracic drainage were performed. Nilotinib treatment was discontinued, and approximately 60 hours later, nilotinib concentrations of 927 and 2092 ng/mL were determined in his blood and pleural effusion, respectively. Severe pleural effusion may be induced in patients administering nilotinib, and nilotinib concentrations in blood and pleural effusion can be elevated in patients with nilotinib-related pleural effusion. Cross-occurrence of pleural effusions needs to be monitored precisely, especially in patients who are switched to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors after dasatinib treatment.

Introduction. Extramedullary sites of leukemic proliferation, harboring an adverse outcome, are rare and usually found in the blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. We report a case of a newly diagnosed patient with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase, with leukemic infiltration of the right ovary on disease presentation. Case report. The patient presented with abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and anemia. A peripheral blood smear indicated chronic myeloid leukemia, and cytoreductive treatment was started. Due to the worsening of the abdominal pain, computed tomography was done. It revealed a cystic tumor of the right ovary. The tumor was surgically removed. Bone marrow examination confirmed the diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase. Immunohistochemical analysis of the ovarian tumor showed leukemic infiltration with 5% of blasts. The patient was treated with imatinib for one year. Due to treatment failure, imatinib was switched to nilotinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was considered. Conclusion. This case highlights the critical role of the multidisciplinary team approach and close treatment monitoring to achieve the best possible outcome in these patients.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared with second-line TKIs in the treatment of adult patients with CML who failed, or were intolerant to, first-line TKIs. A Markov state transition model was conducted. Model transition, adverse-effect probabilities, utility data and medical costs were obtained from clinical trials and literature. Measurements included medications, follow-ups, adverse events, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Univariable and Bayesian multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo simulations. Dasatinib resulted in an ICER of $79,086/QALY compared to nilotinib. Ponatinib yielded an ICER of $176,278/QALY and $141,563/QALY compared to dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively. Dasatinib was the optimal treatment at a $100,000/QALY threshold. The probability (36%-40%) for ponatinib or dasatinib optimal treatment was associated with thresholds of $160,000-$180,000/QALY. Dasatinib and ponatinib can be considered cost-effective options and provide clinical benefits compared to other second-line TKIs for CML in the US.

Context Nilotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Aims We aim to evaluate the responses and safety of upfront Nilotinib therapy in Indian CML patients. Setting and Design We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CML patients who received Nilotinib as an upfront treatment at our center between January 1, 2011 and October 15, 2019.The follow-up was taken till March 31, 2020. Results Forty One patients (n = 36 chronic phase and five accelerated-phase CML) received frontline Nilotinib. Median age was 39 years (21–63) with male-to-female ratio of 1.1: 1. At 3 months, 96.9% patients achieved BCR-ABL of ≤10% at international scale. By the end of 12 months, 71.5% patients achieved major molecular response (BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) and 91.4% patients achieved complete cytogenetic response assessed by BCR-ABL polymerase chain reaction of ≤1%. Common toxicities observed were weight gain, thrombocytopenia, corrected QT prolongation, and elevated serum amylase in 14 (34.1%), 7(17.07%), 4(9.7%), and 4(9.7%) patients, respectively. Overall, five patients had loss of response with further progression and death in three patients. At a median of 43.7 months, 38 patients survived with estimated 3 year event-free survival and overall survival of 65 ± 9 and 93 ± 5%. Conclusion This study showed remarkable good response with upfront Nilotinib in Indian patients with CML.

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) play a crucial role in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL), intolerance and resistance to TKIs have been serious problems. Due to a lack of research, the importance of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TKIs is currently unclear. We examined the PK of the third-generation TKI ponatinib to monitor side effects and efficacy during treatments for one patient with CML-chronic phase (CP-CML) and two who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), one for CML-blastic crisis (BC-CML) and one for Ph + ALL. The patient with CP-CML was intolerant to multiple TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, imatinib, and bosutinib) and thus was switched to ponatinib (15 mg/day). The patients who received allo-HSCT for BC-CML and Ph + ALL received ponatinib (15 mg/day) as maintenance therapy. Notably, serial evaluation of the PK of ponatinib showed that the median trough values (ng/ml) were 17.2 (12.2-34.5), 33.1 (21.2-40.3) and 27.7 (13.6-29.9) in patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These values were around the target concentration (23 ng/ml). All patients are maintaining complete remission without side effects. In conclusion, serial evaluation of PK of ponatinib may yield meaningful information about its safety and efficacy.

Targeted therapies have emerged as innovative treatments for patients whose disease does not respond to conventional chemotherapy, and their use has widely expanded in the field of pediatric hematologic malignancies in the last decade. While they carry the promise of improved disease control and survival and are currently investigated in first-line treatment protocols for patients with poor prognostic markers, they are associated with a considerable incidence of specific toxicities, including cytokine-release syndrome, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, endocrine adverse events, and infectious complications. Iatrogenic or secondary dysgammaglobulinemia is a main consequence of targeted therapies using monoclonal antibodies and other antibody-derived treatments that target specific antigens on lymphoid cells (blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, rituximab), chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) and, to a lesser extent, checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). This review discusses the diagnosis and incidence of secondary or iatrogenic dysgammaglobulinemia in children treated with targeted therapies for leukemias and lymphomas, and options for monitoring and treatment.

This study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients prescribed with nilotinib as a second-line therapy and explores the influential factors. A multicenter retrospective survey was conducted via face-to-face interviews based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A total of 121 adult CML patients resistant to imatinib and used nilotinib for at least 3 months were enrolled. The influential features were assessed by multiple linear regression models. Patients had the mean age of 47.49 (SD = 13.67) years, dominated by middle-aged and male groups. The mean scores of functions ranged from 75 to 83, and those of symptoms were from 5 to 28, with the highest of fatigue (28.28), insomnia (22.87), and pain (21.07). The mean global health status/QoL score was 67.70 (SD = 16.80) with considerable financial difficulties (52.34 (SD = 32.15)). Male patients reported higher functional scores and fewer symptoms compared with female patients. All aspects of QoL became worse with increasing age. Besides age and gender, level of education, duration of nilotinib usage, and comorbidities were also significantly influential factors in many QoL domains. A predicted model for expected mean scores of QoL domains was built based on these factors. The CML patients treated with nilotinib had the above-moderate QoL scores, a light decrease of functional scores, great financial difficulties, and still experienced symptoms. Strategies and more therapeutic considerations to enhance QoL for CML patients targeted toward women, the old, low educational level, and long duration of nilotinib usage, and many comorbidities are needed in the setting.

Background A recently conducted matching-adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that bosutinib improved progression-free survival, and delayed progression to advanced disease compared with dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with second line (2L) chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, the long-term clinical and economic impact of using bosutinib versus dasatinib and nilotinib has not been evaluated. The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of bosutinib compared with dasatinib and bosutinib compared with nilotinib from a US payer perspective. Methods A cost-effectiveness model was developed using partition survival methods and three health states: progression-free, progression, and death. Trial data (individual patient-level and aggregate-level data) informed the progression-free and overall survival estimates. Costs included drugs and medical resource use. Utility values were obtained from literature. Sensitivity analyses (SAs) included one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs). Results Comparing bosutinib versus dasatinib resulted in a gain of 0.4 discounted life years, 1.5 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental costs of $28,459 (values in 2020 US dollars), for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,811/QALY gained. Comparing bosutinib versus nilotinib resulted in a gain of 0.8 discounted life-years, 1.8 QALYs, and incremental costs of $76,563, for an ICER of $41,932/QALY gained. Drug costs and extrapolation distribution type were the main drivers of the model in the one-way SAs. In the PSAs, bosutinib had >90% and >80% probabilities of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY versus dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively. Conclusions Our results suggest that compared with dasatinib and nilotinib, bosutinib may represent good value for money for treating 2L CP-CML patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of second-line nilotinib versus dasatinib for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who are intolerant or resistant to imatinib and can transition to treatment-free remission (TFR). Methods A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost effectiveness of nilotinib versus dasatinib. The model was developed from the Italian healthcare payer perspective and included the following health states: on second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), off second-line TKI, accelerated phase/blastic crisis, TFR, and death. Progression-free and overall survival curves were derived from patient-level data that compared nilotinib and dasatinib as second-line therapy in CML-CP patients who were resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Drug costs, healthcare costs, and adverse event costs were based on real-world evidence and publicly available databases. Cost effectiveness was estimated over a 40-year time horizon. Scenario analyses were performed by adjusting time horizon, TFR parameters, costs, and utilities. Results Second-line nilotinib resulted in greater time spent in TFR (0.91 life-years), increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.89), increased life-years (2.16), and decreased per-patient costs (− 38,760 €). Therefore, nilotinib was strongly dominant compared with dasatinib in the base-case analysis. Nilotinib remained strongly dominant in most scenario analyses including shorter time horizon, exclusion of TFR, and varying TKI drug costs. Conclusions While the model showed that nilotinib treatment of imatinib-intolerant or resistant CML-CP patients was more effective and less costly than dasatinib treatment, there is considerable uncertainty in the findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib have drastically improved the life expectancies of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). While survival outcomes are comparable across first-line TKIs, each TKI has a unique toxicity profile that should be considered before starting or managing any treatment. Furthermore, the safety and tolerability of TKIs are particularly important in CML-CP, as the majority of patients remain on treatment for several years or for life. Management of adverse events (AEs) is critical to ensure adherence to treatment and to maintain efficacy and quality of life; management should also be considered in the context of the patient’s molecular response to therapy to avoid switching TKIs unnecessarily. We present case studies examining pleural effusion occurring with bosutinib and dasatinib, cardiovascular events associated with nilotinib and ponatinib, and myelosuppression, which is common across all TKIs. We discuss the management of these AEs based on international guidelines and present our collective experience for advanced practitioners to consider.

Aims New-generation breakpoint cluster region-Abelson tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have a higher incidence of cardiovascular events than imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). However, this knowledge is insufficiently proven. Hence, this study aimed to explore the association between cardiovascular events and TKIs in patients with CML. Methods and results This retrospective population-based cohort study enrolled first-time users of imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) were the primary outcome, while other cardiovascular-related events were the secondary outcomes. The event rates were estimated using Kaplan–Meier estimates, and the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression. Additionally, the competing risk was adjusted using the Fine and Gray competing risk model. We included 1207 patients. Nilotinib had a significantly higher ATE risk (subdistribution HR = 4.92, 95% CI = 1.68–14.36) than imatinib. Conversely, no difference was found for other cardiovascular-related events. Risks of ATE and other cardiovascular-related events were similar between dasatinib and imatinib and between nilotinib and dasatinib. The risk of ATE hospitalization consistently increased throughout the main analyses and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Nilotinib-treated patients had a significantly higher risk of developing ATE than imatinib-treated patients. However, the risks of ATE and other cardiovascular-related events were not significantly different between dasatinib and imatinib.

Valentina Perrone,1 Elisa Giacomini,1 Margherita Andretta,2 Loredana Arenare,3 Maria Rosaria Cillo,4 Marisa Latini,5 Alessandra Mecozzi,6 Romina Pagliaro,5 Adriano Vercellone,7 Luca Degli Esposti1 1CliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy; 2UOC Assistenza Farmaceutica Territoriale, Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy; 3UOC Farmaceutica e Territoriale e Integrativa– Asl Latina, Latina, Italy; 4Pharmaceutical Department Local Health Unit (LHU) Salerno, Salerno, Italy; 5U.O.C. Farmaceutica Territoriale – Asl Roma 5, Roma, Italy; 6UOC Farmacia SE/CTO Asl Roma 2, Roma, Italy; 7Department of Pharmacy, Local Health Unit (LHU) Naples 3 South, Napoli, ItalyCorrespondence: Valentina PerroneCliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, via Murri, Bologna, 9 - 40137, ItalyTel +39 0544 38393Fax +39 0544 212699Email valentina.perrone@clicon.itPurpose: To date, litte evidence is reported about the real-life dosage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors prescribed in Italy. The present observational retrospective study aimed to evaluate the mean daily dose of nilotinib prescribed as first- and second-line therapy among patients suffering from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in settings of clinical practice in Italy.Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from the administrative databases of a sample of Italian entities. All adult patients prescribed nilotinib were included from January 2013 to December 2016 if they were using it as first-line and from January 2015 to December 2018 as second-line therapy. The mean daily dose was calculated considering the dosage between first and last nilotinib prescription date or last BCR/ABL test date.Results: Among CML patients treated with nilotinib as first-line (N=87), the mean daily dose of nilotinib was 500.5 mg during a mean treatment duration of 798.9 days and of 498.54 mg considering the last determination of BCR/ABL test (mean duration of 811 days). A total of 103 CML patients were prescribed nilotinib as second-line therapy; of them, 80.6% had previously received imatinib, 17.5% dasatinib. The mean daily dose of nilotinib was found to be 566.3 mg with a mean time duration of 302.8 days, while when the last BCR/ABL test was taken into account (mean duration of 323.1 days), a mean daily dose of 565.2 mg was detected.Conclusion: The study reported on the real-world dosage pattern of a TKI for CML management. Our results compared with the dosage of nilotinib reported in datasheet (600 mg and 800 mg for first- and second-line, respectively) showed a trend of mean daily dose prescribed in clinical practice settings lower than the dosage currently indicated.Keywords: BCR/ABL, dosage, nilotinib, real-world

BACKGROUND: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is one of the most common hematological tumors. Gene candidate studies cleared the association of single genetic variants (SNVs) to the risk and progression in CML. MicroRNA biogenesis genes disruption contributes a fundamental role in carcinogenesis. AIM: We aimed to determine the association between rs636832 and rs2740348 SNVs of AGO1 gene and GEMIN4 gene, respectively, and the risk and prognosis in CML Egyptian patients with 5 years survival estimation. METHODS: The study was conducted on 110 newly diagnosed CML patients and 110 age and sex healthy matched controls. Real-time polymerase chain reaction utilizing TaqMan probes was operated to demonstrate genetic modalities of rs636832 and rs2740348. RESULTS: No significance difference was observed between the cases and controls regarding the genotypic and allelic frequencies for both variants. On the other hand, the rs636832 GG genotype was more evident at a younger age of diagnosis and associated with the poor grades of the Sokal and Eutos scores. As well, rs2740348 CC genotype was encountered in high Eutos score levels. Regarding the response therapy, rs636832 GG genotype was overrepresented in the resistance to Imatinib while rs2740348 CC genotype was prevalent in the resistance to both Imatinib and Nilotinib. Overall survival was of no statistical significance for both variants. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that the major homozygous genotypes of both variants were associated with bad prognostic clinical scores and poor response to therapy but with no role in CML risk.

Second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) play an important role in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL). However, data on feasibility and efficacy of using these drugs for persisting or relapsed Ph + ALL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) are scarce. Based on the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party registry, we evaluated the use of second-/third-generation TKI in 140 patients with Ph + ALL, suffering from measurable residual disease (MRD, n = 6), molecular relapse (MRel, n = 23), or hematological relapse (HRel, n = 111) following alloSCT. Treatment included dasatinib in 104, nilotinib in 18, or ponatinib in 18 patients. Forty-nine patients received TKI monotherapy, while 91 received additional treatment. Toxicity of second-/third-generation TKI post alloSCT was comparable to pretransplant use and could be managed with dose reduction or temporary discontinuation. Response rates were 71% (overall) and 61% (following TKI monotherapy). For the entire cohort, 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 49% and 33%, respectively. OS was comparable among patients treated for persisting MRD/MRel and HRel. Among patients treated with TKI monotherapy, 2- and 5-year OS was 38% and 33%, respectively. The data underscore that second-/third-generation TKI are important compounds for the management of active Ph + ALL post alloSCT.

Chordoma is a rare but devastating tumor that arises in the cranial skull base or spine. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for chordoma, and little understanding of whether using more than one therapy has benefit over monotherapy. The objective of this study was to systematically review the current status of clinical trials completed for patients with chordoma to determine if multimodal therapy offers a benefit in progression-free survival over monomodal therapy. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to review the available clinical trials of targeted therapy for chordoma. We compiled the clinical data to determine if there is a benefit of multimodal therapy over monotherapy. Our search resulted in 11 clinical trials including 270 patients with advanced chordoma who were treated with targeted therapies. The most commonly employed targeted therapies acted within the following pathways: platelet-derived growth factor receptor (187 patients), vascular endothelial growth factor (66 patients), and mammalian target of rapamycin (43 patients). Reported progression-free survival for included studies ranged from 2.5 to 58 months, with the longest progression-free survival in a trial that included a platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, nilotinib, and concurrent radiotherapy (58.2 months). There was a higher range of progression-free survival for trials treating patients with multimodal therapy (10.2–14 months vs 2.5–9.2 months, except for a monotherapy trial published in 2020 with a progression-free survival of 18 months), and those published in 2018 or later (14–58.2 months vs 2.5–10.2 months). Only 23% of patients with chordoma in published clinical trials have been treated with multimodal therapy. Progression-free survival may be enhanced by the use of targeted therapy with concurrent radiotherapy, use of multimodal therapy, and use of newer targeted therapy. Future clinical trials should consider use of concurrent radiotherapy and multimodal therapy for patients with advanced chordoma.

Bosutinib, nilotinib and dasatinib are approved for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). In the absence of head-to-head comparisons between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the objective of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy of bosutinib with nilotinib and dasatinib in first-line (1L) CP-CML.Cross-trial heterogeneity in terms of patient baseline characteristics and imatinib dose escalation are difficult to adjust for in network meta-analyses and anchored matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs). Therefore, an unanchored MAIC was performed using patient level data from bosutinib (BFORE trial) and published aggregated data from nilotinib (ENESTnd) and dasatinib (DASISION) trials. After matching, cytogenetic and molecular responses, and disease progression, after a minimum follow-up of 24 months were compared between nilotinib versus bosutinb and dasatinib versus bosutinib.The comparison of nilotinib versus bosutinib resulted in no statistically significant differences for MMR at and by 24 months, MR4 by 24 months, MR4.5 at and by 24 months, CCyR by 24 months, and disease progression, however, a decreased odds of MR4 at 24 months in favor of bosutinib versus nilotinib was observed. The comparison of dasatinib versus bosutinib by 24 months resulted in no statistically significant differences for MMR, disease progression, and CCyR, however a decreased odds of MR4.5 in favor of bosutinib versus dasatinib was observed.Overall, in these analyses bosutinib demonstrates equivalent efficacy to nilotinib and dasatinib in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Introduction Incidences of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) after treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are well described. Here, we report a case of secondary HL in a patient with CML treated with dasatinib as a third-line treatment. Patient information A 64-year-old male was diagnosed with CML and initially treated with imatinib and then with nilotinib due to resistance. Finally, the patient experienced cardiovascular complications, and dasatinib was introduced. After 19 months of treatment, the patient experienced enlargement of lymph nodes that formed packs on the neck. Interventions Based on histopathological examination of the lymph nodes, a diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma - mixed cellularity was established. The patient was successfully treated with 4 cycles of AVD (adriamycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) chemotherapy. Outcomes Complete metabolic remission of Hodgkin lymphoma is currently sustained, and the molecular response to dasatinib at a reduced dose of 50 mg daily corresponds with a deep molecular response. Conclusion In this report, we demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the combination of dasatinib and AVD regimens in coexisting CML and HL. This case report emphasizes the importance of insightful evaluation and differential diagnosis in cases of lymphadenopathy during CML treatment.

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved the outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Currently, four TKIs are available for the frontline treatment, including the first-generation TKI (imatinib) and the second-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib). The second-generation TKIs lead to a faster and deeper molecular response without a survival benefit compared with imatinib. However, the opportunity for the treatment discontinuation and functional cure requires the achievement of durable deep molecular remission. Therefore, the second-generation TKIs should be considered as initial therapy for chronic-phase CML. Switch of therapy is warranted in case of treatment failure, including resistance and/or intolerance. The life expectancy of patients with CML is approaching that of the general population. Given an expected lifespan, future perspectives should consider the strategy for the optimal choice of TKIs, allowing for long-duration of effective TKI therapy with less toxicity to aim for a functional cure. A novel prediction approach such as artificial intelligence-driven analysis on the accumulated data from clinical trials paves a promising path for the personalized recommendation on frontline TKIs and precise survival prediction.

Background and Purpose: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a common hematological malignancy. The characteristic molecular abnormality is the presence of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL fusion gene which is the result of 9:22 translocation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) form the main stay of treatment in CML with excellent responses. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of additional chromosomal abnormalities on outcomes in CML.Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of all patients who were diagnosed with CML in chronic phase (CP) with additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) over a period of 5 years from 2010 to 2015 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Results: A total of 283 patients were diagnosed with CML from January 2010 to January 2015. 31 patients out of these were found to have additional chromosomal abnormalities at the time of diagnosis in addition to BCR-ABL fusion gene or Philadelphia chromosome detection. Out of these 31 patients, 23 (74.2%) were males whereas 8 (25.8%) were females. 13 (41.9%) were in the age group of 31 to 50 years whereas the other two groups that is 18 to 30 years and 51 to 70 years had 9 patients each. After approval from the government which usually takes a standard 2-3 weeks’ time, these patients were started on tyrosine kinase inhibitors which was Imatinib in 30 (96.8%) and Nilotinib in 1 (3.2%) patient. Conventional cytogenetic analysis performed for each patient at the time of diagnosis revealed that 11 (35.5%) of patients had variant Philadelphia chromosome followed by 7 patients (22.6%) with trisomy 8. 5 patients (16.1%) had multiple chromosomal abnormalities including trisomy 8, deletion 1 and isochrome 17q. 2 patents each had isochrome 17q, inversion 3 and deletion 9 abnormalities. 1 patient had deletion 7 whereas 1 had variant Philadelphia chromosome with other chromosomal abnormalities. Conclusion: It was evident that frequently occurring ACAs In our CML population were Variant Philadelphia chromosome and trisomy 8.

Background & Objectives: Hepatic fibrosis is the extreme extracellular matrix buildup of collagen due to the chronic liver disorders. Progressive liver fibrosis results in cirrhosis and hepatic failure. Nilotinib is considered a 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which exhibited antifibrotic efficacy. Stem cells release cytokines and growth factors which exhibited paracrine-mediated antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo. Hence, stem cells conditioned medium (SC-CM) may have an antifibrotic role. This study is designed to explain the association between the oxidative stress markers and the hydroxyproline content in liver fibrosis. Methods: Sixty male wistar rats were distributed into six major groups; control group, CCl4 group, Free conditioned media group, (CCl4 & Nilotinib) group, (CCl4 & stem cells exosomes) group, and (CCl4 & Nilotinib & stem cells exosomes) group. They had an intraperitoneal injection with CCl4 for nine weeks and had treatments of Nilotinib, stem cell exosomes (extracted from Liver mesenchymal stem cells), and a combined treatment of Nilotinib and stem cell exosomes from the 5th week to the 9th week of CCl4 intoxication. Oxidative stress parameters (e.g. MDA, SOD, GSH, CAT, NO, and NOS) and hydroxyproline content were estimated for each group. Results: results showed a significant positive correlation between Hydroxyproline and MDA, NO and NOS. Also, there is a significant negative correlation between Hydroxyproline and GSH, SOD and CAT. Conclusion: There is a significant positive correlation between Hydroxyproline and MDA, NO and NOS. And there is a significant negative correlation between Hydroxyproline and GSH, SOD, CAT.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2-100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3-4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Introduction: Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting BCR/ABL, which is used for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and the second-line treatment of most CML patients who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy that includes imatinib. In addition to common adverse reactions, long-term use of nilotinib shows some toxicities that are different from those of occurring during other BCR/ABL TKI treatments, such as cardiovascular toxicity. It is life-threatening, which would affect not only the choice of initial treatment of CML patients but also the safety of long-term medication.Areas covered: Through searching literature and reports from PubMed and clinical trials, here we review a profile of the adverse effects induced by nilotinib. We also discuss the potential molecular toxicological mechanisms and clinical management, which may provide strategies to prevent or intervene the toxicity associated with nilotinib.Expert opinion: Severe adverse effects associated with nilotinib limit its long-term clinical application. However, the exact mechanisms underlying these toxicities remain unclear. Future research should focus on the developing strategies to reduce the toxicities of nilotinib as well as to avoid similar toxicity in the development of new drugs.

In the last 20 years major goals of therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) have changed. This leukemia, which was previously a fatal disease, has indeed become a chronic disease thanks to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with life expectancy close to that in the general population. Excellent treatment effectiveness with the achievement of long-term, stable, deep molecular response was the motivation for attempts to stop the therapy with the intention of maintaining remission (TFR, treatment-free remission). Based on many clinical trials with over 3,000 patients and several years of follow-up, it is known that 40–60% of patients will maintain molecular remission and remain untreated, while the rest of them will require TKI to be restarted. Information on the procedure to be followed appeared in scientific societies’ recommendations and some centers treating CML patients have made attempts to stop the therapy. This work describes a group of six patients in the TFR phase after discontinuation of nilotinib used in the first-line treatment.

The use of dasatinib and nilotinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia represents a valid therapeutic option for patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. In this multicentre study, adherence, persistence and efficacy in real life over two years of treatment were evaluated.Adherence to treatment was calculated as the ratio between the dose received and the prescribed dose. The dose received was calculated using pharmacy refill data. The persistence with treatment was calculated as the difference between the end and the beginning of the treatment. Efficacy was assigned as Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Events-Free Survival (EFS) and represented through the Kaplan-Meier curve.The number of patients analysed was 117, 70 treated with dasatinib and 47 with nilotinib. Adherence to treatment for dasatinib and nilotinib at two years was 0.91 and 0.82 respectively. Persistence at two years was 77% while the PFS was 92% for both drugs in the study.Adherence to the treatment calculated over two years showed a superiority of dasatinib over nilotinib. Nevertheless, the efficacy in terms of PFS and EFS is superimposable between the two drugs in the study.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can help to increase the survival time in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients; however, the risk of secondary malignancies due to TKIs is a growing concern. Only few reports showed clinical course of patients who developed lymphoma during TKI therapies. Herein, we report a case of high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma diagnosed in the course of CML treatment with bosutinib. The 75‐year‐old male patient had been diagnosed with CML 25 years ago. After receiving TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib), he achieved a major molecular response. Over 3 years after starting bosutinib, he was diagnosed with a high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma. A total of six courses of DA‐EPOCH‐R therapy brought complete remission of the lymphoma. Moreover, BCR‐ABL1 transcript copies remained undetectable by RT‐PCR, 8 months after stopping bosutinib. The risk of secondary malignancy due to TKI has been controversial. It is reported that TKI induces irreversible chromosomal abnormalities or chromosome aberrations and inhibits the proliferation or function of T cells, B cells, and NK cells. These mechanisms of TKI may contribute to the development of secondary malignancy. There remains no consensus on the management of secondary lymphoma during TKI therapies. At present, the only alternative is to observe patients receiving TKI treatment cautiously and to treat secondary lymphoma in the same manner as de novo lymphoma., There remains no consensus on the management of secondary lymphoma during TKI therapies. The only alternative is to observe patients receiving TKI treatment cautiously and to treat secondary lymphoma in the same manner as de novo lymphoma.

Objectives(1) Describe how the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has evolved; (2) evaluate the risk of MACE associated with the prescription of different CML tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).MethodsA population-based retrospective study including all patients (n=4238) diagnosed with CML in Ontario, Canada between 1986 and 2017 and and age-matched and sex-matched individuals who received healthcare but who did not have CML (controls: n=42 380). The cohort was divided into those entering before 2001 vs from 2001 onwards (when TKIs were introduced). We developed competing risks models to compare time-to-event in CML cases versus controls. We adjusted for baseline comorbidities and present subdistribution HRs and 95% CIs. The relationship between TKI use and MACE was assessed by logistic regression.ResultsBefore 2001 and from 2001 on, patients with CML had a higher crude incidence of MACE than patients without CML (19.8 vs 15.3 and 20.3 vs 12.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, patients with CML had a lower subdistribution hazard for MACE (0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.76) before 2001; but from 2001, the adjusted subdistribution HR for MACE (1.27, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43) was similar to age-matched and sex-matched patients. The incidence (9.3 vs 13.8 per 1000 person-years) and subdistribution hazard for cardiovascular death (0.43, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.52) were lower in patients with CML than controls before 2001. From 2001 on, the incidence (6.3 vs 5.4 per 1000 person-years) and subdistribution hazard for cardiovascular death (0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.18) were similar to age-matched and sex-matched patients without CML with a higher risk of cerebrovascular events (8.6 vs 5.6 per 1000 person-years; 1.35, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.83) and peripheral arterial events (6.9 vs 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 1.66 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.39) in patients with CML than patients without CML. Compared with imatinib, there was no difference in the risk of MACE among those prescribed dasatinib (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.10) or nilotinib (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.97).ConclusionsIn a contemporary CML population, the risk of MACE and cardiovascular death is at least as high as among age-matched and sex-matched patients without CML and may be higher for cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial events. No difference in the risk of MACE between imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib was observed.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess cardiotoxicity and potential adverse effects related to lipid metabolism during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and methods Eighty-two consecutive patients with CML, who received nilotinib and/or imatinib in a single haemato-oncological Slovak center between years 2002-2018 were evaluated in a retrospective study. The mean age was 55.8 years (range 22-77 years). Median of follow-up was 61.3 months. Results A significantly higher incidence of dyslipidemia, significantly higher levels of potential risk markers of cardiovascular disease small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-CH) and a significant increase in total cholesterol were found in the patients during treatment with nilotinib in comparison to imatinib. Dyslipidemia led to drug therapy in 22 % of the patients in the nilotinib group. Fourteen percent of the patients in the nilotinib group had one or more cardiovascular events, including peripheral artery disease (10 %), myocardial infarction (4 %) and stroke (4 %). Conclusion A higher risk of cardiovascular events and atherogenic dyslipidemia were associated with nilotinib therapy. Patients treated with TKI, especially nilotinib, require an early modification of cardiovascular risk factors and a careful cardiologic surveillance so that antileukemic therapy with this highly effective agent could continue (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 32). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cardiovascular events, dyslipidemia, small dense LDL-cholesterol, nilotinib, imatinib.

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have a life expectancy similar to those of age- and gender-matched healthy populations. Nevertheless, patients receiving TKIs report chronic adverse events such as fatigue, edema, and muscle cramps, which lead to a decrease in their quality of life (QoL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the QoL and symptom burden in patients receiving original imatinib, generic imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.A total of 121 patients with CML who received TKIs for at least 3 months were enrolled in the study. The QoL was assessed with the Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (QLQ-CML24) modules. The symptom burden was assessed with MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (MDASI-CML) and EORTC QLQ-CML24.The median age of the study population was 53 years (range, 28-90 years), and 83 (81.4%) patients had a low-to-medium Sokal risk score. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of most patients were good (2; 96%), and comorbidity scores were low (HCT-CI 3; 90.8%). There was no significant difference between the general health status of patients in terms of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CML24. According to the results of the MDASI-CML and QLQ-CML24 modules, the most common symptom was fatigue (58.7%) in all groups, and there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the effects on the daily life activities of the patients.Patients with CML receiving first- and second-generation TKIs were seen to have a similar QoL and symptom burden.

BACKGROUND: Following approval of imatinib, a breakthrough tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), survival significantly improved by more than 20% since 2001 among treated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. Subsequently, more expensive second-generation TKIs with varying selectivity profiles have been approved. Population-based studies are needed to evaluate the real-world utilization of TKI therapies, particularly given their escalating costs and recommendations for maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utilization patterns of first-line TKIs, overall and by specific agent, among elderly CML patients in the United States, and the cost implications. METHODS: CML patients aged 65 years and older at diagnosis between 2007 and 2015 were identified from population-based cancer registries in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. The percentage of CML patients receiving imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib within the first year of diagnosis was calculated along with time to first-line treatment initiation. Bivariate comparisons and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with TKI initiation. Average monthly patient responsibility, including patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, stratified by Part D low-income subsidy (LIS) status were also calculated. RESULTS: Among the 1,589 CML patients included, receipt of any TKI within 1 year of diagnosis increased from 66.2% to 78.9%. In 2015, the distribution of first-line TKI therapies was 41.3% imatinib, 28.3% dasatinib, and 9.3% nilotinib. Almost 60% of patients initiated TKI treatment within 3 months of diagnosis. Multivariable analysis indicated that TKI use in the first year was lower among the very elderly (aged > 75 years vs. 65-69 years: HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.63-0.83), patients with more comorbidities (Hierarchical Condition Category risk score > 2 vs. HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62-0.88), and patients ineligible for LIS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.65-0.87). Average monthly patient OOP cost was significantly lower for LIS-eligible versus LIS-ineligible patients: imatinib (2016: $12 vs. $487), dasatinib (2016: $34 vs. $557), and nilotinib (2016: $1 vs. $526). CONCLUSIONS: TKI use has increased significantly since 2007. While imatinib remained the most frequently prescribed first-line agent, by 2015 newer TKIs represented one third of the market share. Utilization patterns indicated persistent age, comorbidity, and financial barriers. TKI use is indicated for long-term therapy, and increased adoption of newer, more expensive agents raises concerns about the sustained affordability of CML treatment, particularly among unsubsidized patients. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. There are no reported conflicts of interest.

Item does not contain fulltext Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is important to facilitate decisions in the current treatment landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Therefore, the availability of a validated HRQOL questionnaire, specifically developed for CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), may enhance quality of research in this area. We performed an international study including 782 CML patients to assess the validity of the EORTC QLQ-CML 24 questionnaire, and to generate HRQOL reference values to facilitate interpretation of results in future studies. Internal consistency, assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficients, ranged from 0.66 to 0.83. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all standardized factor loadings exceeded the threshold of 0.40 (range 0.49-0.97), confirming the hypothesized scale structure. Reference values stratified by age and sex were also generated. Our findings support the use of the EORTC QLQ-CML 24, in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30, as a valuable measure to assess HRQOL in CML patients.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) has transformed the survival and quality of life of patients with end-organ dysfunction. Lifelong need for immunosuppressive medications prolongs life expectancy, but results in altered immune function and is associated with a higher risk of certain malignancies, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this article, we report on six patients, aged 41–79 years, diagnosed with CML, from 3 to 132 months post-various organ transplants and treated with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), including first generation (i.e., imatinib) and second generation (i.e., dasatinib and nilotinib). Use of second-generation TKIs has not been previously reported in this population. In these six cases, treatment with different TKIs in SOT patients was feasible, well tolerated and achieved good efficacy, which was maintained in extended follow-up, as well.

Objectives Overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase is not significantly different by treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but emerging evidence reveals differences in costs and safety profiles. We evaluated the 1-year cost-effectiveness of TKI initiation with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib among a hypothetical cohort of incident patients with CML from a US payer's perspective. Methods We constructed a decision analytic model to assess quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, net monetary benefit, and incremental cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies. We used published studies and data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan database for model parameters. To calculate TKI costs, we used the 2018 Federal Supply Schedule estimates for generic imatinib and branded second-generation TKIs. We evaluated cost-effectiveness under various willingness-to-pay thresholds. We accounted for uncertainty with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results In the base-case analysis, imatinib was favored over dasatinib and nilotinib at a lower cost per QALY gained. Imatinib remained the favored strategy after 1-way variations in TKI costs, TKI switching, QALYs, adverse event risk, and CML progression. When we assessed model uncertainty with prespecified parameter distributions, imatinib was cost-saving compared with dasatinib in 40% of 100 0000 simulations and was favored over all simulations compared with nilotinib. First-line treatment with second-generation TKIs was cost-effective in 50% of simulations at a $200 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions Generic availability of imatinib provides a more cost-effective treatment approach in the first year compared with other available TKIs for newly diagnosed patients with CML.

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeted therapy revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. However, cardiotoxicity associated with these targeted therapies puts the cancer survivors at higher risk. Ponatinib is a third-generation TKI for the treatment of CML patients having gatekeeper mutation T315I, which is resistant to the first and second generation of TKIs, namely, imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib. Multiple unbiased screening from our lab and others have identified ponatinib as most cardiotoxic FDA approved TKI among the entire FDA approved TKI family (total 50+). Indeed, ponatinib is the only treatment option for CML patients with T315I mutation. This review focusses on the cardiovascular risks and mechanism/s associated with CML TKIs with a particular focus on ponatinib cardiotoxicity. We have summarized our recent findings with transgenic zebrafish line harboring BNP luciferase activity to demonstrate the cardiotoxic potential of ponatinib. Additionally, we will review the recent discoveries reported by our and other laboratories that ponatinib primarily exerts its cardiotoxicity via an off-target effect on cardiomyocyte prosurvival signaling pathways, AKT and ERK. Finally, we will shed light on future directions for minimizing the adverse sequelae associated with CML-TKIs.

Introduction In this study, we aim to report the outcome of COVID-19 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Method The data of 16 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients with CML receiving TKI and age, gender, and comorbid disease matched COVID-19 patients without cancer at a 3/1 ratio (n = 48), diagnosed between March 11, 2020 and May 22, 2020 and included in the Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health database, were analyzed retrospectively. Results The rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation (MV) support were lower in CML patients compared to the control group, however, these differences did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.1, and p = 0.2, respectively). The length of hospital stay was shorter in CML patients compared with the control group; however, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). The case fatality rate (CFR) in COVID-19 patients with CML was 6.3%, and it was 12.8% in the control group. Although the CFR in CML patients with COVID-19 was lower compared to the control group, this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.5). When CML patients were divided into 3 groups according to the TKI, no significant difference was observed regarding the rate of ICU admission, MV support, CFR, the length of stay in both hospital and ICU (all p > 0.05). Conclusion This study highlights that large scale prospective and randomized studies should be conducted in order to investigate the role of TKIs in the treatment of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Taking advantage of its food-dependent bioavailability, the present study investigated the effect of a reduced dose taken with real-life meals on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients.METHODS: Nilotinib was taken fasted (300 mg BID, days 1-4) or with real-life meals (200 mg BID, days 5-11). Rich sampling (days 1, 3, 8, 11) allowed for non-compartmental PK analysis. Nilotinib exposure (AUC0-12 h -Cmin -Cmax ) and its intra- and interpatient variability were compared between the two regimens. Adverse events were recorded by means of a patient diary and ECG monitoring.RESULTS: Fifteen patients aged 40-74 years participated. Nilotinib PK following 200 mg BID taken with a meal strongly resembled that of 300 mg BID taken fasted (Cmin percentile (P)10-P90: 665-1404 ng/mL and 557-1743 ng/mL, respectively). Meals delayed nilotinib absorption. Intra- and interpatient variability were not increased by intake with meals. Nilotinib with food was well tolerated.CONCLUSION: With support of therapeutic drug monitoring, the use of a reduced 200 mg nilotinib dose with real-life meals seems feasible and safe. Future (confirmatory) studies should further explore the usefulness of nilotinib dosing together with food, including the relationship with treatment efficacy as well as long-term effects on quality of life.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5000 (Netherlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl).

QTc interval prolongation can lead to life-threatening complications such as Torsade de Pointes (TdP), ventricular tachycardia (VT) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). It can occur with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) but comparative real-world analyses on the incidence and complication rates are scarce. We retrospectively reviewed all cancer patients treated with TKI therapy at Mayo Clinic between January 2005 and December 2018 and had at least two ECGs (before and after TKI). For each TKI type, we determined the administration rate and incidence of QTc prolongation. QTc prolongation was defined as a corrected QT interval (by Fridericia formula) ≥450 ms in men and ≥470 ms in women. A total of 618 cancer patients were included with 902 TKI administrations, of which 654 (72.5%) were accounted for by pazopanib, sunitinib, imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. QTc prolongation (any grade) was reported in 28.8%, most commonly with nilotinib (38.7%) and dasatinib (41.7%). A QTc interval ≥500 ms and a QTc increase ≥60 ms was documented in 46 and 63 administrations, respectively. Life-threatening toxicity was seen in 14 cases (5.4% of QTc prolongation cases) including VT in 9, SCD in 3 and TdP in two administrations. The response to QTc prolongation was: discontinuation in 68%, dose reduction in 13.5%, temporary hold in 8.1% and no action in 10.4%. In conclusion, QTc prolongation with TKI therapy is very common (∼1/3 of cases) and in 5% (1.7% overall) associated with life-threatening complications. These data support recommendations for careful ECG monitoring in cancer patients undergoing TKI therapy.

Background Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. However, medication adherence is vital for patients on chronic treatment. Objective The objective of the current study was to evaluate response to treatment, adherence by patients to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and factors associated with adherence and response. Setting A haematology clinic in a regional referral hospital in Malaysia. Method Patients aged ≥ 13 years who had been on imatinib or nilotinib for ≥ 12 months were included in this cross-sectional study. An optimal response was defined as the achievement of major molecular response at 12 months of treatment. Patient medication adherence was determined using the average medication possession ratio based on the dispensing records. The patients were considered adherent if the medication possession ratio was > 90%. Multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the factors associated with adherence. The association of adherence with molecular response was analysed by univariate logistic regression. Main outcome measure The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients who achieved optimal response and the medication possession ratio. Results A total of 151 patients were screened, and 71 patients were included. Twenty-eight patients (39%) achieved major molecular response at 12 months of treatment. The median time to achieve this was 15.5 months (an interquartile range of 15). The mean medication possession ratio for imatinib and nilotinib was 0.94 (± 0.14) and 0.96 (± 0.10), respectively, but this difference was without statistical significance (t = − 0.517, p = 0.610). Nausea and vomiting (odds ratio [OR] of 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07–0.83, p = 0.023) and disease phase at diagnosis (OR of 0.20, 95% CI 0.04–1.06, p = 0.059) were associated with patient adherence. An association was not found between patient adherence and molecular response (OR of 1.03, 95% CI 0.35–3.09, p = 0.956). Conclusion The patients in this study demonstrated a relatively deep molecular response and optimal adherence. Nevertheless, one fourth of them were noncompliant with imatinib. Therefore, active interventions are warranted to prevent treatment-associated adverse events and improve adherence.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasia that is characterised by Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1 chromosome) and/or fusion gene BCR-ABL1 in bone marrow. Interpheron#945; and bone marrow transplantation used to be the main treatment modalities for patients with CML 20 years ago. Due to the introduction of imatinib mesylate since the year 2000 the outcome of CML patients has dramatically improved. The survival of both younger and elderly patients in the case of an optimal response has been prolonged and currently is close to survival of healthy population. Although, one third of patients does not respond well to first line imatinib and needs to change the treatment to second line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI: bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib). Younger patients without cardiologic and metabolic disorders and those with poor risk profile score may have benefit from TKI of 2nd generation as a 1st line treatment option with the aim of reaching deeper molecular response and the chance of treatment free remission (TFR) in future. By older patients with severe comorbidities and in patients with good risk profile score imatinib as a 1st line treatment option can be used. For patients who are resistant simultaneously to 2nd generation TKI and for patients with mutation T315I ponatinib - TKI of 3rd generation can be used effectively. Intolerance and toxicity of TKI´s are the main barriers of effective CML treatment. TKI selection for each patient should be individual. Patient´s cooperation with medical team is crucial and inevitable in long time treatment process. The chance for TFR has become feasible for approximately 40-60 % CML patients in deep and durable molecular remission and represents a further important milestone in the management of CML patients.

The recent American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting, held in Orlando, Florida, in December 2019 was an exciting meeting for researchers and clinicians working in the field of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as for patients suffering from the disease. Interesting updates were presented on new kinase inhibitors (TKI) demonstrating great potential with low toxicities in heavily pretreated patients. Moreover, the 10-year follow-up data of the ENESTnd Study, comparing 2nd generation (2ndG) TKI nilotinib with imatinib showed a continuous benefit of the 2ndG TKI in achieving deeper molecular responses and less progressions to accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis (BC), but no benefit in progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Encouraging data were also presented on the treatment of CML BC by combining conventional chemotherapy (FLAG-IDA) with TKI therapy (Ponatinib). Furthermore, great efforts have been undertaken to be able to predict the likelihood of successful TKI cessation in deep molecular remission for individual CML patients in first chronic phase (CP).

The advent of BCR–ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment and prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia. Life expectancy for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia now nears that of the healthy population; however, optimal outcomes require continuous tyrosine kinase inhibitor administration, which can impact patient quality of life. Consequently, the concept of treatment-free remission has been explored in patients achieving and sustaining a deep molecular response. Heterogeneous data exist with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors; however, nilotinib is currently the only therapy that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment-free remission. The decision to pursue treatment-free remission is one that relies heavily on both patient- and disease-related factors. Herein, we will discuss relevant considerations to be made when determining an optimal candidate for treatment-free remission.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic disorder caused by the BCR/ABL gene or Philadelphia chromosome. The first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treatment of CML was imatinib in 2001. Since then, multiple therapies, such as nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and, more recently, ponatinib, have made their way as viable treatment options for first-line and secondary therapies. Most patients tend to respond to first-line treatment. Although there is a subset of patients who do not achieve complete molecular response with first line, newer options have proven beneficial. As we progress through therapies, there still remain some patients who do not adequately respond to current available therapies. The treatment options and guidelines become more difficult in such situations, not only with respect to cost but also patient quality of life and satisfaction. We discuss a 75-year-old white female with CML, who has had multiple therapies with hematological remission but has never achieved complete molecular remission, currently on bosutinib and tolerating it well.

Objective Preclinical evidence with nilotinib, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for leukemia, indicates improvement in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes. We investigated whether nilotinib is safe, and detectable in cerebrospinal fluid, and alters biomarkers and clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease. Methods This single-center, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nilotinib, and measured biomarkers in participants with mild to moderate dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The diagnosis was supported by cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid positron emission tomography biomarkers. Nilotinib 150 mg versus matching placebo was taken orally once daily for 26 weeks followed by nilotinib 300 mg versus placebo for another 26 weeks. Results Of the 37 individuals enrolled, 27 were women and the mean (SD) age was 70.7 (6.48) years. Nilotinib was well-tolerated, although more adverse events, particularly mood swings, were noted with the 300 mg dose. In the nilotinib group, central nervous system (CNS) amyloid burden was significantly reduced in the frontal lobe compared to the placebo group. Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ40 was reduced at 6 months and Aβ42 was reduced at 12 months in the nilotinib group compared to the placebo. Hippocampal volume loss was attenuated (-27%) at 12 months and phospho-tau-181 was reduced at 6 months and 12 months in the nilotinib group. Interpretation Nilotinib is safe and achieves pharmacologically relevant cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. Biomarkers of disease were altered in response to nilotinib treatment. These data support a larger, longer, multicenter study to determine the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in Alzheimer's disease. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:183-194.

PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved survival for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). No overall survival differences were observed between patients initiating first- and second-generation TKIs in trials; however, real-world safety and cost outcomes are unclear. We evaluated comparative safety and health care expenditures between first-line imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib among patients with CML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had one or more fills for imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016 (earliest fill is the index date), 6 months pre-index continuous enrollment, CML diagnosis, and no TKI use in the pre-index period. Hospitalizations or emergency department visits (safety events) were compared across treatment groups using propensity-score-weighted 1-year relative risks (RRs) and subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs). Inflation-adjusted annual health care expenditures were compared using quantile regression. RESULTS: Eligible patients included 1,417 receiving imatinib, 1,067 receiving dasatinib, and 647 receiving nilotinib. The 1-year risk of safety events was high: imatinib, 37%; dasatinib, 44%; and nilotinib, 40%, with higher risks among patients receiving dasatinib (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.30) and nilotinib (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.23) compared with those receiving imatinib. Over a median of 1.7 years, the cumulative incidence of safety events was higher among patients receiving dasatinib (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.38) and nilotinib (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.24) than among those receiving imatinib. One-year health care expenditures were high (median, $125,987) and were significantly higher among patients initiating second-generation TKIs compared with those receiving imatinib (difference in medians: dasatinib v imatinib, $22,393; 95% CI, $17,068 to $27,718; nilotinib v imatinib, $19,463; 95% CI, $14,689 to $24,236). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving imatinib had the lowest risk of hospitalization or emergency department visits and 1-year health care expenditures. Given a lack of significant differences in overall survival, imatinib may represent the ideal first-line therapy for patients, on average.

We report on 18 patients with myeloid neoplasms and associated tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes on treatment with the TK inhibitors (TKI) ruxolitinib (PCM1-JAK2, n = 8; BCR-JAK2, n = 1) and imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib (ETV6-ABL1, n = 9). On ruxolitinib (median 24 months, range 2-36 months), a complete hematologic response (CHR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was achieved by five of nine and two of nine patients, respectively. However, ruxolitinib was stopped in eight of nine patients because of primary resistance (n = 3), progression (n = 3) or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT, n = 2). At a median of 36 months (range 4-78 months) from diagnosis, five of nine patients are alive: four of six patients after allo SCT and one patient who remains on ruxolitinib. In ETV6-ABL1 positive patients, a durable CHR was achieved by four of nine patients (imatinib with one of five, nilotinib with two of three, dasatinib with one of one). Because of inadequate efficacy (lack of hematological and/or cytogenetic/molecular response), six of nine patients (imatinib, n = 5; nilotinib, n = 1) were switched to nilotinib or dasatinib. At a median of 23 months (range 3-60 months) from diagnosis, five of nine patients are in CCR or complete molecular response (nilotinib, n = 2; dasatinib, n = 2; allo SCT, n = 1) while two of nine patients have died. We conclude that (a) responses on ruxolitinib may only be transient in the majority of JAK2 fusion gene positive patients with allo SCT being an important early treatment option, and (b) nilotinib or dasatinib may be more effective than imatinib to induce durable complete remissions in ETV6-ABL1 positive patients.

We conducted a phase I-II study to evaluate Nilotinib (NIL) safety and pharmacokinetics in 22 SR-cGVHD patients; we also evaluated ORR by using in parallel NIH criteria and an exploratory approach, combining objective improvement (OI) without failure criteria (GITMO criteria). Results: 22 patients were enrolled. After dose escalation up to 600 mg/day, MTD was not reached. Main toxicities were asthenia, headache, nausea, pruritus, cramps, and mild anemia. Mean and median plasma concentrations of NIL (C-NIL) were 817 (SD ± 450) and 773 ng/ml. ORR at 6 months, according to 2005 and 2014 NIH and GITMO criteria were 27.8%, 22.2%, and 55.6% respectively; close correspondence has been observed for ORR, according to 2014 NIH criteria, both assessed in a conventional way and assisted by dedicated software (CROSY). At 48 months OS was 75% while FFS, according to NIH and GITMO criteria, was 30 and 25%. In conclusion the safety profile of NIL and long-term outcome makes NIL an attractive option in SR-cGVHD. Exploratory GITMO criteria could represent an alternative tool for easy response evaluation in patients with prevalent skin and lung involvement, but require validation in a larger population; CROSY software showed excellent reliability in capturing ORR according to the 2014 NIH criteria.

BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved survival outcomes in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) and are associated with a manageable safety profile. However, long-term TKI administration can lead to cardiovascular or renal adverse events. One goal in discontinuation of TKIs was reduction of adverse events, but it is unclear whether chronic toxicities are ameliorated as a result. In this study, we evaluated changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with CML-CP before and after TKI discontinuation. Long-term TKI treatment appears to induce renal toxicity, as eGFR at the time of TKI discontinuation correlated with the duration of TKI treatment (r = − 0.478, p = 0.005). Patients who received imatinib as first-line treatment exhibited lower eGFR levels than those treated with dasatinib or nilotinib, which may be correlated with long-term treatment (p = 0.027). After TKI discontinuation, no significant increases in eGFR were seen either in patients with treatment-free remission (66.8–71.2 ml/min/1.73 m2) or molecular relapse (64.8–68.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.666). These data indicate that TKI-induced renal toxicities are associated with long-term TKI treatment, and may be irreversible even following treatment discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE To examine the association among tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) out-of-pocket costs, adherence, and health care costs and utilization in a large group of commercially insured patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with CML aged 18 to 64 years were identified using IBM MarketScan Commercial Database between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled 3 months before and 12 months after TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib) initiation. TKI adherence is estimated using the proportion of days covered (PDC), defined as the percentage of the PDC by the prescription fill during the 12-month study period (adherent patients have PDC ≥80%). Health care cost differences between adherent and nonadherent patients were estimated using generalized linear models. Health care utilization was compared using negative binomial regression models. All models were controlled for potential confounding factors. RESULTS The study sample consisted of 863 patients, where 355 (41.1%) patients were classified as adherent. Over the study period, nonadherent patients incurred US$10,974 more in medical costs (P