Search

PURPOSE: An in-depth analysis of the tumor microenvironment of ovarian cancer is needed. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the architecture of the immune microenvironment of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSCs) with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. METHODS: A cohort of highly annotated HGSC patients with known germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 status was selected, and pretreatment tumor tissue specimens were analyzed with a multiplexed staining technique aimed at detecting lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts in the whole tumor area and in specific regions including epithelium, stroma, and perivascular areas. RESULTS: BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated tumors showed a more immunogenic microenvironment, characterized by a higher abundance of CD8(+) and PD-L1(+) cells, than did tumors with wild-type BRCA1 and BRCA2. High numbers of PD-L1(+) and PD-L1(+)CD8(+) cells were prognostic for event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21–0.79, p = 0.008 and HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.91, p = 0.025, respectively), as were high numbers of epithelial PD-L1(+) and FAP(+)PD-L1(+) cells (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28–0.96, p = 0.037 and HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08–0.87, p = 0.029) and CD8(+) cells (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.93, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals substantial differences between the immune microenvironment composition of germline BRCA-mutated and BRCA wild-type HGSC.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the factors associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the ability to undergo interval tumor reductive surgery (iTRS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review from April 2013 to March 2019 of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer triaged to NACT based on our standard triage algorithm. Clinicopathologic and treatment data were analyzed for factors associated with response to NACT, outcomes at iTRS, and their impact on progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 562 patients met inclusion criteria and triaged to NACT following laparoscopy (n=132) or without laparoscopy (n=430). 413 patients underwent iTRS (74%). Factors that correlated with a patient reaching iTRS included increasing age (p1cm, p

The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study, a phase II basket study, evaluates anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancers harboring genomic alterations known as drug targets. With no known genomic targets predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab, cetuximab was evaluated in patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer (OC), without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. Eligible patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC received a cetuximab loading dose, then weekly infusions (250 mg/m2 over 60 min). A Simon two-stage design, requiring ten patients in stage I, was employed per each disease-specific cohort. The primary endpoint was disease control (objective response or stable disease for at least 16 weeks). If two or more patients in stage I achieved disease control, the cohort would enroll 18 more patients in stage II. Power and alpha of the design are 85% and 10%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Patients with BC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 10), and OC (n = 29) were enrolled between June 2016 and September 2018. No objective responses or stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the BC and NSCLC cohorts. No objective responses and four patients with stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the OC cohort. Six of 49 patients reported grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events at least possibly related to cetuximab. Cetuximab does not have clinical activity in patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. NCT02693535 (26 February, 2016).

Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary/peritoneum (LGSC) is relatively chemoresistant in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and recurrent settings. We sought to expand our prior work and evaluate response rates of women with LGSC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to women with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary/peritoneum (HGSC).Thirty-six patients with LGSC who received NACT were matched to patients with HGSC. A single radiologist re-reviewed pre- and post-NACT imaging for response using RECIST 1.1. Pre- and post-NACT CA-125 values were compared using paired t-tests. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.All patients received neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens. LGSC patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 3-9), HGSC patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 3-9). Interval cytoreductive surgery was performed in 29/36 (81%) of LGSC and 32/36 (89%) HGSC patients. Complete cytoreduction was reported and achieved in 11/29 (38%) of LGSC patients and 24/32 (75%) of HGSC patients (p = 0.002). Median pre- and post-treatment CA-125 levels for LGSC patients were 295.5 U/mL and 144 U/mL (52% decrease) (p 0.001). The median pre- and post-treatment CA-125 levels for HGSC patients were 767.5 and 35.6 (96% decrease) (p 0.001). For LGSC patients, 4/36 (11%) had partial response (PR), 30/36 (83%) had stable disease (SD), and 2/36 (6%) had progressive disease (PD). In HGSC patients, 27/36 (75%) had PR, and 9/36 (25%) SD. Median PFS for LGSC patients was 18.5 months and median OS was 47.4 months.This study provides further evidence of relative chemoresistance of LGSC in patients treated with NACT.

Objectives We aimed to compare clinical and survival outcomes in high grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) stratified by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status undergoing frontline and/or maintenance therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of HGOC from April 2013 to June 2019. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by (1) germline BRCA+ (2) germline BRCA - and somatic BRCA/HRD+, or (3) BRCA-/HRD-. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. Results 187 patients met inclusion criteria. 106 patients had germline BRCA mutation, 26 somatic BRCA/HRD+, and 55 BRCA/HRD-. Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04), p=0.01), stage (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.39–23.4, p=0.02), R0 resection at TRS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21–0.83, p=0.01), and BRCA/HRD- status (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07–2.48, p=0.02) were significant factors impacting PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03–1.10, p Conclusions Germline BRCA-mutant, somatic BRCA/HRD+ HGOC was associated with improved PFS and OS regardless of primary TRS or NACT. BRCA-/HRD- was a negative prognostic factor for survival in HGOC. PARPi maintenance therapy was associated with improved PFS in Germline BRCA-mutant, somatic BRCA/HRD+ HGOC

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) is used to score histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of patients with extrauterine high-grade serous carcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine if the CRS in the omentum, adnexa or when combined correlates with (1) progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), (2) laparoscopic score of abdominal disease, (3) Cancer antigen 125 levels, (4) BRCA status, and (5) platinum-resistant disease. A total of 158 cases were retrospectively collected that received NACT between April 2013 and February 2018 at a single institution. The 3-tier Bohm CRS system was applied to the omentum and adnexa. Survival outcomes between scored subgroups were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Spearman rank correlation analyses were used to assess CRS and clinical data. A total of 119 cases were treated only with carboplatin/paclitaxel. Omental CRS was: 1 (23 cases, 19.3%), 2 (65 cases, 54.6%), and 3 (31 cases, 26.1%), whereas adnexal CRS was: 1 (50 cases, 42%), 2 (48 cases, 40.3%) and 3 (21 cases, 17.6%). The omental CRS was significantly associated with PFS as a 2-tier score (hazard ratio [HR]=0.612, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.378-0.989, P=0.045) but not associated with the PFS using the 3-tier score or with OS using either system. Adnexal CRS was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.263-0.914, P=0.025) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.535, 95% CI: 0.297-0.963, P=0.037). The combined score was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.348, 95% CI: 0.137-0.88, P=0.026) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.364, 95% CI: 0.148-0.896, P=0.028). No CRS system used associated with laparoscopic assessment of disease. CRS in the omentum had no significant association with platinum resistance; however, the adnexal CRS 1/2 were 3 times as likely to develop platinum resistance compared with CRS 3 (relative risk=3.94, 95% CI: 1.03-15.09, P=0.046). The CRS, when used on the omentum, adnexa, and as a combined score, was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS. Adnexal CRS 1/2 are more likely to develop platinum-resistant disease. Therefore, the use of this pathology parameter may be useful for clinical management.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of pharmacologic beta-adrenergic blockade in women with newly diagnosed stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) throughout primary treatment. METHODS: Patients initiated propranolol prior to beginning chemotherapy or surgery. Feasibility was assessed as proportion able to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles while on adrenergic suppression. Descriptive statistics summarized surveys, and paired changes were analyzed using signed rank tests. Random-intercept Tobit models examined immune response. RESULTS: Median age was 59.9; 88.5% were stage IIIC/IV; and 38.5% underwent primary debulking. Thirty-two patients were enrolled; 3 excluded because they never took propranolol; an additional 3 didn’t meet inclusion criteria, leaving 26 evaluable. Eighteen of 26 (69%), 90% credible interval (CI) of 53–81%, completed 6 chemotherapy cycles plus propranolol (an 82% posterior probability that the true proportion of success is ≥60%). Among the 23 patients with baseline and six month follow up data, overall QOL, anxiety, and depression improved (P

// Marilyne Labrie 1 , Tae-Beom Kim 2 , Zhenlin Ju 2 , Sanghoon Lee 3 , Wei Zhao 3 , Yong Fang 1 , Yiling Lu 3 , Ken Chen 2 , Pedro Ramirez 4 , Michael Frumovitz 4 , Larissa Meyer 4 , Nicole D. Fleming 4 , Anil K. Sood 4 , Robert L. Coleman 4 , Gordon B. Mills 1 , 3 and Shannon N. Westin 4 1 Knight Cancer Institute and Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA 2 Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 3 Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 4 Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Correspondence to: Shannon N. Westin, email: swestin@mdanderson.org Keywords: poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor; combination therapy; adaptive response; ovarian cancer; targeted therapy Received: March 12, 2019 Accepted: May 02, 2019 Published: May 28, 2019 ABSTRACT Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi)-based combination therapies are demonstrating efficacy in patients, however, identifying the right combination for the right patient remains a critical challenge. Thus, it is urgent to develop approaches able to identify patients likely to benefit from specific combination therapies. Several groups, including ours, have demonstrated that targeting adaptive responses induced by PARPi increases depth and duration of response. In this study, we instituted a talazoparib (PARPi) monotherapy window of opportunity trial to identify informative adaptive responses in high grade serous ovarian cancer patients (HGSOC). Patients were treated for 7 to 14 days with PARPi monotherapy prior to surgery with tissue samples from multiple sites being collected pre- and post-treatment in each patient. Analysis of these samples demonstrated that individual patients displayed different adaptive responses with limited interlesional heterogeneity. Ability of combination therapies designed to interdict adaptive responses to decrease viability was validated using model systems. Thus, assessment of adaptive responses to PARPi provides an opportunity for patient-specific selection of combination therapies designed to interdict patient-specific adaptive responses to maximize patient benefit.

Objective We reviewed our institutional data to evaluate toxicity and efficacy outcomes of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib in recurrent endometrial cancer in a “real-world” clinical setting and to compare the impact of reduced lenvatinib starting dose on outcomes. Methods Retrospectively, we reviewed toxicity, treatment responses, and survival outcomes of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who received ≥1 cycle of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib. We compared subgroups based on lenvatinib starting dose (recommended [20 mg] vs reduced [ Results We analyzed 70 patients (recommended dose cohort, n = 16; reduced dose cohort, n = 54). The most common starting dose was 14 mg daily. Compared to the reduced dose cohort, the recommended dose cohort had a significantly higher mean number of lenvatinib dose reductions due to side effects (1.1 vs. 0.4; p = 0.003) and significantly shorter median time to treatment toxicity (1.3 vs. 3.7 days; p = 0.0001). Response rates did not differ significantly between the recommended and reduced dose cohorts (28.6% vs. 38.3%, respectively; p = 0.752). Two patients, both in the reduced dose cohort, had complete responses. Patients with carcinosarcoma histology had response and clinical benefit rates of 25% (3 of 12) and 58.3% (7 of 12), respectively. There were no differences between the 2 dose cohorts with respect to progression-free (p = 0.245) or overall survival (p = 0.858). Conclusion In clinical practice, a lower starting dose of lenvatinib (14 mg daily) in combination with pembrolizumab was safe and efficacious in recurrent endometrial cancer. The combination produced responses in endometrial carcinosarcomas. Larger studies are required to validate these findings.

Vaginal and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are rare tumors that can be challenging to treat in the recurrent or metastatic setting. We present a case series of patients with vaginal or vulvar SCC who were treated with single-agent pembrolizumab as part of a phase II basket clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety. Two cases of recurrent and metastatic vaginal SCC, with multiple prior lines of systemic chemotherapy and radiation, received pembrolizumab. One patient had significant reduction (81%) in target tumor lesions prior to treatment discontinuation at cycle 10 following confirmed progression of disease with new metastatic lesions (stable disease by irRECIST criteria). In contrast, the other patient with vaginal SCC discontinued treatment after cycle 3 due to disease progression. Both patients had PD-L1 positive vaginal tumors and tolerated treatment well. One case of recurrent vulvar SCC with multiple surgical resections and prior progression on systemic carboplatin had a 30% reduction in her target tumor lesions following pembrolizumab treatment with a PD-L1 positive tumor. Treatment was discontinued for grade 3 mucositis after cycle 5. Pembrolizumab may provide some clinical benefit to some patients with vaginal or vulvar SCC and is overall safe to utilize in this population. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in these rare tumor types and to identify predictive biomarkers of response.

Simple Summary Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in women and is typically diagnosed at an advanced-stage. Historically, primary tumor reductive surgery was attempted followed by postoperative chemotherapy in most patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery is an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer where primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Here, we review proposed models that can assist in selecting patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death amongst all gynecologic cancers despite advances in surgical and medical therapy. Historically, patients with ovarian cancer underwent primary tumor reductive surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery has gradually become an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer for whom primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Decision-making about the use of these approaches has not been uniform. Hence, it is essential to identify patients who can benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery. Several prospective and retrospective studies have proposed potential models to guide upfront decision-making for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize important decision-making models that can improve patient selection for personalized treatment. Models based on clinical factors (clinical parameters, radiology studies and laparoscopy scoring) and molecular markers (circulating and tumor-based) are useful, but laparoscopic staging is among the most informative diagnostic methods for upfront decision-making in patients medically fit for surgery. Further research is needed to explore more reliable models to determine personalized treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Objectives: The androgen receptor (AR) is more widely expressed than the estrogen or progesterone receptor in endometrial cancer (EC), including up to 90% of endometrioid type. Enzalutamide binds to the AR thereby nuclear translocation of receptors and blocking the association of the AR with DNA. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel, carboplatin and enzalutamide in a phase II study of advanced or recurrent endometrioid EC. Methods: Women with chemo-naive, advanced-stage or recurrent endometrioid EC with measurable disease and adequate end organ function were eligible. Documented AR expression was not required. A safety lead in of the triplet was performed to confirm dose. In phase II, patients received 28 days of enzalutamide (160mg daily) as a single agent before starting triplet therapy. Pre- and post-treatment biopsies were obtained during the single agent lead in for evaluation of molecular markers including AR receptor expression and activation, expression of AR-related genes/proteins, and DNA copy number alterations and mutations. Patients then received carboplatin (AUC 6 IV Q3wk), paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), and enzalutamide (160mg daily). Response per RECIST 1.1 was assessed every 3 cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles. Evaluable patients received at least 6 cycles of triplet therapy. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from date of treatment initiation to earliest date of progression, death, or last contact. This study was approved and funded in part by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Results: A total 81 patients were screened with 49 patients treated to date (safety lead in n=7; phase II n=42). Median age was 64 years (range 41-81) and the majority of patients had grade 2 histology (53.1%) and recurrent disease (81.6%). There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed during the safety lead in. Patients received a median of 9 cycles of triplet therapy (range 0-9). 8 patients (16.3%) did not receive chemotherapy due to rapid progression during single agent enzalutamide (n=3), unrelated death (n=2), withdrawal (n=2), and unrelated stroke (n=1). PFS for the entire cohort was 11.47 months (95% CI 9.86 - 17.94; Figure 1a) and 6-month PFS probability was 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.87). Among 35 evaluable patients, confirmed objective response rate was 71% (95% CI 54–85%), 6 months PFS probability was 0.83 (95% CI 0.66-0.92) and median PFS was 14.42 months (95% CI 11.2-25.5; Figure 1B). The most common adverse events were as expected for chemotherapy alone, including neutropenia (20%), anemia (18%), fatigue (18%), neuropathy (10%), hyperglycemia (14%), nausea (8%), and thrombocytopenia (8%). Download : Download high-res image (41KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was tolerable and had promising clinical outcomes in chemo-naive advanced or recurrent endometrioid EC. Further analyses are ongoing regarding predictors of response and resistance to androgen-inhibitor therapy. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02684227.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the impact of frailty in ovarian cancer patients on surgical procedures and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database from April 2013 to September 2017 was performed. Patients with advanced disease were triaged by laparoscopy to determine primary resectability. The modified frailty index score (mFI) was calculated based on the sum of 10 items: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or recent pneumonia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease (CVA), CVA with neurologic deficit, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 3 or 4, with each item receiving a score of 1 if present. Patients with an mFI ≥2 were classified as high frailty. Clinical outcomes were assessed and compared by mFI using t-test or Fisher's exact test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 591 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 57% of patients had an mFI of 0, 29% mFI of 1, and 14% mFI ≥2. There was no difference in stage by mFI (p=0.984). Patients with high frailty were less likely to be offered a laparoscopic surgery to determine primary resectability than those with an mFI of 1 or 0 (27.63% vs 42.77% vs 48.58%, respectively, p=0.004). If laparoscopy was performed, the modified Fagotti score was more likely to be ≥8 in patients with a higher frailty score (58%, 48%, and 34% for a score of ≥2, 1, and 0, respectively, p=0.038), leading to only 17% of the high frailty cohort proceeding with primary debulking surgery, compared to 26% and 34% in patients with mFI = 1 and mFI = 0 (p=0.015). Furthermore, patients with a higher frailty score were less likely to undergo any tumor reductive surgery (TRS), whether primary or interval (59% vs 74% vs 85% for a score of ≥2, 1, and 0, respectively, p Conclusions: Frailty is associated with bulkier disease, decreased surgical intervention, and worse clinical outcomes.

Objectives: Pembrolizumab/lenvatinib demonstrated impressive response rates in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in a recent phase II clinical trial, leading to its accelerated FDA approval. However, tolerability of the recommended 20 mg starting dose of lenvatinib may pose clinical challenges. To comprehend how this regimen translates into daily clinical practice, we evaluated our preliminary data regarding toxicity and efficacy of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced/recurrent EC at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Methods: In this single-institution, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated recurrent/advanced EC patients who received ≥1 cycle of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib treatment. Toxicity was evaluated through rates of hospitalization and treatment interruptions or discontinuations, as well as number of dose reductions. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by best radiologic response to treatment. Clinical benefit was defined as having stable disease or partial/complete response. Results: From October 2019 to July 2020, 83 EC patients were identified but 16 were excluded for unconfirmed administration of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib or lack of toxicity or response data. Thus, 67 EC patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 5 months (range 1 - 11). The median age and number of prior lines of therapy were 67 (range 31–77) and 2 (range 1–9), respectively. The majority had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1 (91%). The predominant histologic subtype was endometrioid and serous (n=19 each) followed by carcinosarcoma (n=13), mixed (n=8), clear cell (n=4), and other (n=4). The most common starting dose of lenvatinib was 14 mg (n=43; 64.2%), followed by 20 mg (n=15; 22.4%). Treatment-related hospitalizations occurred in 26.9% of patients but did not differ between lenvatinib dosage groups (p=0.37). Compared to those with a lower starting dosage level, patients started on 20 mg doses had significantly higher treatment discontinuations (100% vs 69.2%, p=0.01) and numbers of lenvatinib dose reductions (1.0 vs 0.38, p=0.004), with a trend of higher treatment interruptions (93.3% vs 73.1%, p=0.09). Among the 56 patients with evaluable radiologic response, there were 21 (37.5%) patients with either a partial (n=18) or complete response (n=3), while 18 patients (32.1%) had stable disease. Of the patients with complete response, all patients had a starting lenvatinib dose of 14 mg. Based on a starting lenvatinib dose of 20 mg vs Conclusions: In treatment of recurrent/advanced EC, lower starting dosage of lenvatinib was associated with fewer treatment interruptions/discontinuations and dose de-escalations compared to the FDA recommended 20 mg dosage level while maintaining equivalent response and clinical benefit rates. Furthermore, patients with carcinosarcoma histology also appeared to benefit from pembrolizumab/lenvatinib. While larger studies are needed to validate these safety and efficacy findings, our preliminary data supports starting a lower dosage of lenvatinib in clinical practice.

Objectives: Despite similar histologic appearance amongst high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC), anecdotally there are differences in gross appearance. However, no systematic framework to classify morphologic differences exists. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) can be reliably divided into distinct gross morphologic subtypes and to assess clinical outcomes and molecular features of these subtypes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of video-recordings from patients who underwent laparoscopic assessment of disease burden prior to primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Video recordings were reviewed by at least 2 physicians. A total of 4 sites (diaphragm, omentum, peritoneum, and pelvis) were assessed and classified as type I (deep, infiltrative disease with distortion of surrounding tissue) or type II (superficial, exophytic disease bordered by normal tissue). Tumor tissues from 16 of these chemotherapy-naive patients were analyzed by multi-platform omics (RNA sequencing, proteomics). Clinical outcomes were assessed utilizing a prospectively collected database and compared by morphology using t-test or Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 99 evaluable patients, 60 exhibited uniform morphology at all involved metastatic sites (65% type I and 35% type II), and 81 exhibited a predominating morphology (58% type I and 42% type II). A total of 164 images were reviewed by a third physician with 83.5% inter-rater concordance (κ=0.6446). Patients with uniform type 1 (n=34)tumor morphology were more likely to exhibit an excellent response to NACT (defined as radiologic or CA-125 complete response) than those with type II (n=16) tumor morphology (47% vs 18%, p=0.13). Patients with type II predominant tumor morphology had a significantly higher estimated blood loss at the time of interval debulking surgery (p=0.008) as well as longer operative time (p=0.03) compared with type I tumor morphology. Patients with complete type II morphology were more likely to have a modified Fagotti score of Conclusions: There are at least two distinct gross morphological patterns of HGSOC with unique molecular differences and responses to chemotherapy. These findings could have major clinical implications for tailored therapeutic strategies. Download : Download high-res image (97KB) Download : Download full-size image

Summary In patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), it is unclear which genomic features are related to complete gross resection (R0), which is typically associated with better clinical outcomes, or response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In this study, we evaluated T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity in primary and metastatic tumor samples (n = 90) from clinically well-annotated patients with HGSC who achieved R0 or received NACT with excellent or poor response based on a laparoscopic triage algorithm. TCR sequencing followed by an integrative analysis with comprehensive multi-omics data identified higher TCR diversity (e.g., higher number of unique productive sequences and less clonal relatedness) in the R0 than NACT groups. We found enrichment of specific TCRβ genes usage, distinct mutual exclusiveness and co-occurrence pattern of TCRβ genes among the groups. We also found significantly positive correlations between clonal relatedness and neoantigens, copy number variations, and mutation load in the groups., Graphical abstract, Highlights • Higher TCR repertoire diversity in the R0 versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups • Enrichment of specific TCRβ genes usage was noted among HGSC subgroups • Distinct mutual exclusiveness of TCRβ genes was noted among HGSC subgroups • Positive correlations between clonal relatedness and copy number variations, Biological Sciences; Immunology; Cancer

ObjectiveThis retrospective study examined the clinicopathologic features of adenosarcoma patients to determine potential prognostic factors and retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after primary treatment of adenosarcoma including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.MethodsOne hundred sixty-five patients with adenosarcoma were identified from the MD Anderson Cancer Center tumor registry between 1982 and 2014. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Pathologic characteristics were examined by sarcoma pathologists. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate OS, DFS, and LRFS. The log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups. Multivariate regression analyses of survival data were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsMedian OS and DFS for all patients were 8.5 and 4.7 years, respectively. Pathologic characteristics that influence OS and DFS were sarcomatous overgrowth (SO), myometrial invasion (MI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor size, number of mitosis, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, age, and resection status. Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with SO was 5.2 versus 14.5 years for patients without SO (P < 0.0001). Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with MI was 5.8 years versus not reached for patients without MI (P = 0.0005). Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with LVI was 1.0 versus 8.9 years for patients without LVI (P = 0.0021). On Cox analysis for OS and DFS and LRFS, only SO, MI, LVI, age, resection status, and FIGO stage remained significant. There was no difference in OS or LRFS for adjuvant radiation versus no adjuvant radiation (P = 0.17, P = 0.076).ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of LVI as a prognostic factor and confirms the prognostic significance of SO, MI, age, resection status, and FIGO stage for adenosarcoma. Furthermore, this study suggests that there is no additional benefit to adjuvant radiation. The standard-of-care treatment for adenosarcoma should remain total abdominal hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy +/− lymphadenectomy and no adjuvant radiation.

Objectives: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is a rare tumor with limited therapeutic options and no clearly established best treatment sequence strategy. The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment sequencing for ULMS following primary surgical management and determine predictors of survival. Methods: Women with a diagnosis of ULMS between 1/2013 and 1/2018 were identified. Clinical data was collected; for this analysis, only women treated with primary surgical management were included. Descriptive statistics were performed and predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: 179 patients were included. Median age was 52 years (20-78), 94% had grade 3 tumors, and over half the total population were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n=100, 56%). In the subset of patients with early stage disease (126), 49% were treated with surgery only while 51% received adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in PFS between early stage patients who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.60). For the overall cohort, the most common adjuvant therapy regimens were gemcitabine/docetaxel (gem/doce, 40.9%) or ifosphamide/doxorubicin (ifos/doxo, 11.4%).137 patients (76.5%) experienced recurrence, progression or death during their follow up. The median PFS was 1.76 years (95% CI: 1.27- 2.08). The median survival for those treated with surgery alone was 1.79 years, for those treated with gem/doce was 1.27 years, and other chemotherapy regimen was 0.43 years. Median survival was not estimated for the ifos/doxo regimen due to small patient number. Upfront therapy regimen significantly impacted PFS (Figure 1, p=0.003), but was not significantly associated with OS (p=0.069). The one-year PFS probability was 0.58 for gem/doce (95% CI 0.45-0.68) compared with 0.80 for ifos/doxo (95% CI 0.54-0.91). Download : Download high-res image (94KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Median PFS was 1.76 years, despite many women undergoing adjuvant therapy after surgery, most commonly with either gem/doce or ifos/doxo regimens. Primary treatment with ifos/doxo was associated with higher one-year PFS. This finding warrants additional evaluation to determine the optimal adjuvant therapy for these women.

Objectives: To characterize distinct T cell repertoires between clinically well-defined groups of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients, we obtained pre- treatment tumor samples via a laparoscopic triage algorithm. Methods: Pre-treated frozen tumor samples (one primary and two metastatic sites) were collected from patients with HGSC based on a laparoscopic triage algorithm: 1) patients who underwent complete gross resection after primary surgery (R0, n=10), 2) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with excellent response (NACT-ER, n=10), or 3) patients who received NACT with poor response (NACT-PR, n=10). These samples were subjected to high-throughput TCR sequencing analysis and integrative analyses, with immune assessments and high-depth whole-genome sequencing from the matched samples among the groups. Results: We identified a rearranged complementary-determining region 3 (CDR3) of the T-cell receptor b (TCRb) gene using a total of 90 samples. Importantly, we identified higher TCR b-chain CDR3 diversity (i.e., a higher number of unique productive sequences, less clonal relatedness, and higher TCR convergence) in the R0 group than in the NACT groups. We also found enrichment of specific variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) genes usage in each group and significant unique mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence of V, D, and J genes in all three groups. In addition, we also found significant positive correlations between clonal relatedness and neoantigens (R=0.31, p=0.007), copy number variations (R=0.43, p Conclusions: Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of TCR repertoire diversity in clinically defined HGSC subgroups, and could have prognostic and therapeutic strategies in HGSC.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping continues to evolve in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer (EC). The purpose of this trial was to identify the sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) and FN predictive value (FNPV) of SLN compared to complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LAD) in women with high-risk EC.Women with high-risk EC (grade 3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma) were enrolled in this prospective surgical trial. All patients underwent preoperative PET/CT and intraoperative SLN biopsy followed by LAD. Patients with peritoneal disease on imaging or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if SLN was attempted and complete LAD was performed.123 patients were enrolled between 4/13 and 5/16; 101 were evaluable. At least 1 SLN was identified in 89% (90); bilateral detection 58%, unilateral pelvic 40%, para-aortic only 2%. Indocyanine green was used in 61%, blue dye in 28%, and blue dye and technetium in 11%. Twenty-three pts. (23%) had ≥1 positive node. In 20/23, ≥1 SLN was identified and in 19/20 the SLN was positive. Only 1 patient had bilateral negative SLN and positive non-SLNs on final pathology. Overall, sensitivity of SLN was 95% (19/20), FNR was 5% (1/20) and FNPV was 1.4% (1/71). If side-specific LAD was performed when a SLN was not detected, the FNR decreased to 4.3% (1/23).This prospective trial demonstrated that SLN biopsy plus side-specific LAD, when SLN is not detected, is a reasonable alternative to a complete LAD in high-risk endometrial cancer.

Objective To evaluate clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant treatment effects on recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in early stage uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC). Methods Our retrospective review included central pathology confirmed stage I or II UCCC treated and/or followed between 2000 and 2016. Cases with pure or mixed histology with >50% UCCC were included. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results 112 women were identified. Median age was 65.5 years (range 34–94). Most patients had mixed UCCC (61%), while 39% had pure UCCC. The majority of patients had stage IA UCCC (66%) versus stage IB (15%) or stage II (18%) disease. Adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy + radiation (26%), brachytherapy (27%), whole pelvic radiation (15%), chemotherapy alone (8%), and observation (24%). Thirty-eight (34%) women had recurrent disease. Median RFS was 4.32 years (95% CI 2.77–5.78). On multivariate analysis, age ≥70 (HR 2.48, 95% 1.28–4.81) and positive LVSI (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.15–4.18) were associated with shorter RFS. Median OS was 9.8 years (95% CI 7.46–15.93). On multivariate analyses, age ≥70 (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.64–7.74) and positive LVSI (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.12–5.37) were associated with shorter OS. In this retrospective descriptive uncontrolled patient series, adjuvant treatment type did not impact RFS or OS. Conclusions OS approaches 10 years for early stage UCCC patients. Women ≥70 years have worse PFS and OS regardless of treatment modality, encouraging consideration of quality of life implications when electing for adjuvant therapy.

5568 Background: Nearly 50% of patients with high grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) harbor a germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 or have tumors characterized by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD is associated with response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in HGOC. Although PARPi show great promise, there is interest in investigating how HRD status affects outcomes and can be used to objectively tailor other treatment strategies. We aimed to compare clinical and survival outcomes in HGOC stratified by HRD status. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all advanced HGOC from April 2013 to June 2019. Patients were included if germline BRCA and HRD status was known. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and stratified by (1) germline BRCA+ (2) germline BRCA - and somatic BRCA/HRD+, or (3) BRCA-/HRD-. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods stratified by HRD status and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 1271 patients with advanced HGOC presented during the study period of which 187 met inclusion criteria. 106 patients had germline BRCA mutation, 26 somatic BRCA/HRD+, and 55 BRCA/HRD-. Patients who had HRD- tumor had older median age at diagnosis (63 vs. 54 and 60 years, p

Background: The impact of chemotherapy response score (CRS) on prognosis has varied among studies. We addressed the prognostic significance of CRS and the prognostic value of previously undescribed histologic features using a cohort of 245 patients. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with advanced extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery from 1990 to 2018 in our hospital. Gynecologic pathologists assessed tumor CRS and other histologic features. Clinical information was collected, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: A modified 2 tier CRS (CRS 1/2 versus CRS 3) was significantly associated, independent of scoring site (omental versus adnexal), with overall survival (OS) (omentum, p = 0.018, adnexa, p = 0.042, entire cohort, p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.021, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate survival analysis, 2 tier CRS, oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for OS (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, p = 0.007, and p = 0.010, respectively). Likewise, 2 tier CRS, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for PFS (p = 0.012, p = 0.003, p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions: The modified 2 tier CRS was significantly associated with survival, independent of scoring site. Additional histologic features including oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia can also predict patient outcomes.

Background The incidence of complex atypical hyperplasia and early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer is increasing, in part owing to the epidemic of obesity, which is a risk factor tightly linked to the development of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. The standard upfront treatment for complex atypical hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer is hysterectomy. However, nonsurgical treatment of early-stage endometrial neoplasia may be necessary owing to medical comorbidities precluding surgery or desired future fertility. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device to treat complex atypical hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Study Design A single-institution, single-arm, phase II study of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (52 mg levonorgestrel, Mirena) was conducted in patients with complex atypical hyperplasia or grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer. The primary endpoint was pathologic response rate at 12 months, including complete or partial response. Quality of life and toxicity were assessed. Molecular analyses for proliferation markers, hormone-regulated genes, and wingless-related integration site pathway activation were performed at baseline and 3 months. Results A total of 57 patients were treated (21 endometrial cancer, 36 complex atypical hyperplasia). The median age was 48.0 years, and the median body mass index was 45.5 kg/m2. Of the 47 evaluable patients, 12-month response rate was 83% (90% credible interval, 72.7–90.3)—37 were complete responders (8 endometrial cancer; 29 complex atypical hyperplasia), 2 were partial responders (2 endometrial cancer), 3 had stable disease (2 endometrial cancer; 1 complex atypical hyperplasia), and 5 had progressive disease (3 endometrial cancer; 2 complex atypical hyperplasia). After stratification for histology, the response rate was 90.6% for complex atypical hyperplasia and 66.7% for grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer. Notably, 4 patients (9.5%) experienced relapse after the initial response. Adverse events were mild, primarily irregular bleeding and cramping. Quality of life was not negatively affected. At 3 months, exogenous progesterone effect was present in 96.9% of responders (31 of 32) vs 25% of nonresponders (2 of 8) (P=.001). Nonresponders had higher baseline proliferation (Ki67) and lower dickkopf homolog 3 gene expression than responders (P=.023 and P=.030). Nonresponders had significantly different changes in secreted frizzled-related protein 1, frizzled class receptor 8, and retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 compared with responders. Conclusion The levonorgestrel intrauterine device has a substantial activity in complex atypical hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer, with a modest proportion demonstrating upfront progesterone resistance. Potential biomarkers were identified that may correlate with resistance to therapy; further exploration is warranted.

There is a broad range of possible diagnoses for an elevated beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) in the absence of intrauterine or ectopic pregnancy. When women of child bearing potential undergo evaluation for clinical trial, it is often unclear what course of evaluation to take when a pregnancy test is positive. We describe the clinical course of a patient with widely metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma with metastasis to the peritoneum, lymph nodes and liver. The patient was found to have a mildly elevated β-hCG during initial evaluation for clinical trial. Extensive work up for ectopic pregnancy, trophoblastic disease, and phantom β-hCG were negative. The patient's β-hCG levels continued to rise until initiation of therapy. She was treated on a phase I protocol with restaging scans revealing a partial response. The β-hCG was retested and declined in conjunction with her response, consistent with paraneoplastic β-hCG. Here, we propose a decision making algorithm to evaluate a patient with an elevated β-hCG undergoing assessment for clinical trial., Highlights • Evaluation of positive pregnancy test during clinical trial accrual is difficult. • We describe a case of a woman with metastatic ovarian cancer. • The patient was found to have an elevated β-hCG during clinical trial evaluation. • We propose a decision making algorithm to evaluate these patients.

Objectives: To evaluate safety and efficacy of durvalumab (D) in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, high grade, non-mucinous ovarian cancer (OC). To investigate informative pharmacodynamic changes including proteome changes and immune-related pathways by treatment with immuno-oncology therapy in combination with chemotherapy. Methods: In this single arm phase II study, patients (pts) with untreated, advanced stage (III/IV) OC dispositioned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) received D (750mg) with weekly P (80mg/m2) and C (AUC6) after baseline tissue biopsy. Matched biopsies were obtained at tumor reductive surgery (TRS) after 3 cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA) were performed on pre- and post-treatment tissues. Protein expression alteration and an enriched Reactome pathway analysis using differentially expressed proteins between pre- and post-treatments were assessed. Results: 19 pts were enrolled and 18 treated. Median age was 63 and 50% had stage III disease. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. 94% of pts had an adverse event (AE). Most common AEs were anemia (94%), neutropenia (83%), fatigue (72%), hyperglycemia (73%), and thrombocytopenia (66%). Immune-related AEs observed included hyperthyroidism (22%), hypothyroidism (22%), diarrhea (6%), hypophysitis (6%). Eighty-three percent had optimal interval TRS, 70% had a pre-operative response by RECIST (PR=11, CR=1). At 13 months (mo) median follow up, 9 pts (50%) had disease progression and median PFS was 14.5 mo (95% CI: 9.2 - NA). Median OS was not reached; OS rate at 18 mo was 69% (95% CI 0.21 - 0.91). Fifty-five tumor specimens were available from 9 pts (31 pre- and 24 post-treatment). Thirteen significantly differentially expressed proteins among 211 proteins (adj. p Citation Format: Shannon N. Westin, Sanghoon Lee, Li Zhao, Ying Yuan, Jimin Wu, Richard Hajek, Sara Sharafi, Larissa A. Meyer, Nicole D. Fleming, Amir Jazaeri, Robert L. Coleman, Karen H. Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Jianhua Zhang, Andrew Futreal, Anil K. Sood. Pharmacodynamic changes by durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy in women with untreated, advanced stage ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT188.

Background: Prior molecular characterization efforts for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) were restricted to those who had upfront surgical debulking with variable treatment paradigms. Thus, we sought to examine molecular and cellular differences between clinically defined groups (tumor tissues from patients who had complete gross resection (CGR) versus those who were triaged to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and experienced either excellent or poor response. Methods: Tumor biopsies were collected from three patient groups managed under a systematic surgical algorithm: CGR after primary surgery (R0, n=10); poor tumor response to NACT (NACT-PR, n=10); excellent tumor response to NACT (NACT-ER, n=10). Primary and multiple metastatic tumor sites per each patient were obtained pre-treatment and subjected to comprehensive omics analyses including high-pass whole-genome (WGS) and targeted deep DNA sequencing. Results: An average of 71 nonsynonymous somatic mutations from each sample for 75 samples with high-purity tumors (≥75%) by WGS were identified from each sample for the entire cohort. Fourteen ovarian-cancer-associated genes were found mutated in our patient cohort and, as expected, the most frequently mutated gene was TP53 in both primary and metastatic sites in all three groups. TP53 nonsense mutations were exclusively identified in the NACT-ER (36.0%) and NACT-PR groups (15.4%), while in the R0 group most TP53 mutations were missense mutations (62.5%). Nonsense mutations in CSMD3 and PIK3CA were exclusively identified in both primary and metastatic sites in the NACT-PR group. The most frequent copy number variations (CNVs) in the R0 were copy number gain/loss of CSMD3 (67%) and copy number loss of NF1 (54%) and CDK12 (50%) in both primary and metastatic sites. Interestingly, copy number losses of NF1 were significantly lower in the NACT groups (18%, p=0.002), especially in the NACT-PR (8%, p=0.0004), when compared to the R0 group (54%). We also identified significant less observation of chromothripsis-like patterns, and a significantly higher level of strong-binding neoantigens in the R0 than in the NACT groups. Conclusions: Our findings using HGSOC samples obtained from patients treated on a prospective algorithm identified distinct molecular abnormalities, and could have prognostic and therapeutic implications for patients with HGSOC. Citation Format: Sanghoon Lee, Li Zhao, Shannon N. Westin, Nicholas W. Bateman, Amir A. Jazaeri, Nicole D. Fleming, Karen H. Lu, Robert L. Coleman, Gordon B. Mills, Jianhua Zhang, Thomas P. Conrads, George L. Maxwell, P. Andrew Futreal, Anil K. Sood. High-depth whole genome sequencing of clinically-annotated high-grade serous ovarian cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2510.

Background: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies. Here, we examined tumoral proteome changes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to identify potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers of response to primary chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 65 tissue specimens from 10 patients with advanced-stage HGSOC were collected from matched pre- and post-NACT (3 cycles of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin). Protein expression was assessed using reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA). All relative protein levels using 297 antibodies were normalized by the expression level of pre-treatment samples, and then protein expression alterations and functional analyses were performed by Reactome pathway analysis followed by statistical analysis. Results: The protein expression patterns of samples tended to cluster according to the time point (pre- and post-treatment) by a non-supervised clustering analysis using all the proteins assessed in the RPPA panel. Five differentially expressed proteins among 239 proteins (adj. p Conclusion: Our findings identified significant proteomic alterations following NACT, and could provide insights into interval proteomic alterations following induction chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients. These data present information to optimize future clinical trial designs for patients with ovarian cancer. Citation Format: Sanghoon Lee, Li Zhao, Joseph Celestino, Kelly M. Rangel, Richard A. Hajek, Mark S. Kim, Sara E. Sharafi, Jinsong Liu, Nicole D. Fleming, Karen H. Lu, Jianhua Zhang, P. Andrew Futreal, Gordon B. Mills, Shannon N. Westin, Anil K. Sood, Amir A. Jazaeri, Robert L. Coleman. Functional proteomic aberrations post-chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2941.

e18035 Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is a rare tumor with limited therapeutic options and no clearly established best treatment sequence strategy. Methods: Women with ULMS between 2013-2018 were identified. Clinical data was collected; descriptive statistics were performed and predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results: 189 patients were included. Median age was 53 (20-84), 91% had grade 3 tumors and 51.3% had stage IB disease. 50% underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy (n = 94, 49.7%) and 37% had surgery only (n = 70). 49 patients retained their ovaries; there was no difference in OS by oophorectomy status (p = 0.71). Estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, positive in 41% and 33% respectively, was not independently associated with OS (p = 0.23, p = 0.12) nor did it impact OS among those with oophorectomy and without (p = 0.70). The most common adjuvant therapy regimens were gemcitabine/docetaxel (gem/doce, 64%) or ifosphamide/doxorubicin (ifos/doxo, 19%). There were no differences in the regimens prescribed by physician specialty (gynecologic oncology vs other, p = 0.21). 147 patients (78%) experienced a recurrence or progression. For the 73 patients who received gem/doce as adjuvant therapy, 58.9% recurred and were most commonly treated with doxo containing regimens (67%). Of the 22 patients treated with ifos/doxo, only 3 recurred and each received a different second line regimen. For those not treated with adjuvant therapy (70 patients), 58.2% recurred and were treated with gem/doce (62%) and ifos/doxo (24%). In early stage patients, the majority received surgery only (45%) or surgery followed by chemotherapy (44%). There was no difference in OS in those who received adjuvant therapy and those who did not (p = 0.39). 46 (24%) had molecular testing and 37 had identified mutations. The most common mutation found was P53 (n = 25, 54%) followed by RB1 (8, 17%), PTEN (7, 15%), and BRCA (2, 4%). Conclusions: Recurrence occurred in 78% of patient despite many women undergoing adjuvant therapy after surgery. Oophorectomy did not influence OS, even though 41% of tumors were ER positive. The sequence of treatment was not associated with OS, however, the risk for recurrence in patient treated with adjuvant Ifos/Doxo was 14% compared to 59% in gem/doce. This finding warrants additional evaluation to determine the optimal adjuvant therapy for these women.

SUMMARY The diversity and heterogeneity within high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), which is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, is not well understood. Here, we perform comprehensive multi-platform omics analyses, including integrated analysis, and immune monitoring on primary and metastatic sites from highly clinically annotated HGSC samples based on a laparoscopic triage algorithm from patients who underwent complete gross resection (R0) or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with excellent or poor response. We identify significant distinct molecular abnormalities and cellular changes and immune cell repertoire alterations between the groups, including a higher rate of NF1 copy number loss, and reduced chromothripsis-like patterns, higher levels of strong-binding neoantigens, and a higher number of infiltrated T cells in the R0 versus the NACT groups., Graphical Abstract, In Brief High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients with no gross residual disease (R0) after primary surgery have the greatest improvement in clinical outcomes. A deep understanding of molecular and cellular heterogeneity of HGSC is lacking. Findings by Lee et al. highlight major molecular and cellular differences between clinically defined subgroups of HGSC.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of clinicopathologic characteristics and adjuvant treatment on survival outcomes in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with stage I or II uterine carcinosarcoma at our institution between March 1990 and June 2016. All pathology had been reviewed and confirmed by gynecologic pathologists. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used to compare clinicopathologic characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for survival outcomes. RESULTS: 140 patients were identified. Median age was 67 years (range: 36–91). Median follow-up was 39.1 months (2.9–297.4). The majority of patients had stage IA (67%) versus stage IB (21%) or stage II (11%) disease. The majority of patients (63%) received adjuvant treatment: vaginal brachytherapy only (14%); whole pelvic radiation therapy only (16%); chemotherapy only (n=13, 9%); combination chemotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy (15%); combination chemotherapy and whole pelvic radiation (9%). 52 patients (37%) received no adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 48.0 months (95% CI 32.7–80.9). On multivariable analysis for OS, advancing age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–1.08, p

OBJECTIVE. To assess treatment patterns, outcomes, and costs for women with low-(LIR) and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer (HIR) who are treated with and without adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS. All patients with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgery from 2000 to 2011 were identified from the SEER-Medicare database. LIR was defined as G1–2 tumors with

Objectives To determine if the ratio of positive to negative lymph nodes, or lymph node ratio (LNR), is a prognostic variable in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer and the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival. Methods After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of patients diagnosed as having stage IIIC endometrioid or mixed endometrioid endometrial cancer at a single institution from January 2000 through October 2011 was performed. Clinicopathologic and adjuvant treatment data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify prognostic factors for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival. Results One hundred twenty-four patients with stage IIIC1 (n = 64) and IIIC2 (n = 60) endometrial cancer were included in the analysis. Median age was 60 years (range, 25–84 years), and median follow-up was 49.4 months (range, 0.1–301.6 months). Age >70 years was identified as a prognostic factor for worse PFS (P = 0.0002) and overall survival (P = 0.0002) on multivariate analysis. Patients in this cohort receiving any adjuvant radiotherapy showed improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13–0.90; P = 0.03) compared with those receiving any adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.16–4.65; P = 0.02). In a subgroup analysis, patients with at least 10 nodes removed (n = 81) with an LNR greater than 50% had a PFS of 25.2 months compared with 135.6 months with an LNR of 50% or less (HR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.15–13.04; P = 0.03). Conclusions Lymph node ratio may define a subgroup of stage IIIC endometrial cancers at increased risk for recurrence. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with decreased recurrence risk.

The ratio of positive to negative lymph nodes, or lymph node ratio (LNR), is an important prognostic factor in several solid tumors. The objective of this study was to determine if LNR can be used to define a high-risk category of patients with node-positive early stage cervical cancer.We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with node-positive stage I or II cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy at MD Anderson from January 1990 to December 2011. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Median total nodes removed were 19 (range 1-58), and median number of positive nodes was 1 (range 1-12). Fifty-eight patients (61%) received radiation with concurrent cisplatin and 27 patients (28%) received radiotherapy alone. Twenty-one (22%) patients recurred. On multivariate analysis, a LNR6.6% was associated with a worse PFS (HR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.26-7.02, p = 0.01), and a LNR7.6% with a worse OS (HR = 3.96, 95% CI 1.31-11.98, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, positive margins were associated with worse PFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002), and adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.01) with improved OS.LNR appears to be a useful tool to identify patients with worse prognosis in node-positive early stage cervical cancer. LNR may be used in addition to pathologic risk factors to tailor adjuvant treatment in this population.

Objectives To assess the tolerability and efficacy of bevacizumab with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer. Methods After IRB approval, this single-institution, phase II study enrolled patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary cytoreductive surgery to treatment with carboplatin (AUC 5), weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15mg/kg) every 3weeks for at least 6cycles. The primary endpoint was tolerability of at least 4cycles of therapy, with a target treatment success rate of >60%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Plasma biomarkers were analyzed by the multiplex ELISA assays. Results Thirty-three patients were enrolled with 30 evaluable patients receiving at least one cycle of combination treatment. Twenty-three patients (77%) were able to complete at least 4cycles of therapy per protocol, and the posterior probability that the treatment success rate is >60% is 0.77. Twenty-one patients (70%) were able to complete ≥6cycles of therapy. Median PFS was 22.4months for patients with optimal (R0) compared to 16.9months for optimal≤1cm (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.58–4.98, p=0.33), and 16.9months for suboptimal>1cm (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.05–13.34, p=0.04) disease. Increases in mean Flt-3L was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (83.4 vs. 28pg/mL, p=0.05). Conclusions Adjuvant bevacizumab with dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with acceptable toxicity and a high likelihood of completing 4cycles of therapy. Dynamic changes in Flt-3L may represent a predictive marker to treatment response.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of bevacizumab in a cohort of women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. Methods This single-institution retrospective study assessed all patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal cancer who received bevacizumab from 2007 to 2016. Study endpoints included best response, median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and toxicity. Results Forty patients received 45 separate "patient-regimens." Most received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Complete response (CR) was seen in 7.5%, while 40% had partial responses (PR) and 30% achieved stable disease (SD). Disease progression occurred in nine patients (22.5%). Overall response rate (CR+PR) to bevacizumab-containing regimens was 47.5%. Clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) was seen in 77.5% of patients. Median progression free survival was 10.2months (95% CI 7.9, 12.4). Median overall survival was 34.6months (95% CI 29.5, 39.7). Fifteen patients discontinued bevacizumab related to toxicity. Conclusions Bevacizumab, most often in combination with chemotherapy, has activity in recurrent low-grade ovarian cancer and should be considered a treatment option for these patients. Further investigation into the most effective chemotherapeutic agent in combination with bevacizumab is warranted.

Objectives The study objective was to analyze the impact of prognostic factors, including treatment modality, on outcome in patients with advanced-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV USC between 1993 and 2012 was performed. Summary statistics were used to describe demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the association of potential prognostic factors with OS and RFS. Results The study included 260 patients with median follow-up of 26.6months (range 1–172.8). Median age was 63years (range 30–88) and 52.3% had stage III disease. In all, 60% were treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy, 18.1% received surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, 11.5% had surgery and radiotherapy, and 10.4% had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The overall complete response rate was 68.9%, and the cumulative incidence of recurrence was 82.7%. Treatment that included surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation and stage III disease were associated with improved RFS on multivariate analysis. For OS, therapy with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, mixed histology, and stage III disease were associated with better OS on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Patients with advanced-stage USC have a poor prognosis, regardless of clinical factors or treatment received. However, combination therapy that includes chemotherapy and radiation appears to be associated with improved survival in these women.

Purpose. This study retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OS) by treatment of recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy and evaluated OS and progression-free survival (PFS) after 1st line systemic chemotherapy. Methods. 78 patients with recurrent or metastatic adenosarcoma comprised the study population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups. Results. Median OS from diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic disease was 1.8 yrs. OS was influenced by pathology on recurrence, p=0.035. Median OS differed by surgery for 1st recurrence 26.3 months versus 15.1 months. OS was not influenced by chemotherapy, p=0.58, palliative radiation, p=0.58, or hormonal therapy, p=0.15. The response rate (CR + PR) per RECIST 1.1 for chemotherapy was 31.2% for doxorubicin-based regimens and 14.3% for gemcitabine/docetaxel. OS since 1st line chemotherapy was not significantly different among chemotherapy regimens. However, the median PFS was superior for doxorubicin/ifosfamide (15.4 months) compared to gemcitabine/docetaxel (5.0 months), platinum-based regimens (5.7 mo), or other doxorubicin-based regimens (6.5 months). Conclusion. These results suggest that surgery is an important treatment modality for recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma, and the most effective chemotherapeutics are doxorubicin/ifosfamide and gemcitabine/docetaxel.