1. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Disease
- Author
-
Henrique Mesquita Gabriel, Miguel Sousa-Uva, Tiago Nolasco, Manuel Almeida, Pedro J. Freitas, Sérgio Boshoff, Sérgio Madeira, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Pedro Magro, Nélson Vale, Luís Raposo, Marta Canas Marques, Catarina Brízido, Luís Bruges, Ana Braga, João Brito, Miguel Mendes, José Pedro Neves, Sara Ranchordás, Miguel Abecasis, José Calquinha, Márcio Madeira, and F Gama
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Revascularization ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Risk of mortality ,Humans ,Registries ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction ,Propensity Score ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Coronary Vessels ,Treatment Outcome ,surgical procedures, operative ,Conventional PCI ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Current recommendations on the optimal revascularization strategy in Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are based upon randomized clinical trials conducted in stable coronary artery disease. In a real-world contemporary observational registry, we compared the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD (n = 1,104) submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimized medical therapy (OMT). The primary end point was 5-year all-cause mortality. Results were assessed in the entire population (CABG 289, PCI 399, and OMT 416) and in a propensity score-matched cohort of CABG (n = 159) and PCI (n = 159). Crude 5-year mortality rates in CABG and PCI were 25.3% versus 29.6%, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.9 to 1.6; p = 0.212); OMT, however, was associated with a twofold higher risk of mortality when compared with any revascularization strategy (unadjusted HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.5; p0.001). After propensity score-matching and multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of the primary end point in patients who underwent PCI versus CABG (31% vs 21%; adjusted HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.50; p = 0.094). This was a consistent finding over subgroups deemed clinically relevant, such as in patients with LM or proximal left anterior descending disease, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23 and left ventricle ejection fraction40%. In conclusion, in a real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD, those selected for OMT had a dire outcome. Although adjusted 5-year mortality was statistically similar between revascularization strategies, there was a trend favoring CABG, which might be the preferred option in LM, proximal LAD, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23, and left ventricle ejection fraction40% subgroups.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF