Search

Introduction The use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been increasing in recent years, but the long-term overall survival characteristics of this approach is currently unknown. Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer within the National Cancer Database. Patients who received TNT (defined as chemotherapy, followed by CRT, followed by surgery) were propensity score matched to patients who received adjuvant therapy (defined as CRT, followed by surgery, followed by chemotherapy). We compared overall survival (OS) and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) between the two arms. Results Of the 4,300 patients in our cohort, 3,502 (81%) received adjuvant therapy and 798 (19%) received TNT. At baseline, patients who received TNT were more likely to have higher clinical T and N stages (p Conclusion In this observational study, we found TNT was not associated with a lower OS compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding potentially reassures clinicians choosing TNT as an alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, future prospective data are needed to confirm these findings. Microabstract The long-term overall survival characteristics of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has not been well-defined despite its increasing popularity. In a large National Cancer Database cohort, we found that TNT was not associated with worse survival compared to historical controls.

Background Palbociclib is highly active in oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer, but neutropenia is dose limiting. The goal of this study was to determine whether early neutropenia is associated with disease response to single-agent palbociclib. Methods Blood count and disease-response data were analysed from two Phase 2 clinical trials at different institutions using single-agent palbociclib: advanced solid tumours positive for retinoblastoma protein and advanced liposarcoma. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary exposure variable was the nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during the first two cycles of treatment. Results One hundred and ninety-six patients (61 breast, 135 non-breast) were evaluated between the two trials. Development of any grade neutropenia was significantly associated with longer median PFS in both the breast cancer (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11–0.74, p = 0.010) and non-breast cancer (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.85, p = 0.006) cohorts. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was significantly associated with prolonged PFS in the non-breast cohort (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.85, p = 0.006) but not in the breast cohort (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51–1.47, p = 0.596). Multivariate analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions Treatment-related neutropenia in the first two cycles was significantly and independently associated with prolonged PFS, suggesting that neutropenia may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker to guide individualised palbociclib dosing. Clinical trials registration information Basket Trial: NCT01037790; Sarcoma Trial: NCT01209598.

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

Patients newly diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma generally have poor survival, with heterogeneous rates of progression. Biomarkers that could predict progression and/or survival would help inform patients and providers as they make care decisions. In a previous retrospective study, we discovered that circulating thrombospondin-2 (THBS2) could, in combination with CA19-9, better distinguish patients with PDAC versus healthy controls. Here we evaluated whether THBS2 levels, previously not known to be prognostic, were associated with outcome in 68 patients at time of diagnosis of metastatic PDAC. Specifically, we interrogated the association of THBS2 level, alone or in combination with CA19-9, with progression by 90 days and/or survival to 180 days. The results indicate that elevated THBS2 levels alone, at the time of a metastatic PDAC diagnosis, can identify patients with a shorter time to death and thus help patients and providers when planning treatment.

Summary Background Standard chemotherapy remains inadequate in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Combining an agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy induces T-cell-dependent tumour regression in mice and improves survival. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of combining APX005M (sotigalimab) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with and without nivolumab, in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma to establish the recommended phase 2 dose. Methods This non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, four-cohort, phase 1b study was done at seven academic hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years and older with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–1, and measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. All patients were treated with 1000 mg/m2 intravenous gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 intravenous nab-paclitaxel. Patients received 0·1 mg/kg intravenous APX005M in cohorts B1 and C1 and 0·3 mg/kg in cohorts B2 and C2. In cohorts C1 and C2, patients also received 240 mg intravenous nivolumab. Primary endpoints comprised incidence of adverse events in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in all patients who had a DLT or received at least two doses of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and one dose of APX005M during cycle 1, and establishing the recommended phase 2 dose of intravenous APX005M. Objective response rate in the DLT-evaluable population was a key secondary endpoint. This trial (PRINCE, PICI0002) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03214250 and is ongoing. Findings Between Aug 22, 2017, and July 10, 2018, of 42 patients screened, 30 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of any study drug; 24 were DLT-evaluable with median follow-up 17·8 months (IQR 16·0–19·4; cohort B1 22·0 months [21·4–22·7], cohort B2 18·2 months [17·0–18·9], cohort C1 17·9 months [14·3–19·7], cohort C2 15·9 months [12·7–16·1]). Two DLTs, both febrile neutropenia, were observed, occurring in one patient each for cohorts B2 (grade 3) and C1 (grade 4). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were lymphocyte count decreased (20 [67%]; five in B1, seven in B2, four in C1, four in C2), anaemia (11 [37%]; two in B1, four in B2, four in C1, one in C2), and neutrophil count decreased (nine [30%]; three in B1, three in B2, one in C1, two in C2). 14 (47%) of 30 patients (four each in B1, B2, C1; two in C2) had a treatment-related serious adverse event. The most common serious adverse event was pyrexia (six [20%] of 30; one in B2, three in C1, two in C2). There were two chemotherapy-related deaths due to adverse events: one sepsis in B1 and one septic shock in C1. The recommended phase 2 dose of APX005M was 0·3 mg/kg. Responses were observed in 14 (58%) of 24 DLT-evaluable patients (four each in B1, C1, C2; two in B2). Interpretation APX005M and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with or without nivolumab, is tolerable in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and shows clinical activity. If confirmed in later phase trials, this treatment regimen could replace chemotherapy-only standard of care in this population. Funding Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Research Institute, and Bristol Myers Squibb.

This economic evaluation uses Markov modeling to identify and compare the cost and utility of doublet and standard treatments for patients with BRAF V600E variant colorectal cancer., Key Points Question Is the use of doublet therapy (encorafenib and cetuximab) compared with standard chemotherapy (with cetuximab and irinotecan-based regimens) a cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer? Findings In this economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of 2 treatment strategies, doublet therapy was associated with an incremental cost of $78 233, an incremental effectiveness of 0.15 quality-adjusted life years, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $523 374 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Meaning Results of this study suggest that doublet therapy for metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment under current pricing., Importance The BEACON trial showed that combination therapy with encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and cetuximab (EGFR inhibitor) was associated with prolonged overall survival compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer. However, the cost-effectiveness of using these agents in this clinical setting is unknown. Objective To create a cost-effectiveness model to compare doublet therapy (encorafenib plus cetuximab) with standard chemotherapy (cetuximab plus irinotecan or cetuximab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) in treating patients with metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation constructed a Markov model to compare the lifetime cost and utility of doublet therapy and standard chemotherapy. Parametric survival modeling was used to extrapolate the effectiveness of each line of therapy from large clinical trials. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the uncertainty in the model. Patients mirrored the cohorts in the BEACON trial: they had metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer and were followed up as they progressed through multiple lines of therapy, best supportive care, and death. Data collection and data analysis were performed from November 15, 2019, to July 14, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which was calculated using the cumulative cost and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), of doublet therapy compared with standard chemotherapy. Results The model patient cohort had a mean age of 61 years, and 53% of the patients were women, 66% had 1 previous line of therapy, and 8% had high microsatellite instability. Doublet therapy was associated with an improvement of 0.15 QALYs compared with standard chemotherapy. However, the incremental cost of doublet therapy was $78 233, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $523 374 per QALY gained. Concomitant decreases in the price of encorafenib and cetuximab are needed to achieve cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY gained. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that doublet therapy for metastatic BRAF variant colorectal cancer was unlikely to be cost-effective under current pricing. Cost-effectiveness needs to be considered in clinical trial design, particularly when combining new therapies with non-cost-effective treatments that are coadministered without a fixed duration.

Background CTLA-4 pathway blockade with ipilimumab (IPI) ± nivolumab (NIVO; anti–PD-1) is an effective treatment for several cancers. A nonfucosylated version of IPI, BMS-986218, was developed to increase the effects of CTLA-4 blockade and enhance intratumoral regulatory T-cell depletion via its increased affinity for Fcγ receptors (FcγR, CD16) on natural killer T cells and macrophages, resulting in enhancement of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Preclinical data supported the mechanism of action of BMS-986218 and demonstrated greater antitumor activity in an MC38 tumor model vs IPI.1 Here, we present initial results from the first-in-human phase 1/2a trial of BMS-986218 ± NIVO in previously treated patients with advanced cancer (NCT03110107). Methods Patients with ≥1 prior therapy received BMS-986218 2–70 mg intravenously Q4W. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Results As of December 12, 2019, 65 patients (median age, 61 years [range, 24–85 years]) received BMS-986218 monotherapy. TRAEs occurred in 52% of patients; most were grade 1–2. The most common (≥10%) TRAEs (any grade; grade 3) were pruritus (12%; 0%) and diarrhea (11%; 3%). Eight patients (12%) had grade 3 TRAEs; most resolved with protocol-defined management. No grade 4 TRAEs were reported; 1 grade 5 TRAE (pneumonitis; 2 mg) occurred. Seven patients (11%) discontinued treatment due to TRAEs; 4 dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. BMS-986218 exposure increased dose proportionally, and the half-life was ≈2 weeks. Increased levels of serum chemokine ligands 9 and 10 and interferon-γ indicate that pharmacodynamic changes occurred at the lowest dose tested (2 mg [≈0.03 mg/kg]), similar to previous findings with IPI 3 mg/kg, and at higher doses (40–70 mg [≈0.06–1 mg/kg]), consistent with findings with IPI 10 mg/kg. In a subset of patients with paired biopsies, BMS-986218 was associated with an increased gene signature linked to CD8+ T-cell infiltration and inflammation. In a highly heterogeneous population, as part of dose escalation, BMS-986218 monotherapy treatment was associated with clinical activity in some patients. Updated data based on a September 2020 data cutoff will be presented. Conclusions BMS-986218 monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and signs of clinical benefit in this heterogeneous patient population with select advanced cancers. Preliminary pharmacodynamic activity was consistent with enhanced effects of CTLA-4 blockade. Data from continuing dose escalation of BMS-986218 ± NIVO along with preclinical results provide support for ongoing monotherapy expansions and for BMS-986218 + NIVO expansions in patients with advanced cancer. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge Dr Charles Drake while at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, for his contributions to the study. Trial Registration NCT03110107 Ethics Approval This study was approved by the WCG Independent Review Board, approval number 20170464 Reference Engelhardt J, Akter R, Valle J, et al. Preclinical characterization of BMS-986218, a novel nonfucosylated anti–CTLA-4 antibody designed to enhance antitumor activity. Presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Virtual Annual Meeting II; June 22–24, 2020 [poster 4552].

Background CDX-1140 is an agonist anti-CD40 mAb selected to optimize systemic exposure and hence tumor microenvironment (TME) ingress. CDX-1140 activity may be enhanced by combining with CDX-301 (recombinant Flt3L), a dendritic cell growth factor, or with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 mAb. Methods Patients with advanced solid or hematologic (Part 1 only) tumors are enrolled. Part 1 dose-escalation results have been presented (SITC 2019). In Part 2, CDX-1140 dose-escalation (0.09–1.5 mg/kg q4w) is in combination with CDX-301 (75 mcg/kg sc QD x 5 for 2 cycles). In Part 3, CDX-1140 dose-escalation (0.72–1.5 mg/kg q3w) is in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg q3w. Part 1 and 2 expansion cohorts are dosed at the CDX-1140 MTD, 1.5 mg/kg q4w. Part 3 expansion cohorts are planned. Peripheral blood and tumor biomarkers analysis are ongoing. Results 92 patients have been treated (Part 1 n=57, Part 2 n=31, Part 3 n=4). Part 1 expansion cohorts in SCCHN (n=7) and RCC (n=5) are fully enrolled. Part 2 dose-escalation completed to the highest CDX-1140 dose and a SCCHN expansion cohort is ongoing. Part 3 dose-escalation recently initiated. Safety data is available for 23 and 10 patients at the MTD in Part 1 and 2, respectively. In general, the safety profiles were similar, with arthralgia (52% vs. 50%), pyrexia (44% vs 50%), fatigue (30% vs. 50%), chills (39% vs. 40%), vomiting (30% vs. 20%), nausea (26% vs 40%), myalgia (22% vs. 30%), increased ALT (22% vs. 20%), and increased AST (22% vs. 30%) being the most common drug related AEs at the MTD in Part 1 and 2, respectively. Most AEs were low grade. Across all cohorts, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (G2 n=4, G3 n=2) occurred in 6 (Part 1 n=2; Part 2 n=4) and pneumonitis (G3) occurred in 5 (Part 1 n=4; Part 2 n=1) patients. Immune activation in the TME consistent with CD40 agonism and increases serum inflammatory cytokines were observed. Evidence of anti-tumor activity/clinical benefit include SD (n=13), tumor cavitation (n=2) and a uPR in solid tumors. A patient with follicular lymphoma has an ongoing durable complete metabolic response. Conclusions The CDX-1140 MTD dose of 1.5 mg/kg, a dose level expected to provide good systemic exposure and TME penetration, is generally well tolerated alone and with CDX-301. Transaminitis and CRS have generally been low grade and infrequent. A cohort combining CDX-1140 with chemotherapy will be initiated in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Trial Registration NCT03329950 Ethics Approval The study was approved by the following: Providence St. Joseph Health IRB, approval number MOD2020001128; WIRB, approval number 1188814 (Hauke, Gabrail, Bordoni & Gordon); University of Pennsylvania IRB, approval number UPCC 18917; Mount Sinai School of Medicine IRB, approval number 18-00202; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center IRB, approval number 18-225A; Houston Methodist IRB, approval number MOD00000836

Purpose: To determine whether a multianalyte liquid biopsy can improve the detection and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Experimental Design: We analyzed plasma from 204 subjects (71 healthy, 44 non-PDAC pancreatic disease, and 89 PDAC) for the following biomarkers: tumor-associated extracellular vesicle miRNA and mRNA isolated on a nanomagnetic platform that we developed and measured by next-generation sequencing or qPCR, circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) concentration measured by qPCR, ccfDNA KRAS G12D/V/R mutations detected by droplet digital PCR, and CA19-9 measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We applied machine learning to training sets and subsequently evaluated model performance in independent, user-blinded test sets. Results: To identify patients with PDAC versus those without, we generated a classification model using a training set of 47 subjects (20 PDAC and 27 noncancer). When applied to a blinded test set (N = 136), the model achieved an AUC of 0.95 and accuracy of 92%, superior to the best individual biomarker, CA19-9 (89%). We next used a cohort of 20 patients with PDAC to train our model for disease staging and applied it to a blinded test set of 25 patients clinically staged by imaging as metastasis-free, including 9 subsequently determined to have had occult metastasis. Our workflow achieved significantly higher accuracy for disease staging (84%) than imaging alone (accuracy = 64%; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Algorithmically combining blood-based biomarkers may improve PDAC diagnostic accuracy and preoperative identification of nonmetastatic patients best suited for surgery, although larger validation studies are necessary.

We conducted a phase I trial evaluating pembrolizumab+hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for patients with metastatic cancers. There were two strata (12 patients each): (i) NSCLC/melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-1 therapy, (ii) other cancer types; anti-PD-1-naive. Patients received 6 cycles of pembrolizumab, starting 1 week before HFRT. Patients had ≥2 lesions; only one was irradiated (8 Gy × 3 for first half; 17 Gy × 1 for second half in each stratum) and the other(s) followed for response. Of the 24 patients, 20 (83%) had treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (all grade 1 or 2). There were eight grade 3 AEs, none treatment related. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4/5 AEs. Stratum 1: two patients (of 12) with progression on prior PD-1 blockade experienced prolonged responses (9.2 and 28.1 months). Stratum 2: one patient experienced a complete response and two had prolonged stable disease (7.4 and 7.0 months). Immune profiling demonstrated that anti-PD-1 therapy and radiation induced a consistent increase in the proliferation marker Ki67 in PD-1-expressing CD8 T cells. HFRT was well tolerated with pembrolizumab, and in some patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma, it reinvigorated a systemic response despite previous progression on anti-PD-1 therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02303990 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

BackgroundGemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel (GnP) is a standard of care regimen for first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and has a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 35%. There is an urgent need for novel therapeutics and precision medicine approaches in PDAC. PRINCE, a randomized phase 2 trial, reported an increased 1-year OS relative to historical data, for patients treated with nivolumab (nivo)/GnP (57.3%, p = 0.007, n=34) and sotigalimab (sotiga) (APX005M; CD40 agonist)/GnP (48.1%, p = 0.062, n= 36).MethodsTo investigate immune modulatory and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of nivo or sotiga in combination with GnP we used several orthogonal minimally invasive, blood-based biomarker technologies. Immune population profiles were evaluated by CyTOF and features of T cell phenotype and function by multicolor flow cytometry. Soluble proteins were evaluated with predefined panels using the Olink platform (Immuno-oncology (IO) and Immune Response) along with an unbiased mass spectrometry proteomic approach (Biognosys) that identified circulating soluble proteins of significance.ResultsRelative to baseline, patients who received nivo/GnP had numerically increased frequencies of proliferating, activated CD8+ and CD4+ effector memory T cells in circulation across multiple timepoints. These patients also had significantly increased levels of soluble proteins associated with type II interferon responses and immune cell migration and T cell activation, as well as significantly decreased levels of immunomodulatory proteins.Patients who received sotiga/GnP had increased expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD86 on conventional dendritic cells. These patients also had significantly increased concentrations of soluble proteins associated with mature antigen presenting cells, and the activation of helper CD4+ T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Significant increases in soluble proteins associated with type-1 cell-mediated effector immunity and decreases in immunosuppressive factors were observed in both arms. Significant proteins were defined as p ≤ 0.05, log2 expression fold change ≥ 0.5 (Olink) and Sparse PLS discriminant analysis was used with zero as a threshold (Biognosys).ConclusionsThis study is a first to use multiomic minimally invasive biomarker approaches in PDAC to demonstrate PD effects and immune modulation with immunotherapy/chemotherapy combinations. Orthogonal assays demonstrate that nivo/GnP and sotiga/GnP elicit unique immune responses and the observed effects are consistent with their distinct mechanisms of action. These data suggest that multiomic biomarker signatures may identify subsets of patients who may benefit from an immunotherapy/chemo approach in PDAC. Moreover, results from these analyses will support early phase clinical study development decisions.AcknowledgementsWe extend our gratitude to the patients, their families, the clinical investigators, and their site staff members who are making this trial possible. We would also like to thank Sultan Nawabi at Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI) for operations leadership of the trial. We thank Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Apexigen for collaboration and study drugs. The study was funded by Cancer Research Institute, BMS and PICI.Trial RegistrationNCT03214250Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board; Federalwide assurance #00004028.

Importance Autophagy is a mechanism of treatment resistance to chemotherapy that has a role in the maintenance of pancreatic cancer. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) is an inhibitor of autophagy that inhibits the fusion of the autophagosome to the lysosome. Objective To determine whether HCQ improves overall survival at 1 year in combination with gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel (GA) among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants Open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial conducted between March 18, 2013, and November 16, 2017, at the University of Pennsylvania, HonorHealth, and The Johns Hopkins University among 112 patients with previously untreated metastatic or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate marrow and organ function. All efficacy analyses were performed for the intention-to-treat population. Interventions Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive GA with or without HCQ. All patients received standard doses of GA, and those randomized to receive HCQ were treated continuously with 600 mg orally twice daily. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival at 1 year. Results A total of 112 patients (45 women and 67 men; median age, 65 years; range, 43-86 years) were enrolled; 55 were randomized to receive GA plus HCQ, and 57 to receive GA. Overall survival at 12 months was 41% (95% CI, 27%-53%) in the HCQ group and 49% (95% CI, 35%-61%) in the non-HCQ group. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-9.3 months) in the HCQ group and 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.5-7.6 months) in the non-HCQ group. Median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.2 months) in the HCQ group and 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.3-15.5 months) in the non-HCQ group. Overall response rate was 38.2% (n = 21) in the HCQ group and 21.1% (n = 12) in the non-HCQ group (P = .047). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events that differed between the HCQ and non-HCQ groups were neutropenia (23 of 54 [42.6%] vs 12 of 53 [22.6%]), anemia (2 of 54 [3.7%] vs 9 of 53 [17.0%]), fatigue (4 of 54 [7.4%] vs 0), nausea (5 of 54 [9.3%] vs 0), peripheral neuropathy (7 of 54 [13.0%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), visual changes (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0). Conclusions and Relevance The addition of HCQ to block autophagy did not improve the primary end point of overall survival at 12 months. These data do not support the routine use of GA plus HCQ for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the absence of a biomarker. However, improvement seen in the overall response rate with HCQ may indicate a role for HCQ in the locally advanced setting, where tumor response may permit resection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT01506973

Deploying CD40 activation to stimulate T cell responses upstream of immune checkpoint molecules is a novel clinical opportunity for cancer immunotherapy. Despite numerous active clinical trials with agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), biological treatment effects especially treatment-related modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME), remain poorly understood. Here, we performed a neoadjuvant clinical trial of agonistic CD40 mAb (selicrelumab) administered intravenously with or without chemotherapy (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) to 16 resectable patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prior to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and CD40 mAb. The toxicity profile was acceptable, including only grade 1 or 2 cytokine release syndrome and expected toxicities from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival was 13.8 months (95% CI 2.9 - 24.8 months) and median overall survival was 23.4 months (95% CI 18.0 - 28.8), with 8 patients alive at a median of 20.0 months after surgery (follow-up range 12.2 to 34.8 months). Neoadjuvant selicrelumab induced major pharmacodynamic differences in the TME, as revealed by a multiplex imaging platform auditing the immune ecosystem, compared to resection specimens from PDAC patient previously untreated or given neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy only. For tumors resected after selicrelumab, 82% (9/11) were T-cell enriched, compared to 37% (38/104) (p=0.004) of untreated tumors and 23% (93/13) of chemotherapy/chemoradiation-treated tumors (p=0.012). Moreover, for selicrelumab tumors, tumor-associated fibrosis was less, “M2” macrophages were fewer, dendritic cells were more mature, and T cells were activated and proliferative, compared to the non-selicrelumab groups. In the periphery, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were more activated and proliferative, and serum inflammatory cytokines CXCL10 and CCL22 increased after treatment. This study provides proof-of-concept in patients that agonistic CD40 mAb alters the TME, enhances T-cell infiltration, and modulates systemic inflammatory responses. These findings inform design of next-generation CD40 clinical trials. Citation Format: Katelyn T. Byrne, Courtney B. Betts, Rosemarie Mick, Shamilene Sivagnanam, David L. Bajor, Daniel A. Laheru, E. Gabriela Chiorean, Mark H. O'Hara, Shannon M. Liudahl, Craig Newcomb, Cécile Alanio, Ana P. Ferreira, Byung S. Park, Takuya Ohtani, Austin P. Huffman, Sara A. Väyrynen, Andressa Dias Costa, Judith C. Kaiser, Andreanne M. Lacroix, Colleen Redlinger, Martin Stern, Jonathan A. Nowak, E. John Wherry, Martin A. Cheever, Brian M. Wolpin, Emma E. Furth, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Lisa M. Coussens, Robert H. Vonderheide. T cell inflammation in the tumor microenvironment after agonist CD40 antibody: Clinical and translational results of a neoadjuvant clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT005.

4108 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing can be used for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients with early-stage or advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Prospective evaluation of this methodology in clinical practice has been limited to-date. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera 16-plex bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA for MRD assessment. We analyze and present results from an ongoing early adopter program of ctDNA testing across the spectrum of CRC management. Results: Here we present a total of 250 patients with colon (n=200), rectal (n=40), and other lower gastrointestinal cancers (n =10; anal, appendiceal, small bowel). MRD positivity rates and ctDNA quantification (mean tumor molecules/mL) are shown in Table. ctDNA detection was significantly associated with stage of disease (p

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer typically have poor outcomes, with a median survival of approximately 16 months. Novel methods to improve outcomes are needed. Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) has shown efficacy in pancreatic cancer and is FDA-approved for metastatic disease in combination with gemcitabine. Nab-paclitaxel is also a promising radiosensitizer based on laboratory studies, but it has never been clinically tested with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. We performed a phase 1 study using a 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy to determine the safety and tolerability of dose-escalated nab-paclitaxel with fractionated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Following induction chemotherapy with two cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel and daily radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions. Final dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) determination was performed at day 65 after the start of radiotherapy. Nine patients received nab-paclitaxel at a dose level of either 100 mg/m2 (n = 3) or 125 mg/m2 (n = 6). There were no observed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities. One DLT (grade 3 neuropathy) was observed in a patient who received 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel. Other grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), anemia (11%) and neutropenia (11%). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Following chemoradiotherapy, four patients (borderline resectable, n = 2 and unresectable, n = 2) underwent surgical resection, all with negative margins and with significant treatment effect with limited tumor viability. The combination of fractionated radiation and weekly full dose nab-paclitaxel was safe and well-tolerated.

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 are ineffective as single agents for patients (pts) with PDAC. Preclinical data suggest that chemotherapy with agonistic CD40 antibodies can be combined with anti-PD-1 to trigger effective T cell immunity. We conducted a multi-center, open label clinical trial to evaluate the combination of APX005M with nivo and standard chemotherapy (gem and NP). Herein, we report safety and efficacy from the ongoing study. Methods: Pts with previously untreated PDAC were enrolled in 4 cohorts: Gem/NP/APX005M 0.1 mg/kg (B1), Gem/NP/APX005M 0.3 mg/kg (B2), Gem/NP/Nivo/APX005M 0.1 mg/kg (C1) and Gem/NP/Nivo/APX005M 0.3 mg/kg (C2). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of APX005M. Secondary objectives included tumor response and immune pharmacodynamics. Analyses were performed on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable subjects, defined as receiving 1 dose of APX005M and ≥ 2 doses of gem/NP during Cycle 1 and remaining on study through Cycle 2 Day 1. Results: N=30 pts dosed; 24 DLT-evaluable (6 per cohort). Median follow up is 32.2 weeks. N=13 (54%) pts experienced an AE leading to discontinuation, and 10 (42%) pts experienced a treatment-related serious AE. Two DLTs were observed, 1 each in cohorts B2 and C1 (grade 3 and 4 febrile neutropenia, respectively). AE rates were similar across cohorts. Four (17%) subjects died (2 each in Cohorts B1 and C1) due to disease progression (n=2) and AE (n=2, sepsis and septic shock in the setting of neutropenia). Within the DLT-evaluable population, best overall responses included 14 (58%) PR (11 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed), 8 (33%) SD, 1 (4%) PD and 1 (4%) NE. Post-baseline tumor assessments were available for 2 of the 6 DLT-inevaluable pts (best overall responses of SD and confirmed PR). Multiplexed IHC analysis of baseline tumors revealed a low CD8 T cell and high macrophage infiltrate. Analysis of circulating mutant KRAS DNA showed marked and rapid decrease with therapy in some pts. Immune profiling of PBMCs at baseline and on-treatment by CyTOF revealed remodeling of the myeloid compartment in response to treatment, with rapid activation of dendritic cells in most pts. Conclusions: Gem/NP/APX005M ± nivo demonstrated manageable safety profiles and promising antitumor activity in untreated metastatic PDAC pts. APX005M 0.3 mg/kg was selected as the dose for a randomized Phase II study in which the primary endpoint is 1-year overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT02482168. Citation Format: Mark H. O'Hara, Eileen M. O'Reilly, Mick Rosemarie, Gauri Varadhachary, Zev A. Wainberg, Andrew Ko, George A. Fisher, Osama Rahma, Jaclyn P. Lyman, Christopher R. Cabanski, Erica L. Carpenter, Travis Hollmann, Pier Federico Gherardini, Lacey Kitch, Cheryl Selinsky, Theresa LaVallee, Ovid C. Trifan, Ute Dugan, Vanessa M. Hubbard-Lucey, Robert H. Vonderheide. A Phase Ib study of CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M together with gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (NP) with or without nivolumab (Nivo) in untreated metastatic ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT004.

Background: PARP inhibitors have activity in multiple BRCA-related malignancies and have recently demonstrated dramatic efficacy as a maintenance strategy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Between 5-8% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. Therefore, we initiated a single arm phase II clinical trial of maintenance monotherapy rucaparib in patients with advanced PC and a pathogenic germline or somatic BRCA or PALB2 mutation, whose cancer had not progressed following at least four months of platinum-based chemotherapy (NCT 03140670). Methods: Patients were enrolled and treated with rucaparib 600mg PO BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Patients have previously received >4 months of platinum-based chemotherapy without evidence of disease progression. However, patients with a medical contraindication to receiving the full four months of platinum have been permitted to enroll at the discretion of the primary investigator. Responses were determined using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of December 31st, 2018, we have enrolled 24 of the planned 42 patients, of which 19 are evaluable for PFS at the time of this interim analysis. For these patients, the mutational distribution includes: 13 germline BRCA2, 3 germline BRCA1, 2 germline PALB2, 1 somatic BRCA2. Patients were predominantly female (84.2%) with a median age of 61 years (range: 35-81). Patients had received a median of four months (range 0.5-32 months) of prior platinum therapy for advanced disease. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Overall, treatment with rucaparib was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicities. The most common adverse events that were at least possibly related to treatment included nausea (grade 1, 41.6%; grade 2, 4.2%), dysgeusia (grade 1, 33.3%) and fatigue (grade 1, 25%). One patient required dose reduction for nausea. The median PFS was 9.1 months from the start of rucaparib therapy with an ORR of 36.8% (six PRs; one CR). Disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 89.5% for at least eight weeks. Two patients (10.5%) had progressive disease at first follow-up scan two months after beginning treatment. Eight patients have been on rucaparib for >6 months and two patients remain on treatment for >1 year (13 months and 15 months). The seven responding patients include those with germline BRCA2 mutations (4 patients), germline PALB2 mutations (2 patients) and somatic BRCA2 mutation (1 patient). Conclusions: Based on these early data, maintenance rucaparib following induction with platinum-based chemotherapy shows encouraging disease control with minimal toxicity in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced PC and a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. Citation Format: Kim A. Reiss Binder, Rosemarie Mick, Mark O'Hara, Ursina Teitelbaum, Thomas Karasic, Charles Schneider, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Erica Carpenter, Austin Pantel, Mehran Makvandi, David Mankoff, Katherine Nathanson, Kara Maxwell, Stacy Cowden, Mary Jane Fuhrer, Janae Romeo, Gregory L. Beatty, Susan Domchek. A Phase II, single arm study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT234.

e15125 Background: Autophagy is a resistance mechanism to chemotherapy that is inhibited by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We have reported a phase II trial of FOLFOX/bevacizumab/HCQ in 28 evaluable patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Overall response rate was 68%, with 11% complete response (CR) and 57% partial response (PR), while stable disease (SD) was seen in 30%. We hypothesize that analysis of CT imaging features via machine learning (ML) will enhance subtle yet important radiographic characteristics, and reveal imaging signatures determinant of outcome and mutational status. Methods: Baseline CT images were collected and 1265 quantitative imaging (QI) features extracted across all the metastatic sites – liver, lung, and lymph nodes – including descriptors of size, morphology, texture, and intensity. Cross-validated sequential feature selection coupled with support vector machine (SVM) was used to determine the most discriminative QI features for our integrative predictor of response and mutational status, and support vector regression (SVR) was used to derive imaging predictors of overall survival. The model predictions were compared with actual clinical results, including response, survival, and genomic aberrations. Results: Various QI features, primarily descriptive of texture and tumor volume, were determined as most important by the ML predictor. Using this signature, our predictor classified “Responder (PR+CR) vs Non-responder (SD)” with an accuracy of 85% [sensitivity(se) = 0.84, specificity(sp) = 0.71, AUC = 0.85]. The QI features were also able to detect KRAS and TP53 mutational status with an accuracy of 88% [se = 0.92, sp = 0.85, AUC = 0.87] and 86% [se = 0.80, sp = 0.90, AUC = 0.84], respectively. The SVM model predicted overall survival greater than the median (32 mo) with an accuracy of 86% [se = 0.93, sp = 0.79, AUC = 0.87]. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the SVR score and overall survival was estimated to be 0.73 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of baseline CT imaging features analyzed by ML yielded an imaging signature predictive of response, survival, and KRAS and TP53 mutational status. If validated in a larger clinical data set, machine learning may offer a predictive biomarker to aid clinical decision making for mCRC patients.

TPS4161 Background: The treatment paradigm for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) typically involves ongoing chemotherapy until either disease progression or clinical deterioration. A subset of patients with advanced PDAC have exceptional responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. We hypothesized that durable platinum sensitivity in patients with advanced PDAC might be indicative of a DNA repair deficiency, and that these patients may respond to a combination of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, plus immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We have enrolled 25 of 84 planned patients on study NCT 03404960. Eligibility criteria include inoperable PDAC and stability on platinum-based chemotherapy for ≥16 weeks without evidence of progressive disease. Patients who have progressed on platinum-based treatment or who have received prior therapy with PARP inhibitors are excluded. Patients are randomized to receive oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus nivolumab 240mg IV every two weeks in continuous 28 day cycles or oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every three weeks for four doses in continuous 21 day cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include response rate, duration of response and overall survival. Paired biopsies are obtained, as well as serial blood collections for circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Correlative assays will include germline whole exome sequencing and analyses of serially collected PBMCs, CTCs and ctDNA to identify genomic and immunologic innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms. Clinical trial information: NCT 03404960.

TPS465 Background: Treatment options for PDAC are limited; thus, new therapies that can improve outcomes and extend survival are needed. PDAC is associated with high infiltration by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that inhibit antitumor T-cell activity. Blocking colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling—which supports the recruitment, differentiation, and maintenance of immunosupressive macrophages in tumors—may lead to depletion of TAMs and upregulation of T-cell checkpoints. Cabira, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, binds to CSF-1R and blocks its signaling, a key determinant of TAM activation and survival. By reducing TAMs and promoting a proinflammatory microenvironment, cabira may stimulate T-cell responses, thereby sensitizing PDAC to therapy with nivo (anti‒PD-1). In a phase 1a/b study cabira + nivo was tolerable and showed evidence of on-target tumor immune modulation and durable clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced PDAC (Wainberg et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 [abst O42]; Carleton et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 [abst 3020]). Here we describe a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabira + nivo ± chemo in advanced PDAC. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC that progressed on/after first-line chemo (gemcitabine [gem] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] based) will be enrolled. Pts with active/suspected autoimmune disease, uncontrolled/significant cardiovascular disease, or prior exposure to select immune cell–modulating antibodies are not eligible. Depending on prior chemo received, pts will be randomized to 1 of 4 arms (n≈40 each): cabira + nivo; cabira + nivo + gem/nab-paclitaxel; cabira + nivo + oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin; or investigator’s choice of standard-of-care chemo. Endpoints include median progression-free survival (primary), overall survival rate, objective response rate, median duration of response, pharmacokinetics, and safety. In a completed preliminary safety cohort, 12 pts were treated with cabira + nivo + chemo and monitored for 4 wk; competitive enrollment is open, with 32 pts enrolled. (NCT03336216, NCT02526017) Clinical trial information: NCT03336216.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer typically have poor outcomes, with a median survival of ~16 months. Novel methods to improve local control are needed. Nab-paclitaxel (abraxane) has shown efficacy in pancreatic cancer and is FDA approved for metastatic disease in combination with gemcitabine. Nab-paclitaxel is also a promising radiosensitizer based on laboratory studies, but it has never been clinically tested with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We performed a phase 1 study using a 3+3 dose-escalation strategy to determine the safety and tolerability of dose escalated nab-paclitaxel with fractionated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Following induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel and daily radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions. Final dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) determination was performed at day 65 after the start of radiotherapy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Nine patients received nab-paclitaxel at a dose level of either 100 mg/m2 (n=3) or 125 mg/m2 (n=6). One DLT (grade 3 neuropathy) was observed in a patient who received 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel. Other grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), anemia (11%), and neutropenia (11%). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 5–28 months), median survival was 19 months and median progression-free survival was 10 months. Following chemoradiation, 3 patients underwent surgical resection, all with negative margins and limited tumor viability. Of the 3 patients, 2 initially had borderline resectable tumors and 1 had an unresectable tumor. Tumor (SMAD-4, Caveolin-1) and peripheral (circulating tumor cells and microvesicles) biomarkers were collected and are being analyzed. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The combination of fractionated radiation and weekly nab-paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated. This regimen represents a potentially promising therapy for patients with unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and warrants further investigation.

Lessons Learned Palbociclib monotherapy demonstrated minimal clinical activity in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal cancers. Further clinical evaluation of palbociclib monotherapy is not warranted in gastroesophageal cancers, but improved understanding of resistance mechanisms may permit rational combination approaches. Background Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. Progression through the G1/S transition requires phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (RB) by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6, which are regulated by cyclins D and E. Amplifications of cyclin D loci and activating mutations in CDKs are frequent molecular aberrations in gastroesophageal malignancies. We conducted a phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib as an initial test of efficacy. Methods Patients with previously treated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers with intact RB nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry were treated with 125 mg daily of palbociclib for days 1–21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Results We screened 29 patients and enrolled 21 patients: 5 with gastric adenocarcinoma, 3 with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 8 with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 5 with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. All 29 tumors screened had intact nuclear RB expression, and four treated patients tested positive for CCND1 overexpression. No objective responses were seen. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 3.0 months. All recurrent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hematologic, with neutropenia in eight patients (38%), anemia in four patients (19%), and thrombocytopenia in two patients (10%). Conclusion Palbociclib has limited single-agent activity in gastroesophageal tumors.

Importance Palbociclib (PD0332991) is a newly developed drug that received breakthrough designation and recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in combination with endocrine therapy in the treatment of hormone receptor positive, ERBB2-negative (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. Objective Herein we describe the preclinical and translational data and early- and late-phase clinical trials in which palbociclib has been investigated in a broad array of tumor types. We discuss the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxic effects, and clinical response rates. Evidence Review On March 1, 2015, we conducted a review of the literature describing the development of palbociclib. We used the PubMed search terms “PD0332991,” “palbociclib,” and “CDK4/6 inhibitor” to find all published articles of interest, without limitation as to publication date. Findings Palbociclib is a potent and specific oral cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor that has strong preclinical data to support its activity in retinoblastoma protein–expressing tumors. Phase 1 trials have demonstrated safety, and phase 2 trials have shown single-agent activity in mantle-cell lymphoma, breast cancer, liposarcoma, and teratoma with reversible neutropenia as the main toxic effect. Addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy improves progression-free survival in endocrine therapy–naive and endocrine therapy–resistant metastatic settings. Conclusions and Relevance Palbociclib is well tolerated and has therapeutic potential for multiple cancers, including breast cancer, where its efficacy has been demonstrated alone and in combination with endocrine therapy. Additional combinations of palbociclib with endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy have potential in various tumors, and phase 3 trials are under way.

3545 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) cells can become resistant to chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy through autophagy. The antimalarial agent hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a potent inhibitor of autophagy, and in vivo studies in CRC cell models show significant decrease tumor volume when these autophagy inhibitors were combined with oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. We previously reported safety with HCQ 600mg BID in combination with standard front-line FOLFOX and bevacizumab in a Phase I study in metastatic CRC patients. We report the results of a single-arm phase II trial of patients with previously untreated stage IV CRC with good performance status and adequate hematologic and biochemical indices. Methods: Patients were treated with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab with HCQ 600mg BID. Imaging was obtained every 2 months. Results: 37 patients were enrolled, 62% male, 89% Caucasian, median age 61, 65% ECOG PS 0, and 73% colon primary. Twenty-eight patients were evaluable for response as 2 patients did not start therapy and 7 patients withdrew prior to first response assessment. The ORR was 68% with an 11% CR rate. The median time to response was 3.1 months. Responses were independent of genomic aberrations within tumor tissue, specifically KRAS, TP53, BRAF, and PIK3CA. Median PFS and duration of response were not interpretable given that only 25% of patients came off trial for progression; all other patients withdrew to pursue surgery or liver embolization therapy, to receive therapy elsewhere, or due to toxicity associated with chemotherapy. The 1 year OS rate was 74%, and median OS has not been reached. The most common G3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (31%), fatigue (11%), thromboembolism (9%), and cardiac events (9%). HCQ-attributable side effects included G1-3 insomnia (26%), G1-3 anxiety (20%), G1 visual disturbances (11%) and G3 allergy (3%). The majority of patients had increase in both LC3 and p62 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and exhibited an increase in autophagosomes within the cytosol by electron microscopy. Conclusions: These data are promising and further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01206530.

This is the case of a 47-year-old woman diagnosed with chemotherapy and radiation-refractory BRAF V600E mutant, poorly differentiated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with multiple metastatic lesions within the liver, lungs, pleura, and bone, stage IV. Discussion of her malignancy’s next-generation sequencing genomic information at a multidisciplinary molecular tumour board took place. The patient was considered a suitable candidate for dual BRAF and MEK inhibition, with the intent to prolong her survival and optimize the quality of life. We report her excellent tolerance and exceptional response to dual therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib, including symptomatic and sustained near-complete radiological improvement. We also briefly review the current knowledge of the genomics of cholangiocarcinoma with a focus on BRAF mutations, and make a point of the importance of the establishment of a molecular tumour board for personalized genomic medicine approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the use of personalized genomic information for the successful management of a patient with ICC, and it is also the first description of dual BRAF and MEK targeted therapy in this malignancy, leading to what is considered an exceptional response.

3614 Background: We have shown that autophagy, the regulated dissolution of cellular elements to maintain survival in adverse environmental conditions, is a determinant of resistance to chemotherap...

3007 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment with a scarcity of effector T cells. Adoptive T cell therapy to restore anti-tumor...

626 Background: Cell cycle dysregulation is a hallmark of most cancers. At the G1/S transition, cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and CDK 6 proteins associate with cyclin D proteins to allow cell cycle progression. Tumor cells that are driven by abnormalities of the cell cycle through activation of the cdk4/6-cyclin D axis showed increased phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (Rb), the major substrate for CDKs at the G1/S transition. Palbociclib is a potent specific inhibitor of cdk 4/6, with preclinical data showing G1 arrest in Rb-positive cells. Since activation of the MAP kinase pathway impacts directly on cdk-cyclin activation, we performed a phase II trial of palbociclib in patients with metastatic, KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We screened 36 patients with KRAS mutant mCRC for Rb expression and 35 (97%) were Rb positive. We enrolled 15 patients, 9 (60%) of which were male and 6 (40%) female, median age was 62, 10 (67%) colon, 4 (27%) rectal (27%) rectal, and 1 (7%) appendiceal malignancy. Patients received 125mg daily of palbociclib for 21 days of a 28-day cycle, the recommended phase II dose. Results: Six patients (33%) experienced grade 3 neutropenia, 1 patient had grade 3 neutropenic fever (6%), and 2 patients (11%) had grade 3 AST/ALT elevation. There were no responses, but 5 patients (33%) had stable disease by RECIST criteria after 2 cycles of treatment, and 1 patient had stable disease for 8 cycles. The median number of cycles was two. As a pharmacodynamic marker of activity, 9 patients underwent FLT-PET at baseline and after 1 cycle of therapy. FLT-PET uses the tracer 3’-deoxy-3’[18F]-fluorothymidine, uptake of which is proportional to cellular proliferation. Six of the 9 patients (67%) had a decrease in uptake in target lesions, with an average 20% decrease in uptake in target lesions. FLT uptake in the bone marrow decreased by an average 4.85% and this correlated with a decrease in absolute neutrophil count of 62.3% (r2 0.59). Conclusions: While palbociclib has limited activity in KRAS mutant mCRC as a single agent, there is a clear pharmacodynamic effect as determined by FLT-PET imaging. Given the limited toxicity profile, combinations with non-myelosuppressive agents hold great promise. Clinical trial information: NCT01037790.