Search

Objectives Progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) varies in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven byEGFR mutations, suggesting that other genetic alterations may influence oncogene addiction. Low BRCA1 mRNA levels correlate with longer PFS in erlotinib-treated EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Since the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib, may attenuate and/or prevent BRCA1 expression, the addition of olaparib to gefitinib could improve outcome in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. Materials and methods GOAL was a multicenter, randomized phase IB/II study performed in two countries, Spain and Mexico. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, treatment-naive, pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC, with centrally confirmed EGFR mutations and measurable disease. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg daily or gefitinib 250 mg daily plus olaparib 200 mg three times daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety and tolerability. Results Between September 2013, and July 2016, 182 patients underwent randomization, 91 received gefitinib and 91 received gefitinib plus olaparib. There were no differences in gender, age, smoking status, performance status, presence of bone and brain metastases or type ofEGFR mutation. Median PFS was 10.9 months (95 % CI 9.3–13.3) in the gefitinib arm and 12.8 months (95 % CI 9.1–14.7) in the gefitinib plus olaparib arm (HR 1.38, 95 % CI 1.00–1.92; p = 0.124). The most common adverse events were anemia, 78 % in gefitinib plus olaparib group, 38 % in gefitinib arm, diarrhea, 65 % and 60 %, and fatigue, 40 % and 32 %, respectively. Conclusions The gefitinib plus olaparib combination did not provide significant benefit over gefitinib alone. The combination’s safety profile showed an increase in hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity, compared to gefitinib alone, however, no relevant adverse events were noted.

Summary Background Few options exist for treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after failure of first-line therapy. Lurbinectedin is a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription. In this phase 2 study, we evaluated the acti and safety of lurbinectedin in patients with SCLC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods In this single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial, we recruited patients from 26 hospitals in six European countries and the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, measurable disease as per Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, absence of brain metastasis, adequate organ function, and pre-treated with only one previous chemotherapy-containing line of treatment (minimum 3 weeks before study initiation) were eligible. Treatment consisted of 3·2 mg/m2 lurbinectedin administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an overall response (complete or partial response) as assessed by the investigators according to RECIST 1.1. All treated patients were analysed for activity and safety. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02454972 . Findings Between Oct 16, 2015, and Jan 15, 2019, 105 patients were enrolled and treated with lurbinectedin. Median follow-up was 17·1 months (IQR 6·5–25·3). Overall response by investigator assessment was seen in 37 patients (35·2%; 95% CI 26·2–45·2). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (irrespective of causality) were haematological abnormalities—namely, anaemia (in nine [9%] patients), leucopenia (30 [29%]), neutropenia (48 [46%]), and thrombocytopenia (seven [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (10%) patients, of which neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were the most common (five [5%] patients for each). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation Lurbinectedin was active as second-line therapy for SCLC in terms of overall response and had an acceptable and manageable safety profile. Lurbinectedin could represent a potential new treatment for patients with SCLC, who have few options especially in the event of a relapse, and is being investigated in combination with doxorubicin as second-line therapy in a randomised phase 3 trial. Funding Pharma Mar.

Background: Little progress has been achieved in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with unresectable stage III disease and new drug schemes are warranted. Material and methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase II trial 65 treatment-naive stage III NSCLC deemed surgically unresectable by a multidisciplinary team were treated with 2 cycles of induction cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) every 21 days plus metronomic oral vinorelbine at 50 mg/day every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. During the concomitant treatment with thoracic radiotherapy cisplatin was administered in the same manner but oral vinorelbine was reduced to 30 mg/day. The objective was to administer a total radiotherapy dose of 66 Gy in 33 daily fractions of 2 Gy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Correlation between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels and survival was also evaluated. Results: Fifty-five (78.5 %) patients completed treatment. Overall response rate, by RECIST criteria, was 66.2 %. Four (6.2 %) patients had complete response, 39 (60.0 %) partial response and 12 (18.5 %) stable disease. Seven patients (10.8 %) had progressive disease during the induction period. Median follow-up was 29.1 months (m), median PFS was 11.5 m (95 %CI: 9.6-15.4). PFS at 12 m in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 47.8 % (95 %CI: 35.1-59.4 %) and median OS was 35.6 m (95 %CI: 24.4-46.8). Grade >= 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (21.5 %) patients during induction and in 13 (24.5 %) patients during concomitant treatment with esophagitis occurring in 3% and pneumonitis in 1.5 % of the patients. Patients with undetectable ctDNA after 3 m follow-up had median PFS and OS of 18.1 m (95 %CI: 8.8-NR) and not reached (NR) (95 %CI: 11.3-NR), respectively, compared with 8.0 m (95 %CI: 2.7-NR) and 24.7 m (95 %CI: 5.7-NR) for patients who remained ctDNA positive at that time point. Conclusions: Metronomic oral vinorelbine and cisplatin obtains similar efficacy results with significantly lower toxicity than the same chemotherapy at standard doses. ctDNA can identify populations with particularly good prognosis.

Background Lung cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer death. Despite its high incidence and mortality, there are few studies describing its symptoms at diagnosis broken down by tumour stage and tobacco use. Accordingly, this study was proposed to describe the frequency of the most common symptoms of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at diagnosis, with a breakdown by stage and tobacco use. Patients and methods Cases were collected from the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry, a nationwide registry sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. More than 50 hospitals recruited histologically confirmed lung cancer cases and information was gathered through personal interview plus data contained in the electronic clinical record. There were no data available on the lag between the appearance of the first symptoms and diagnosis of lung cancer. Results A total of 9876 patients (74% male, median age 64 years) were recruited from 2016 to 2019. Of these, 12.5% presented with SCLC. Stage IV was the most frequent stage at diagnosis (46.6%), and the most frequent symptom was cough (33.9%), followed by dyspnoea (26.7%). No symptom was present in 59% of patients diagnosed in stage I; 40% of stage I patients presented with at least one symptom, while 27.7% of patients in stage IV had no symptoms at diagnosis. Cough was the most frequent symptom in SCLC (40.6%), followed by dyspnoea (34.3%). The number of symptoms was similar across the respective smoking categories in SCLC, and differences between the symptoms analysed did not exceed 7% in any case. Conclusion The absence of the most frequent symptoms (ie, cough, pain, dyspnoea) should not lead to a decision to rule out the presence of lung cancer. A relevant percentage of stage IV patients displayed no symptoms at diagnosis.

Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend re-challenge with the first-line treatment for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI)≥180 days. A phase II study (NCT02454972) showed remarkable antitumor activity in SCLC patients treated with lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1 -h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks as second-line therapy. We report results for the pre-planned subset of patients with CTFI ≥ 180 days. Material and Methods: Twenty patients aged ≥18 years with pathologically proven SCLC diagnosis, pretreated with only one prior platinum-containing line, no CNS metastases, and with CTFI ≥ 180 days were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) assessed by the Investigators according to RECIST v1.1. Results: ORR was 60.0 % (95 %CI, 36.1−86.9), with a median duration of response of 5.5 months (95 %CI, 2.9−11.2) and disease control rate of 95.0 % (95 %CI, 75.1−99.9). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95 %CI, 2.6−7.3). With a censoring of 55.0 %, the median overall survival was 16.2 months (95 %CI, 9.6-upper level not reached). Of note, 60.9 % and 27.1 % of patients were alive at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were hematological disorders (neutropenia, 55.0 %; anemia; 10.0 % thrombocytopenia, 10.0 %), fatigue (10.0 %) and increased liver function tests (GGT, 10 %; ALT and AP, 5.0 % each). No febrile neutropenia was reported. Conclusion: Lurbinectedin is an effective treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC, especially in patients with CTFI ≥ 180 days, with acceptable safety and tolerability. These encouraging results suggest that lurbinectedin can be another valuable therapeutic option rather than platinum re-challenge., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

TPS8581 Background: The results of current studies are considered acceptable evidence to support the hypothesis of efficacy of the proposed combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy (CT-IO) in patients with NSCLC stages Ib-IIIA candidates for adjuvant treatment. Methods: This is an open-label, randomised, two-arm, phase III, multi-centre clinical trial. Primary objective and endpoint: The primary objective is disease free survival (DFS) defined time from randomization to the earliest event defined as disease recurrence, any new lung cancer (even in the opposite lung), or death from any cause at any known point in time Sample size: 210 patients NSCLC stages Ib-IIIA (Experimental Arm (Adjuvant Chemotherapy-Inmunotherapy + maintenance adjuvant Inmunotherapy): 105 patients, Control Arm (Adjuvant Chemotherapy): 105 patients Treatment Patients randomised to the experimental arm will receive Nivolumab 360mg + Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 for 4 cycles every 21 days (+/- 3 days) as adjuvant treatment followed by maintenance adjuvant treatment for 6 cycles with Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W (+/- 3 days). Patients randomized to the control arm will receive Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 for 4 cycles every 21 days (+/- 3 days) followed by 2 observation visits. Total trial duration: 6.5 years, 3.5 years of recruitment, 1 year of adjuvant treatment or observation and 2 years of follow up. The start date was January 2021. The estimated primary completion date is June 2027. Clinical trial information: NCT04564157.

[Background] Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Although Spain contributes to global statistics related to cancer, it is difficult to discern aspects linked to clinical presentation of the disease or molecular testing. The Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) was created with the aim of filling this gap., [Methods] Observational cohort multicenter study performed in Spain, including patients with lung cancer or other types of thoracic tumors undergoing active treatment or palliative care only. Enrollment took place between August 2016 and December 2018. The evaluation included a review of demographic, epidemiological, clinical and molecular data., [Results] A total of 6,600 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were recruited at 56 Spanish hospitals. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. The majority of patients (80%) presented with advanced disease, being adenocarcinoma the most frequent histological type. Up to 86% of patients were current- or ex-smokers, with men starting to smoke earlier than women (average age 17.9 vs. 19.2 years). Sixty-seven percent of patients underwent some type of molecular testing. Mutations in EGFR and KRAS genes were found in 18% and 28% of patients, respectively., [Conclusions] Our findings suggest that the TTR study accurately describes the clinical reality of lung cancer in Spain, including useful information on smoking status as well as molecular profiling and tumor histology, and can therefore be used to drive improvements in health care. Social and political pressure to reduce tobacco consumption among the population should be reinforced, particularly among youth., This work was supported by Grupo Español de Cáncer de Pulmón (GECP), Novartis, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD).

Objectives: Concomitant chemo-radiation is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of oral vinorelbine and cisplatin (OVP) compared with etoposide and cisplatin (EP), both in combination with radiotherapy, in this setting. Material and methods: An open-label, randomized phase II trial was undertaken including 23 hospitals in Spain. Adults with untreated unresectable stage III NSCLC were randomizedl:1 to receive: oral vinorelbine (days 1 and 8 with cisplatin on day 1 in 3-week cycles; 2 cycles of induction, 2 cycles in concomitance) or etoposide (days 1-5 and 29-32 with cisplatin on days 1 and 8 in 4-week cycles; 2 cycles in concomitance). Both groups received concomitant radiotherapy 2 Gy/day (66 Gy). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: One hundred and forty patients were enrolled. Sixty-nine patients received OVP and 71 received EP. Globally adverse events grade 3/4 per cycle were fewer in the vinorelbine arm (19.4%) than in the etoposide arm (62.6%) (p < 0.001). One patient (1.5%) in the OVP arm and 12 pts (17.6%) in the EP arm presented esophagitis grade 3/4 (p = 0.002). Median PFS was similar in both groups (10.8 [95% CI 7.7-13.8] and 9.6 months [95% CI 4.4-14.8]; p = 0.457, respectively). Preliminary median overall survival was 30 months in the OVP arm and 31.9 months in the EP arm (p = 0.688). Conclusions: Our findings show that OVP could be considered a standard combination with similar efficacy and better safety profile for the treatment of LA-NSCLC patients.

e21515 Background: The liquid biopsy (LB) is an important tool in the diagnostic and follow up of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can provide big information about the mutational variability of the disease during of the treatment. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study with 200 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, treated with first-line TKI therapy. We analyse the ctDNA by dPCR pre-treatment, at 8 weeks, at 7 months and at the progression of the disease (PD). Results: A total of 200 patients (60% women / 40% men) were included. The median of age was 68-year. The never smokers were 56% and 34% ex-smokers. 92% of the cases were adenocarcinomas. According to the stage of the disease, 52% were stage IVB, 38.5% stage IVA and 9.5% unknown. The first-line treatment was afatinib in 47.5%, erlotinib in 21.5% and gefitinib in 31%. According to the type of sensitivity mutation, 61.5% corresponded to Del19, 32% to L858R, 2.5% to G719X and 2.5% to L861Q. At the time of diagnosis, 63% had pulmonary metastatic involvement and 42.5% liver metastasis. At the time of data analysis, 66% of the patients had some progression of the disease (PD) and 37% died. 68% of the patients with Del19 received afatinib, while 20% of the patients with L858R received afatinib, 54.5% erlotinib and 32% gefitinib (p = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 20 months, progression-free survival was 11.8 months, without any differences according to the treatment (p = 0.93). The groups with worse PFS included: the squamous histology (HR 5.7; 95%CI 2.04-15.91, p = 0.001), the G719X mutation (HR 3.36; 95%CI 1.21-9.25, p = 0.019) and the liver metastasis (HR 1.65; 95%CI 1.01-2.68, p = 0.042). The sensitizing mutation was detected in the 80.8% of the patients in the LB by dPCR and the T790M in 2%. However, in the first control only was detectable in 18.5%. At the time of PD, the percentage of detection of T790M raised to 52.3%, and the sensitizing mutation 79.44%. At that moment, patients who developed T790M were mostly never smokers (66%, p = 0.006) and had Del19 (66%). Patients with bone progression developed T790M in 60.4% (p = 0.014) and hepatic 27% (p = 0.012). Conclusions: We concluded that the clinical characteristics of the patients of the OPH study are consistent with the previous reported in the Caucasian population and the subgroups with the worst prognosis include the squamous histology, the G719X mutation and the liver metastasis.

e13029Background: De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents approximately 6–10% of breast cancer. In luminal-like dnMBC recommendation for endocrine therapy (ET) as first-line treatment i...

e13608Background: The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) initiated a Tumor Thoracic Register (RTT) in September 2016 with the aim of evaluating accurate, basic data concerning this oncological pathol...

9012Background: Low BRCA1 mRNA levels correlate with longer progression free survival (PFS) in erlotinib treated EGFR mutant NSCLC patients (p), while risk of shortened PFS was associated with inte...

e11560 Background: The Oncotype DX (ODX) Breast Cancer assay (Genomic Health NC., Redwood City, CA) has been validated as a predictor of the likelihood of chemotherapy benefit in hormone receptor p...

Introduction: Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression are generally determined by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) as recommended in the clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncologists. This method may be subject to variability because of differences in fixation, ER antibody clones, as well as to immunostain interpretation and use of arbitrary cut-off points. Materials and methods: We identified 72 breast cancer cases at Basurto University Hospital from 1 September 2012 to 31 May 2014 that have been analyzed by Oncotype DX with reporting on ER/PR expression levels by RT-PCR (Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA). According to the company’s report, a tumor is considered as ER positive with expression units of >=6.5 and PR positive with expression units of >=5.5. Oncotype DX is a commercial assay that predicts tumor recurrence in node-negative ER-positive breast cancers. It is a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based assay that analyzes the expression of 21 genes (16 cancer-related and 5 control genes) to provide a distant disease recurrence score ranging from 0 to 100. At our institution, hormone receptors by IHC were analyzed on corresponding surgery breast specimens at the time of initial diagnosis. They were evaluated by IHC on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, between 8-72 hours. ER was assessed using Roche antibody clone SP1 and PR was assessed using antibody clone 1E2. Percentage of positive nuclei was determined by visual microscopic estimation: Citation Format: Patricia Novas, Elena Galve, Sara Fernández, Maria Ángeles Sala, Alberto Arévalo, Juan Arango, Borja López de San Vicente, Seila Fernández, Ane Zumárraga, Purificación Martínez del Prado. Concordance between semiquantitative immunohistochemical assay and oncotype DX RT-PCR assay for estrogen and progesterone receptors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-12.

10500 Background: Nucleotide excision and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways are the most recognized antitumor mechanism of action of trabectedin in STS. Additionally, our group has shown...

TPS8127 Background: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered the treatment of choice for p with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, with higher response rate (RR) and longer progr...

Background Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) are an important component in adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with positive estrogenic receptors in breast cancer. They inhibit the enzyme Cytochrome P450 CYP19, which causes a loss of BMD and consequently an increase in the risk of fracture. In patients with early breast cancer (EBC) in treatment with AI, it is estimated that the risk of fracture is 11% at five years. FRAX is used to calculate the probability of fracture at 10 years. Within its limitations, it should be highlighted that among its risk factors it does not include medications such as AI and that the treatment threshold adapted to patients of the Spanish population is not currently valid. Objectives To determine if the therapeutic intervention thresholds according to the FRAX proposed by the NOF (National Osteoporosis Foundation) as well as of the NOGG (National Osteoporosis Guidelines Group) identify appropriately whether patients with early breast cancer have a high risk of fracture at the start of AI treatment. Methods Retrospective and descriptive study of 73 patients with EBC in treatment with AI sent to the medical oncology department of a tertiary hospital (Basurto University Hospital) for monographic consultation of osteoporosis for its diagnosis, control and monitoring in the period from 01/01/2006 to 31/12/2010. A questionnaire was conducted of the risk factors, BMD DXA and FRAX. The FRAX results are described in the basal visit and the incidence of fractures in this population in December 2012 (monitoring period of 2 to 7 years). The patients with densitometric osteopenia and high risk of fracture according to the FRAX and the patients with both densitometric and established osteoporosis received treatment with bone agents by the Osteoporosis Unit. Results The mean age of our series is 63 years (40-83). The median time from the start of the AI and the realization of the basal BMD is 4 months. The initial densitometry identified 36 patients (49%) with osteoporosis, 35 patients (48%) osteopenia and 2 patients (3%) normal. According to the FRAX applying the treatment thresholds of the NOF (FMO >= 20% and FC >=3%): 19 patients (25%) have high risk of fracture: 16 patients (21%) of FMO and 18 patients (23.6%) of FC. Applying the treatment thresholds of the NOGG in which the values vary according to age: 3 patients (4%) have high risk of fracture, 1 patient (1%) of FMO and 3 patients (4%) of FC. Of the 73 patients, 15 (20%) present fracture, all vertebral, with 5 (33%) of high risk by FRAX according to NOF and only 1 (6%) according to NOGG. Conclusions In our series, the treatment thresholds for the FRAX of the NOF are more sensitive by identifying a greater number of patients with high risk of fracture (25%) than the NOGG (6%). Of the patients with fractures of the study (20%), only 33% of them were identified previously as high risk according to the NOF and 6% according to the NOGG. Both thresholds clearly underestimate the risk of fracture. It is necessary to validate the FRAX in prospective studies that include AI as a risk factor and apply new validated cut-off points in our population. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

LBA8002 Background: Findings from the SLCG phase II customized chemotherapy trial (NCT00883480) showed that RAP80, a component of the BRCA1 complex, influenced outcome both in p with low BRCA1 expression treated with cisplatin (cis)/gemcitabine (gem) and in p with intermediate/high BRCA1 levels treated with cis/docetaxel (doc) or with doc alone. Together with the French Lung Cancer Group, the SLCG has performed a prospective, randomized phase III trial comparing noncustomized cis/doc with customized therapy in metastatic NSCLC p. A parallel phase II study (ChiCTR-TRC-12001860) is being carried out in China under the auspices of the SLCG. Methods: Since 6 March 2008, 391 p with wild-type EGFR have been randomized 1:1 to the control or experimental arm. p in the control arm receive cis/doc; p in the experimental arm receive treatment according to their BRCA1 and RAP80 levels: p with low RAP80, regardless of BRCA1 levels, cis/gem; p with intermediate/high RAP80 and low/intermediate BRCA1, cis/doc; p with int...