Search

We aimed to increase pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with invasive breast cancer by adding preoperative capecitabine to docetaxel following 5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) (with trastuzumab for patients with HER2‐positive disease) and to evaluate 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) associated with this preoperative regimen. Chemotherapy included four cycles of FEC100 (5‐fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 every 21 days) followed by 4 21‐day cycles of docetaxel (35 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) concurrently with capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days off) (wTX). For HER2‐positive patients, treatment was modified by decreasing epirubicin to 75 mg/m2 and adding trastuzumab (H) in standard doses (FEC75‐H →wTX‐H). The study objective was to achieve a pCR rate in the breast and axillary lymph nodes of 37% in patients with HER2‐negative breast cancer and of 67% in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer treated with preoperative trastuzumab. A total of 186 patients were enrolled on study. In an intent‐to‐treat analysis, the pCR rate was 31% (37/118, 95% CI: 24–40%) in the HER2‐negative patients, 24% (15/62, 95% CI: 14–37%) in ER‐positive/HER2‐negative patients, 39% (22/56, 95% CI: 27–53%) in the ER‐negative/HER2‐negative patients, and 46% (29/63, 95% CI: 34–48%) in the HER2‐positive patients. The pCR rate in the 40 trastuzumab‐treated patients was 53% (21/40, 95% CI: 38–67%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included neutropenia, leukopenia, diarrhea, and hand‐foot skin reactions. One trastuzumab‐treated patient developed grade 3 cardiotoxicity, and 4 others experienced grade 1–2 decrements in left ventricular function; all five patients’ cardiac function returned to their baseline upon completion of trastuzumab. At 5 years, disease‐free survival was 70% in the HER2‐negative population (78% in ER‐positive/HER2‐negative and 62% in the ER‐negative/HER2‐negative patients) and 80% in the HER2‐positive patients (87% in the trastuzumab‐treated HER2‐positive patients). At 5 years, overall survival was 80% in the HER2‐negative population (88% in ER‐positive/HER2‐negative and 71% in the ER‐negative/HER2‐negative patients) and 86% in the HER2‐positive patients (94.5% in the trastuzumab‐treated HER2‐positive patients). FEC100 (FEC75 with trastuzumab) followed by weekly docetaxel plus capecitabine, with or without trastuzumab is a safe, effective preoperative cytotoxic regimen. However, the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel following FEC, with or without trastuzumab, did not increase pCR rates nor 5‐year DFS over the rates that have been reported with standard preoperative doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab. Therefore, the use of capecitabine as part of preoperative chemotherapy is not recommended.

Purpose: We conducted a randomized phase III study to determine whether patients with early breast cancer would benefit from the addition of capecitabine (X) to a standard regimen of doxorubicin (A) plus cyclophosphamide (C) followed by docetaxel (T). Experimental Design: Treatment comprised eight cycles of AC→T (T dose: 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or AC→XT (X dose: 825 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1–14; T dose: 75 mg/m2 on day 1). The primary endpoint was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Of 2,611 women, 1,304 were randomly assigned to receive AC→T and 1,307 to receive AC→XT. After a median follow-up of 5 years, the study failed to meet its primary endpoint [HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67–1.05; P = 0.125]. A significant improvement in overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was seen with AC→XT versus AC→T (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51–0.92; P = 0.011). There were no unexpected adverse events. Of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/HER2-negative disease, 70% of whom were node-positive, 26% and 59% had tumors with a centrally assessed Ki-67 score of Conclusions: The very low event rate in patients with ER-positive, low Ki-67 cancers, regardless of nodal status, strongly suggests that these patients should not be enrolled in adjuvant trials that assess 5-year DFS rates and that central Ki-67 analyses can identify these patients. Clin Cancer Res; 21(19); 4305–11. ©2015 AACR.

Triple-negative breast cancers have inherent defects in DNA repair, making this cancer a rational target for therapy based on poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition.We conducted an open-label, phase 2 study to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and carboplatin with or without iniparib, a small molecule with PARP-inhibitory activity, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. A total of 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and carboplatin (at a dose equivalent to an area under the concentration-time curve of 2) on days 1 and 8--with or without iniparib (at a dose of 5.6 mg per kilogram of body weight) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11--every 21 days. Primary end points were the rate of clinical benefit (i.e., the rate of objective response [complete or partial response] plus the rate of stable disease for ≥6 months) and safety. Additional end points included the rate of objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.The addition of iniparib to gemcitabine and carboplatin improved the rate of clinical benefit from 34% to 56% (P=0.01) and the rate of overall response from 32% to 52% (P=0.02). The addition of iniparib also prolonged the median progression-free survival from 3.6 months to 5.9 months (hazard ratio for progression, 0.59; P=0.01) and the median overall survival from 7.7 months to 12.3 months (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; P=0.01). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in either treatment group included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue or asthenia, leukopenia, and increased alanine aminotransferase level. No significant difference was seen between the two groups in the rate of adverse events.The addition of iniparib to chemotherapy improved the clinical benefit and survival of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer without significantly increased toxic effects. On the basis of these results, a phase 3 trial adequately powered to evaluate overall survival and progression-free survival is being conducted. (Funded by BiPar Sciences [now owned by Sanofi-Aventis]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00540358.).

Purpose We previously reported that four cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) produced superior disease-free survival (DFS) compared with four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in early breast cancer. Older women are under-represented in adjuvant chemotherapy trials. In our trial 16% of patients were ≥ 65 years. We now report 7-year results for DFS and overall survival (OS) as well as the impact of age, hormone receptor status, and HER2 status on outcome and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of standard-dose AC (60/600 mg/m2; n = 510), or TC (75/600 mg/m2; n = 506), administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Results The median age in women younger than 65, was 50 years (range, 27 to 64) and for women ≥ 65 was 69 years (range, 65 to 77). Baseline characteristics in the two age subgroups were generally well matched, except that older women tended to have more lymph node involvement. At a median of 7 years follow-up, the difference in DFS between TC and AC was significant (81% TC v 75% AC; P = .033; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98) as was OS (87% TC v 82% AC; P = .032; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.97). TC was superior in older patients as well as younger patients. There was no interaction of hormone-receptor status or HER-2 status and treatment. Older women experienced more febrile neutropenia with TC and more anemia with AC. Conclusion With longer follow-up, four cycles of TC was superior to standard AC (DFS and OS) and was a tolerable regimen in both older and younger patients.

Purpose Hormonal breast cancer treatment increases menopausal symptoms in women. This study investigated differences between the symptoms associated with either adjuvant tamoxifen or exemestane. Patients and Methods Ten common symptoms were assessed by self-report questionnaire administered to 1,614 consecutive patients at baseline and every 3 months during the first year of a double-blind, randomized trial of postmenopausal women with early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Symptoms were categorized as none, mild, moderate, or severe. A hot flash score was calculated at each time point. Symptoms were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Each time period was tested repeatedly against the baseline; an overall P value was assigned for each reported symptom. Results Compliance was excellent, with 7,286 questionnaires analyzed. Baseline symptom prevalence ranged from 2% (vaginal bleeding) to 60% to 70% (bone/muscle aches and low energy). There were no significant differences in vaginal bleeding, mood alteration, or low energy. Patients receiving tamoxifen had significantly more vaginal discharge (P < .0001). Exemestane patients reported more bone/muscle aches (P < .0001), vaginal dryness (P = .0004), and difficulty sleeping (P = .03). In both groups, the hot flash score peaked at 3 months and decreased thereafter. At 12 months, patients receiving tamoxifen had a significantly higher mean hot flash score (P = .03), with daily hot flashes increasing from baseline by 33% compared with a 7% increase from baseline with exemestane. Conclusion At 12 months, exemestane was associated with fewer hot flashes and less vaginal discharge than tamoxifen, but with more vaginal dryness, bone/muscle aches, and difficulty sleeping. Symptoms were common in both groups.

BACKGROUND Fulvestrant is an estrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects. In the second-line treatment of advanced breast carcinoma, fulvestrant was shown previously to be as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in terms of time to disease progression and objective response rates. The authors reported the overall survival results from these studies. METHODS A prospectively planned, combined, overall survival analysis was performed, including data from two Phase III trials that compared the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant (250 mg monthly; n = 428) with anastrozole (1 mg daily; n = 423) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma who had disease progression after receipt of previous endocrine treatment. RESULTS At an extended median follow-up of 27.0 months (range, 0–66.9 months), 319 (74.5%) patients in the fulvestrant group and 322 (76.1%) patients in the anastrozole group had died. Prolonged survival was observed with both drugs, with 10–20% of patients still alive > 5 years after randomization. The median overall survival was similar between treatments, being 27.4 months and 27.7 months in fulvestrant and anastrozole-treated patients, respectively (hazards ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.15; P = 0.809). Fulvestrant continued to be well tolerated, and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of joint disorders compared with anastrozole (P = 0.0234). CONCLUSIONS The current analysis showed that fulvestrant was similar to anastrozole with respect to overall survival in the second-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

The efficacy of fulvestrant (Faslodex), a novel oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER and has no known agonist effects, was compared with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (Arimidex) for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with visceral and non-visceral metastases. Assessment was by means of a retrospective subgroup analysis of combined data from two randomised, phase III trials. Objective response (OR) rates were similar in patients treated with fulvestrant and anastrozole, respectively (21.9% versus 19.3%-patients with no visceral metastases; 15.7% versus 13.2%-all of the patients with visceral metastases; 18.8% versus 14.0%-patients with visceral metastases only). The proportion of patients with clinical benefit (CB) was also similar between treatments and between subgroups with and without visceral disease. Fulvestrant is at least as effective as anastrozole, providing a valuable treatment option for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with visceral metastases who have failed on prior endocrine therapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and antitumor activity of IFN-gamma retroviral vector in patients with advanced melanoma. Seventeen patients (9 single courses, 8 multiple courses) received a total of 363 intratumor injections of IFN-gamma retroviral vector (1 x 10(7) PFU/ml administered at 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 ml per cohort). No grade III/IV adverse events were attributed to study medication. Replication-competent retrovirus was not detected in any of the 17 patients by polymerase chain reaction studies. Eight patients showed elevated anti-tumor antibody responses in comparison with baseline by ELISA. One of nine patients treated with a single course had an optimal response of stable disease, compared with eight of eight multiple-injected patients. Median survival of single-injected patients was 150 days, and patients who received multiple injections have still not achieved median survival duration, with four of eight still living (p = 0.0462, Wilcoxon; p = 0.0273, log rank). We conclude that intratumor injection of IFN-gamma is safe and well tolerated. Evidence of antitumor activity is suggested in patients with advanced malignancy that received multiple injections.

Reva Schneider1, Ayman Barakat1, John Pippen1,2,3, Cynthia Osborne1,2,3 1Medical Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, 2Texas Oncology PA, 3US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA Abstract: Estrogen and its metabolites play a significant role in the proliferation of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors can significantly reduce estrogen levels by blocking enzyme-mediated estrogen synthesis within tissues. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors have now surpassed tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer, showing improved response rates and time to progression. Aromatase inhibitors have shown incremental improvements in disease-free survival, lower local recurrence rates, lower metastatic recurrence rates, and a lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer over tamoxifen when used in the adjuvant setting. Aromatase inhibitors are recommended to be used as adjuvant therapy within the first 5 years of hormonal therapy and may be used either upfront for 5 years or sequenced with tamoxifen. No superiority of one aromatase inhibitor over another has yet been shown. The side effect profiles of aromatase inhibitors have some key differences compared with tamoxifen. These differences may influence treatment choices as well as impact compliance. Keywords: aromatase inhibitor, breast cancer, postmenopausal, hormonal therapy

Purpose An independent Adjuvant Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee (ACREC) systematically reviewed cases of symptomatic heart failure events to uniformly define the cardiac event rate across two large trials (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP] B-31 and North Central Cancer Treatment Group [NCCTG] N9831) that assessed the addition of trastuzumab to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods The committee was composed of six independent oncologists and cardiologists. A retrospective review of patients with a cardiac event was performed by the primary investigators of the trials. The ACREC prospectively established criteria for determining a symptomatic heart failure event. Recovery status was determined from documented resolution of signs and symptoms. Potential risk factors were also assessed. Results Medical records for a total of 173 patients were reviewed: 40 in the chemotherapy-alone arm and 133 in the trastuzumab arm. Trastuzumab-treated patients had a 2.0% incidence of symptomatic heart failure events compared with 0.45% in the chemotherapy-alone arm. Complete or partial recovery was observed in 86.1% of trastuzumab-treated patients with symptomatic heart failure events. Of five patients who died, only one patient had received trastuzumab. Independent predictors for cardiac events were age older than 50 years, a low ejection fraction at the start of paclitaxel treatment, and trastuzumab treatment. Conclusion The incidence of symptomatic heart failure events is 2.0% in patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab, and the majority of these patients recover with appropriate treatment.

Purpose This phase II trial assessed efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine to treat metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in patients previously treated with taxanes. Patients and Methods Eligible women with advanced breast cancer treated with taxanes in the adjuvant or metastatic setting received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Hematologic toxicities limiting day 8 gemcitabine dosing were observed in the first 20 patients, prompting a protocol amendment to evaluate pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results Between July 2003 and September 2006, 73 evaluable women (median age, 52.1 years; range, 28–73 years) were enrolled (21-day schedule: 21 patients, 52% estrogen receptor—positive, 24% HER2-positive; 14-day schedule: 52 patients, 58% ER-positive, 15% HER2-positive). For patients on the 21-day and 14-day schedules, median number of cycles was 4 (range, 1–8 cycles) and 5 (range, 1–38 cycles), respectively. The ORRs were 23.8% and 19.2%, respectively; median survival times were 16.2 months and 13.4 months. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (71% vs. 33%) and leukopenia (24% vs. 14%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 10% and 6%. The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was fatigue (29% vs. 10%). Conclusion Pemetrexed/gemcitabine given on a 21-day or 14-day schedule is active in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with taxanes. A 14-day schedule appears to result in fewer serious toxicities.

PurposeCross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) –positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsPostmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population.ResultsIn HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease ≥ 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable.ConclusionThis trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.

Summary Background Gene expression microarrays are being used to develop new prognostic and predictive tests for breast cancer, and might be used at the same time to confirm oestrogen-receptor status and ERBB2 status. Our goal was to establish a new method to assign oestrogen receptor and ERBB2-receptor status to breast carcinoma based on mRNA expression measured using Affymetrix U133A gene-expression profiling. Methods We used gene expression data of 495 breast cancer samples to assess the correlation between oestrogen receptor ( ESR1 ) and ERBB2 mRNA and clinical status of these genes (as established by immunohistochemical [IHC] or fluorescence in-situ hybridisation [FISH], or both). Data from 195 fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples were used to define mRNA cutoff values that assign receptor status. We assessed the accuracy of these cutoffs in two independent datasets: 123 FNA samples and 177 tissue samples (ie, resected or core-needle biopsied tissues). Profiling was done at two institutions by use of the same platform (Affymetrix U133A GeneChip). All data were uniformly normalised with dCHIP software. Findings ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA levels correlated closely with routine measurements for receptor status in all three datasets. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0·62 to 0·77. An ESR1 mRNA cutoff value of 500 identified oestrogen-receptor-positive status with an overall accuracy of 90% (training set), 88% (first validation set), and 96% (second validation set). An ERBB2 mRNA threshold of 1150 identified ERBB2-positive status with the overall accuracy of 93% (training set), 89% (first validation set), and 90% (second validation set). Reproducibility of mRNA measurements in 34 replicate experiments was high (correlation coefficient 0·975 for ESR1 , 0·984 for ERBB2 ). Interpretation Amounts of ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA as measured by the Affymetrix GeneChip reliably and reproducibly establish oestrogen-receptor status and ERBB2 status, respectively.

PurposeThe combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Studies of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) showed promise in MBC. In 1997, we initiated a randomized adjuvant trial of TC compared with standard-dose AC with a primary end point of disease-free survival (DFS).Patients and MethodsPatients were eligible if they had stage I to III operable invasive breast cancer with complete surgical excision of the primary tumor. Between June 1997 and December 1999, 1,016 patients were randomly assigned to four cycles of either standard-dose AC (60 and 600 mg/m2, respectively; n = 510) or TC (75 and 600 mg/m2, respectively; n = 506), administered intravenously every 3 weeks as adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiation therapy (as indicated) and tamoxifen, for patients with hormone receptor–positive disease, were administered after completion of chemotherapy.ResultsBoth treatment groups (TC and AC) were well balanced with respect to major prognostic factors. Patients were observed through 2005 for a median of 5.5 years. At 5 years, DFS rate was significantly superior for TC compared with AC (86% v 80%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; P = .015). Overall survival rates for TC and AC were 90% and 87%, respectively (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.1; P = .13). More myalgia, arthralgia, edema, and febrile neutropenia occurred on the TC arm; more nausea and vomiting occurred on the AC arm as well as one incident of congestive heart failure.ConclusionAt 5 years, TC was associated with a superior DFS and a different toxicity profile compared with AC.

This prospective clinical trial was designed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with rapidly proliferating node-negative breast cancer. This group has been predicted to have a 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 70% without adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, 449 women with rapidly proliferating breast cancer (91% measured by S-phase fraction and 9% by histochemistry) received adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) plus tamoxifen for estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive cancer. The 5-year DFS was 90% (+/- 2%) and the 5-year overall survival was 94% (+/- 1%). At a median follow-up of 62 months, the strategy of administering 6 cycles of AC to women with T2 N0 cancer and 3 cycles in those with smaller T1 N0 cancers appeared to eliminate tumor size as a potential prognostic factor. Adjuvant chemotherapy with AC appears effective in reducing recurrence rates for women with rapidly proliferating node-negative breast cancer.

Preliminary results of a phase II study of gemcitabine plus trastuzumab in previously treated (up to 3 previous regimens) metastatic breast cancer patients are presented. Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, with 2+ or 3+ tumor HER2 expression. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg over 90 minutes, followed by 2 mg/kg infused over 30 minutes weekly. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Preliminary results are available on the first 38 patients enrolled. Median patient age was 53 years, 53% had estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive disease, and HER2 staining was 2+ in 39% and 3+ in 61% of patients. There was a median of 3 previously administered (including adjuvant) chemotherapy regimens, and a median of 4.5 treatment cycles per patient has been administered so far. Twelve patients (32%) have had an objective partial response, with a median response duration of 8.6 months. Median time to disease progression is 6.7 months to date, with a median overall survival of 10.2 months. No unexpected toxicities or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities have been observed; 2 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and 1 patient had febrile neutropenia. Thus, gemcitabine/ trastuzumab resulted in an encouraging 32% response rate, given the heavily pretreated patient population. Tolerability was good overall, with no unexpected side effects observed.

This study was designed to compare outcome in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) in women with histologically negative axillary lymph nodes and documented low proliferative rate cancer to other well-defined prognostic factors including type of adjuvant treatment. Between 1988 and 1998, we studied 669 patients with invasive node-negative breast cancer up to 5 cm in size and low proliferative rate measured by flow cytometry to determine S-phase fraction (SPF) or by histochemistry (Ki67/MIB1). At a median follow-up of 53 months, 5-year DFS for the entire group was 94% and did not differ significantly by type of systemic adjuvant treatment: none (133 patients, 95% DFS), tamoxifen (441 patients, 94% DFS), or chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (95 patients, 92% DFS). In a multivariate prognostic factor analysis, only tumor size was significant; 5-year DFS was 96% for T1N0 cancer versus 89% for T2N0 cancer (P = 0.01). We have prospectively confirmed that a low rate of proliferation as measured by SPF or MIB1 determination confers an excellent prognosis in invasive node-negative breast cancer up to 5 cm in size, regardless of adjuvant treatment.

590 Background: Some ER-negative (ER-) breast cancers express low levels of estrogen receptors and approximately 12% express androgen receptors (Traina, T, et al. ASCO, 2012). Whether young premenopausal women (age 40yrs and by ER status. Results: In the two studies combined, ER- patients ≤40 had a superior DFS (84%) than ER- patients >40 (80%), while ER+ patients ≤40 had a worse 5-yr DFS (83%) than ER+ patients >40 (89%), although these findings were of borderline significance (see Table below). In 99-016, omitting C did not adversely affect outcomes in either age group, regardless of ER status. Conclusions: We did not observe worse outcomes in ER- patients ≤40 years compared to those >40 years in 2 US Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy trials, suggesting no adverse impact of assumed greater ovarian function following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≤40yrs. ER+ patients ≤40 had a worse DFS than ER+ patients >40. Omitting C in ER- patients ≤40 or >40 did not adversely affect outcome. [Table: see text]

547 Background: Randomized phase III USON 01062 trial determining if patients with EBC would benefit from addition of capecitabine to docetaxel after AC (AC-T vs AC-XT). AC-T: docetaxel 100mg/M2 IV; AC-XT: docetaxel 75mg/M2 IV with capecitabine 825mg/M2 PO BID 14/7 days every 21days for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint, improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years, was not met (HR=0.84, p=0.12) likely due to lower-than-expected event rate. The secondary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was improved with capecitabine (HR 0.68, p=0.01) (O’Shaughnessy, J. ASCO, 2011). Methods: Molecular analyses demonstrate that pleomorphic lobular (mixed lobular/ductal) carcinomas evolve from the same precursor and/or through the same genetic pathway as classical lobular cancers (Reis-Filho, J., J Path, 2005). We conducted exploratory analyses to evaluate the addition of adjuvant capecitabine in ductal vs lobular or lobular/ductal (mixed) EBC within USON 01062. Histology was classified according to local pathology assessment on patients’ primary cancers. Results: In ductal patients (n=2195), there was no difference in DFS (HR=0.92, p=0.48) and OS (HR=0.75, p=0.07) with AC-T vs AC-XT. In lobular/mixed patients (n=355), adding capecitabine improved DFS (HR=0.55, p=0.055) and OS (HR=0.38, p=0.04). There was no difference in DFS (HR=1.004, p=0.98) in the ER+ ductal patients (n=1258) with the addition of capecitabine. Conclusions: Ductal and lobular cancers have distinct histologic and molecular characteristics; lobular cancers are generally less sensitive to chemotherapy (Cristofanilli, M. JCO, 2005). This exploratory analysis suggests that patients with lobular/mixed EBC may benefit from adjuvant capecitabine. This hypothesis requires evaluation in other adjuvant capecitabine trials. [Table: see text]

500 Background: First results of study USON 01062 comparing adjuvant AC→T vs AC→XT in high-risk EBC [O’Shaughnessy, SABCS 2010] showed the primary endpoint, improvement in DFS, was not met (median ...

Background: EGF30008 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study which evaluated the benefit of adding lapatinib (L) to letrozole (Let) alone in patient (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+), metastatic breast cancer. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with HER2+ tumors was significantly increased from 3 to 8.2 mos with dual therapy (HR [95% CI] =0.71 [0.53, 0.96], P=.019). Safety data presented at the 2008 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium demonstrated that the combination of L+Let was manageable and predictable, with no unexpected toxicity.Methods: 1286 pts were randomized 1:1 to treatment with Let versus L+Let. Safety data were collected from start of study drug until 30 days after discontinuation. The safety population was based on the actual treatment received (Let n=623; L+Let n=655). Updated adverse events (AEs) associated with L were evaluated at both pt and event level as a function of time on study. AEs were categorized into 4 groups: diarrhea, rash, cardiac, and hepatobiliary events. Multiple AE terms were classified within these groups.Results: Safety data through 03Feb09 are reported (additional 8 mos data beyond trial reporting). Let group: median exposure of Let=37.57 weeks (range 0.9-251.1). L+Let group: median exposure of Let= 40.43 (range 0.1-248.6) and median exposure of L=40.14 weeks (range 0.3-248.6). Overall, there were 537 AE events (86%) in the Let alone group, and 629 (96%) in the L+Let group. Incidence, counts, and time to first occurrence of AEs associated with HER1 and HER2 inhibition are summarized below. Let (n=623)L+Let (n=655)Rash Pts with AE, n95 (15%)328 (50%)- Max Grade 30.012 (4%)- Max Grade 40.00.0AEs (n events)123638- Leading to study withdrawal1 ( Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5094.

3 Background: TNBC is an aggressive breast cancer subtype that shares molecular and pathologic features with BRCA1-related breast cancers. BRCA-deficient cells are sensitive to inhibition of PARP1, a critical enzyme of cell proliferation and DNA repair, and thus represent a rational target of PARP inhibitor-based cancer therapy. The objectives of this study were to evaluate BSI-201, a potent PARP1 inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in subjects with metastatic TNBC. Methods: Eligible subjects had measurable disease and had ≤2 prior cytotoxic regimens for ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were randomized (1:1) to G/C alone or G/C + BSI-201. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=2) were given on days 1 and 8, and BSI-201 (5.6 mg/kg; iv; biweekly) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. Endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + SD ≥6 months), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Analyses of the first 86 of a planned 120 patients showed that BSI-201 + G/C had improved CBR, median PFS, and median OS, compared with G/C alone. The frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs) did not differ between arms. Conclusions: This preliminary analysis demonstrates that BSI-201 + G/C significantly improves CBR, PFS, and OS, compared with G/C alone. BSI-201 + G/C was well tolerated, with BSI-201 adding no significant toxicity to G/C. Updated CBR, PFS, and OS for all 120 patients and exploratory correlative analyses of PARP expression and clinical response will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

1003 Background: The antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1 combines the biological activity of trastuzumab with targeted delivery of an anti-microtubule agent (DM1) to HER-2-expressing cancer cells. This analysis examines correlation of response to T-DM1 with HER-2 status, as assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), mRNA quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HER-2 extracellular domain [ECD]), for pts enrolled in TDM4258g, a phase II study of T-DM1 in pts with MBC. Methods: TDM4258g is an open-label, single-arm study of T-DM1 administered at 3.6 mg/kg IV q3w. Pts had progressed on HER-2-directed therapy and received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and were HER-2 + based on local testing. Archival tissue (paraffin block or >7 unstained tumor slides) was collected for retrospective central laboratory testing. HER-2 DNA amplification was determined by FISH, and protein levels by IHC. qRT-PCR for HER-2 was performed on extracted RNA; baseline HER-2 ECD ELISA was performed on pt sera. HER-2 data for each pt were compared with pt's best response. Results: As of August 29, 2008, 112 pts had enrolled; 107 were efficacy-evaluable pts with median 4.4 mos follow-up. There were 42/107 (39.3%) partial responses (PR) (investigator assessment). Of 86 pts centrally tested, 64 (74.4%) were confirmed HER-2+ (FISH+ and/or IHC 3+), with 32/64 (50%) PR. Of 76 pts tested by both FISH and IHC, 15/76 (19.7%) were confirmed HER-2- (FISH- and IHC 2+/1/0), with 2/15 (13.3%) PR. In HER-2+ pts, response rates did not correlate with high versus low FISH+ counts, nor with HER-2 ECD levels. Among 39 HER-2+ (FISH+ and/or IHC3+) efficacy-evaluable pts with qRT-PCR data, there were 13/19 (68.4%) PR for pts with qRT-PCR above median levels, and 7/20 (35.0%) PR for pts with qRT-PCR below median. Conclusions: HER-2+ pts (by central retesting) had better responses to T-DM1 than HER-2- pts, although a small number of PR were observed in HER-2- pts. Assessment of HER-2 expression by qRT-PCR may identify pts more likely to respond to T-DM1 therapy. Updated data, including additional diagnostic markers, will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts Abstract #46 Background: Cross-talk between growth factor and steroid receptor pathways has been implicated in endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Combining EGFR/HER2-targeted therapy with aromatase inhibitors for HR+ postmenopausal breast cancer may enhance endocrine responsiveness and delay the onset of resistance. [EGF30008][1] is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-line phase III trial to explore the benefit of letrozole with/without lapatinib, an oral dual tyrosine-kinase inhibitor of HER2 and EGFR, in patients (pts) with HR+ postmenopausal MBC. Methods: 1286 postmenopausal women with HR+ untreated MBC from 212 international centers were randomized to once daily treatment with letrozole 2.5 mg and lapatinib 1500 mg or letrozole and placebo. Pts were stratified according to presence of visceral vs bone only disease and time since completion of prior adjuvant endocrine tamoxifen therapy (

10595 Background: Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility of obtaining fine needle biopsies, for pharmacogenomic analysis, in community based oncology practices and develop gene expression-based predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative sequential docetaxel/capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Methods: One hundred seventy-five patients were accrued at 29 sites in the US Oncology Research network. FNA specimens were mailed to a central laboratory (MDACC) and gene expression profiling was performed on Affymetrix U133A chips. Results: RNA extraction was started on 140 specimens, 112 of these (80%) yielded ≥1 μg total RNA, 69 were hybridized and 65 (94%) gene expression profiles have passed quality control as of abstract submission date. The analysis plan is to develop a multigene predictor of pCR from the first 80 cases and test its performance independently in the remaining cases. Conclusions: Collection of mandatory research FNA biopsies for pharmacogenomic research is feasible in community practice. Approximately 80% of biopsies yield sufficient RNA for gene expression profiling. In 20% of patients, either technical factors, which can be addressed, or tumor biology (necrotic, rapidly growing tumors) were limiting. Supported by Roche Laboratories, Inc., Nutley, NJ; Pfizer, New York, NY; and Precision Therapeutics, Pittsburgh, PA. [Table: see text]

20073 Background: Multiple chemotherapy options exist for the treatment of primary breast cancer. While response rates are good, many patients are treated with unnecessary or ineffective chemotherapy. Inadequate treatments are partly due to the lack of accurate predictors of response in individual patients. To predict an individual’s response to therapy, ex vivo chemosensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) have long been evaluated, but have been limited by technical difficulties, including the need for large (1–2 gm) amounts of fresh tissue. However, these problems have largely been overcome with new technology. Novel methods used in Precision Therapeutics’ ChemoFx assay allow for testing smaller amounts of tissue (35 mg). The reduced tissue requirement is crucial in the breast cancer setting, as the diagnosis is often made by percutaneous biopsy. The goals of the study were to determine the growth success rate of culturing epithelial cells from breast tissue core needle biopsies and the feasibility of testing the cells in the assay. Methods: A prospective feasibility study involving women with invasive primary breast cancer. One to four core needle biopsy specimens were collected using a 14 gauge needle (est. per patient yield [Table: see text]

516 Background: We assessed 10 menopausal symptoms at baseline and every 3 months during the first year of an ongoing randomized Phase III trial comparing relapse-free survival of postmenopausal women with receptor positive, early breast cancer treated with exemestane (an aromatase inactivator) or tamoxifen for 5 years. Methods: Symptoms were assessed by each patient as none, mild, moderate, or severe with more detail used to establish a “hot flash score”. The median age of 997 evaluable pts was 65 years (range, 40–90). The symptoms were examined statistically by analysis of variance with repeated measurement design. Results: Vaginal dryness (p=0.0021) and bone/muscle aches (p