Search

Background This phase I/II trial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of marizomib, an irreversible pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood–brain barrier. Methods Part A assessed the safety and efficacy of marizomib monotherapy. In Part B, escalating doses of marizomib (0.5–0.8 mg/m2) in combination with bevacizumab were evaluated. Part C explored intra-patient dose escalation of marizomib (0.8–1.0 mg/m2) for the combination. Results In Part A, 30 patients received marizomib monotherapy. The most common AEs were fatigue (66.7%), headache (46.7%), hallucination (43.3%), and insomnia (43.3%). One patient (3.3%) achieved a partial response. In Part B, the recommended phase II dose of marizomib was 0.8 mg/m2 when combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. In Part C, dose escalation to 1.0 mg/m2 was not tolerated. Pooled analysis of 67 patients treated with marizomib ≤0.8 mg/m2 and bevacizumab showed a nonoverlapping safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of each agent: the most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (16.4%), confusion (13.4%), headache (10.4%), and fatigue (10.4%). The overall response rate was 34.3%, including 2 patients with complete response. Six-month progression-free survival was 29.8%; median overall survival was 9.1 months. Conclusions The safety profile of marizomib as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab was consistent with previous observations that marizomib crosses the blood–brain barrier. Preliminary efficacy did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit of the addition of marizomib to bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent GBM.

Background nab-Paclitaxel has demonstrated efficacy in adults with solid tumours and preclinical activity in paediatric solid tumour models. Results from phase I of a phase I/II study in paediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid tumours treated with nab-paclitaxel are reported. Patients and methods Patients with recurrent/refractory extracranial solid tumours received nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks at 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, or 270 mg/m2 (rolling-6 dose-escalation) to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Results Sixty-four patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 dizziness at 120 mg/m2 and grade 4 neutropenia >7 days at 270 mg/m2. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were haematologic, including neutropenia (36%), leukopenia (36%) and lymphopenia (25%). Although the MTD was not reached, 270 mg/m2 was declared non-tolerable due to grade 3/4 toxicities during cycles 1–2 (neutropenia, n = 5/7; skin toxicity, n = 2/7; peripheral neuropathy, n = 1/7). Of 58 efficacy-evaluable patients, complete response occurred in one patient (2%; Ewing sarcoma) and partial responses in four patients (7%; rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, renal tumour with pulmonary metastases [high-grade, malignant] and sarcoma not otherwise specified); all responses occurred at ≥210 mg/m2. Thirteen patients (22%) had stable disease (5 lasting ≥16 weeks) per RECIST. Conclusions nab-Paclitaxel 240 mg/m2 qw3/4 (nearly double the adult recommended monotherapy dose for this schedule in metastatic breast cancer) was selected as the RP2D based on the tolerability profile, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity. Phase II is currently enrolling patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01962103. EudraCT 2013-000144-26.

2021 Background: Proteasome inhibition sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ and RT, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for GBM. MRZ, an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor with anti-glioma activity was combined with standard TMZ/RT → TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM (NCT02903069), to determine the recommended dose (RD). The primary endpoint of this expanded phase 1 trial was toxicity, with secondary endpoint of OS. Methods: Patients were enrolled in separate cohorts (TMZ/RT+MRZ→TMZ+MRZ, N=15; TMZ/RT→TMZ+MRZ, N=18) in dose-escalation (3+3 design), followed by dose-expansion (N=20) with TMZ/RT+MRZ at RD → TMZ+MRZ at RD. A separate cohort received TMZ/RT→TMZ+MRZ at RD with Tumor Treating Fields (Optune, N=13). MRZ was infused IV (10 min at 0.55, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mg/m2) on Days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 (42-day TMZ/RT+MRZ cycle) and Days 1, 8, 15 (28-day TMZ+MRZ cycle). Results: 66 patients treated; median age 58 years, 68% male, 50% receiving corticosteroid at baseline, 52% unmethylated MGMT. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in dose-escalation cohorts: 1 (fatigue) at 0.7 mg/m2 MRZ, 5 (ataxia/diarrhea; ataxia/confusion; myocardial infarction, delirium/ataxia; ataxia/fatigue) in 1.0 mg/m2 cohorts. MRZ demonstrated a steep dose-response with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/DLTs predominately CNS AEs (Grade ≥3 TEAEs in 12 of 12 patients at 1.0 mg/m2 vs 22 of 41 patients at ≤0.8 mg/m2); the RD for MRZ was determined to be 0.8 mg/m2. Most common TEAEs (all grades): fatigue, nausea (both 70%), hallucination (54%), vomiting (53%), headache (47%), confusional state (33%), ataxia, constipation, muscular weakness (all 29%). Conclusions: CNS TEAEs were short-lasting, reversible and ameliorated by early dose reductions (29% patients dose-reduced), allowing patients to remain on treatment. For patients receiving MRZ with TMZ/RT→TMZ (N=35), the median OS was 14.8 months (17 deaths, median follow-up 14.3 months), and 7 patients remain active (Cycles 11-23). The MRZ RD + TMZ/Optune combination was tolerated, with 4 of 13 patients treated on this arm remaining active. An international Phase 3 trial (EORTC 1709-BTG/CCTG CE.8, NCT03345095) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02903069.

Proteasome inhibition sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ and RT, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for ndGBM. MRZ, an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor with anti-glioma activity was combined with standard-of-care (SOC) concomitant TMZ/RT followed by adjuvant TMZ in ndGBM (NCT02903069), to determine the recommended dose (RD). Patients were enrolled in separate concomitant (TMZ/RT+MRZ, N=15) and adjuvant (TMZ+MRZ, N=18) cohorts in dose-escalation (3 + 3 design), followed by dose-expansion (N=20) at RD (0.8 mg/m2) in concomitant followed by adjuvant treatment. MRZ infused IV (10 min) at increasing dose levels (0.55, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mg/m2): Concomitant days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36; Adjuvant days 1, 8, 15 (28-day cycle). RESULTS (as of 02May2018): Mean age 55 years, 68% male. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, 20% patients, all grades): fatigue, nausea, vomiting, hallucination, ataxia, headache. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1 (fatigue) at 0.7 mg/m2 adjuvant cohort, 3 (ataxia/diarrhea; ataxia/confusion; myocardial infarction) in concomitant and 2 (delirium/ataxia; ataxia/fatigue) in adjuvant cohorts at 1.0 mg/m2. Grade 3 TEAEs in 11 of 12 patients at 1.0 mg/m2 including one Grade 4 and one Grade 5 TEAE; at 0.8 mg/m2 MRZ, Grade 3 TEAEs in 9 of 21 patients. MRZ demonstrated a steep dose-response with TEAEs/DLTs predominately CNS AEs (ataxia, hallucinations) which were dose-related, short-lasting, reversible and ameliorated by early dose reductions, allowing patients to remain on treatment. Currently 8 dose-escalation patients remain active in Cycle 10–23. Median OS for dose-expansion not yet estimated; 7 patients remain active, 1 death, median follow-up 4.1 months. MRZ at the RD with adjuvant TMZ+Tumor Treating Fields (Optune) is currently enrolling. An international Phase 3 trial (EORTC #1709-BTG, NCT03345095) has been launched in 2018 to assess the overall survival benefit of MRZ added to SOC in ndGBM.

Purpose: This dose-finding phase I study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound rapamycin (nab-rapamycin) in patients with untreatable advanced nonhematologic malignancies. Experimental Design: nab-Rapamycin was administered weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, with a starting dose of 45 mg/m2. Additional doses were 56.25, 100, 150, and 125 mg/m2. Results: Of 27 enrolled patients, 26 were treated. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at 150 mg/m2 [grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation and grade 4 thrombocytopenia], and two DLTs occurred at 125 mg/m2 (grade 3 suicidal ideation and grade 3 hypophosphatemia). Thus, the MTD was declared at 100 mg/m2. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were grade 1/2, including thrombocytopenia (58%), hypokalemia (23%), mucositis (38%), fatigue (27%), rash (23%), diarrhea (23%), nausea (19%), anemia (19%), hypophosphatemia (19%), neutropenia (15%), and hypertriglyceridemia (15%). Only one grade 3 nonhematologic TRAE (dyspnea) and one grade 3 hematologic event (anemia) occurred at the MTD. One patient with kidney cancer had a partial response and 2 patients remained on study for 365 days (patient with mesothelioma) and 238 days (patient with neuroendocrine tumor). The peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of rapamycin increased with dose between 45 and 150 mg/m2, except for a relatively low AUC at 125 mg/m2. nab-Rapamycin significantly inhibited mTOR targets S6K and 4EBP1. Conclusions: The clinical dose of single-agent nab-rapamycin was established at 100 mg/m2 weekly (3 of 4 weeks) given intravenously, which was well tolerated with preliminary evidence of response and stable disease, and produced a fairly dose-proportional pharmacokinetic profile in patients with unresectable advanced nonhematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res; 19(19); 5474–84. ©2013 AACR.

e14083Background: Proteasome inhibition sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ and RT, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for ndGBM. MRZ, an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor with...

The efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma was evaluated in a phase III randomized, controlled trial.Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV melanoma received nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or dacarbazine 1000 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review; the secondary end point was overall survival (OS).A total of 529 patients were randomized to nab-paclitaxel (n = 264) or dacarbazine (n = 265). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The majority of patients were men (66%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 (71%), and had M1c stage disease (65%). The median PFS (primary end point) was 4.8 months with nab-paclitaxel and 2.5 months with dacarbazine [hazard ratio (HR), 0.792; 95.1% confidence interval (CI) 0.631-0.992; P = 0.044]. The median OS was 12.6 months with nab-paclitaxel and 10.5 months with dacarbazine (HR, 0.897; 95.1% CI 0.738-1.089; P = 0.271). Independently assessed overall response rate was 15% versus 11% (P = 0.239), and disease control rate (DCR) was 39% versus 27% (P = 0.004) for nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were neuropathy (nab-paclitaxel, 25% versus dacarbazine, 0%; P0.001), and neutropenia (nab-paclitaxel, 20% versus dacarbazine, 10%; P = 0.004). There was no correlation between secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) status and PFS in either treatment arm.nab-Paclitaxel significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with dacarbazine, with a manageable safety profile.

9045 Background: In a phase 3 trial, nab-paclitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with DTIC (4.8 vs 2.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.792; P = 0.044) in chemotherapy...

9030 Background: Activating mutations of BRAF V600 can be found in 40%-50% of melanomas and are related to poor prognosis. In a phase 3 trial for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in chemotherapy-naive patients, nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) vs dacarbazine (DTIC) demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by independent radiological review (IRR), and a trend toward prolonged overall survival (OS) at the interim survival analysis. The study also explored the effect of BRAF status on the efficacy parameters. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV melanoma (M1c stage 65%; elevated LDH 28%) and ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized to nab-P 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (n = 264) or DTIC 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n = 265) independent of BRAF status. Prespecified subgroup analyses of final PFS and interim OS in subgroups by BRAF status (V600E mutant, wild-type, or unknown) were performed. Results: BRAF mutation status was balanced between the treatment arms, with 36% and 38% of patients with known BRAF mutation status in the nab-P and DTIC arms, respectively. Patient characteristics were also balanced within BRAF subgroups. As shown in the Table, advantage in the nab-P arm vs DTIC arm was observed for both PFS and interim OS regardless of BRAFmutation status. Poststudy BRAF inhibitor treatment was also balanced. Conclusions: In this phase III trial, treatment effect was independent of BRAF mutation status, benefiting all patients who received nab-P vs DTIC. Therefore nab-P should be considered in the armamentarium for all chemotherapy-naive patients with MM. Clinical trial information: NCT00864253. [Table: see text]