Search

Appendicectomy may reduce relapses and need for medication in patients with ulcerative colitis, but long-term prospective data are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the effect of appendicectomy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.In this prospective multicentre cohort series, all consecutive patients with refractory ulcerative colitis referred for proctocolectomy between November 2012 and June 2015 were counselled to undergo laparoscopic appendicectomy instead. The primary endpoint was clinical response (reduction of at least 3 points in the partial Mayo score) at 12 months and long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score of 1 or less), failure (colectomy or start of experimental medication), and changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (range 32-224), EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores.A total of 28 patients (13 women; median age 40·5 years) underwent appendicectomy. The mean baseline IBDQ score was 127·0, the EQ-5D™ score was 0·65, and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL score was 41·1. At 12 months, 13 patients had a clinical response, five were in endoscopic remission, and nine required a colectomy (6 patients) or started new experimental medical therapy (3). IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores improved to 167·1 (P 0·001), 0·80 (P = 0·003) and 61·0 (P 0·001) respectively. After a median of 3·7 (range 2·3-5·2) years, a further four patients required a colectomy (2) or new experimental medical therapy (2). Thirteen patients had a clinical response and seven were in endoscopic remission. The improvement in IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores remained stable over time.Appendicectomy resulted in a clinical response in nearly half of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and a substantial proportion were in endoscopic remission. Elective appendicectomy should be considered before proctocolectomy in patients with therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.La apendicectomía puede reducir las recaídas y la necesidad de medicación en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (ulcerative colitis, UC), sin embargo, faltan datos a largo plazo obtenidos de forma prospectiva. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el efecto de la apendicectomía en pacientes con UC refractarios al tratamiento. MÉTODOS: En esta serie prospectiva de cohortes multicéntrica, a todos los pacientes consecutivos con UC refractaria remitidos para proctocolectomía entre noviembre de 2012 y junio de 2015 se les recomendó en su lugar someterse a una apendicectomía laparoscópica. El criterio de valoración principal fue la respuesta clínica (disminución de ≥ 3 puntos del sistema de puntuación parcial de Mayo que varía de 0 a 9) a los 12 meses y en el seguimiento a largo plazo. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la remisión endoscópica (puntuación endoscópica de Mayo ≤ 1), fracaso (colectomía o inicio de medicación experimental) y cambios en el IBDQ (rango 32-224), EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL.En total, 28 pacientes (13 mujeres, mediana de edad 40,5) se sometieron a una apendicectomía. El IBDQ de referencia promedio fue de 127,0; el EQ-5D 0,65 y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL 41,1. A los 12 meses, 13 pacientes presentaban una respuesta clínica, cinco estaban en remisión endoscópica y nueve precisaron colectomía (n = 6) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 3). El IBDQ, EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL mejoraron a 167,1 (P 0,001); 0,80 (P = 0,003) y 61,0 (P 0,001) respectivamente. Después de una mediana de 3,7 años (rango 2,3-5,2), otros cuatro pacientes requirieron una colectomía (n = 2) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 2). Trece pacientes presentaron respuesta clínica y siete se encontraban en remisión endoscópica. La mejora del IBDQ, el EQ-5D y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL se mantuvo estable a lo largo del tiempo. CONCLUSIÓN: La apendicectomía consiguió una respuesta clínica en casi la mitad de los pacientes con UC refractaria. La apendicectomía electiva debería ser considerada antes que la proctocolectomía en pacientes con UC refractaria al tratamiento.

Golimumab (GLB) is an antitumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF) therapy that has shown efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to describe the outcome of GLB therapy for UC in a real-world clinical practice.Consecutive patients receiving GLB for UC in six Irish Academic Medical Centres were identified. The primary study endpoint was the 6-month corticosteroid-free remission rate. The secondary endpoints included the 3-month clinical response, time free of GLB discontinuation and adverse events.Seventy-two patients were identified [57% men; median (range) age of 41.4 years (20.3-76.8); disease duration 6.6 years (0-29.9); follow-up 8.7 months (0.4-39.2)]. Sixty-four percent of patients were anti-TNF naive. The 3-month clinical response and the 6-month corticosteroid-free remission rates were 55 and 39%, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients discontinued GLB during the follow-up, median (95% confidence interval) time to GLB discontinuation 18.7 months (9.2-28.1). A C-reactive protein more than 5 mg/l at baseline was associated with failure to achieve 6-month corticosteroid-free remission and a shorter time to GLB discontinuation, odds ratio 0.2 (0.1-0.7), P=0.008, and hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.8 (1.3-5.7), P=0.007, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 7% of patients (n=5), all of which were minor and self-limiting.These real-world clinical data suggest that GLB is an effective and safe therapy for a UC cohort with significant previous anti-TNF exposure. An elevated baseline C-reactive protein, likely reflective of increased inflammatory burden, is associated with a reduced likelihood of a successful outcome of GLB therapy.

Background Recent studies report an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Concurrently, paediatric IBD incidence is rising, with more patients now exposed to immunomodulators from a younger age. Objectives To investigate NMSC incidence and to examine the risk associated with immunomodulators in the development of NMSC in patients with IBD. Methods This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients with IBD attending a tertiary adult hospital from 1994 to 2013 were included. Skin cancer incidence was compared with population data from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI) to calculate standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Logistic regression was utilized for risk factor analysis. Results Two thousand and fifty-three patients with IBD were studied. The SIR for NMSC in patients with IBD taking immunomodulators overall was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.0–2.7) with age-specific rates significantly elevated across certain age categories. Exposure to thiopurines (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.15–12.93, P < 0.001) and in particular thiopurines and/or tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (OR: 6.45, 95% CI: 2.69–15.95, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with NMSC. The majority (82%) of those exposed to a TNF-α inhibitor also had thiopurine exposure. Conclusions Compliance with skin cancer preventative measures should be highlighted to all patients with IBD. There should be a low threshold for dermatology referral for immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with a history of exposure to dual immunomodulators from a young age.

Introduction As with other chronic diseases, patients with IBD are also at risk for depression, anxiety, low self-esteem and social isolation. The physical symptoms in gastrointestinal disease, including diarrhoea, bleeding per rectum and faecal incontinence are much less socially acceptable than other chronic diseases. Together with the potential for surgery, including stoma formation, this results in a high risk for altered body image and psychosocial distress unique to IBD. Aims/Background In this study we aimed to compare the effects of disease activity on body image and quality of life in these patients and also to assess whether biological treatment offers superior clinical and psychological outcomes or reduction in disability. Method Patients taking biologics attending St. Luke9s IBD service were asked to complete a questionnaire including the Body Image States Scale (BISS), the Stunkard Figure Rating Scales (FRS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the SF 36 Health Survey, the IBDQ and the sexual satisfaction survey. Clinical markers of disease severity were also examined including recent endoscopic findings, Mayo score and CRP. These were then age and sex matched with IBD patients not taking biologics. Results were statistically analysed p values Results 64 IBD patients were included in this study. 32 patients were taking biologics at time of study (60% M) Median age was 41; IQR (31-54). 55% had UC, 33% had Crohn9s, 13% had indeterminate colitis. These were age, sex and disease matched with 32 respondents not taking biologics. Mayo scores, Hb and CRP were not significantly different between groups. Endoscopic severity was increased in the biologic group though not significantly. There was no significant difference in Beck Depression Inventory scores between treatment groups, however those on biologic treatment who were in remission reported significantly lower disability using the Disability Index (Peyronie et al , 2012) compared to their peers in remission not on biologics (p Conclusion Depression is common in IBD. Clinical and mucosal remission may not only lead to reduced inflammation but also to reduced levels of depression. Treatment with biologics appears to be associated with lower levels of disability in patients with similar pre-treatment clinical severity scores.