1. Comparison of the finger plethysmography derived stroke volumes by Nexfin CO Trek and suprasternal aortic Doppler derived stroke volume measurements in adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and in healthy controls
- Author
-
Frans C. Visser, C Linda M C van Campen, Peter C. Rowe, and Freek W.A. Verheugt
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Supine position ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Biomedical Engineering ,Biophysics ,Health Informatics ,Bioengineering ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Biomaterials ,03 medical and health sciences ,symbols.namesake ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,0302 clinical medicine ,030202 anesthesiology ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Chronic fatigue syndrome ,Humans ,Stroke ,Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic ,business.industry ,Limits of agreement ,Stroke Volume ,Stroke volume ,Finger plethysmography ,medicine.disease ,Plethysmography ,Tilt (optics) ,symbols ,Cardiology ,business ,Doppler effect ,Information Systems - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Finger plethysmography derived stroke volumes are frequently measured during tilt table testing. There are two algorithms to determine stroke volumes: Modelflow and Nexfin CO Trek. Most tilt studies used Modelflow, while there are differences between the two algorithms. OBJECTIVE: To compare stroke volume indices by Nexfin CO Trek (SVINexfinCOTrek) with suprasternal Doppler derived SVI (SVIDoppler) in healthy controls (HC) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients during tilt testing. These patients may have a large SVI decrease during the tilt enabling a large range of SVI to be studied. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients and 39 HC with a normal tilt test were included. Supine and end-tilt SVIDoppler and SVINexfinCOTrek were compared using the Bland-Altman analysis. Also, the effect of calibrating supine SVINexfinCOTrek to SVIDoppler was studied. RESULTS: Supine and end-tilt SVINexfinCOTrek were significantly higher than SVIDoppler: both P< 0.005. Bias, limits of agreement, and percent error (PE) were high with PE’s between 37 and 43%. The calibration procedure resulted in an acceptable variance with a PE of 29%. CONCLUSIONS: SVINexfinCOTrek overestimates stroke volumes compared to SVIDoppler, leading to high PE’s. Calibration reduced variance to an acceptable level, allowing SVINexfinCOTrek to be used for assessment of SVI changes during tilt testing.
- Published
- 2021