Search

Risk assessment for early, severe right heart failure (RHF) after LVAD implantation remains imperfect. We sought to define the differences in RV adaptation and load after axillary Impella support between patients who experienced RHF and those who did not. Seventeen of 18 patients included were deemed intermediate or high risk for RHF by EUROMACS-RHF score. Before Impella insertion, RV adaptation parameters (RAP, RAP:PCWP, PAPi) were worse in the non-RHF group compared to the RHF group. In both groups, RV load parameters (effective pulmonary arterial elastance, pulmonary vascular resistance, and pulmonary vascular compliance) improved after Impella insertion. Lesser improvements in RV adaptation were seen in the RHF group. Moreover, load-to-adaptation relationships (EA/RAP and EA/RAP:PCWP) worsened to a greater degree. In patients at intermediate or high risk for RHF after LVAD, assessment of RV adaptation and load during axillary Impella support may improve risk stratification.

BACKGROUND There is little insight into which patients can be weaned off right ventricular (RV) acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We hypothesize that concomitant RV AMCS insertion instead of postoperative implantation will improve 1-year survival and increase the likelihood of RV AMCS weaning. METHODS A multicenter retrospective database of 826 consecutive patients who received a HeartMate II or HVAD between January 2007 and December 2016 was analyzed. We identified 91 patients who had early RV AMCS on index admission. Cox proportional-hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of 1-year mortality post-RV AMCS implantation and competing risk modeling identified RV AMCS weaning predictors. RESULTS There were 91 of 826 patients (11%) who required RV AMCS after CF-LVAD implantation with 51 (56%) receiving a concomitant RV AMCS and 40 (44%) implanted with a postoperative RV AMCS during their ICU stay; 48 (53%) patients were weaned from RV AMCS support. Concomitant RV AMCS with CF-LVAD insertion was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.26-0.80], p = 0.01) in multivariable model (which included age, BMI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, and heart transplantation as a time-varying covariate). In the multivariate competing risk analysis, a TPG < 12 (SHR 2.19 [95% CI 1.02-4.70], p = 0.04) and concomitant RV AMCS insertion (SHR 3.35 [95% CI 1.73-6.48], p < 0.001) were associated with a successful wean. CONCLUSIONS In patients with RVF after LVAD implantation, concomitant RV AMCS insertion at the time of LVAD was associated with improved 1-year survival and increased chances of RV support weaning compared to postoperative insertion.

BACKGROUND Multicenter data on long term survival following LVAD implantation that make use of contemporary definitions of RV failure are limited. Furthermore, traditional survival analyses censor patients who receive a bridge to heart transplant. Here we compare the outcomes of LVAD patients who develop post-operative RV failure accounting for the transitional probability of receiving an interim heart transplantation. METHODS We use a retrospective cohort of LVAD patients sourced from multiple high-volume centers based in the United States. Five- and ten-year survival accounting for transition probabilities of receiving a heart transplant were calculated using a multi-state Aalen Johansen survival model. RESULTS Of the 897 patients included in the study, 238 (26.5%) developed post-operative RV failure at index hospitalization. At 10 years the probability of death with post-op RV failure was 79.28% vs 61.70% in patients without (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.72 - 2.57; p = < .001). Though not significant, patients with RV failure were less likely to be bridged to a heart transplant (HR 0.87, p = .4). Once transplanted the risk of death between both patient groups remained equivalent; the probability of death after a heart transplant was 3.97% in those with post-operative RV failure shortly after index LVAD implant, as compared to 14.71% in those without. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Long-term durable mechanical circulatory support is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients who develop post-operative RV failure. Improving outcomes may necessitate expeditious bridge to heart transplant wherever appropriate, along with critical reassessment of organ allocation policies.

We describe a 31-year-old woman with pulmonary homograft rupture and ventricular fibrillation arrest complicating a transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) procedure. She underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with immediate surgical repair including bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement. She had difficulty weaning off ECMO due to hyperacute failure of the valve and ultimately underwent successful hybrid TPV with complete recovery. This case illustrates the importance of the heart team approach during catheter and surgical interventions in adult congenital heart disease.

Aim: To evaluate adverse events in cancer patients with pre-existing sarcoidosis receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients & methods: We retrospectively reviewed cancer patients with sarcoidosis who underwent treatment with ICI to determine frequency of sarcoidosis flares. Results: 32 patients with sarcoidosis received ICIs The median time to ICI initiation was 7 years (range: 1 month to 51 years). One patient (3%) with a 20-year remote history of sarcoidosis developed a clinically symptomatic exacerbation after three doses of atezolizumab, with hilar lymphadenopathy, subcutaneous nodules, arthritis and uveitis. Atezolizumab was discontinued and prednisone initiated. She had a fluctuating course with two additional flares. Conclusion: Frequency of flares in patients with a remote history of sarcoidosis who receive ICIs is low.

Women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who receive an aromatase inhibitor (AI) are at risk for fractures. We aim to determine if dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans made at the time of AI initiation are associated with decreased fractures. We retrospectively identified 25,158 women with local or regional breast cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 who received AI therapy between 2007 and 2013 from the Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Texas Cancer Registry databases. We defined baseline DXA screening using claims made between 1 year before and 6 months after each patient's first AI claim to examine determinants of baseline screening using a multivariable GENMOD model. We included a propensity score adjustment in Cox proportional hazard models to assess the association between time-varying DXA screening and the risk of fractures. Additionally, we compared the use of antiresorptive therapy drugs between the two groups. Of the study cohort, 14,738 (58.6%) received DXA screening. The screening rates increased annually from 52.1% in 2007 to 61.7% in 2013. Higher screening rates were observed in patients with younger age, married status, non-Hispanic white race, localized disease, fewer comorbidities, more than one type of aromatase inhibitor drug claim, no state buy-in (surrogate for low socioeconomic status), higher education level, and prior osteoporosis diagnosis. Baseline DXA screening was associated with decreased risk of subsequent fractures (hazard ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.97, p

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause profound immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The host genetic background is likely to play a role in irAE susceptibility because the presentation of toxicity varies among patients and many do not develop irAEs despite continued ICI use. We sought to identify potential genetic markers conferring risk for irAEs. We conducted a pilot exploratory study in 89 melanoma patients who received ICIs (44 with irAEs, and 45 without irAEs after at least 1 year from starting treatment). Genotyping was performed using the Infinium Multi-Ethnic Global-8 v1.0 Bead Chip. The genotype data were extracted using PLINK (v1.90b3.34) and processed for quality control. Population structure-based clustering was carried out using IBS matrix, pairwise population concordance test (p

Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) affecting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and liver are among the most frequent and most severe inflammatory toxicities from contemporary immunotherapy. Inflammation of the colon and or small intestines (entero)colitis is the single most common GI IrAE and is an important cause of delay of discontinuation of immunotherapy. The severity of these GI IrAEs can range from manageable with symptomatic treatment alone to life-threatening complications, including perforation and liver failure. The frequency and severity of GI IrAEs is dependent on the specific immunotherapy given, with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade more likely to induce severe GI IrAEs than blockade of either programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), and combination therapy showing the highest rate of GI IrAEs, particularly in the liver. To date, we have minimal prospective data on the appropriate diagnosis and management of GI IrAEs, and recommendations are based largely on retrospective data and expert opinion. Although clinical diagnoses of GI IrAEs are common, biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of both immunotherapy-induced enterocolitis and hepatitis and can play an important role in excluding competing, though less common, diagnoses and ensuring optimal management. GI IrAEs typically respond to high-dose corticosteroids, though a significant fraction of patients requires secondary immune suppression. For colitis, both TNF-α blockade with infliximab and integrin inhibition with vedolizumab have proved highly effective in corticosteroid-refractory cases. Detailed guidelines have been published for the management of low-grade GI IrAEs. In the setting of more severe toxicities, involvement of a GI specialist is generally recommended. The purpose of this review is to survey the available literature and provide management recommendations focused on the GI specialist.

Background Bisphosphonates and denosumab, as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer, have been associated in some studies with improved cancer outcomes. The potential benefits of these drugs used at the lower doses commonly given for osteoporosis have not been established. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between therapy with bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and survival in older women with early breast cancer. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged ≥66 years with breast cancer who were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Texas Cancer Registry Medicare-linked databases. Associations were examined between the receipt of BMAs at dosages indicated for osteoporosis within 2 years after diagnosis and overall and breast cancer-specific survival. Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score adjustment and matching were used for the analyses. Results Of the 37,724 women included, 7925 (21%) received at least 6 months of a BMA within the first 2 years of breast cancer diagnosis, including bisphosphonates only in 6898 women (80.7%), denosumab only in 1204 (15.2%), and both classes of BMAs in 323 (4.1%). The median follow-up was 64 months. The receipt of a bisphosphonate was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92) after multivariable adjustment. Benefits were primarily seen for patients who had stage II and III disease. No benefits were observed with denosumab (stage II: HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.90-1.22]; stage III: HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.66-1.82]). Conclusions Bisphosphonates at the doses recommended for osteoporosis are associated with improved survival in older postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

While Doppler and cuff blood pressure techniques are prevalent methods of assessing blood pressure in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, the impact of pulsatility on measurement is not well established. Retrospective chart analysis of clinical variables including pulse perception, blood pressure (Doppler and standard cuff), and aortic valve opening on echo at clinic visit were abstracted. Stable outpatients on continuous flow left ventricular assist devices support with concomitant portable echo assessment were included. Mean average difference was calculated and Pearson’s correlation performed for all those patients who had both Doppler and cuff pressure obtained. In all, 74 Heartmate-II patients with a median time from implant of 380 days were analyzed. A pulse was perceived in 82% of patients with persistent aortic valve opening on portable echo and also in 30% of those who had a persistently closed aortic valve. The mean average difference between the Doppler and systolic cuff pressure was ~13 mmHg ( r = 0.5, p = 0.004) when a pulse was present and ~11 mmHg when aortic valve was open ( r = 0.68, p

PURPOSE To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to update the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 through 2021. RESULTS A total of 175 studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review and were pertinent to the development of the recommendations. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for specific organ system–based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to the organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, except for some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert ≤ grade 1. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids. Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4-6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, except for endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines .

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) interfere with the immune system and could theoretically increase risk of malignancies. However, recent evidence has not substantiated such concerns and physicians are less reluctant in treating patients with underlying cancer with such bDMARDs. We aimed to understand the current utilization patterns of bDMARDs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in cancer patients.We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with prevalent RA and cancer initially seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. A cohort of cancer patients was identified from the tumor registry, and patients with RA were identified through ICD-9 codes, followed by review of electronic medical records. We included patients 18 years and older, with a cancer diagnosis, and a diagnosis of RA by a rheumatologist. Patients were followed until 2016.We identified 431 patients with RA and cancer that met our inclusion criteria. Overall, 111 (26%) received bDMARDs after their cancer diagnosis; of these, 60 (54%) had received bDMARDs prior to their cancer diagnosis and continued to receive this therapy following their diagnosis. Thirteen (22%) switched to a different bDMARD, and the rest continued to receive the same agent after their cancer diagnosis. Of all patients on a bDMARD, 91 (82%) received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).The treatment landscape of patients with a history of cancer and RA is changing. Future studies evaluating the safety of bDMARDs in patients with a recent history of cancer or with active cancer are needed. Part of the data of this project was presented as a poster at the 2016 American College of Rheumatology annual meeting. Zamora NV, Siddhanamatha H, Barbo A, Tayar J, Lin H, Suarez-Almazor M. Utilization of Biologic Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cancer [abstract].Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-biologic-therapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-cancer/. Accessed September 30, 2019. Key Points • One in four patients with RA and concomitant cancer received bDMARDs, including TNFi, after their cancer diagnosis, at our institution. • Half of the patients with RA and cancer who received bDMARDs had initiated therapy prior to the cancer diagnosis, continuing thereafter.

Objective To assess methotrexate (MTX) adherence using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and characterize associations with adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Eligible patients participated in Forward, the National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, and recently (12 months or sooner) initiated oral MTX. MEMS was used to compile MTX weekly dosing over 24 weeks. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) was completed, and baseline demographics and disease characteristics obtained. MTX adherence (percentage of weeks dose taken correctly), implementation (percentage of weeks dose taken correctly from initiation until last dose), and persistence (duration from initiation to last dose) were calculated. Analyses measured associations between patient characteristics and adherence, modeled using logistic generalized estimating equations and censored Poisson regression, and persistence modeled using Cox regression. Results Overall, 60 of 119 eligible patients were included in the analysis. MTX adherence, implementation, and persistence were 75%, 80%, and 83%, respectively, at 24 weeks. Demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between patients with 1 week or less and 2 weeks or more of missed MTX. Unemployment, less disability, higher Patient Global scores, and no prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use were associated with correct dosing. No significant differences in adherence were observed between patients receiving concomitant MTX versus MTX monotherapy, and biologic DMARD-experienced versus biologic DMARD-naive patients. Higher scores in BMQ Specific Necessity (indicating a greater belief in the necessity of the medication) was associated with a decreased likelihood of dosing at an interval shorter than prescribed (odds ratio 0.89). Conclusion Even in a participatory group over a short period, MTX adherence was suboptimal and associated with certain demographics, medication experience, and beliefs about medicines. This suggests a need for screening and alternative treatment opportunities in nonadherent MTX patients with RA.

Background: Despite their efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause significant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Rheumatic and musculoskeletal irAEs can be serious and adversely affect the quality of life. The full spectrum of irAEs is still emerging, and to represent and better understand their scope, we evaluated the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: We used AERSMine, an open-access web application to mine FAERS data across 11,919,342 patients from 2011 (first quarter) to 2018 (fourth quarter). Measures of disproportionality were calculated using well-established pharmacovigilance metrics, proportional reporting ratios, and safety signals (information component), in patients receiving ICI. Results: We analyzed 63,979 cancer patients for reports of ICI-associated AEs. Eighty-two percent of these reports were in relation with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Rates of rheumatic and musculoskeletal AEs were higher in men and in patients >65 years of age. Several statistically significant AEs were identified, most in relation with PD-1 inhibitors. AEs with the highest number of reports included arthralgia (n = 1062), followed by myalgia (n = 532), myositis (n = 438), arthritis (n = 403), and rhabdomyolysis (n = 230). Novel AEs affecting the skeleton included compression fractures, fractures at various skeletal sites (rib, thoracic vertebral, and humerus), osteonecrosis of the jaw, osteitis, and osteomyelitis. Conclusion: A wide spectrum of rheumatic and musculoskeletal AE signals were detected within the FAERS data which may signify the emerging trends of irAEs post approval of ICI. Additional research to explore mechanisms and identify optimal management strategies of these AEs is warranted.

Patients with cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have worse outcomes than those without SLE, given their comorbidities. We examined survival in elderly women with breast cancer (BC) and SLE and hypothesized that survival would be decreased compared with women with BC but without SLE.We identified patients with BC and SLE and patients with BC without SLE in the Texas Cancer Registry and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, linked to Medicare claims. Overall survival (OS) was estimated after matching (age and cancer stage) and in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for other cancer characteristics, treatment, and comorbidities. Two additional cohorts of women without cancer with and without SLE were also studied.We identified 494 BC SLE cases and 145,517 BC non-SLE cases, of whom we matched 9,708. Women with SLE were less likely to receive radiation, breast conserving surgery, or endocrine therapy. The 8-year OS estimate for women with early BC (stages 0-II) with and without SLE was 52% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 45%-59%) and 74% (95% CI 73%-75%), respectively. In the Cox multivariable model, BC and SLE had increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.98). Women with BC and SLE also had increased risk of death compared with women with SLE but without cancer (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05-1.92) after adjusting for SLE severity. Women with SLE and BC received less glucocorticoids, antimalarials, and immunosuppressants after cancer diagnosis than those without cancer.Systemic lupus is a risk factor for increased mortality in women with early BC.

PURPOSE: Readmissions for the medical treatment of cancer have traditionally been excluded from readmission measures under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Patients with cancer often have higher readmission rates and may need heightened support to ensure effective care transitions after hospitalization. Estimating readmission risk before discharge may assist in discharge planning efforts and help promote care coordination at time of discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed and validated a readmission risk scoring system among a cohort of adult cancer patients with solid tumor admitted at a comprehensive cancer center. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the model. The model's discriminative capacity was evaluated through a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We further compared the performance of the developed score with existing risk scores for 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The 30-day unplanned readmission rate in the total cohort was 16.0% (n = 1,078 of 6,720). After multivariate analysis, Cancer site, Recent emergency room visit within 30 days, non-English primary language, Anemia defined as hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, > 4 Days length of stay during the index admission, unmarried Marital status, Increased white blood cell count > 11 × 109/L, and distant Tumor spread were significantly associated with risk of unplanned 30-day readmission. The derived score, which we call the Cancer READMIT score, had modest discriminatory performance in predicting readmissions (area under the curve for the model receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.647). CONCLUSION: The Cancer READMIT score was able to predict 30-day unplanned readmissions to our institution with fairly modest performance. External validation of our derived risk scoring system is recommended.

Purpose The risks and benefits of remote corticosteroid weaning in heart transplant recipients more than 2 years post-transplant are unknown. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing early and remote steroid weaning after heart transplantation. Methods We performed a retrospective study (range 09, 1991-04, 2017). Primary outcomes included short-term and long-term mortality, allograft dysfunction, and burden of rejection. Secondary outcomes included impact on hemoglobin A1c, lipid panel, bone scan T-score, and body mass index. Results 63 patients underwent corticosteroid weaning between 2012 and 2017. Outcomes of patients weaned early (n = 34; median time from transplant = 1.1 years) were compared with those weaned late (n = 29; median time from transplant = 4.4 years). 52 (82.5%) patients were successfully weaned off corticosteroids. No statistically significant difference in outcomes was found between the early and late weaning groups (p = .20). There were no differences in allograft function (p-value = .16), incidence of rejection (p = .46), or mortality (p = .15). Improvement in metabolic profile was seen in both groups but was not statistically significant. Conclusions In heart transplant recipients, remote vs early weaning of corticosteroids is not associated with significant differences in graft function or the incidence of rejection after 1-year follow-up. Moreover, there were no significant differences in survival up to 3 years between the two groups.

This study aimed to develop a definition of vasoplegia that reliably predicts clinical outcomes. Vasoplegia was evaluated using data from the electronic health record for each 15-minute interval for 72 hours following cardiopulmonary bypass. Standardized definitions considered clinical features (systemic vascular resistance [SVR], mean arterial pressure [MAP], cardiac index [CI], norepinephrine equivalents [NEE]), threshold strategy (criteria occurring in any versus all measurements in an interval), and duration (criteria occurring over multiple consecutive versus separated intervals). Minor vasoplegia was MAP 60 mm Hg or SVR 800 dynes⋅sec⋅cm-5 with CI 2.2 L/min/m2 and NEE ≥ 0.1 µg/kg/min. Major vasoplegia was MAP 60 mm Hg or SVR 700 dynes⋅sec⋅cm-5 with CI 2.5 L/min/m2 and NEE ≥ 0.2 µg/kg/min. The primary outcome was incidence of vasoplegia for eight definitions developed utilizing combinations of these criteria. Secondary outcomes were associations between vasoplegia definitions and three clinical outcomes: time to extubation, time to intensive care unit discharge, and nonfavorable discharge. Minor vasoplegia detected anytime within a 15-minute period (MINOR_ANY_15) predicted the highest incidence of vasoplegia (61%) and was associated with two of three clinical outcomes: 1 day delay to first extubation (95% CI: 0.2 to 2) and 7 day delay to first intensive care unit discharge (95% CI: 1 to 13). The MINOR_ANY_15 definition should be externally validated as an optimal definition of vasoplegia.

Rationale: Growing literature on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests that obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) is a strong risk factor for increasing disease severity, hospitalization and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In such critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can serve as salvage therapy. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) COVID-19 ECMO registry reports that 49% of its patients were classified as obese as of 12/01/2020. However, the morbidity and mortality outcomes of this subgroup remains unclear. As such, this high-risk population merits further examination. Methods: We identified adult COVID-19 ARDS patients who were candidates for either veno-venous ECMO or veno-arterial ECMO between March 13, 2020 and August 31, 2020. The eligibility for ECMO was selected based on our institutional algorithm and the EOLIA Trial criteria (except for high BMI cutoff). Patients were divided into two groups, obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 29.9 kg/m2). We compared the pre-cannulation characteristics including time elapsed between admission to ECMO, intubation to ECMO and respiratory indices. We then examined length on ECMO, ICU or hospital length of stay and disposition. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze categorical and continuous data. Results: We identified a total of 41 patients, 33 (80.5%) were obese and 8 (19.5%) were non-obese [Table 1]. The average age of the obese and non-obese groups was 47.8 years and 55.5 years respectively. The median BMI was 39.85 kg/m2 (IQR: 35.63, 43.00) in the obese group and 29.05 kg/m2 (IQR: 25.35, 29.39) in the non-obese group (p

Aims Prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant remains a challenge. The EUROMACS right-sided heart failure (EUROMACS-RHF) risk score was proposed as a prediction tool for post-LVAD RHF but lacks from large external validation. The aim of our study was to externally validate the score. Methods and results From January 2007 to December 2017, 878 continuous-flow LVADs were implanted at three tertiary centres. We calculated the EUROMACS-RHF score in 662 patients with complete data. We evaluated its predictive performance for early RHF defined as either (i) need for short- or long-term right-sided circulatory support, (ii) continuous inotropic support for ≥14 days, or (iii) nitric oxide for ≥48 h post-operatively. Right heart failure occurred in 211 patients (32%). When compared with non-RHF patients, pre-operatively they had higher creatinine, bilirubin, right atrial pressure, and lower INTERMACS class (P Conclusion In an external cohort, the EUROMACS-RHF had limited discrimination predicting RHF. The clinical utility of this score remains to be determined.

Summary Background Pain is an important and detrimental feature of systemic sclerosis but is often overlooked or deprioritised in research and clinical care. Raynaud's phenomenon, arthritis, and cutaneous ulcers are among the commonly reported disease manifestations of systemic sclerosis that could be associated with pain. We aimed to assess levels of pain intensity and interference and to evaluate disease factors associated with pain intensity and interference. Methods In this multicentre cross-sectional study, participants from the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network cohort who completed pain intensity and interference measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Information System-29 profile, version 2·0) as part of baseline assessments were included. Patients were recruited from 46 centres in Australia, Canada, France, Mexico, Spain, the UK, and the USA between April 15, 2014, and Jan 7, 2020. Eligible patients included those aged 18 years or older who met the criteria for systemic sclerosis devised by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. Associations of pain intensity and pain interference with systemic sclerosis-related variables and overlap syndromes, controlling for sociodemographic variables, were assessed with multiple linear regression. Continuous independent variables were standardised. Findings Among 2157 participants with systemic sclerosis (268 [12%] males and 1889 [88%] females), 1870 (87%) reported mild, moderate, or severe pain (defined as ≥1 on a 0 to 10 scale), and 815 (38%) reported moderate or severe pain (defined as ≥5). Moreover, 757 (35%) participants reported moderate or severe pain interference. Greater pain intensity was independently associated with female sex (0·58 points [95% CI 0·26–0·90]), non-White race or ethnicity (0·50 points [0·21–0·79]), fewer years in formal education (0·30 points per SD [0·19–0·41]), country (reference: USA; Canada: 0·29 points [0·01–0·57] and UK: 0·58 points [0·21–0·95]), greater body-mass index (0·35 points per SD [0·24–0·45]); joint contractures (0·67 points [0·39–0·94]), digital ulcers (0·33 points [0·10–0·55]), gastrointestinal involvement (0·66 points [0·33–0·98]), skin involvement (measured using modified Rodnan skin score; 0·22 points per SD [0·10–0·35]), rheumatoid arthritis (0·96 points [0·50–1·43]), and Sjogren's syndrome (0·42 points [0·01–0·83]). Pain interference results were similar. Interpretation Pain is common among people with systemic sclerosis. Controlling for sociodemographic variables, greater pain was associated with multiple systemic sclerosis-related manifestations, including joint contractures, digital ulcers, gastrointestinal involvement, skin involvement, and the presence of overlap syndromes. Health-care providers should work with patients to address pain, including identifying and addressing systemic sclerosis manifestations associated with their pain, and supporting behavioural approaches to minimise impact on function and quality of life. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Arthritis Society, The Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Jewish General Hospital Foundation, McGill University, Scleroderma Society of Ontario, Scleroderma Canada, Sclerodermie Quebec, Scleroderma Manitoba, Scleroderma Atlantic, Scleroderma Association of BC, Scleroderma SASK, Scleroderma Australia, Scleroderma New South Wales, Scleroderma Victoria, and Scleroderma Queensland.

Introduction: Post-operative right ventricular failure (RV failure) is the single largest contributor to short-term mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD); yet predicting which patient is at risk of developing this complication in the pre-operative setting has remained beyond the abilities of experts in the field. We hypothesized that deep artificial intelligence (AI) driven characterization of subtle pre-operative myocardial motion features, could predict post-operative RV failure in LVAD patients. Methods: We developed a novel echocardiography AI system using an improved dense trajectory algorithm that tracks motion vectors in an unsupervised fashion, and a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network that tracks spatiotemporal features from videos. We used pre-operative ECHO videos from a 536 patient multicenter echocardiographic and clinical dataset, and via a standard 10-fold cross validation, trained and validated the AI system to predict severe or higher grades of post-operative RV failure at the time of index hospitalization. Finally, we independently benchmarked our AI system against clinicians equipped with contemporary clinical risk scores to predict post-operative RV failure (Penn and CRITT score) and manually derived echocardiographic metrics of RV function. Results: 173 (32%) patients were adjudicated to have severe post-operative RV failure. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC) for the AI system was 0.86 (95% CI 0.824-0.896). The performance of our AI system exceeded that of both the best performing clinical risk score and manually derived echocardiographic metric by a significant margin (ΔAUC +0.30, 95% CI 0.27 - 0.33 and ΔAUC +0.24, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.27; both p &lt 0.0001). Conclusions: A novel ECHO AI system trained and validated on a multicenter dataset outperformed clinical experts equipped with both contemporary risk scores and manually calculated echocardiographic metrics.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have resulted in unprecedented advances in the treatment of cancer. By disinhibiting the immune system, they enhance anti-tumor immunity, but provoke off-target inflammatory and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can seriously impact morbidity and mortality. The exact immunobiology of irAEs is not completely understood, but may involve specific immune pathways. To date, there is no validated biomarker test to predict the development of irAEs in patients treated with ICIs. Methods To identify possible biomarkers of irAEs, we performed in-depth proteomic profiling of blood samples obtained from cancer patients receiving ICIs. The plasmas were processed with Hu-14 immuno-depletion column (Agilent Technologies) and the samples were labeled with TMT (Thermo Scientific). The proteins were next pre-fractionated with HPLC, trypsin digested and analyzed by nanoAQUITY LC coupled Synapt G2-Si ion-mobility mass spectrometry (WATERS). Results A total of 12 patients were enrolled in the study; all were receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) agents. Cancer types included melanoma (n=9), renal cell carcinoma (n=2), and non-small cell lung cancer (n=1). Eight patients had irAEs with active toxicity symptoms at blood draw (4 with pneumonitis-irAE and 4 with arthritis-irAE); 6 of those patients were receiving corticosteroids (ranging from 5 to 60 mg/d), and 1 was receiving tocilizumab (an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody). Four patients who completed a minimum of one year of anti-PD1 treatments without irAEs were enrolled as control group. Median time from ICI initiation until blood draw was 16 months (range, 4–31) among patients with irAEs and 23 months (range, 17–28) among controls.We identified 925 protein gene products from 2.5 million mass spectra that can cover 107 dynamic range of plasma proteins. Among them, 19 proteins showed statistically significant differences between patients with and without irAEs (P Conclusions In-depth plasma proteome analysis identified possible biomarkers of adverse events modulated by ICI treatment. We plan a prospective validation cohort study of melanoma patients initiating treatment with ICIs to further evaluate the potential clinical utility of the identified biomarkers and their association with immune toxicity, and tumor response to ICI therapy. Ethics Approval The study was approved by The Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, approval number PA16-0928 Consent Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who agreed to participate in the study

Background Autoimmunity is associated with increased risk of malignancy. However, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (AIDs) were excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials as these agents can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited on the safety and efficacy of combination immunotherapy in this at-risk population. Methods We conducted a multi-center retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with pre-existing AID treated at NYU and at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Primary endpoints were occurrence of irAEs and AID flares. Secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Results Of 121 patients identified from our institutional databases, 53% received single-agent anti-PD-1 therapy, and 47% received ICI combination. Over half of malignancies were lung cancer (34%) and melanoma (20%). Preexisting AIDs included: rheumatologic (58%), gastrointestinal (12%), endocrine (16%) and neurologic (4%). Overall, 94% had asymptomatic AID, and 21% were receiving systemic immunomodulatory drugs at ICI initiation. Median duration of follow up after ICI initiation was 9 (0.4–41.9) months in patients receiving ICI combination and 8 (0.2–47.3) months in patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with higher rates of irAEs compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (56% versus 28%). Grade 3/4 irAEs were equivalent in both groups: combination (38%) and anti-PD-1 group (39%). Treatment related deaths were not observed in any group. AID flares occurred in 36% of the anti-PD-1 group versus 29% of combination group. Adverse events (irAEs and/or flares) required systemic immunomodulatory therapies more frequently in the combination group (84%) versus the anti-PD-1 group (59%), and permanent ICI discontinuation was reported in 19% of patients in the combination group versus 11% in the anti-PD-1 group. Tumor progression was observed in 49% of patients on combination ICI and TTF was 14.5 months (95% CI 0.000–31.5), while progression was observed in 64% of patients on anti-PD-1 monotherapy and TTF was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.01–8.9) (p=0.019). Median OS in the combination therapy group was not reached whereas it was 27.3 months in the anti-PD-1 monotherapy group. Conclusions Our novel findings suggest that high rates of adverse events were observed in patients with pre-existing AIDs treated with ICI combination therapy. However, they were manageable and rarely required permanent ICI discontinuation. Taken together, these data show that ICIs should be offered, albeit with caution in patients with AIDs, to achieve durable cancer remission. Prospective clinical data are needed to guide these complex decisions. Ethics Approval The study was approved by NYU Langone’s Ethics Board, approval number i18-01657 and MD Anderson’s Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089

Introduction The objective of this presentation is to evaluate the reason for referral of patients with a diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma treated in the Cervical Pathology Unit of the Hospital San Borja Arriaran. Material and Method Retrospective analysis of records of patients treated for cervical adenocarcinoma, between the years 2008 to January 2019. Results Of 5353 positive cytologies studied between January 2008 and January 2019, a total of 105 adenocarcinoma were found, with a median age of 47 years (between 20 to 85 years). Out of these 105 patients: 15% were referred due to clinical suspicion, of which 5 patients (30%) had a visible tumor; and 89 patients (85%) were referred due to altered cytology, corresponding to 2% of the total. Analyzing the cytology that originated the referral of these 89 patients with abnormal results, 41.5% (37) had a PAP suggestive of adenocarcinoma, 6.7% (6) were suggestive of squamous carcinoma, 28% (25) had a PAP NIE II-III, and 23.5% (21) had an atypical in one of its three varieties [double non-specific atypical: 9.5% (2), glandular atypical: 47.6% (10) and atypical that does not exclude high-grade injury 42.8% (9)]. Conclusions Cervical adenocarcinoma is an emerging entity and it is difficult to diagnose. Screening programs do not necessarily decrease its incidence, on the contrary, they have become the main source of referral for cervical adenocarcinoma. In our review, it corresponded to 85% of the cases. Despite the difficulty of investigating an adenocarcinoma through PAP, this was the main cause of referral. The referral for clinical suspicion corresponded to 15%.

Background Management of certain immune mediated adverse events (irAEs) can be challenging and may require prolonged/chronic immune suppression with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant which could compromise and even reverse the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While the exact immunobiology of irAEs is not fully understood there is enough evidence that IL-6 induced Th-17 that may play critical role in the pathogenesis. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade in management of irAEs in melanoma patients. Methods We searched MD Anderson databases to identify cancer patients who had received ICIs between January 2004 and March 2020. Of 11,391 ICI-treated patients, 21 patients with melanoma who received IL-6R blockade after ICI infusion were identified and their medical records were reviewed. Results Median age was 61 years (41–82), 52% were females, 90% received anti-programmed cell death-1 antibodies. Fourteen patients (67%) had de novo onset irAEs (11 had arthritis, and 1 each with polymyalgia rheumatica, oral mucositis, and CNS vasculitis), and 7 patients (33%) had flare of their pre-existing autoimmune diseases (5 had had rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 each with myasthenia gravis and Crohn’s disease). Median time from ICI initiation to irAEs was 91 days (range, 1–496) and to initiation of IL-6R blockade was 6.6 months (range, 0.6–24.3). Median number of IL-6R blockade was 12 (range, 1–35), and 16 patients (76%) were concomitantly receiving corticosteroids of median dose of 10 mg (range, 5–20 mg). Of the 21 patients, irAEs improved in 14 (67%) (95% CI: 46%-87%). Of 13 evaluable patients with arthritis, 11 (85%) achieved remission or minimal disease activity as defined by the clinical disease activity index. Median time from initiation of IL-6R blockade till improvement of irAEs was 2.9 months (range, 1.5–36.9). Nineteen patients tolerated well IL-6R blockade, while two patients stopped treatment due to abdominal pain and sinus tachycardia. The median CRP levels at irAEs was 84 mg/L (0.6–187) and decreased to 1.9 mg/L (0.56–12) at 10 weeks after initiation of IL-6R blockade (P=0.02). Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall tumor response rate by RECIST-1.1 criteria was similar before and after IL-6R blockade initiation (41% vs. 53%). Conclusions Our data demonstrated that IL-6R blockade could be an effective therapy for irAEs management without dampening the efficacy of ICIs. Prospective clinical trials with longitudinal blood, tumor, and inflamed tissue biopsies are planned to accurately validate these findings and better study the immunobiology of irAEs. Ethics Approval The study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition’s Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089

Assess the association between digoxin use and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in a multicenter continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) cohort.Patients implanted with continuous flow LVADs with data on GIB and digoxin use from two centers were included in the analysis (n = 649). GIB events were captured up to 2 years of follow-up. Digoxin use was defined as digoxin prescribed at discharge or within the first 3 months after LVAD implantation. A negative binomial regression model was performed to determine the association between digoxin use and number of GIB events over the follow-up period.Mean age of the cohort was 57 years (±14) and 45% (293/649) were bridge to transplant (BTT). Digoxin was prescribed in 33% of patients. Digoxin use was associated with an unadjusted 32% reduction in the incidence of rate of all cause GIB (IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-0.99, p = 0.049). After adjusting for age, sex, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile, renal function, and implanting center there was still a 34% reduction in the incidence rate (IRR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99, p = 0.048). When limiting the analysis to those with likely arteriovenous malformation associated GIB, the association strengthened (unadjusted: IRR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.26-0.89, p = 0.02, adjusted: IRR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.25-0.9, p = 0.022).In this multicenter study, inclusive of contemporary devices, digoxin use was associated with reduced GIB events. Prospective data will be required to confirm this association.

Background Underreporting of harms in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may lead to incomplete or erroneous assessments of the perceived benefit-to-harm profile of an intervention. To compare benefit with harm in clinical practice and future clinical studies, adverse event (AE) profiles including severity need to be understood. Even though patients report harm symptoms earlier and more frequently than clinicians, rheumatology RCTs currently do not provide a reporting framework from the patient's perspective regarding harms. Our objective for this meta-research project was to identify AEs in order to determine harm clusters and whether these could be self-reported by patients. Our other objective was to examine reported severity grading of the reported harms. Methods We considered primary publications of RCTs eligible if they were published between 2008 and 2018 evaluating pharmacological interventions in patients with a rheumatic or musculoskeletal condition and if they were included in Cochrane reviews. We extracted data on harms such as reported AE terms together with severity (if described), and categorized AE- and severity-terms into overall groups. We deemed all AEs with felt components appropriate for patient self-reporting. Results The literature search identified 187 possible Cochrane reviews, of which 94 were eligible for evaluation, comprising 1,297 articles on individual RCTs. Of these RCTs, 93 pharmacological trials met our inclusion criteria (including 31,023 patients; representing 20,844 accumulated patient years), which reported a total of 21,498 AEs, corresponding to 693 unique reported terms for AEs. We further sub-categorized these terms into 280 harm clusters (i.e., themes). AEs appropriate for patient self-reporting accounted for 58% of the AEs reported. Among the reported AEs, we identified medical terms for all of the 117 harm clusters appropriate for patient reporting and lay language terms for 86%. We intended to include severity grades of the reported AEs, but there was no evidence for systematic reporting of clinician- or patient-reported severity in the primary articles of the 93 trials. However, we identified 33 terms suggesting severity, but severity grading was discernible in only 9%, precluding a breakdown by severity in this systematic review. Conclusions Our results support the need for a standardized framework for patients’ reporting of harms in rheumatology trials. Reporting of AEs with severity should be included in future reporting of harms, both from the patients’ and investigators’ perspectives. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42018108393

Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. A few studies have examined the risk for recurrence in patients with RA receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, primarily tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Although these agents seem to be safe in patients with a history of cancer and no evidence of disease, additional information is needed to determine their potential effects in patients with RA and active cancer. Patients with RA undergoing cancer therapy, including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, need to be carefully monitored because they are at increased risk for adverse events.

The effects of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cancer are largely unknown. We examined overall survival (OS) in patients with RA and solid malignancies receiving bDMARDs.We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with RA and solid malignancies seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. Cox proportional hazard regression models, stratified by tumor type and stage, were fit evaluating use of bDMARDs as a time fixed and time varying covariate.We identified 431 RA patients with solid malignancies: 111 (26%) received bDMARDs after their cancer diagnosis. Median OS from cancer diagnosis was 16.1 years. Of the patients receiving bDMARDs, most had localized disease, and only 14 (13%) had advanced cancer. In the stratified Cox models no statistically significant differences were observed between patients who received tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or patients who received nonTNFi, compared with those who did not receive bDMARDs (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31, 1.44; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.26, 4.60 respectively). In breast cancer patients, those receiving TNFi or nonTNFi had a numerically higher but statistically nonsignificant HR compared with those who did not receive bDMARD: HR, 1.40 (95% CI, 0.42, 4.73), and HR, 1.37 (95% CI, 0.22, 8.42) respectively.No significant differences in OS were observed between patients who received bDMARDs and those who did not. Additional data is needed to evaluate other cancer outcomes such as recurrence and progression, and patients with advanced cancer. Key Points •We found no statistically significant differences in OS between patients with RA and concomitant solid malignancies who received bDMARDs and those who did not. •Most patients who received bDMARDs had been diagnosed with early stage cancer •As few patients with advanced cancer received bDMARDs safety for this group cannot be established •No significant differences were observed between TNFi and nonTNFi, but the sample size was small.

OBJECTIVE To determine rates of cervical cancer screening and associated abnormal results in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS We identified women with an initial diagnosis of SLE in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2001 to 2014. Cervical cancer screening rates and associated diagnostic claims within 3 years of the initial claim were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of screening with lupus treatment. A matched logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare screening rates to those in age-matched women without connective tissue disease. RESULTS We included 4,316 women with SLE. Screening rates were higher in women with SLE than in general controls (73.4% versus 58.5%; P < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased screening included recent time (odds ratio [OR] 0.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 0.55-0.89) (2012-2014 compared to 2001-2005), age ≥61 years (OR 0.27 [95% CI 0.18-0.39]), comorbidity score ≥2 (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.6-0.83]), corticosteroid use (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.97]), and use of immunosuppressants (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69-0.94]). Abnormal pathology result claims were more common in women with SLE than in general controls (12.3% versus 9.8%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Though with higher rates than the general cohort, over 25% of the patients with SLE were not screened, and screening rates seem to be decreasing over time. Patients with SLE are at higher risk of abnormal cervical screening test results than controls, supporting the need for regular screening.

Objectives Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can successfully treat cancer, but their use can be hindered by serious immune-related adverse events. We report six patients receiving ICIs who presented with de novo myositis. Methods We identified patients with myositis who were receiving ICIs between January 2004 and September 2016 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Results Six patients developed de novo myositis. The mean age was 64.3 years and five patients were male. Cancer types included melanoma, urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and prostate cancer. ICI regimens included single-agent ipilimumab (n = 1), pembrolizumab (n = 1), or atezolizumab (n = 1); nivolumab and ipilimumab (n = 3). The median time to development of de novo myositis from first infusion was 5.4 weeks (range: 2.1–17.1 weeks). All patients with myositis had elevated levels of creatinine kinase, ranging from 514 to 13,710 U/L. Two of them developed rhabdomyolysis, one with concurrent myocarditis. Five patients were treated with 1–2 mg/kg corticosteroids, with variable response rates; one patient received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Two patients with myositis died as a result of cancer progression. Conclusion We found several occurrences of de novo myositis following ICI therapy. These preliminary data suggest that myositis can occur early after onset of ICI therapy with serious adverse outcomes.

Rationale & Objective The approved therapeutic indication for immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are rapidly expanding including treatment in the adjuvant setting, the immune related toxicities associated with CPI can limit the efficacy of these agents. The literature on the nephrotoxicity of CPI is limited. Here, we present cases of biopsy proven acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) and glomerulonephritis (GN) induced by CPIs and discuss potential mechanisms of these adverse effects. Study design, setting, & participants We retrospectively reviewed all cancer patients from 2008 to 2018 who were treated with a CPI and subsequently underwent a kidney biopsy at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Results We identified 16 cases diagnosed with advanced solid or hematologic malignancy; 12 patients were male, and the median age was 64 (range 38 to 77 years). The median time to developing acute kidney injury (AKI) from starting CPIs was 14 weeks (range 6–56 weeks). The average time from AKI diagnosis to obtaining renal biopsy was 16 days (range from 1 to 46 days). Fifteen cases occurred post anti-PD-1based therapy. ATIN was the most common pathologic finding on biopsy (14 of 16) and presented in almost all cases as either the major microscopic finding or as a mild form of interstitial inflammation in association with other glomerular pathologies (pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, membranous glomerulonephritis, C3 glomerulonephritis, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, or amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis). CPIs were discontinued in 15 out of 16 cases. Steroids and further immunosuppression were used in most cases as indicated for treatment of ATIN and glomerulonephritis (14 of 16), with the majority achieving complete to partial renal recovery. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that CPI related AKI occurs relatively late after CPI therapy. Our biopsy data demonstrate that ATIN is the most common pathological finding; however it can frequently co-occur with other glomerular pathologies, which may require immune suppressive therapy beyond corticosteroids. In the lack of predictive blood or urine biomarker, we recommend obtaining kidney biopsy for CPI related AKI.

BACKGROUND. Optimal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening strategies for cancer patients have not been established. We compared the performance of selective HCV screening strategies. METHODS. We surveyed patients presenting for first systemic anticancer therapy during 2013–2014 for HCV risk factors. We estimated the prevalence of positivity for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and examined factors associated with anti-HCV status using Fisher’s exact test or Student’s t-test. Sensitivity was calculated for screening patients born during 1945–1965, patients with ≥1 other risk factor, or both cohorts (“combined screening”). RESULTS. We enrolled 2,122 participants. Median age was 59 years (range, 18–91); 1,138 participants were women. Race/ethnicity distribution was white non-Hispanic, 76% (n=1616); Hispanic, 11% (n=233); black non-Hispanic, 8% (n=160); Asian, 4% (n=78); other, 2% (n=35). Primary cancer distribution was non-liver solid tumor, 78% (n=1,664); hematologic cancer, 20% (n=422); liver cancer, 1% (n=28). Prevalence of anti-HCV was 1.93% (95% CI, 1.39%–2.61%). Over 28% of patients with detectable HCV RNA were unaware of infection. Factors significantly associated with anti-HCV positivity included less than a bachelor’s degree, birth in 1945–1965, chronic liver disease, injection drug use, and blood transfusion or organ transplant before 1992. A total of 1,315 participants (62%), including 39 of 41 with anti-HCV, reported ≥1 risk factor. Sensitivity was 80% (95% CI, 65–91%) for birth-cohort-based, 68% (95% CI, 52–82%) for other-risk-factor-based, and 95% (95% 83–99%) for combined screening. CONCLUSION. Combined screening still missed 5% of patients with anti-HCV. These findings favor universal HCV screening to identify all HCV-infected cancer patients.

Background: The NuPulseCV intravascular ventricular assist system (iVAS) provides extended duration ambulatory counterpulsation via a durable pump placed through the distal subclavian artery. Methods: We performed a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, US Food and Drug Administration-approved feasibility trial of iVAS therapy as a bridge to transplant or decision following the FIH (First-In-Human) trial. Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled, and 45 patients (median 61 years old, 37 males, and 30 listed on United Network of Organ Sharing) received iVAS support for median 44 (25–87) days. There were no intraoperative complications. Success was defined as survival or transplant on iVAS therapy free from disabling stroke. Outcome success at 30 days (the primary end point of this study) and at 6 months was 89% and 80%, respectively. During 6 months of iVAS support, 2 patients died and 2 patients experienced disabling neurological dysfunction. Six-minute walk distance, 2-minute step test, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved during 4-week iVAS support. Conclusions: This feasibility trial demonstrated promising short-term outcomes of iVAS therapy with improved functional capacity and quality of life during the therapy. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02645539.

Summary Background Patients previously infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV; indicated by positivity for anti-HBc) can experience HBV reactivation during cancer chemotherapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, which is frequently used in supportive care, might facilitate passive transfer of anti-HBc. We aimed to estimate the probability of passive transfer of anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion in patients with cancer. Methods We reviewed institutional databases to identify adult patients who received outpatient chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2011, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Eligible patients had received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, had tested negative for both anti-HBc and HBsAg before infusion, and had been tested for anti-HBc after infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who became positive for anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion. Findings 950 of 18 874 patients who underwent chemotherapy within the study time frame received intravenous immunoglobulin, of whom 870 had been tested for anti-HBc before infusion. 199 patients who were negative for anti-HBc before receiving intravenous immunoglobulin were retested after infusion, of whom 29 (15% [95% CI 10–20]) became positive for anti-HBc. The probability of anti-HBc conversion at 1 week after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion was 34% (95% CI 22–48) and at 12 weeks was 4% (2–7). Interpretation Conversion of patients from anti-HBc negativity to anti-HBc positivity was common after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. However, the probability of a positive test decreased with time since infusion. Positive anti-HBc tests done shortly after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion should be interpreted with caution because they might indicate passive transfer instead of true infection. Funding None.

Objective We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct and indirect trial evidence to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Methods We searched four electronic databases from inception to January 2016, clinicaltrials. gov, and bibliographies of relevant articles. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated the studies. The primary outcome was development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Results Nine studies were included. Interventions included methotrexate, abatacept, infliximab, intra-articular or intramuscular glucocorticoids, and radiation synovectomy. Treating patients resulted in lower rates of RA at 12 months compared to placebo or no treatment (odds ratio (OR) 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.90). From direct meta-analysis, patients treated with methotrexate were less likely to develop RA at 12 months compared to patients treated without methotrexate (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.48). This difference was no longer significant at 30 or 60 months. From indirect comparisons, most interventions showed decreased risk of developing RA compared to placebo at 12 months, reaching statistical significance for methotrexate (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33), and intramuscular methylprednisolone (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). Limitations Most individual interventions included a limited number of studies. Conclusions Treating patients with UA resulted in a statistically significant delay in the development of RA, with the largest effect observed for methotrexate. These findings suggest that there is a window of opportunity to treat patients with UA early, to delay subsequent progression to RA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Purpose Prediction of right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant is a crucial step to improve outcomes. The EUROMACS Right-Sided Heart Failure (EUROMACS-RHF) risk score is one of the most recent derived scores for RHF prediction after LVAD but it lacks external validation. The aim of our study was to validate the EUROMACS-RHF risk score. Methods From 01/2007 to 12/2017, 878 continuous-flow LVADs were implanted at three tertiary care centers. We calculated the EUROMACS-RHF score in 662 patients with complete data. We evaluated the predictive performance of the score for early RHF defined as need for short- or long-term right-sided circulatory support, continuous inotropic support for ≥14 days or nitric oxide ventilation for ≥48 hours post-operatively. Results RHF occurred in 211 patients (32%). RHF patients had higher creatinine, bilirubin and right atrial pressure, more echocardiographic RV dysfunction and were more critically ill reflected in lower INTERMACS class (p Conclusion In an external validation, the EUROMACS-RHF had similar discrimination predicting RHF compared to the original derivation cohort, which was better than other published scores. The clinical utility of these scores in the decision to implant LVAD in prospective studies remains to be determined.

Purpose Deciding which patients can be weaned from an RVAD placed after LVAD implantation could help triage advanced heart failure device strategy. Therefore, we set out to determine the predictors of RVAD weaning. Methods A multi-center retrospective study of 826 consecutive patients who received either a HeartMate2 or HVAD between 1/2007 an 12/2007. We identified 91 patients who received an early RVAD insertion during their LVAD implant index admission. A Cox Proportional hazard model was constructed to identify predictors of RVAD weaning. Results There were 91 patients (11%) who required an RVAD after LVAD with 48 (52%) weaned from RVAD support and 43 (48%) not weaned. Patients who were weaned had a lower prevalence of hypertension, higher pre-operative ACE-inhibitor use, and lower pre-operative transpulmonary gradient (TPG), RA-PCWP ratio, and RVSWI; they were also more likely to receive concomitant RVAD at time of LVAD insertion and ultimately transplanted more often (Table 1). Our multivariable model for predictors of RVAD weaning included pre-operative creatinine (HR 0.32 [0.15, 0.70], p = 0.004), PVR (HR 1.23 [1.02, 1.48], p = 0.03), non-white ethnicity (HR 2.56 [1.19, 5.54], p = 0.02), COPD (HR 4.63 [1.32, 16.25], p = 0.02), and concomitant RVAD insertion (HR 2.87 [1.00, 8.21], p-value = 0.05) with a model c-statistic of 0.84. The survival curve demonstrates that patients who are weaned from RVAD have significantly improved 1-year mortality (Figure 1, p Conclusion In a multi-institutional continuous-flow LVAD cohort, we show novel predictors of RVAD weaning that can help triage mechanical support strategy.

Purpose Early insertion of an RVAD may help to mitigate post-LVAD implantation morbidity and mortality. We hypothesize that concomitant RVAD insertion at time of LVAD implantation improves 1-year mortality in comparison to post-operative insertion. Methods A multi-center retrospective study of 826 consecutive patients who received either a HeartMate2 or HVAD between 1/2007 an 12/2017. We identified 91 patients who either had an unplanned or planned early RVAD on index admission. A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to identify predictors of 1-year mortality. Results There were 91 patients (11%) who required an RVAD after LVAD implantation with 51 (56%) receiving a concomitant RVAD and 40 (43%) post-operatively (Table 1). Concomitant RVAD with LVAD insertion was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.45 [0.27, 0.76], p-value = 0.002, Figure 1). Our multivariable model (which included age, BMI, and ACE-i use) found receiving transplant (HR 0.04 [0.01, 0.29], p = 0.001) and concomitant RVAD (HR 0.51 [0.29, 0.90], p = 0.004) to be independent predictors of 1-year mortality with a final model C-statistic of 0.77. Stratifying concomitant RVAD by intended approach, planned versus unplanned RVAD insertion had a similar survival rate as unplanned approach at 1 year (42.8% versus 28.6%, p-value = 0.08). Conclusion We show in a continuous-flow and multi-institutional cohort that concomitant RVAD insertion at time of LVAD is associated with improved survival at 1 year compared to post-operative insertion.

BackgroundManaging immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has become a critical challenge with the increasing implementation of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment. IrAEs may cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, the rate of which is higher with multi-agent ICI regimen needed to overcome resistant tumor microenvironment. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor antagonists (IL-6RA) to manage irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-6RA for irAE management. Eligible patients were identified from the institutional databases (pharmacy records, tumor registries, oncology and specialty clinic records for diagnosis and management of irAEs). The primary objective was assessing changes in irAE symptoms. The secondary objective was assessing overall response rate (ORR) before and after IL-6RA treatment.ResultsA total of 81 patients received an IL-6RA (tocilizumab or sarilumab); median age was 66 years, 41% were females, 70% received single-agent anti-PD-1 and 23% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (44%), genitourinary cancer (37%), and lung cancer (8.6%). Indications for using IL-6RA were inflammatory arthritis (74%), polymyalgia rheumatica (6%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%) encephalitis (5%), and 1% each with pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, central nervous system vasculitis, oral mucositis, and flare of pre-existing myasthenia gravis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease. Notably, 83 % of patients received corticosteroids as first-line therapy, and 29% received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, without improvement. After initiation of IL-6RA, improvement of irAEs was observed in 78% after a median of 2.1 months. Of evaluable patients with inflammatory arthritis, the median clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at IL-6RA initiation was 28, indicating high disease activity, and dropped to 6 after treatment, indicating low disease activity. The median CRP level at IL-6RA initiation was 59.5 mg/L and dropped to 1.5 mg/L within 10 weeks of treatment. Seventy-two patients tolerated IL-6RA, and nine stopped treatment due to side effects. Thirty-eight patients were evaluated for tumor response by RECIST 1.1 criteria; the ORR was 58% prior to IL-6RA and 66% after treatment. Of 21 evaluable melanoma patients, the ORR was 62% prior to IL-6RA compared to 71% after treatment (figure 1).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to mitigate autoimmunity while maintaining and possibly boosting tumor immunity. Clinical trials are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in combination with ICIs in patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition's Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089Abstract 816 Figure 1A patient with sinonasal malignant melanoma involving the ethmoid air cells. (A) Baseline maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET image at 1 month before initiation of ICI (ipilimumab and nivolumab) shows avid FDG uptake of the tumor at the ethmoid air cells (arrow). (B) MIP PET image at 7 months after ICI initiation shows resolution of the FDG uptake at the site of the tumor, consistent with complete response. (C) Concurrent MIP PET and corresponding fused PET-CT images 7 months after initiation of ICI show avid radiotracer uptake at the knee joints, suggestive of arthritis. (D) MIP PET image at 10 months after concomitant therapy with IL6R antagonist and nivolumab shows persistent absence of hypermetabolic radiotracer activity at the paranasal sinuses, consistent with complete response. (E) Concurrent MIP PET and corresponding fused PET-CT images show physiologic radiotracer uptake at the knee joints, consistent with resolving arthritis.

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been used as a predictor of mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. However, improvement or worsening of MELD and how those changes affect outcomes is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of 244 patients implanted with a continuous flow (CF) LVAD. Patients were dichotomized at admission into low- or high-risk categories using a cutoff of MELD ≥ 19, and they were reclassified at day of implant forming four groups: Group LL (low to low, remained low risk), LH (low to high, worsened to high risk), HH (high to high, remained high risk), and HL (high to low, improved to low risk). Patients who improved to a low risk (group HL) had the same 1 year survival as those that remained low risk (group LL; 80% vs. 77%; p = 0.6). However, patients who were initially classified as low risk and worsened to a high risk (group LH) had a survival that was worse than those that were consistently high risk (group HH; 55% vs. 10%; p = 0.01). Model for end-stage liver disease reclassification after adjusting for commonly attributed risk factors remained an independent predictor for mortality, including patients classified as Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 1 and 2. In conclusion, our MELD score reclassification is an independent and powerful predictor of mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

BACKGROUND Data on the incidence of adverse liver outcomes are limited for cancer patients with chronic (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]–positive/hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]–positive) or past (HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc–positive) hepatitis B virus (HBV) after chemotherapy. This study was aimed at determining the impact of test timing and anti-HBV therapy on adverse liver outcomes in these patients. METHODS Patients with solid or hematologic malignancies who received chemotherapy between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively studied. HBV testing and anti-HBV therapy were defined as early at the initiation of cancer therapy and as late after initiation. Outcomes included hepatitis flares, hepatic impairment, liver failure, and death. Time-to-event analysis was used to determine incidence, and multivariate hazard models were used to determine predictors of outcomes. RESULTS There were 18,688 study patients (80.4% with solid tumors). The prevalence of chronic HBV was 1.1% (52 of 4905), and the prevalence of past HBV was 7.1% (350 of 4905). Among patients with solid tumors, late identification of chronic HBV was associated with a higher risk of hepatitis flare (hazard ratio [HR], 4.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-12.86), hepatic impairment (HR, 8.48; 95% CI, 1.86-38.66), liver failure (HR, 9.38; 95% CI, 1.50-58.86), and death (HR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.19-12.83) in comparison with early identification. Among patients with hematologic malignancies and chronic HBV, the risk of death was 7.8 (95% CI, 1.73-35.27) times higher for persons with late initiation of anti-HBV therapy versus early initiation. Patients with late identification of chronic HBV had late or no anti-HBV therapy. Chronic HBV predicted liver failure in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies, whereas male sex and late identification were predictors for patients with solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS Early identification correlates with early anti-HBV therapy and reduces the risk of liver failure and death in chronic HBV patients receiving chemotherapy. Cancer 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

We thank Dr. Urata for his interest in our recent systematic review (1) and appreciate the opportunity to clarify two points he raised. First, the recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology appear in two articles published in two different issues of the same journal: Rev Bras Reumatol 2012;52(2):135-174 and Rev Bras Reumatol 2013;53(2):158-183. In our review, these articles are cited as references 41 and 16, respectively. While both articles are from the same society, the information and content they each provide are slightly different.

Purpose The 2016 ISHLT revised cardiac transplantation listing criteria has recommended patients to achieve a body mass index (BMI) 35 show poorer outcome post-transplant, there is limited data on the BMI group of 35-39.9. This study aims to determine the relationship between post-transplant outcomes and a pre-transplant listing BMI of 35-39.9 as compared to a BMI Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of patients stratified by BMI subgroup was performed of 23,009 adult heart transplant patients from 2009-2018 using the United Network for Organ sharing database. Patients with BMI of 35-39.9 post-transplant outcomes were compared to patients with BMI Results Patients with a BMI 35.0-39.9 had post-transplant survival of 92.4% at 90 days, 89.3% at 1 year and 74.5% at 5 years, compared to patients with a BMI Conclusion Although a statistically significant increase in mortality was observed between the BMI

This review summarizes the evidence on antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and related thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors. Data sources included Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed ePubs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2019 without restrictions. Observational studies that evaluated patients with solid tumors for the presence of aPL antibodies were included. Data were extracted and quality was assessed by one reviewer and cross-checked by another. Thirty-three studies were identified. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) cancers were the most frequently reported. Compared with healthy patients, patients with GI cancer were more likely to develop anticardiolipin antibodies (risk ratio [RR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-9.95), as were those with GU (RR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.3-16.2) and lung cancer (RR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.3-20.6). The increased risk for anti-β2-glycoprotein I or lupus anticoagulant was not statistically significant. Patients with lung cancer who had positive aPL antibodies had higher risk of developing thromboembolic events than those who had negative antibodies (RR, 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.2-12.2), while the increased risk in patients with GU cancer was not statistically significant. Deaths due to thromboembolic events were more common among patients with lung cancer who had elevated aPL antibodies. A limitation of this review is that the results are contingent on the reported information. We found an increased risk of developing aPL antibodies in patients with GI, GU, and lung cancers resulting in thromboembolic events and death. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathogenesis and development of aPL antibodies in cancer.

Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare but life-threatening adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Given the limited evidence, data from a large cohort of patients is needed to aid in recognition and management of this fatal complication. Methods We reviewed our institutional databases to identify patients who had cancer and MG in the setting of ICI. We systematically reviewed the literature through August 2018 to identify all similar reported patients. We collected data on clinical and diagnostic features, management, and outcomes of these cases. Results Sixty-five patients were identified. Median age was 73 years; 42 (65%) were males, 31 (48%) had metastatic melanoma, and 13 (20%) had a preexisting MG before ICI initiation. Most patients received anti-PD-1 (82%). Sixty-three patients (97%) developed ICI-related MG (new onset or disease flare) after a median of 4 weeks (1 to 16 weeks) of ICI initiation. Twenty-four patients (37%) experienced concurrent myositis, and respiratory failure occurred in 29 (45%). ICI was discontinued in 61 patients (97%). Death was reported in 24 patients (38%); 15 (23%) due to MG complication. A better outcome was observed in patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis (PLEX) as first-line therapy than in those who received steroids alone (95% vs 63% improvement of MG symptoms, p = 0.011). Conclusions MG is a life-threatening adverse event of acute onset and rapid progression after ICI initiation. Early use of IVIG or PLEX, regardless of initial symptoms severity, may lead to better outcomes than steroids alone. Our data suggest the need to reassess the current recommendations for management of ICI-related MG until prospective longitudinal studies are conducted to establish the ideal management approach for these patients.

Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Safety Working Group objective was to identify harm domains from existing outcome measurements in rheumatology.Methods.Systematically searching the MEDLINE database on January 24, 2017, we identified full-text articles that could be used for harm outcomes in rheumatology. Domains/items from the identified instruments were described and the content synthesized to provide a preliminary framework for harm outcomes.Results.From 435 possible references, 24 were read in full text and 9 were included: 7 measurement instruments were identified. Investigation of domains/items revealed considerable heterogeneity in the grouping and approach.Conclusion.The ideal way to assess harm aspects from the patients’ perspective has not yet been ascertained.