5 results on '"Burcu Kelleci Cakir"'
Search Results
2. How we Provide Nutritional Treatment in Hospitalized Patients?
- Author
-
Mert Esme, Kutay Demirkan, Cafer Balci, Meltem Halil, Osman Abbasoglu, and Burcu Kelleci Cakir
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Parenteral Nutrition ,Access route ,Hospitalized patients ,business.industry ,Clinical nutrition ,Patient Care Planning ,Hospitalization ,Gastrointestinal complications ,Parenteral nutrition ,Enteral Nutrition ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Original Article ,Total energy ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to evaluate enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) and supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in terms of achieving nutritional goals. METHODS: Patients receiving either EN, PN, or SPN treatment followed up by the clinical nutrition team between January and December 2017 at the university research and training hospital were included in the study. Daily nutritional requirements were calculated according to the recommendations. Total energy intake during nutritional treatment (NT) and all metabolic, mechanical, technical complications of NT were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 603 inpatients were included in the study. The nutritional goal was achieved in the majority of the SPN group patients (87.5%) statistically significant relation was found between the achievement of the target (or not) and PN access route (peripheral or central) (P < .001). However, none of the complications found statistically related to achieving the target, including gastrointestinal complications of EN (P = .46), metabolic complications of EN (P = .07), mechanical complications of EN (P = .79), metabolic complications of PN (P = .89), gastrointestinal complications in SPN group (P = .45), and metabolic complications in SPN group (P = .68). CONCLUSION: Nutritional goals could be achieved with SPN without increasing complications in the majority of patients. Commencement of SPN should be considered for positive outcomes in patients who failed to achieve desired nutritional outcomes.
- Published
- 2021
3. Evaluation of the effect of antibiotics used during parenteral nutrition treatment on Candidemia
- Author
-
Kutay Demirkan, Murat Gündüz, Burcu Kelleci-Cakir, Nadir Yalçın, Özlem Özkan-Kuşcu, and Nursel Sürmelioğlu
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Medicine (General) ,Antifungal Agents ,medicine.drug_class ,Antibiotics ,R5-920 ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Risk factor ,Piperacillin-Tazobactam ,Retrospective Studies ,Potential impact ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Hazard ratio ,Antibiotic ,Candidemia ,General Medicine ,bacterial infections and mycoses ,Parenteral nutrition ,Growth time ,Anti-Bacterial Agents ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Risk factors ,Piperacillin/tazobactam ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Parenteral nutrition is an important risk factor for candidemia. In this risk analysis study, the effect of previous antibiotic administration apart from the length of hospital stay, duration of Parenteral nutrition treatment, and Candida score parameters on developing candidemia was evaluated in the non-neutropenic patients receiving Parenteral nutrition treatment. METHODS: In this double center, retrospective, and cross-sectional study, the data of patients who received Parenteral nutrition treatment were collected. Patients with or without candidemia after the initiation of Parenteral nutrition treatment were compared in terms of demographic features, Candida score, length of hospital stay, duration of Parenteral nutrition treatment, and previous use of antibiotics. Then, predictor factors affecting the probability of candidemia during Candida growth time were determined by the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients (59.5% males) were included and 16 (10.81%) of these had candidemia after initiation of parenteral nutrition treatment. The median (min–max) duration of parenteral nutrition treatment was 11 (4–72) days and the Candida growth time was 13 (7–29) days. Statistically significant differences were found between patients with or without candidemia groups in terms of length of hospital stay (p
- Published
- 2021
4. Benefit versus toxicity risk of digoxin in patients with COVID-19
- Author
-
Burcu Kelleci Cakir, Kutay Demirkan, and Aygin Bayraktar-Ekincioglu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Digoxin ,Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ,Renal function ,030226 pharmacology & pharmacy ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Therapeutic index ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics ,Cardiac glycoside ,business.industry ,Atrial fibrillation ,medicine.disease ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Concomitant ,Heart failure ,Toxicity ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
As the oldest cardiac glycoside with a narrow therapeutic index and complex pharmacokinetic profile, digoxin is still used to treat many conditions such as congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation or flutter, and certain cardiac arrhythmias.1 Its distribution in the heart and muscles might increase due to hyperthyroidism or hypokalaemia and decrease due to hyperkalaemia or hyponatraemia.1 Digoxin is the minor substrate of cytochrome-P450 (CYP) 3A4 and the major substrate of P-glycoprotein/ABCB1.1 In general, the incidence of toxicity is reported to be about 1% in patients with CHF treated with digoxin.1 Increased intracellular calcium due to inhibition of Na–K transporter is the primary pathway of digoxin toxicity.2 Factors such as renal function, age, lean body weight, cytokine levels and concomitant medications should be …
- Published
- 2021
5. Post-pyloric Drug Administration in Enteral Nutrition
- Author
-
Burcu Kelleci Çakır, Cansu Zeynep Doğan, and Kutay Demirkan
- Subjects
clinical pharmacy ,post-pyloric feeding ,jejunum ,medication administration via feeding tube ,Medicine ,Internal medicine ,RC31-1245 ,Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
Most of the patients who require enteral nutrition therapy also require concomitant medication administration. In this review, the appropriate medication administration through the post-pyloric feeding tube and related issues that should be considered by clinicians has been focused and accordingly appropriateness of some medication available in our country were listed. Before the drug administration via feeding tube, information such as length of the functional bowel, the inner diameter and length of the tube, the location of distal end of the feeding tube should be considered. The location of distal end of the feeding tube plays an important role for drug absorption due to differences in pH and osmolarity between stomach and jejunum. While a medication designed for oral use administered directly to the jejunum, its bioavailability, gastric complaints and malabsorption may alter, since the expected process (dissolution in stomach and absorption from small intestine) cannot be pursued. As a result, inappropriate medication administration in patients with post-pyloric feeding tube may lead to ineffectiveness, adverse reactions or toxicity of the medication. Therefore, to provide optimal pharmaceutical and nutritional treatment together, medications should be evaluated for appropriateness before administration via post-pyloric feeding tube by the multidisciplinary team, including clinical pharmacists.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.