Search

Background: Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO2) can be used to diagnose Lower Extremity Artery Disease (LEAD) and allows the quantification of limb ischemia during exercise on treadmill. Exercise-TcPO2 test-retest reliability in patients with LEAD and severe walking impairment is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) of exercise-TcPO2 in patients with claudication., Methods: Data were collected from patients that performed 2 treadmill tests within a 1-month interval. Delta from Rest of Oxygen Pressure (DROP) values were measured at both buttocks (proximal) and both calves (distal). Test-retest reproducibility was assessed by recording transcutaneous oximetry measurements twice and expressed as SEM and intra-class correlation coefficients. MDC was calculated using the formula MDC = SEM x 1.96 x √ 2., Results: Twenty eight LEAD patients (61 ± 9 years old) were included. Intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.66 [0.50, 0.79] and 0.65 [0.49, 0.79] for the proximal and distal levels, respectively. The SEM of DROP at the proximal and distal levels were 7 [6, 9] mm Hg and 9 [8, 11] mm Hg, respectively. The SEM for all (proximal and distal) DROP values was 8 [7, 10] mm Hg and the MDC of DROP was 23 mm Hg., Conclusions: Exercise-TcPO2 with measurement of DROP values has a moderate test-retest reliability in LEAD patients with a maximal walking distance ≤ 300m. For an individual, an improvement or deterioration in DROP of ≥ 23 mm Hg after an intervention would be required to be 95% confident that the change is significant. It should be considered in evaluating the impact of treatment in patients with claudication., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently experience claudication, a clinical symptom indicative of reduced walking capacity. Recommended care consists of exercise rehabilitation combined with optimal medical treatment and surgery. The effects of a single oral dose of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, on patients with claudication are discussed. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a single 100 mg dose of sildenafil compared to placebo in terms of maximal walking time (MWT) in patients with claudication., Methods: The ARTERIOFIL study is a crossover, double-blind, prospective, randomized, single-center study conducted at Angers University Hospital in France. MWT (primary endpoint) was assessed using a treadmill test (10% incline; 3.2 km/h). Secondary endpoints (pain-free walking time (PFWT), transcutaneous oximetry during exercise and redox cycle parameters and safety) were also studied., Results: Fourteen patients were included of whom two were ultimately excluded. In the 12 remaining patients, the MWT was significantly improved during the sildenafil period compared with the placebo period (300 s [95% CI 172 s-428 s] vs 402 s [95% CI 274 s-529 s] p < 0.01). Sildenafil had no significant effect on pain-free walking time or skin tissue oxygenation during exercise. According to redox cycle parameters, sildenafil significantly reduced blood glucose and pyruvate levels and the 3-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio, while there was no significant effect on lactate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate and free fatty acid levels. Symptomatic transient hypotension was observed in two women., Conclusions: The ARTERIOFIL study has shown that a single 100 mg oral dose of sildenafil had a significant effect on increase in MWT but had no significant effects on PFWT and oxygenation parameters in patients with claudication. A double-blind, prospective, randomized, multicenter study (VIRTUOSE©) is ongoing to evaluate the chronic effect of six month-long sildenafil treatment on MWT in PAD patients with claudication., Clinical Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, registration. number: NCT02832570, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02832570)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diet has an essential role in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention by modulating various cardiovascular risk factors. The need to have easily useable tools seems essential to facilitate the daily practice of clinicians in order to propose the most optimal management of their patients' diet. The aim of this study was to compare the diet assessed with a simple food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) between patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) and healthy subjects. In this ancillary study (ELECTRO-PAD study), we included symptomatic PAD patients and healthy participants. All participants filled a FFQ previously validated called Cardiovascular-Dietary-Questionnaire 2 (CDQ-2). CDQ-2 allows the calculation of different scores: global food score, saturated fatty acids score (SFA), unsaturated fatty acids score (UFA), fruit and vegetable score. The higher the score, the better the diet. We compared the different scores between PAD patients and healthy participants. We included 37 PAD patients and 40 healthy subjects. Mean global score was significantly lower in PAD patients compared to the healthy participants (5.35 ± 7.65 vs 10.60 ± 5.81; p = 0.0011). Similarly, the sub-scores concerning unsaturated fatty acids and fruits-vegetables were significantly lower in PAD patients (p < 0.010). Only the sub-score concerning saturated fatty acids was not significantly different (p = 0.8803) between PAD patients and healthy participants. CDQ-2 highlights that PAD patients have an unfavorable diet compared with healthy participants. CDQ-2 is a tool of interest to help the clinicians for dietary advice of PAD patients. • Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is due to atherosclerosis. • Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) allows diet assessment in clinical practice. • PAD patients have an unfavorable diet as compared with healthy subjects. • The simple FFQ used in this study can be useful in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]