Search

The microstructural features and mechanical properties of composites formed by spark plasma sintering (SPS) of Al + 20 vol.% Fe and Al + 20 vol.% Fe66Cr10Nb5B19 (glassy alloy) mixtures composed of micrometer-sized particles are presented. The interaction between the mixture components was studied by differential thermal analysis and through examining the microstructure of composites sintered at two different SPS pressures. When the pressure was increased from 40 MPa to 80 MPa, the thickness of the reaction products formed between the iron particles and aluminum increased due to a more intimate contact between the phases established at a higher pressure. When the metallic glass was substituted for iron, the pressure increase had an opposite effect. It was concluded that local overheating at the interface in the case of Al + 20 vol.% Fe66Cr10Nb5B19 composites governed the formation of the product layers at 40 MPa. The influence of the nature of reinforcement on the mechanical properties of the composites was analyzed, for which sintered materials with similar microstructural features were compared. In composites without the reaction products and composites with thin layers of the products, the hardness increased by 13–38% relative to the unreinforced sintered aluminum, the glassy alloy and iron inclusions producing similar outcomes. The effect of the nature of added particles on the hardness and compressive strength of composites was seen when the microstructure of the material was such that an efficient load transfer mechanism was operative. This was possible upon the formation of thick layers of reaction products. Upon compression, the strong glassy cores experienced fracture, the composite with the glassy component showing a higher strength than the composite containing core-shell structures with metallic iron cores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metallic-glass-reinforced metal matrix composites are a novel class of composite materials, in which particles of alloys with an amorphous structure play the role of reinforcement. During the fabrication of these composites, a crystalline metal is in contact with a multicomponent alloy of an amorphous structure. In the present work, the morphological features of the reaction products formed upon the interaction of Fe66Cr10Nb5B19 metallic glass particles with aluminum were studied. The composites were processed via spark plasma sintering (SPS), hot pressing or a combination of SPS and furnace annealing. The reaction products in composites with different concentrations of the metallic glass and different transformation degrees were examined. The products of the interaction of the Fe66Cr10Nb5B19 metallic glass with Al were observed as dense layers covering the residual alloy cores, needles of FeAl3 protruding from the dense shells as well as needles and platelets of FeAl3 distributed in the residual Al matrix. The possible role of the liquid phase in the structure formation of the reaction products is discussed. The formation of needle- and platelet-shaped particles presumably occurred via crystallization from the Al-Fe-based melt, which formed locally due to the occurrence of the exothermic reactions between aluminum and iron. At the same time, aluminum atoms diffused into the solid Fe-based alloy particles, forming an intermetallic layer, which could grow until the alloy was fully transformed. When aluminum melted throughout the volume of the composite during heating of the sample above 660 °C, a similar microstructure developed. In both Al–Fe66Cr10Nb5B19 and Al–Fe systems, upon the reactive transformation, pores persistently formed in locations occupied by aluminum owing to the occurrence of the Kirkendall effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When metals are modified by second-phase particles or fibers, metal matrix composites (MMCs) are formed. In general, for a given metallic matrix, reinforcements differing in their chemical nature and particle size/morphology can be suitable while providing different levels of strengthening. This article focuses on MMCs reinforced with metallic glasses and amorphous alloys, which are considered as alternatives to ceramic reinforcements. Early works on metallic glass (amorphous alloy)-reinforced MMCs were conducted in 1982–2005. In the following years, a large number of composites have been obtained and tested. Metallic glass (amorphous alloy)-reinforced MMCs have been obtained with matrices of Al and its alloys, Mg and its alloys, Ti alloys, W, Cu and its alloys, Ni, and Fe. Research has been extended to new compositions, new design approaches and fabrication methods, the chemical interaction of the metallic glass with the metal matrix, the influence of the reaction products on the properties of the composites, strengthening mechanisms, and the functional properties of the composites. These aspects are covered in the present review. Problems to be tackled in future research on metallic glass (amorphous alloy)-reinforced MMCs are also identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metal matrix composites (MMCs) are a constantly developing class of materials. Simultaneously achieving a high strength and a high ductility is a challenging task in the design of MMCs. This article aims to highlight a recent trend: the development of MMCs reinforced with particles of core–shell structure. The core–shell particles can be synthesized in situ upon a partial transformation of metal (alloy) particles introduced into a metal matrix. MMCs containing core–shell particles with cores of different compositions (metallic, intermetallic, glassy alloy, high-entropy alloy, metal-ceramic) are currently studied. For metal core–intermetallic shell particle-reinforced composites, the property gain by the core–shell approach is strengthening achieved without a loss in ductility. The propagation of cracks formed in the brittle intermetallic shell is hindered by both the metal matrix and the metal core, which constitutes a key advantage of the metal core–intermetallic shell particles over monolithic particles of intermetallic compounds for reinforcing purposes. The challenges of making a direct comparison between the core–shell particle-reinforced MMCs and MMCs of other microstructures and future research directions are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]