Search

Objective. To evaluate the concurrent validity of the short form of an interactive computerized quality of life (ICQOL-SF) measure for patients with chronic pain. Methods. The ICQOL-SF, consisting of one global and four separate domains of quality of life, was administered to 300 chronic pain patients in two pain centers. Participants also completed the full 21-item interactive computerized quality of life (ICQOL) program, a computerized version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), and a computerized assessment of pain (CAP) program. In a second study, an independent group of 336 chronic pain patients completed the ICQOL-SF, the WHOQOL-BREF, and the CAP. Results. The ICQOL-SF in both studies demonstrated adequate concurrent validity with the WHOQOL-BREF ( r = 0.75) and the CAP ( r = 0.84). The five-item ICQOL-SF was also highly correlated with the full ICQOL ( r = 0.90). Surprisingly, older individuals with more formal education and longer pain duration reported better quality of life. Number of past surgeries was negatively correlated with quality of life. Conclusions. The five-item short-form interactive computerized method to assess quality of life demonstrates adequate concurrent validity and would be a useful, brief software measure in the assessment of persons with chronic pain. Additional studies are needed to determine the reliability and sensitivity to change of the ICQOL-SF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

. Computerized software holds the potential for the novel assessment of the pain experience of patients with chronic pain not available through traditional paper-and-pencil methods. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and discriminant validity of a dynamic computer-administered program for the assessment of pain. . Three computer-administered programs were created to assess the intensity (dynamic visual analog scale DVAS]), character (dynamic verbal ratings), and location (dynamic pain drawings) of pain. The programs were administered to 115 chronic pain patients recruited from a hospital-based pain management program and 115 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals without pain. The healthy controls were instructed to respond as if they had chronic pain. . Analyses showed pain patient DVAS pain intensity ratings to be significantly higher than ratings by the healthy group. Patients selected more words in describing their pain, rated those words higher, and marked significantly more pain locations than the comparison group. However, no differences were found in the DVAS ratings of emotional impact between patients and healthy individuals. . Chronic pain patients were shown to differ from healthy individuals in their assessments of degree of pain intensity and pain location with the use of a novel computerized pain assessment program. Although further investigations are needed, these initial findings support the use of computer methods for the effective assessment of pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT objective. The purpose of this study was to describe the reliability and validity of an interac- tive computer method that assesses the quality of life of patients in chronic pain and healthy individuals. methods. A software program to assess 21 aspects of quality of life was administered to 88 pain patients on two occasions separated by an average of 30 days. Comparison data were obtained from 105 healthy individuals retested after an average of 16 days. results. For both groups, moderate test-retest correlations occurred for mean ratings based on an aggregation of data for all variables, single global ratings, and single ratings of individual variables. Patients in chronic pain scored significantly lower on all quality of life variables than did healthy individuals. High correlations were obtained between mean ratings from the present study and those from an earlier investigation using the same method. conclusions. The interactive computer method is both reliable and valid as a means to assess quality of life for patients in chronic pain as well as for healthy individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. This study presents information on the development of an interactive computer-based rating method of quality of life that assesses the multidimensional impact of chronic pain on the individual. Method. A software program assessing 20 categories of quality of life was created and administered to 103 chronic pain patients. Comparison data were obtained from 103 matched healthy controls. Results. High variability was found among pain patients in their ratings of quality of life, and pain patients rated all categories lower than controls. Three groups emerged from a cluster analysis of the data reflecting high, mixed, and low ratings of satisfaction with quality of life. Conclusions. The rating method was convenient, was easy for the patient to understand, and took very little time to administer. Further investigation of the validity and reliability of this tool is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]