Search

Objective: To assess whether conditional bedside alarm triggers can reduce the frequency of nonactionable alarms without compromising patient safety and enhance nursing and family satisfaction., Study Design: Single-center, quality improvement initiative in an acute care cardiac unit and pediatric intensive care unit. Following the 4-week preintervention baseline period, bedside monitors were programmed with hierarchical time delay and conditional alarm triggers. Bedside alarms were tallied for 4 weeks each in the immediate postintervention period and 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was alarms per monitored patient day. Nurses and families were surveyed preintervention and postintervention., Results: A total of 1509 patients contributed to 2034, 1968, and 2043 monitored patient days which were evaluated in the baseline, follow-up, and 2-year follow-up periods, respectively. The median number of alarms per monitored patient day decreased by 75% in the pediatric intensive care unit (P < .001) and 82% in the acute care cardiac unit (P < .001) with sustained effect at the 2-year follow-up. No increase of rapid response calls, emergent transfers, or code events occurred in either unit. Nursing surveys reported an improved capacity to respond to alarms and fewer perceived nonactionable alarms. Family surveys, however, did not demonstrate improved sleep quality., Conclusions: Implemented changes to bedside monitor alarms decreased total alarm frequency in both the acute care cardiac unit and pediatric intensive care unit, improving the care provider experience without compromising safety., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We utilized the multicenter Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC 3 ) 2017 and 2019 surveys to describe practice variation in therapy availability and changes over a 2-year period. A high acuity therapies (ATs) score was derived (1 point per positive response) from 44 survey questions and scores were compared to center surgical volume. Of 31 centers that completed the 2017 survey, 26 also completed the 2019 survey. Scores ranged from 11 to 34 in 2017 and 11 to 35 in 2019. AT scores in 2019 were not statistically different from 2017 scores (29/44, IQR 27-32.5 vs. 29.5/44, IQR 27-31, p = 0.9). In 2019, more centers reported initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in Acute Care Cardiology Unit (ACCU) (19/26 vs. 4/26, p < 0.001) and permitting continuous CPAP/BiPAP (22/26 vs. 14/26, p = 0.034) compared to 2017. Scores in both survey years were significantly higher in the highest surgical volume group compared to the lowest, 33 ± 1.5 versus 25 ± 8.5, p = 0.046 and 32 ± 1.7 versus 23 ± 5.5, p = 0.009, respectively. Variation in therapy within the ACCUs participating in PAC 3 presents an opportunity for shared learning across the collaborative. Experience with PAC 3 was associated with increasing available respiratory therapies from 2017 to 2019. Whether AT scores impact the quality and outcomes of pediatric acute cardiac care will be the subject of further investigation using a comprehensive registry launched in early 2019.

Objectives: To derive care targets and evaluate the impact of displaying them at the point of care on postoperative length of stay (LOS)., Study Design: A prospective cohort study using 2 years of historical controls within a freestanding, academic children's hospital. Patients undergoing benchmark cardiac surgery between May 4, 2014, and August 15, 2016 (preintervention) and September 6, 2016, to September 30, 2018 (postintervention) were included. The intervention consisted of displaying at the point of care targets for the timing of extubation, transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital discharge. Family satisfaction, reintubation, and readmission rates were tracked., Results: The postintervention cohort consisted of 219 consecutive patients. There was a reduction in variation for ICU (difference in SD -2.56, P < .01) and total LOS (difference in SD -2.84, P < .001). Patients stayed on average 0.97 fewer days (P < .001) in the ICU (median -1.01 [IQR -2.15, -0.39]), 0.7 fewer days (P < .001) on mechanical ventilation (median -0.54 [IQR -0.77, -0.50]), and 1.18 fewer days (P < .001) for the total LOS (median -2.25 [IQR -3.69, -0.15]). Log-transformed multivariable linear regression demonstrated the intervention to be associated with shorter ICU LOS (β coefficient -0.19, SE 0.059, P < .001), total postoperative LOS (β coefficient -0.12, SE 0.052, P = .02), and ventilator duration (β coefficient -0.21, SE 0.048, P < .001). Balancing metrics did not differ after the intervention., Conclusions: Target-based care is a simple, novel intervention associated with reduced variation in LOS and absolute LOS across a diverse spectrum of complex cardiac surgeries., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Collaborative quality improvement and learning networks have amended healthcare quality and value across specialities. Motivated by these successes, the Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC3) was founded in late 2014 with an emphasis on improving outcomes of paediatric cardiology patients within cardiac acute care units; acute care encompasses all hospital-based inpatient non-intensive care. PAC3 aims to deliver higher quality and greater value care by facilitating the sharing of ideas and building alignment among its member institutions. These aims are intentionally aligned with the work of other national clinical collaborations, registries, and parent advocacy organisations. The mission and early work of PAC3 is exemplified by the formal partnership with the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4), as well as the creation of a clinical registry, which links with the PC4 registry to track practices and outcomes across the entire inpatient encounter from admission to discharge. Capturing the full inpatient experience allows detection of outcome differences related to variation in care delivered outside the cardiac ICU and development of benchmarks for cardiac acute care. We aspire to improve patient outcomes such as morbidity, hospital length of stay, and re-admission rates, while working to advance patient and family satisfaction. We will use quality improvement methodologies consistent with the Model for Improvement to achieve these aims. Membership currently includes 36 centres across North America, out of which 26 are also members of PC4. In this report, we describe the development of PAC3, including the philosophical, organisational, and infrastructural elements that will enable a paediatric acute care cardiology learning network.

Background and Objectives: Recent publications have shown improved outcomes associated with resident-to-resident handoff processes. However, the implementation of similar handoff processes for patients moving between units and teams with expansive responsibilities presents unique challenges. We sought to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary standardized handoff process on efficiency, safety culture, and satisfaction., Methods: A prospective improvement initiative to standardize handoffs during patient transitions from the cardiovascular ICU to the acute care unit was implemented in a university-affiliated children's hospital., Results: Time between verbal handoff and patient transfer decreased from baseline (397 ± 167 minutes) to the postintervention period (24 ± 21 minutes) (P < .01). Percentage positive scores for the handoff/transitions domain of a national culture of safety survey improved (39.8% vs 15.2% and 38.8% vs 19.6%; P = .005 and 0.03, respectively). Provider satisfaction improved related to the information conveyed (34% to 41%; P = .03), time to transfer (5% to 34%; P < .01), and overall experience (3% to 24%; P < .01). Family satisfaction improved for several questions, including: "satisfaction with the information conveyed" (42% to 70%; P = .02), "opportunities to ask questions" (46% to 74%; P < .01), and "Acute Care team's knowledgeabout my child's issues" (50% to 73%; P = .04). No differences in rates of readmission, rapid response team calls, or mortality were observed., Conclusions: Implementation of a multidisciplinary I-PASS-supported handoff process for patients transferring from the cardiovascular ICU to the acute care unit resulted in improved transfer efficiency, safety culture scores, and satisfaction of providers and families., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)