Search

Background: Effective teamwork has proven to be crucial for providing safe care. The performance of emergencies in general and cardiac arrest situations in particular, has been criticized for primarily focusing on the individual’s technical skills and too little on the teams’ performance of non-technical skills. The aim of the study was to explore intensive care nurses’ team performance in a simulation-based emergency situation by using expert raters’ assessments and nurses’ self-assessments in relation to different intensive care specialties. Methods: The study used an explorative design based on laboratory high-fidelity simulation. Fifty-three registered nurses, who were allocated into 11 teams representing two intensive care specialties, participated in a videotaped simulation-based cardiac arrest setting. The expert raters used the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale and the first part of the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale to assess the teams’ performance. The registered nurses used the first part of the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale for their self-assessments, and the analyses used were Chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, Spearman’s rho and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Type III. Results: The expert raters assessed the teams’ performance as either advanced novice or competent, with significant differences being found between the teams from different specialties. Significant differences were found between the expert raters’ assessments and the registered nurses’ self-assessments. Conclusions: Teams of registered nurses representing specialties with coronary patients exhibit a higher competence in non-technical skills compared to team performance regarding a simulated cardiac arrest. The use of expert raters’ assessments and registered nurses’ self-assessments are useful in raising awareness of team performance with regard to patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe intensive care nurses' perceptions of simulation-based team training for building patient safety in intensive care. Background: Failures in team processes are found to be contributory factors to incidents in an intensive care environment. Simulation-based training is recommended as a method to make health-care personnel aware of the importance of team working and to improve their competencies. Design: The study uses a qualitative descriptive design. Methods: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 intensive care nurses from May to December 2009, all of which had attended a simulation-based team training programme. The interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis. Results: One main category emerged to illuminate the intensive care nurse perception: "training increases awareness of clinical practice and acknowledges the importance of structured work in teams''. Three generic categories were found: "realistic training contributes to safe care'', "reflection and openness motivates learning'' and "finding a common understanding of team performance''. Conclusions: Simulation-based team training makes intensive care nurses more prepared to care for severely ill patients. Team training creates a common understanding of how to work in teams with regard to patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate ICU staff's perceptions of photographs displayed at the bedsides of unconscious patients and whether profession, years in ICU and work status had any influence on these perceptions. Research methodology: A cross-sectional study was used comprising a questionnaire with statements and one open-ended question. All registered nurses, enrolled nurses and anaesthetists working in one ICU in Sweden were included. A total of 85 participants returned a questionnaire (response rate = 77%). Results: The findings of the study revealed that a photograph of the patient helped the ICU staff to relate to the patient as a person. Profession, years in ICU and work status had influence on the ICU staff's perceptions. From the content analysis two categories emerged: "getting closer and see the person" and "a landmark bringing hope". Conclusion: The ICU staff need to consider how close to the patient they want to be and why the patient's recovery is worth striving for. Keeping a professional approach is one of the challenges of working in ICU. A photograph can be an inexpensive and easy way of preventing the loss of identity of the patient as an individual within the technocratic environments of the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The aims of this descriptive study were to examine (1) nurses’ perceptions of responsibility, knowledge and documentation focusing on enteral nutrition and (2) nursing practice regarding enteral feeding in the intensive care unit. Forty-four nurses in three intensive care units responded to a questionnaire (response rate 70%) and 40 bedside observations were performed. The nurses’ primary source of knowledge was consultation with colleagues. Regarding responsibility, knowledge and documentation, the focus was more on planning, implementation and prevention than on the assessing phase of the nursing process. Gastric residual volumes were almost never checked, and none of the tubes were labelled. Seven out of 40 bedside observations revealed a backrest elevation of 30° or more. Mean backrest elevation was 20.7°. Comparisons between nurses in the three hospitals revealed significant differences. This study indicates that enteral nutritional nursing care within intensive care has its strength in planning, implementation and prevention of complications. Regarding nutritional assessment, the registered nurses (RNs) scored low. There are gaps between recommended nursing care and nursing practice regarding enteral nutrition. Knowledge and awareness of responsibilities in combination with a systematic documentation could increase the optimal nutritional care of the intensive care patient. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]