Search

Unlike type 1 diabetic patients, who have no significant insulin secretion and require insulin therapy from the disease onset, a prominent feature in the early stages of type 2 diabetes is insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia. Therefore, improving insulin sensitivity by diet, exercise, and weight management will benefit type 2 diabetic patients. When these measures fail, glycemic goals may be achieved with oral agents. However, at the late stage of disease,most patients require exogenous insulin therapy to achieve optimal glucose control. The American Diabetes Association recommends that the objective of normalizing glycemia and glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations for patients with type 2 diabetes should be similar to that for type 1 diabetes.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects treated with olanzapine or risperidone. Subjects were randomly assigned to single-blind therapy with olanzapine (10 mg/d), risperidone (4 mg/d), or placebo for approximately 3 wk. Insulin sensitivity was assessed pre- and posttreatment using a 2-step, hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp. Glucose and insulin responses were also assessed by a mixed meal tolerance test. Of the 64 subjects randomized, 22, 14, and 19 in the olanzapine, risperidone, and placebo groups, respectively, completed the study procedures. There were no significant within-group changes in the glucose disposal rate or the insulin sensitivity index for the active therapy groups. Further, the results of the mixed meal tolerance test did not demonstrate clinically significant changes in integrated glucose metabolism during treatment with these medications. In summary, this study did not demonstrate significant changes in insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects after 3 wk of treatment with olanzapine or risperidone.

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of inhaled insulin delivered by the AERx iDMS in young and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Twenty-seven young (18-45 years, inclusive) and 28 elderly (>/= 65 years) type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. A single inhalation of 1.57 mg (45 IU, effect comparable to 6 s.c. units) of regular human insulin was administered to each patient on each of 2 dosing days, and blood samples were drawn up to 360 minutes postdosing to generate the PK/PD curves. AUC(0-360 min) and Cmax values of inhaled insulin were comparable between young and elderly subjects (p = 0.476 for AUC(0-360 min) and p = 0.414 for Cmax). However, the elderly group had significantly less glucose reduction, as indicated by plasma glucose AOC(0-360) (area over the curve) values (p = 0.011). The intrasubject variability of inhaled insulin using the AERx iDMS was similar for young and elderly subjects and was similar to what has previously been reported for soluble insulin administered subcutaneously. Inhaled insulin was well tolerated in these patients, and no changes in pulmonary function tests were observed. A single inhalation of insulin using the AERx iDMS demonstrated comparable insulin PK profiles between the elderly and young type 2 patients but less glucose reduction in the elderly. Based on these results, elderly diabetic patients may need to inhale more insulin than young patients to achieve similar glycemic control. Long-term clinical trials using the AERx device will be useful to study age-related differences.

Objective: To compare the dose-response relationship following inhalation of regular insulin delivered via the Aerodose insulin inhaler with that following subcutaneously injected regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes., Research Design and Methods: Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes (21 nonsmoking men, aged 36-80 years) each received two of three doses of 80, 160, or 240 units inhaled regular insulin, delivered via a clinical Aerodose insulin inhaler, and two of three corresponding doses of 8, 16, or 24 units by subcutaneous injection under isoglycemic clamp conditions on 4 separate study days in an incomplete block design study. Glucose infusion rates (GIRs) and serum insulin concentrations were monitored over the following 8 h., Results: Inhaled insulin exhibited significantly shorter time-to-peak insulin levels (T(max) 77 +/- 66 vs. 193 +/- 104 min, P < 0.001) and time-to-peak metabolic effects (T(GIRmax) 240 +/- 94 vs. 353 +/- 60 min, P < 0.001) compared with subcutaneously injected insulin. Comparison of total insulin absorption (insulin area under the curve [AUC]) versus total metabolic effect (GIR-AUC) from 0 to 8 h (group means) revealed overlapping dose-response relationships for both inhaled and subcutaneous injection treatments. Comparison of slopes revealed no significant differences between the inhaled and subcutaneous injection treatment groups (P = 0.6). No significant differences in either relative bioavailability or relative biopotency were found among doses, indicating a consistent subcutaneous injection-to-inhaled dosing conversion ratio among doses. No serious adverse events or clinically relevant changes in lung function were observed., Conclusions: The overlapping dose-response curves of inhaled and subcutaneous treatments together with a consistent relative bioavailability and relative biopotency for inhaled insulin across doses suggest that the Aerodose insulin inhaler will deliver a pharmacologically predictable insulin dose to patients with diabetes similar to that observed following subcutaneous injection.