1. Observed Discrepancies in Donors’ Information Sharing and Oocyte-Embryo Management and Disposition Reported to Reproductive Health Professionals: A Call for Programmatic Improvement
- Author
-
Linda S. Ross, Ami S. Jaeger, and Steven R. Lindheim
- Subjects
Gynecology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Assisted reproductive technology ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,media_common.quotation_subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Information sharing ,Disposition ,Embryo Disposition ,Discretion ,Oocyte ,humanities ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Informed consent ,Family medicine ,Medicine ,business ,media_common ,Reproductive health - Abstract
Background: Information-sharing practices, disposition of oocytes, and embryo management are at the discretion of the individual assisted reproductive technology (ART) program, donors, and recipients. Ideally, these practices and policies should reflect the information and decision-making needs of the people involved. The ART program that was the focus of this study has incorporated pre- and postdonation discussion of oocyte and embryo disposition into the screening and follow-up processes to improve overall satisfaction. To improve programmatic policy, we assessed how these discussions and the informed consent process were reflected in oocyte donors’ legal contracts. Methods: This retrospective chart review (n = 55) was designed to identify and assess discrepancies between donors’ consented preferences and their executed legal agreements with oocyte recipients. Results: Sixty-three percent of donors had legal contracts that were inconsistent with their medical informed consent. Of this group, 58% agreed ...
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF