Search

Observational studies of oseltamivir use and influenza complications could suffer from residual confounding. Using negative control risk periods and a negative control outcome, we examined confounding control in a health-insurance-claims–based study of oseltamivir and influenza complications (pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, and dispensing of an antibiotic). Within the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel System, we identified individuals aged ≥18 years who initiated oseltamivir use on the influenza diagnosis date versus those who did not, during 3 influenza seasons (2014–2017). We evaluated primary outcomes within the following 1–30 days (the primary risk period) and 61–90 days (the negative control period) and nonvertebral fractures (the negative control outcome) within days 1–30. We estimated propensity-score–matched risk ratios (RRs) per season. During the 2014–2015 influenza season, oseltamivir use was associated with a reduction in the risk of pneumonia (RR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70, 0.75) and all-cause hospitalization (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.55) in days 1–30. During days 61–90, estimates were near-null for pneumonia (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.15) and hospitalization (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.98) but slightly increased for antibiotic dispensing (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.21). The RR for fractures was near-null (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.20). Estimates for the 2016–2017 influenza season were comparable, while the 2015–2016 season had conflicting results. Our study suggests minimal residual confounding for specific outcomes, but results differed by season. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We assessed the ability to identify key data relevant to influenza and other respiratory virus surveillance in a large‐scale US‐based hospital electronic medical record (EMR) dataset using seasonal influenza as a use case. We describe characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized influenza cases across three seasons. Methods: We identified patients with an influenza diagnosis between March 2017 and March 2020 in 140 US hospitals as part of the US FDA's Sentinel System. We calculated descriptive statistics on the presence of high‐risk conditions, influenza antiviral administrations, and severity endpoints. Results: Among 5.1 million hospitalizations, we identified 29,520 hospitalizations with an influenza diagnosis; 64% were treated with an influenza antiviral within 2 days of admission, and 25% were treated >2 days after admission. Patients treated >2 days after admission had more comorbidities than patients treated within 2 days of admission. Patients never treated during hospitalization had more documentation of cardiovascular and other diseases than treated patients. We observed more severe endpoints in patients never treated (death = 3%, mechanical ventilation [MV] = 9%, intensive care unit [ICU] = 26%) or patients treated >2 days after admission (death = 2%, MV = 14%, ICU = 32%) than in patients treated earlier (treated on admission: death = 1%, MV = 5%, ICU = 23%, treated within 2 days of admission: death = 1%, MV = 7%, ICU = 27%). Conclusions: We identified important trends in influenza severity related to treatment timing in a large inpatient dataset, laying the groundwork for the use of this and other inpatient EMR data for influenza and other respiratory virus surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

However, as shown in Table 1 of our article, the differences among the 2 COVID-19 cohorts and the influenza cohort were not large for the baseline variables. COVID-19 vs Influenza for Risk of Thrombotic Events in Hospitalized Patients - Reply We agree that there were differences in our study[1] in observed baseline characteristics between the cohorts of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and influenza. [Extracted from the article]