Search

Background and Aims: Real-world assessments of efficacy and safety of advanced therapies used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are limited. We aimed to report safety, efficacy and treatment persistence of new molecules (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab) in a retrospective multicentric national Romanian analysis., Methods: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective observational multicentric study. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic and paper files. Patients who started on one of the five investigated molecules during December 2019-December 2021 were included. The main outcome measures were clinical remission, endoscopic healing, persistence on treatment and safety data., Results: A total of 678 adult patients from 24 Romanian IBD centers with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease were included. Participants had previously failure to one (268, 39.5%), two (108, 15%) or more treatment lines and only 38% (259) were biologic naïve. In the 24 months study period, most patients were started on vedolizumab (192, 28%), followed by adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib. In biologic-naïve patients, most physicians (72%) preferred anti-TNF treatment as first line biologic (93 patients started on infliximab, 92 on adalimumab), followed by vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib. During follow-up, 71% (470, p=0.05) of patients achieved clinical remission and 36% (134, p=0.03) achieved mucosal healing. The 6 months milestone for persistence was reached in 78% (530) of cases. Almost half of patients (47%, 316 patients) persisted on their current treatment for over 12 months. Overall, an adverse reaction was reported for 67 (10.4%) patients, with no lethal events., Conclusions: Population of biologic-experienced IBD patients in Romania is increasing and is becoming more difficult to achieve long-term disease control. Discontinuation rates for advanced therapies are high.

Background and Objectives : Anemia is the most frequent complication of inflammatory bowel diseases. Clinically, anemia can affect important quality-of-life (QoL) components, such as exercise capacity, cognitive function, and the ability to carry out social activities. The disease activity has a significant impact on QoL, mainly due to clinical manifestations, which are more severe during the periods of disease activity. Our aim was to estimate the impact of anemia on QoL in patients with Crohn's disease. Material and Methods . We made a prospective study on 134 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a Romanian tertiary center. The CD diagnosis was established by colonoscopy and histopathological examination. In particular cases, additional examinations were required (small bowel capsule endoscopy, computed tomography enterography, and magnetic resonance enterography). Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization's definition, the activity of the disease was assessed by Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score, and the QoL was evaluated by Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire 32 (IBDQ 32). Results : 44.8% patient had anemia, statistically related to the activity of the disease and corticoids use. We found a strong association between QoL and disease activity on all four sub-scores: patients with more severe activity had a significantly lower IBDQ (260.38 ± 116.96 vs. 163.85 ± 87.20, p = 0.001) and the presence of anemia (127.03 vs. 148.38, p = 0.001). In multiple regression analyses, both disease activity and anemia had an impact on the QoL. Conclusions : Anemia has high prevalence in the CD in northeastern region of Romania. Anemia was more common in female patients, in patients undergoing corticosteroid treatment, and in those with active disease. Both anemia and disease activity had a strong negative and independent impact on QoL.

Background and Aims: Both inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can be considered chronic immune disorders sharing common etiopathogenetic mechanisms. Changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, which can lead to an abnormal mucosal response, could be the missing link between these two diseases. Our study evaluate the composition of intestinal microbiota and to characterize gut dysbiosis in patients with IBD and AS., Methods: We conducted a prospective case-control study that enrolled 124 patients [20 Crohn's disease (CD), 27 ulcerative colitis (UC), 28 AS, 17 IBD + AS and 32 controls). Intestinal microbiota analysis was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction in stool samples., Results: The total quantity of bacteria was decreased in all investigated groups compared to the control group. In studied groups, we noticed an increased percentage of Bacteroides and Escherichia coli (E.coli) and a decreased percentage of Clostridium coccoides, Clostridium leptum, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii compared to the control group. The percentages of Bifidobacterium (p=0.010) as well as Lactobacillus group (p=0.023) were higher in the L3 form of CD patients. In the E2 form of UC, the quantity of Bacteroides was much higher compared to the E3 form (p=0.004). In AS patients, significant correlations were observed only for the Bifidobacterium species, significantly increased in the axial form compared to peripheral disease (p=0.035). Statistically significant correlations were demonstrated between the Crohn Disease Activity Index score and the total bacterial group (p=0.023, r=-0.507), respectively Bacteroides (p=0.021, r=-0.511) and between the Mayo score and Lactobacillus (p=0.001), respectively E. coli (p=0.001). In IBD + AS group, the Crohn Disease Activity Index score was inversely correlated with the total bacterial group (p=0.010) and directly correlated with Lactobacillus (p=0.047)., Conclusions: Intestinal dysbiosis is associated with both IBD and AS. In the association of IBD with AS, dysbiosis is intermediate, but it is associated with the more severe articular disease. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (commonly used as probiotics!) were found to be increased in the association between active IBD and active AS. Further studies are needed to understand how dysbiosis regulates the gut immune system and contributes to intestinal and articular inflammation.

Patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often develop one or more extraintestinal manifestations (EIM). We performed a prospective study that included 517 patients with IBD (Crohn's disease - CD, ulcerative colitis - UC or undifferentiated colitis - CN) diagnosed between 1975 and 2016 in the Northeastern region of Romania. The patients were extracted from the national database (IBD Prospect). UC cases predominated compared to CD cases (n=368 vs. n=135). Only 10 patients were diagnosed with CN. In the study group, 51 cases with IBD and EIM were identified, having a prevalence of 9.9%. Musculoskeletal manifestations were the most common EIM. Peripheral involvement - arthritis (n=26, 68.42%) predominated, followed by axial damage - sacroiliitis/ankylosing spondylitis (SI∕AS) (n=12, 31.58%) (p=0.001). Patients with CD had a 3.48-fold greater risk of developing joint manifestations [p<0.001, odds ratio (OR)=3.478, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.779-6.801]. In both CD and UC patients, arthritis cases were the most frequent observed (68.42% vs. 31.58%). Patients with CD had a 5-fold higher risk of developing arthritis (p<0.001, OR=5.009, 95% CI 2.21-11.34). Neither CD, nor UC patients, had a confirmed risk of developing SI∕AS (p=0.468, OR=1.565, 95% CI 0.463-5.293 for CD) (p=0.586, OR=0.714, 95% CI 0.211-2.413 for UC). Cases of arthritis and CD (n=16) mainly correlated with the colonic localization of inflammation (n=7, p=0.723) followed by ileo-colonic form of CD (n=7, p=0.321). Patients with arthritis and UC (n=10) initially correlated with pancolitis (n=5, p=0.072, OR=3.023, 95% CI 0.855-10.69) then with proctitis (n=3, p=0.392) and left-sided colitis (n=2, p=0.024, OR=0.196, 95% CI 0.041-0.938).

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by periods of exacerbation and remission, making disease monitoring and management challenging. Endoscopy, the gold standard for assessing disease activity and severity, involves invasive procedures and is associated with patient discomfort and risks. Using machine learning (ML) to combine fecal calprotectin with other clinical or biological tests can significantly enhance the non-invasive prediction of endoscopic disease activity (EDA) in UC. Aim: To prove that by fusing fecal calprotectin with other clinical data into an ML model, the performance of the non-invasive prediction of EDA can be significantly improved. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational, single-center study encompassing 103 patients diagnosed with UC. We employed multilayer perceptron models as the core ML algorithm for predicting EDA. For the constructed models, we utilized the varImp function from the caret library in R to assess the significance of each variable in predicting the outcome. Results: Calprotectin as a sole predictor obtained an accuracy of 70% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. Combining calprotectin with the list of selected predictors that were fed to the MLP models improved accuracy and the AUC. The accuracy of the algorithm on the test set was 85%. Similarly, the AUC increased to 0.93. This is the first study to propose the use of calprotectin as a predictor in an ML model to estimate UC endoscopic disease activity. Conclusion: The deployment of this ML model can furnish doctors and patients with valuable evaluation of endoscopic disease activity which can be highly beneficial for individuals with UC who need long-term treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A suitable, non-invasive biomarker for assessing endoscopic disease activity (EDA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) has yet to be identified. Our study aimed to develop a cost-effective and non-invasive machine learning (ML) method that utilizes the cost-free Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score and low-cost biological predictors to estimate EDA. Four random forest (RF) and four multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifiers were proposed. The results show that the inclusion of IBDQ in the list of predictors that were fed to the models improved accuracy and the AUC for both the RF and the MLP algorithms. Moreover, the RF technique performed noticeably better than the MLP method on unseen data (the independent patient cohort). This is the first study to propose the use of IBDQ as a predictor in an ML model to estimate UC EDA. The deployment of this ML model can furnish doctors and patients with valuable insights into EDA, a highly beneficial resource for individuals with UC who need long-term treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19 disease is yielding a global outbreak with severe threats to public health. In this paper, we aimed at reviewing the current knowledge about COVID-19 infectious risk status in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients requiring immunosuppressive medication. We also focused on several molecular insights that could explain why IBD patients appear not to have higher risks of infection and worse outcomes in COVID-19 than the general population in an attempt to provide scientific support for safer decisions in IBD patient care. Methods. PubMed electronic database was interrogated for relevant articles involving data about common molecular pathways and shared treatment strategies between SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Besides, Neural Covidex, an artificial intelligence tool, was used to answer queries about pathogenic coronaviruses and possible IBD interactions using the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19). Discussions. Few molecular and therapeutic interactions between IBD and pathogenic coronaviruses were explored. First, we showed how the activity of soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, CD209L other receptors, and phosphorylated α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 might exert protective impact in IBD in case of coronavirus infection. Second, IBD medication was discussed in the context of possible beneficial effects on COVID-19 pathogeny, including "cytokine storm" prevention and treatment, immunomodulation, interferon signaling blocking, and viral endocytosis inhibition. Conclusions. Using the current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 as well as other pathogenic coronaviruses immunopathology, we showed why IBD patients should not be considered at an increased risk of infection or more severe outcomes. Whether our findings are entirely applicable to the pathogenesis, disease susceptibility, and treatment management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in IBD must be further explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to assess the impact of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) on the patients' quality of life (QoL) and to identify the significant changes in QoL depending on the developmental particularities of IBD and the epidemiological parameters. A prospective study was conducted over a period of 36 months (October 2011-October 2014) at the Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iai. The study was conducted on 254 patients diagnosed with IBD, 187 patients with UC and 67 patients with CD. The quality of life was assessed using the questionnaire IBDQ-32 (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire), which is one of the most widely used questionnaires in QoL assessment. The total IBDQ score was slightly more reduced in the patients with UC compared to the patients with CD. Of the 4 subscales of the IBDQ score, the scores highlighting the emotional and social component were significantly more reduced in the patients with UC, while the scores for the bowel symptoms were significantly more reduced in the patients with CD. In both the patients with UC and with CD, the correlations between the UCDAI, respectively CDAI score and the IBDQ score were indirect, highlighting reduced values of IBDQ in patients with a severe activity of the disease. The severe flare of the disease had a negative impact on the patients' QoL. The present study confirms the fact that the activity of the disease is the factor likely to have the highest impact on QoL in IBD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Identifying the risk factors for extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) may optimize the therapeutic decision. We aimed to assess the prevalence of EIMs in IBD patients in Romania and to determine the risk factors. Methods: We analyzed 2,626 patients registered in the Romanian IBD Prospect National Registry. We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study to assess the point prevalence of EIMs, calculating global prevalence and analyzing the different types of EIMs and their respective frequencies were carried out. Demographic and clinical risk factors were researched as possible predictors for EIMs development, based on the results of the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The overall point prevalence of EIMs was 16.3%. A significantly higher frequency of EIMs in Crohn's disease (CD) was noted in comparison to ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD unclassified (IBDU) (23.2% vs 11.3% and 16.3%, respectively, p<0.001). The most frequent type of EIM was peripheral arthropathy (8.3%), significantly associated with CD (p<0.001). Univariate analysis highlighted the significant independent common predictive risk factors for EIMs, in both CD and UC patients: female gender, patient's urban area of origin, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and high level of C-reactive protein (CRP), while significant independent IBD phenotype-related risk factors were ileocolonic location and concomitant involvement of upper gastrointestinal tract for CD, non-smoker status and both moderate and severe disease activity for UC (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis determined that female CD patients with moderate or severe disease activity, with other than isolated ileal disease, and female UC patients with moderate or severe extensive colitis are the most likely to develop EIMs. Conclusions: IBD patients are experiencing EIMs in a large proportion, with higher rates for CD. As EIMs negatively affect patient outcomes, foreseeing the risk by identifying independent and associated predictive factors could be a first step to optimal work-up and treatment [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is the most popular and well-studied non-invasive biomarker in diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and it is routinely tested and widely used in clinical practice. Aim. to evaluate the usefulness of FC in predicting clinical relapse in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF agents, during one year of follow-up. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study including 50 IBD patients treated with anti-TNF agents (Infliximab, Adalimumab), in clinical remission (defined according to clinical Mayo and CDAI score) for at least 6 months, evaluated in a tertiary center between April 2021 through April 2022. For each patient, demographic and clinical parameters, data on the extent of the disease, type of treatment and FC value were collected. The patients included in the study were reevaluated 1 year later after the initial evaluation, regarding clinical remission/relapse. Results. There were 29 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (58 %) and 21 with Crohn's disease (CD) (42 %)), with a mean age of 42 years (21-63 years). 28 patients (18 with UC and 10 with CD) were treated with Infliximab and 22 (11 UC, 11 CD) with Adalimumab. Out of 50 IBD patients, 28 (56%) had FC <50 μg/g, 15 (30%) had FC between 50 - 150 μg/g and 7 (14%) had FC ≥ 150 μg/g. After 12 months, we observed persistent clinical remission rates of 82.75% (24) for UC and 71.42% (15) for CD. Clinical relapse was present in no patient with FC <50 μg/g, in 47% of patients with FC between 50 - 150 μg/g, and in 71.42% of the patients with FC ≥ 150 μg/g. All UC who relapsed had initial FC value more than 150 μg/g. There were no differences in clinical relapse in patients treated with Infliximab vs Adalimumab. Conclusion. FC more than 150 μg/g is a good noninvasive marker for 1 year clinical relapse in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. The predictive role is more obvious for patients with UC compared to CD, regardless of the type of anti-TNF used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]