Search

Introduction: A link between the human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVv) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested., Objective: We aimed to estimate the risk of IBD following HPVv compared with periods not exposed to the vaccines., Methods: Primary healthcare records (Spanish Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research [BIFAP]) were used in a cohort study of girls in Spain aged 9-18 years between 2007 and 2016 free of IBD or HPVv at study entrance. During the follow-up to IBD diagnosis, time-varying HPVv exposure and confounders were assessed in Cox models to estimate the hazard ratio (HRs) of IBD in the 2 years after HPVv (exposed period) and thereafter (post-exposed) compared with the no exposure periods. In a post hoc analysis, we moved the IBD date back 30 days as a theoretical delay in diagnosis confirmation., Results: The cohort comprised 388,669 girls; 154,174 of these received the HPVv, and 88 IBD cases occurred (55 non-exposed, 22 exposed [after first N = 6, second N = 2, or third N = 14 dose] and 11 in post-exposed periods). The adjusted HR was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-4.05) for exposed and 1.10 (95% CI 0.37-3.24) for post-exposed periods. The HR for the first dose was 3.94 (95% CI 1.19-13.02). No association was found for the second or third doses. Post hoc, the HR was 1.83 (95% CI 0.72-4.69) for exposed periods (N = 18), and 1.84 (95% CI 0.35-9.83; N = 2), 1.50 (95% CI 0.40-5.63; N = 4) and 1.98 (95% CI 0.71-5.49; N = 12) after the first, second and third doses, respectively., Conclusions: This study did not show an increased risk of IBD following 2 years of HPVv exposure. However, an increased risk of IBD diagnosis was observed following the first vaccination dose (1-34 days), which is likely attributable to the clinical recommendation to vaccinate upon onset of IBD symptoms.

Purpose: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recording validation among girls in the Spanish Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP)., Methods: In this observational study, girls aged 9 to 18 years registered in BIFAP between 2002 and 2016, were followed up until there was a recorded IBD diagnosis or a referral to specialist indicating IBD. Anonymized profiles were reviewed to retrieve diagnosis confirmation (a positive colonoscopy or biopsy, specialist, or physician's comments mentioning the IBD diagnosis) or discarding (negative procedure results, alternative diagnosis, or family history). "possible" IBD were profiles missing that evidence, or had suspected IBD. The prescriptions of intestinal anti-inflammatory agents, azatioprine, and mercaptopurine were collected. The prevalence of IBD was estimated after review., Results: Out of 480 634 girls, 323 had a first ever recorded IBD, of which, 37.8% (N = 122) were "confirmed" incident IBD diagnosis, 19.8% (N = 64) discarded and 38.7% (N = 125) "possible" IBD. Additionally, 12 IBD records (3.7%) referred to prevalent IBD. Prescriptions were recorded in 94.3% (confirmed), 63.2% (possible), 83.3% (prevalent), and 3.1% (discarded) IBD cases. Prevalence was 52.83 "confirmed" or 93.58/10 5 girls when "possible" IBD were added., Conclusions: For a third of the girls, the first recorded IBD included evidence confirming the diagnosis while most of those with missing evidence had treatment indicated for IBD. For research focused in sensitivity, an algorithm including "possible" plus "confirmed" episodes is recommended, whereas only "confirmed" to guarantee higher predictive value. Prevalence suggests that IBD is not a rare disease among girls., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)