1. Diagnostic efficacy of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Fluorescence based Microscope for the diagnosis of Tuberculous lymphadenitis
- Author
-
Selfu Girma, Biniyam Dagne, Abay Atnafu, Leila Birhanu, Yordanos Mengistu, Kassu Desta, Shambel Araya, Tsegaye Hailu, Abraham Aseffa, Adane Mihret, Kidist Bobosha, Gebeyehu Assefa, Shiferaw Bekele, Nigatu Endalafer, Getu Diriba, and Adugna Abera
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,Bacterial Diseases ,Microscope ,Tuberculosis, Lymph Node ,law.invention ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medical Conditions ,Fluorescence Microscopy ,Electronics Engineering ,law ,Positive predicative value ,Cytology ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Medicine ,Staining ,Microscopy ,Multidisciplinary ,Auramine O ,Light Emitting Diodes ,Light Microscopy ,Middle Aged ,Tuberculous lymphadenitis ,Actinobacteria ,Infectious Diseases ,Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Management ,Engineering and Technology ,Anatomy ,Research Article ,Adult ,Science ,030106 microbiology ,030231 tropical medicine ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Fluorescence ,Lymphatic System ,03 medical and health sciences ,Diagnostic Medicine ,Humans ,Tuberculosis ,Bacteria ,business.industry ,Sputum ,Organisms ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Gold standard (test) ,Cell Biology ,medicine.disease ,Tropical Diseases ,Diodes ,Confidence interval ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,chemistry ,Specimen Preparation and Treatment ,Lymph Nodes ,Electronics ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Mycobacterium Tuberculosis - Abstract
Background The comparatively straightforward and cheaper light-emitting diode fluorescent microscope (LEDFM) was suggested by WHO to replace conventional microscope in tuberculosis (TB) laboratories. However, the comparable efficacy of each of those techniques differs from laboratory to laboratory. We investigated the efficacy of LEDFM for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN) patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 211 samples from clinically suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis patients. Three smears were prepared from FNA on microscope slides for cytomorphology study, Auramine O (AO), and for Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining. The left-over samples were inoculated onto Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) media. Statistical analysis was done using STATA version 11. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated by considering the culture results as the gold standard using a 95% confidence interval. Results Among 211 samples 49.7% (105) were positive by cytomorphology, 32.7% (69) by LEDFM, 23.69% (50) by LJ culture, and 13.7% (29) by ZN. Compared to the gold standard sensitivity of ZN, LEDFM, and cytomorphology were 30% [95% CI: 17.9–44.6], 66% [95% CI: 51.2–78.8] 78% [95% CI: 64–88.5], respectively. The specificity of ZN, LEDFM, and cytomorphology was 91.3% [95% CI: 85.8–95.2], 77.6% [95% CI: 70.4–83.8], 58.8% [95% CI: 50.7–66.5], respectively. Conclusion LED fluorescence microscopy gives a legitimate option in contrast to conventional ZN techniques in terms of its higher sensitivity, a bit lower specificity, time-saving, and minimal effort.
- Published
- 2020