Search

Aminoglycosides are recommended for the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infections, especially in severe and bacteremic infection. However, the optimal aminoglycoside or the optimal dosage remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the activity of four aminoglycosides against E. faecalis (gentamicin, netilmicin, tobramycin, and amikacin) and two dosages of gentamicin. One clinical strain of E. faecalis was used to induce aortic endocarditis in the study rabbits. Each aminoglycoside was infused daily over 3 days with a computer-regulated flow simulating human pharmacokinetics of 15 mg/kg/day for amikacin, 6 mg/kg/day for netilmicin, and 3 mg/kg/day for gentamicin and tobramycin. Additionally, two dosages of gentamicin (simulating 3 or 6 mg/kg/day) were compared over 1 or 3 days of treatment. The in vivo efficacy was assessed according to the bacterial count in vegetations, in comparison with a control group. Of the four aminoglycosides tested, only gentamicin and netilmicin showed significant antibacterial efficacy after 3 days of treatment. After only 1 day of treatment, the high dosage of gentamicin (6 mg/kg/day) was more effective than the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day). Among the tested aminoglycosides, gentamicin showed the best efficacy, with the best results after 24 h of treatment for the highest dosage.

Ceftazidime and amikacin were administered in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model using computer-controlled intravenous (iv) infusion pumps to simulate human serum concentrations for the following regimens: continuous (constant rate) infusion of 4, 6 or 8 g of ceftazidime over 24 h or intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 h either alone or in combination with amikacin (15 mg/kg once daily). The in vivo activities of these regimens were tested on four Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Animals were killed 24 h after the beginning of treatment. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the effects of the different groups on bacterial counts in vegetations for each strain tested. For a susceptible reference strain (ATCC 27853; MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 4 g alone or with amikacin was as effective as intermittent dosing with amikacin. For a clinical isolate producing an oxacillinase (MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 32 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 6 g was equivalent to intermittent dosing. For a clinical isolate producing a TEM-2 penicillinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 4 mg/L), continuous infusion of 6 g, but not intermittent dosing, had a significant in vivo effect. For a clinical isolate producing an inducible, chromosomally encoded cephalosporinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 4 mg/L, respectively), neither continuous infusion nor intermittent dosing proved effective. Determination of ceftazidime concentrations in vegetations showed that continuous infusion produced tissue concentrations at the infection site far greater than the MIC throughout the treatment. It is concluded that continuous infusion of the same total daily dose provides significant activity as compared with fractionated infusion. This study confirms that a concentration of 4-5 x MIC is a reasonable therapeutic target in most clinical settings of severe P. aeruginosa infection.

Indifference or even antagonism has mainly been reported with combinations including linezolid. The presence of in vitro antagonism is not always correlated with in vivo failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo activity of linezolid combined with gentamicin using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis experimental model. A human-like pharmacokinetic simulation was used for linezolid and gentamicin to improve the extrapolation of the results to human therapy. Contrary to the antagonism previously described in vitro, linezolid combined with gentamicin exhibited bactericidal activity on the two strains with a decrease of at least 4log 10 cfu/g of vegetation compared with controls. These data suggest that linezolid plus gentamicin could be an appropriate combination for the treatment of severe MRSA infections.

Significant differences between animal and human pharmacokinetics may be responsible for the conflicting results of experimental studies. This study determined the impact of human pharmacokinetic simulation (HPS) on gentamicin activity in an Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis model. The decrease in bacterial counts was greater with HPS than with a dose-equivalent regimen without HPS.