Search

Hand hygiene (HH) is the single most important procedure health care workers (HCWs) can follow to reduce the risk of spreading health care-associated infections, yet compliance with this simple task remains at less than 50%. One of the reasons often cited for noncompliance is irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) resulting from repeated exposure to HH products and procedure. This literature review used the World Health Organization's components of empowerment as a guideline for the search and development of a clinical model to address HCW HH and ICD.

A survey of 1,000 US consumers quantified their knowledge of health care worker hand hygiene compliance, their information sources on hand hygiene rates, and their past behavior of asking health care workers to perform hand hygiene. Sixty-nine percent of respondents believed compliance is above 50%; 17% of respondents had asked a health care worker to perform hand hygiene. Our findings suggest that an organized plan of disclosure about hand hygiene rates may be a way to empower through knowledge., (Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interventional patient hygiene (IPH) has been defined as a comprehensive evidence-based intervention and measurement model for reducing the bioburden of both the patient and health care worker. The components of IPH are hand hygiene, oral care, skin care/antisepsis, and catheter site care. This practice form will provide evidence-based information for each of the components of IPH model and provide a strategy for the development, implementation, and monitoring of IPH protocols.

Background: Transmission of microorganisms from the hands of health care workers is the main cause of health care-acquired infections. Recent studies on bacterial contamination of hands by medical care specialty found the highest bacterial contamination on the hands of health care workers from rehabilitation units. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of a patient education model on hand hygiene (HH) compliance in a rehabilitation unit., Methods: A 6-week pre- and post-intervention study with a 3-month follow-up using a patient education model was conducted in a 24-bed inpatient rehabilitation unit located in an acute care hospital. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the intervention phase of the study after agreeing to ask all health care workers who had direct contact with them, "Did you wash/sanitize your hands?" Compliance with the program was measured through soap/sanitizer usage per resident-day before, during, and after the intervention., Results: Usage increased from 5 HH per resident-day during the preintervention to 9.7 HH per resident-day during the intervention (P <.001), 6.7 HH per resident-day postintervention (6 weeks) (P <.001), and 7.0 HH per resident-day at 3 months (P <.001)., Conclusions: Patient education increased HH compliance in an inpatient rehabilitation unit by 94% during the 6-week intervention, 34% during the 6 week post intervention, and 40% at 3-month follow-up. This program empowers patients with responsibility for their own care and provides ongoing HH education.

Purpose: To improve clinical practice and the quality of patient care by providing a learning opportunity that enhances the participant's understanding of how wound microbiology affects healing., Target Audience: This CME/CE activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in interpreting the role of microorganisms in wound healing., Objectives: At the conclusion of this course, participants should be able to: 1. Identify the microbiology of acute and chronic wounds, risk factors for infection, and advantages and disadvantages of wound culturing. 2. Identify methods of debridement and wounds for which they are appropriate. 3. Identify systemic antibiotic treatment options for acute and chronic wound infections.

Each year, about 5% of people admitted to U.S. hospitals (about 2 million people) acquire an infection there. These infections cause nearly 20,000 deaths each year, and cost an estimated $4.5 billion to treat. Handwashing is the single most effective measure for preventing hospital-acquired infections. Despite widespread knowledge of the importance of handwashing, health care workers wash their hands far less often than is indicated. This Issue Brief describes a novel strategy to improve handwashing among hospital personnel, by involving the people with the most to gain--the patients themselves.

Partners in Your Care, a patient education behavioral model for increasing handwashing compliance and empowering the patient with responsibility for their care was evaluated in an acute care hospital in Oxford, UK. A controlled prospective intervention study comparing medical and surgical patients was performed. Ninety-eight patients were eligible for the study. Thirty-nine patients (40%) agreed to participate in the programme Partners in Your Care by asking all healthcare workers who were going to have direct contact with them "Did you wash your hands?" Compliance with the programme was measured through soap/alcohol usage and handwashings per bed day before and after its introduction. Partners in Your Care increased handwashing on average 50%. Healthcare workers washed hands more often with surgical patients than with medical (P< 0.05). Alcohol gel was used on less than 1% of occasions. Sixty-two percent of patients in study felt at ease when asking healthcare workers "Did you wash your hands?" Seventy-eight percent received a positive response (washed hands). All patients asked nurses, but only 35% asked physicians. Partners in Your Care increased handwashing compliance in the UK. This programme empowers patients with responsibility for their care, provides infection control staff with a continuing means for providing handwashing education without additional staff and can save costs for a hospital., (Copyright 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.)

Hand washing is the single most important function in preventing the spread of infection. However, compliance by healthcare workers still remains under 50%. Intensive observational and interventional programs have been shown to increase compliance, but the increase in compliance is short-term. Therefore, in April 1998, we conducted a random survey of 500 members of the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America to determine the didactic educational practices (in-service lectures) of practitioners with regard to hand washing. Response rate was 18% (n = 90). Eighty-eight percent (73) conducted new employee orientation, 64% (73) conducted yearly in-service, whereas monthly, quarterly, and semiannual in-service were 11% (9), 11% (9), and 14% (12), respectively. Thirty-nine percent (35) of our respondents rated their compliance to hand washing as > 50%; 31% (19), < 50%; and, 39% (33) did not know. Only 5% (4) of our respondents determined the outcome measures and cost-effectiveness of their present handwashing program. Our survey had identified the lack of ongoing education for the healthcare worker about handwashing compliance. Continuous reinforcement through monthly in-service is labor-intensive and costly. An alternative model using the patient as ongoing reinforcement may be a solution for increasing compliance.