Search

In the state of Hawai‘i, nearly all pediatric surgical care is delivered on the main island of O‘ahu at the state’s primary tertiary children’s hospital. Outpatient clinic visits require patients and families to travel to O‘ahu. The direct and opportunity costs of this can be significant. The objective of this study was to characterize potential telehealth candidates to estimate the opportunity for telehealth delivery of outpatient pediatric surgical care. A retrospective chart review including all patients transported from neighbor islands for outpatient consultation with a pediatric surgeon on O‘ahu over a 4-year period was performed. Each patient visit was examined to determine if the visit was eligible for telehealth services using stringent criteria. Direct, insurance-based costs of the travel necessary were then determined. Demographic data was used to characterize the patients potentially affected. A total of 1081 neighbor island patients were seen in the pediatric surgery clinic over 4 years. Thirty-one percent of these patients met criteria as candidates for telehealth visits. The majority of patients came from Hawai‘i and Maui. Most patients were identified as Native Hawaiian or Asian. The average cost per trip was $112.53 per person, leading to a potential direct cost savings of $37,697 over 4 years. Over 30% of outpatient pediatric surgical encounters met stringent criteria as candidates for telehealth delivery of care. Given the significant number of patients that met our criteria, we believe there is an opportunity for direct, travel-based cost savings with the implementation of telehealth delivery of outpatient pediatric surgical care in Hawai‘i.

Introduction. Esophageal stricture is the most common complication following repair of esophageal atresia (EA). In general, these strictures are successfully managed using endoscopic techniques including bougie and balloon dilation, stenting, and chemotherapeutic agent application. If these techniques are unsuccessful, patients require segmental esophageal resection and reanastomosis or esophageal replacement. Magnetic compression anastomosis has been described in children. Herein we report our experience with magnetic compression stricturoplasty to treat refractory strictures after EA repair. Methods. We reviewed our experience using magnets to treat refractory strictures in 2 patients. Both patients failed multiple standard interventions. Because of near complete esophageal obstruction, both patients were candidates for esophageal replacement or segmental resection/anastamosis. In both patients, we applied neodymium-iron-boron magnets using fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. Results. The magnets were successfully positioned in both cases. Magnets were left in place for 7 and 10 days allowing for gradual compression stricturoplasty/anastamosis. Upon removal of the magnets, recanalization was visualized endoscopically and self-expanding stents were placed. There were no leaks or significant early complications. By 31 months post–magnetic stricturoplasty, both patients achieved durable esophageal patency without dysphagia. Conclusion. Magnetic stricturoplasty was successful at establishing early patency of the esophagus in 2 patients with recalcitrant EA strictures. Fundamental knowledge of magnetism was critical in configuring magnet arrays for surgery. In both cases, early follow-up is promising. Further follow-up will define the long-term success of this technique.