Search

Objective: This study aimed to assess if 24-hour in-house neonatologist (NN) coverage is associated with delivery room (DR) resuscitation/stabilization and outcomes among inborn infants <29 weeks' gestational age (GA)., Study Design: Survey-linked cohort study of 2,476 inborn infants of 23 to 28 weeks' gestation, admitted between 2014 and 2015 to Canadian Neonatal Network Level-3 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) with a maternity unit. Exposures were classified using survey responses based on the most senior provider offering 24-hour in-house coverage: NN, fellow, and no NN/fellow. Primary outcome was death and/or major morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe neurological injury, late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between exposures and outcomes and adjust for confounders., Results: Among the 28 participating NICUs, most senior providers ensuring 24-hour in-house coverage were NN (32%, 9/28), fellows (39%, 11/28), and no NN/fellow (29%, 8/28). No NN/fellow coverage and 24-hour fellow coverage were associated with higher odds of infants receiving DR chest compressions/epinephrine compared with 24-hour NN coverage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12-10.6 and aOR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.44-7.70, respectively). Rates of mortality/major morbidity did not differ significantly among the three groups: NN, 63% (249/395 infants); fellow, 64% (1092/1700 infants); no NN/fellow, 70% (266/381 infants)., Conclusion: 24-hour in-house NN coverage was associated with lower rates of DR chest compressions/epinephrine. There was no difference in neonatal outcomes based on type of coverage; however, further studies are needed as ecological fallacy cannot be ruled out., Key Points: · Lower rates of DR cardiopulmonary resuscitation with 24h in-house NN coverage. · The type of 24h in-house coverage was not associated with mortality and/or major morbidity.. · High-volume centers more often have 24h in-house neonatal fellow coverage., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes of outborn and inborn preterm infants born at <29 weeks of gestation admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs)., Study Design: Data were obtained from the Canadian Neonatal Network and Canadian Neonatal Follow-up Network databases for infants born at <29 weeks of gestation admitted to NICUs from April 2009 to September 2011. Rates of death, severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), and overall NDI were compared between outborn and inborn infants at 18-21 months of age, corrected for prematurity., Results: Of 2951 eligible infants, 473 (16%) were outborn. Mean birth weight (940 ± 278 g vs 897 + 237 g), rates of treatment with antenatal steroids (53.9% vs 92.9%), birth weight small for gestational age (5.3% vs 9.4%), and maternal college education (43.7% vs 53.9%) differed between outborn and inborn infants, respectively (all P values <.01). The median Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (P = .01) and Apgar score at 5 minutes (P < .01) were higher in inborn infants. Severe brain injury was more common among outborn infants (25.3% vs 14.7%, P < .01). Outborn infants had higher odds of death or severe NDI (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2), death or overall NDI (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2), death (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-3.0), and cerebral palsy (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3)., Conclusions: The composite outcomes of death or neurodevelopmental impairment were significantly higher in outborn compared with inborn infants admitted to Canadian NICUs. Adverse outcomes were mainly attributed to increased mortality and cerebral palsy in outborn neonates., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Increased use of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) in the delivery room management of preterm neonates has resulted in delayed surfactant treatment, yet the short-term effects of this change are unknown. The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the use of surfactant and the short-term outcomes prior to and after the implementation of early routine use of NRS., Study Design: Eligible infants of <29 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted to a Canadian tertiary neonatal center during two time periods (2005 to 2008 and 2010 to 2013) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Timing of surfactant (prophylactic vs therapeutic) and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) of receiving exogenous surfactant and developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) using the later cohort as the reference group. Subgroup analyses were also performed for infants <26 and 26 to 28 6/7 weeks GA, respectively., Results: A total of 3980 and 5137 infants were included in the first and second time periods, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall surfactant utilization between the two time periods (AOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89, 1.13). However, between 2005 and 2008, a lower proportion of neonates received therapeutic surfactant compared with the later cohort (47.1% vs 56.9%, P<0.01) but were more likely to receive prophylactic surfactant (52.9% vs 43.1%, P<0.01). BPD overall was significantly higher in the earlier cohort (AOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07, 1.33), particularly among the <26 weeks gestation subgroup (AOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08, 1.66)., Conclusion: Early routine use of NRS did not impact overall surfactant utilization rate, although therapeutic surfactant administration rates were higher with a concomitant decrease in BPD rates.

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes of preterm infants (born at <32 weeks' gestation) with focal/spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)-related perforation, NEC without perforation or no NEC/perforation., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 17,426 infants admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units during 2010 to 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy, periventricular leukomalacia or nosocomial infection). Association of intestinal perforation with neonatal outcome was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression., Result: SIP was present in 178 (1.0%) infants, NEC-related perforation in 246 (1.4%) and NEC without perforation in 538 (3.1%). Any intestinal perforation was associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 8.21, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.26 to 10.8); however, the odds were significantly lower for focal/SIP compared with NEC-related perforation (AOR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.51)., Conclusion: Of the two types of intestinal perforation, NEC-related perforation was associated with the highest risk of an adverse neonatal outcome.