Search

An experiment examined the relationship between authoritarianism and managerial assessment of a person designated as a medically controlled schizophrenic. Participants rated a male applicant on both a candidate appraisal form and an affective attitudes scale. Half the participants saw background information and a videotaped interview describing the applicant as having left work for 6 months to receive psychiatric treatment for schizophrenia. He now was taking medication and doing well. Half the participants received background and interview information indicating that the candidate was out of work for 6 months due to a business slowdown. Participants high in authoritarianism who viewed the candidate as schizophrenic gave lower candidate appraisal ratings ( p<.01) and expressed more negative affective attitudes ( p<.01) than did other participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY Based on the hypothesis that many female managers experience job difficulties as a result of their failure to accept male-determined organizational behavior patterns, this study investigated the question, "Does sex, as an independent variable, contribute to differences in male-female perceptions of the legitimacy of various organizational influences?" Data collected from 108 male managers and 145 female managers with use of the Schein-Ott Legitimacy o] Organizational Influence Questionnaire were analyzed by means of Fisher's exact probability test and the coefficient of association asymmetric lambda. The findings indicated that factors other than sex play a major role in determining employee response patterns to the legitimacy of various organizational influences. This conclusion serves to throw doubt on numerous studies purporting to provide evidence that differences exist between male and female organizational behavior patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a speech by the author on industrial development and the attitude of the industrialists to the world that was delivered at the Golden Jubilee Conference of the National Institute of Industrial Psychology in London, England on November 16, 1971. Views on the National Institute of Industrial Psychology; Circumstances with which people are confronted in the world today; Factors responsible for affecting industrial development and the attitude of the industrialist to the world; Impact of the change in social structure and in the behavior of men on industrial development.