Search

NC/Nga (NC) mice, spontaneously develop an eczematous atopic dermatitis (AD)-like skin lesion when kept under conventional condition (Conv), but not under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions, have been thought to be an animal model of AD. We have previously shown that PGD2 and arachidonic acid inhibited the scratching behaviour of NC mice, while indomethacin enhanced it. This study was designed to assess the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 in the itch-related scratching behaviour of NC mice. We examined the expression of COX in the skin using real-time PCR and Western blotting and the effects of SC-560 (a COX-1 selective inhibitor) or NS-398 (a COX-2 selective inhibitor) on scratching behaviour in relation to skin prostaglandin (PG) levels in NC mice. COX-1 mRNA expression was unchanged and protein expression decreased in Conv NC mice compared with that of SPF mice. By contrast, COX-2 mRNA and protein expression increased in Conv NC mice. SC-560 increased scratching behaviour and significantly reduced skin PGD2, PGE2 and PGF2 α levels, but NS-398 did not have effects on scratching and skin PG level. Moreover, the topical application of PGD2, which might be the endogenous inhibitor of itching, suppressed the SC-560-induced enhancement of scratching behaviour by NC mice. These results suggest COX-1-coupled skin PGD2 biosynthesis plays a physiological role in inhibiting regulation of pruritus in NC mice with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effects of indomethacin and dexamethasone on recovery of cutaneous barrier disruption induced by mechanical scratching were examined. Cutaneous barrier was disrupted by scratching using a stainless-steel wire brush (mechanical scratching) and compared to cutaneous application of acetone/ether (1 : 1) mixture (AE) and tape-stripping. Increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), as an indicator of a broken skin barrier, and recovery period for mechanical scratching were higher and longer than those for AE treatment and tape-stripping and we also confirmed the severity of skin damage in a histological study. Topical application of moisturizers showed a temporal effect, rapidly decreased TEWL on mechanical scratching- or AE treatment-induced cutaneous barrier disruption, and gradually increased base levels from 4 to 12 h after treatment. Topical application of indomethacin or dexamethasone prolonged the recovery period for the cutaneous barrier, and concomitant use further worsened the status of the barrier. Additionally, we examined the effects of prostaglandins (PGs) and inflammatory cytokine on mechanical scratching-induced cutaneous barrier disruption pretreated with indomethacin and dexamethasone. As a results, PGD2 and interleukin (IL)-1β significantly accelerated the recovery of cutaneous barrier disruption by mechanical scratching but such was not the case with PGE2, IL-1α, and tumor necrosis factor-α treatment. These results suggest that indomethacin and dexamethasone prolonged the recovery period caused by inhibition of PGD2 and IL-1β. Mechanical scratching-induced cutaneous barrier disruption may be a useful method for evaluating means of recovery from skin damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]