Search

Introduction: Peyronie's disease (PD) and testosterone deficiency (TD) impact men at the same stage of life and can ultimately contribute to erectile dysfunction. There is speculation that low levels of testosterone (T) may predispose men to penile fibrosis; however, there is no published, up-to-date review summarizing the current evidence. Therefore, we conducted a narrative review of the literature exploring the relationship between PD and TD. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search of existing literature of five online databases from June 1990 to June 2018 examining the relationship between PD and TD was conducted. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the risk-of-bias assessment tool for cohort studies were used to evaluate the quality of studies. Results: Six studies were identified (n = 675). Overall, five studies supported the link between PD and TD by demonstrating relationships in PD patients with low total T, free T, bioavailable T, greater penile curvature, and plaque development. However, one study demonstrated no connection between the conditions. The literature is restricted by small studies with methodological flaws. Conclusion: There are a number of mechanisms to support the link between TD and PD. The literature on the topic is limited by small studies which are overall conflicting. The findings of this work suggest the need for larger, prospective studies to clarify the role of TD in the development, evaluation, and treatment of PD. Establishing such a relationship could change management of PD as a diagnosis of PD may encourage clinicians to evaluate a patient's testosterone levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the quality of patient-facing websites advertising low-intensity shockwave therapy (LISWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD) patients in Canada. METHODS: Canadian websites offering LIWST for ED or PD were identified using online web searches. The characteristics of these websites were reviewed, along with examining the presence of HONCode certification, assigning a brief DISCERN score (a tool designed to evaluate health information online) and readability scores. We also examined the LIWST technology advertised, as well as benefits of LIWST cited by the websites. RESULTS: Twenty-five unique websites linked to 46 clinics were identified and reviewed. Twenty-four percent of websites were run by a urologist. Other specialties offering LISWT included general practitioners, anesthesiologists, naturopaths, nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, and registered massage therapists. Twenty-four percent of the websites advertised the use of a focused shockwave generator. Forty percent of the websites had peer-reviewed references. The average brief DISCERN score was 14 (standard deviation 3.4). There was no association between the physician- or non-physician-led websites and the use of peer-reviewed references, readability scores, the number of clinic locations, or higher brief discern scores. CONCLUSIONS: LISWT is readily advertised online for ED and PD patients in Canada; however, only a minority use a focused shockwave generator. There is a wide diversity of practitioners offering LISWT. Websites offering LISWT are generally of poor quality and do not provide adequate information for patients to make educated treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Erectile dysfunction (ED) impacts the wellness and quality of life of millions of Canadians. An evaluation focused on the identification of reversible and irreversible underlying factors is recommended for patients presenting with ED. Through a shared decision-making model framework, the goal of ED treatment is to improve functional outcomes and enhance sexual satisfaction while minimizing adverse effects associated with treatment. Given that ED is assessed and treated by multiple different types of health practitioners, the purpose of this guideline is to provide the best available evidence to facilitate care delivery through a Canadian lens. After a narrative review of ED assessment and treatment for general readership, five key clinical questions relating to priority areas of ED are assessed using the GRADE and Evidence to Decision making frameworks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an increasingly used unconventional treatment option for erectile dysfunction (ED). The validity of PRP as a potential treatment for ED has been proposed in limited human trials. Furthermore, the costs associated with PRP for ED treatment are not readily promoted to patients. The goal of this review was to determine the efficacy and costs of PRP based on currently available literature and Canadian data. Methods: A comprehensive literature review of available PRP studies and current published data pertaining to cost, availability, and provider clinics globally was conducted using the PubMed database. Physicians offering genital PRP in Canada were identified using internet searches and PRP provider directories. Physician qualifications, clinic locations, and cost information were obtained from provider websites and telephone calls to identified clinics. Results: Availability of PRP injections offered for treating ED is increasing globally. There are currently no peer-reviewed publications to substantiate anecdotal evidence pertaining to the efficacy of PRP as a viable treatment option for ED patients. Our results indicate 19 providers for PRP injections in Canada, costing on average $1777 CAD per injection. No providers were affiliated with academic institutions and providers varied in their area of clinical speciality and training. Conclusions: To our knowledge, there is currently no research underway investigating the clinical efficacy of PRP for ED treatment despite its broad availability and significant cost. Patients should be informed of the lack of substantiated efficacy and safety data, as the reliability of PRP treatments requires further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on publishing Canadian Urological Association (CUA) erectile dysfunction (ED) guideline. Topics include supported in consideration of the quality of available evidence and other important factors for clinical decision-making; and supporting the involvement of the patient's partner in discussions regarding sexual health and ED assessment and management.