Search

Immune checkpoint therapies (ICT) improve overall survival of patients with cancer but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as myocarditis. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA-4 Ig), an inhibitor of T cell costimulation through CD28, reverses irAEs in animal models. However, concerns exist about potentially compromising antitumor response of ICT. In mouse tumor models, we administered CTLA-4 Ig 1) concomitantly with ICT or 2) after ICT completion. Concomitant treatment reduced antitumor efficacy, while post-ICT administration improved efficacy without affecting frequency and function of CD8 T cells. The improved response was independent of the ICT used, whether CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade. The frequency of Tregs was significantly decreased with CTLA-4 Ig. The resulting increased CD8/Treg ratio potentially underlies the enhanced efficacy of ICT followed by CTLA-4 Ig. This paradoxical mechanism shows that a CTLA-4 Ig regimen shown to reduce irAE severity does not compromise antitumor efficacy., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:J.P.A. reports consulting, advisory roles, and/or stocks/ownership for Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Akoya Biosciences, Apricity, Bectas, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, Osteologic, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and fatal malignancies with an alarming trend all around the world. Common therapeutic approaches in the early stage of disease are surgical resection, ablation, and liver transplantation. Due to the insidious identity of HCC, the majority of the patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, where tumor spreading, or distant metastasis unfortunately have already occurred. Immunotherapeutic options have elicited a promising approach in some malignancies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approving the first checkpoint inhibitor anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma ten years ago. In the past decade, many clinical trials have been investigating anti-CTLA-4 as well as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapies in various solid tumors, including HCC. In this mini-review we will discuss the latest clinical data from clinical trials for immune-checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of HCC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rationally sequencing and combining PD-1/L1-and MAPK-targeted therapies may overcome innate and acquired resistance. Since increased clinical benefit of MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) is associated with previous immune checkpoint therapy, we compare the efficacies of sequential and/or combinatorial regimens in subcutaneous murine models of melanoma driven by Braf V600 , Nras, or Nf1 mutations as well as colorectal and pancreatic carcinoma driven by Kras G12C . Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in preceding MAPKi combination optimizes response durability by promoting pro-inflammatory polarization of macrophages and clonal expansion of interferon-γ hi , and CD8 + cytotoxic and proliferative (versus CD4 + regulatory) T cells that highly express activation genes. Since therapeutic resistance of melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) limits patient survival, we demonstrate that sequencing anti-PD-1/L1 therapy before MAPKi combination suppresses MBM and improves mouse survival with robust T cell clonal expansion in both intracranial and extracranial metastatic sites. We propose clinically testing brief anti-PD-1/L1 (± anti-CTLA-4) dosing before MAPKi co-treatment to suppress therapeutic resistance., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests R.S.L.: research support from Merck, Pfizer, BMS, and OncoSec. Consultant for Amgen, Novartis, Array BioPharma, Genentech, and Merck. A.R.: consultant for Amgen, BMS, Chugai, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Vedanta. Advisory board member for and stock shareholder of Advaxis, Apricity, Arcus, Compugen, CytomX, Five Prime, Highlight, ImaginAb, Isoplexis, Kalthera, Kite-Gilead, Merus, PACT Pharma, RAPT, Rgenix, and Tango. Research funding from Agilent and BMS through SU2C. A.P.A.: research support, advisory board member, consultant, shareholder and honorarium recipient, OncoSec. Advisory board member for and stock shareholder in Valitor Biosciences. Advisory board member and honorarium recipient for Regeneron and Array. Research support from Acerta, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Dynavax, Genentech, Idera, Incyte, ISA, LOXO, Merck, Novartis, Sensei, and Tessa. M.O.: consultant for Merck, Biosight, and Daiichi Sankyo; independent data safety monitoring committee member for Celgene and Glycomimetics. C.Y.: consultant for QED Therapeutics and Riptide Biosciences and owner of stocks in Riptide Biosciences. H.L.: co-founder and Executive Vice President of Riptide Biosciences. M.W.B.: consultant for Eli Lilly and research support from AstraZeneca. D.B.S.: consultant for Pfizer, Loxo/Lilly Oncology, Vividion Therapeutics, Fore Therapeutics, and BridgeBio., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The therapeutic landscape for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has recently expanded with the development of effective and targeted immunotherapy. Here, we provide an overview of the role of immunotherapy in the management of advanced cutaneous carcinomas., Recent Findings: Several agents were recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. However, recent approvals in tissue-agnostic indications may also benefit other NMSCs including cutaneous adnexal solid tumors with high tumor mutation burdens or microsatellite instability. Furthermore, while FDA-approved indications will likely continue to expand, continued studies are needed to support the role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and refractory settings. Immunotherapy is emerging as the standard of care for several advanced NMSCs not amenable to surgery and radiation. Ongoing evaluation of the clinical trial landscape is needed to optimize enrollment and ensure continued innovation., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

In the last decade, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, with the potential for dramatic changes in the therapeutic landscape. Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of transmem-brane programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), was approved as monotherapy in 2015 for advanced renal cell carcinoma in patients previously treated with an agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor. In April 2018, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitor, was approved for patients with previously untreated intermediate- and poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Then, in 2019, combination therapies consisting of pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) or avelumab (anti-PD-1 ligand, PD-L1) with axitinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) were also approved for use in all risk groups. This review pre-sents a brief historical review of the association between immunology and oncology; describes essential aspects of the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors; discusses the current evidence regarding the clinical use of different immunotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, both clear cell and other histological types; and provides general information on their adverse effects. The role of appropriate patient selection is analyzed to allow individualization of therapy and improve the already promising results. Finally, per-spectives on the future use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat renal cancer are discussed.

Purpose: Detailed study of ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (AEs), including determination of incidence and recurrence rates, is of integral importance in cancer immunotherapy to inform management and treatment guidelines., Design: Retrospective registry study., Participants: Patients newly diagnosed with ophthalmic immune-related AEs between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry., Methods: Data were collected from electronic health records of IRIS® Registry participating ophthalmology practices. Patients with select ophthalmic immune-related AEs were identified by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. The primary exposure of interest was prior initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs within 1 year after initiation of ICI therapy was determined. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were derived by comparing incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after ICIs versus rates of the same ocular complications in patients not taking ICIs in the entire registry population. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs in patients with a past history of ocular inflammation or other specific ophthalmic condition before initiation of ICIs were examined further., Results: A total of 3123 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy were identified, 112 of whom demonstrated an ophthalmic immune-related AE. Incidence rates for anterior uveitis, the most common ophthalmic immune-related AE, were 8209 per 100 000 for ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), 2542 per 100 000 for nivolumab (anti-PD-1), 2451 per 100 000 for pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), 5556 per 100 000 for ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 3740 per 100 000 among all ICIs. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs among patients receiving ICI therapy were higher compared with baseline rates in the general registry population (anterior uveitis IRR, 13.9; other uveitis IRR, 43.0; papilledema IRR, 38.3). Patients with a history of uveitis or other ocular inflammatory condition demonstrated high recurrence rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after initiating ICIs (up to 51.1%)., Conclusions: For patients initiating ICI therapy, early coordination with ophthalmic subspecialist care is important because rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs are elevated compared with ocular complication rates in the entire registry population and patients with a history of prior autoimmune ocular disease are at high risk of recurrence of ocular complications., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The melanoma treatment landscape changed in 2011 with the approval of the first anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 checkpoint inhibitor and of the first BRAF-targeted monoclonal antibody, both of which significantly improved overall survival (OS). Since then, improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. The approval of new immune and targeted therapies has further improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma and other combination modalities are also being explored such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy and surgery. In addition, different strategies of drugs administration including sequential or combination treatment are being tested. Approaches to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response are being developed. Increasing evidence emerges that tissue and blood-based biomarkers can predict the response to a therapy. The latest findings in melanoma research, including insights into the tumor microenvironment and new biomarkers, improved understanding of tumor immune response and resistance, novel approaches for combination strategies and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, were the focus of discussions at the Melanoma Bridge meeting (5-7 December, 2019, Naples, Italy), which are summarized in this report.

Current strategies to improve clinical outcomes in v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients include mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 inhibitor and programmed death (PD) 1 (PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint blockade combinations. Experience from treatment of melanoma suggests that anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinations improve outcomes, but similar benefits remain to be seen for treatment of NSCLC. This report describes a single center, investigator-initiated phase I/II clinical trial to compare 2 combination schedules of intermittent or continuous selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4), and durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) treatment with historical controls in patients with previously treated, unresectable NSCLC. Forty patients will be accrued at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Primary objectives include maximum tolerated dose (dose escalation phase) and progression-free survival (dose expansion phase). Secondary objectives include response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives are to assess biomarkers of response and resistance on the basis of biopsies and peripheral blood taken before and after treatment using immune profiling, transcriptome, and protein readouts., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Due to the novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have only been recently characterized. This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat cutaneous AEs. Pruritus and rash are among the top five immune-related AEs reported in clinical trials for this class of therapy. Incidence varies between 35 and 50% for cutaneous AEs among the eight FDA-approved drugs. Although only 2% are reported as grade 3 or 4 events, the impact on quality of life can be significant for these patients and is best described and most severe in ipilimumab trials. Of ipilimumab patients, 43.5% have a cutaneous AE and, at our institution, 20% of them had a dose interruption as a result. This means potentially 9% of patients have dose interruption of ipilimumab because of their cutaneous AEs. In the following chapter, we review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) shows encouraging results in a subset of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but still elicits a sub-optimal response among those with bone metastases. Analysis of patients' bone marrow samples revealed increased T h 17 instead of T h 1 subsets after ICT. To further evaluate the different tumor microenvironments, we injected mice with prostate tumor cells either subcutaneously or intraosseously. ICT in the subcutaneous CRPC model significantly increases intra-tumoral T h 1 subsets and improves survival. However, ICT fails to elicit an anti-tumor response in the bone CRPC model despite an increase in the intra-tumoral CD4 T cells, which are polarized to T h 17 rather than T h 1 lineage. Mechanistically, tumors in the bone promote osteoclast-mediated bone resorption that releases TGF-β, which restrains T h 1 lineage development. Blocking TGF-β along with ICT increases T h 1 subsets and promotes clonal expansion of CD8 T cells and subsequent regression of bone CRPC and improves survival., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As part of the 2018 Immunotherapy Bridge congress (November 28-29, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on four topical clinical issues in immunotherapy today. These were: the relative importance of adaptive versus innate immunity in the anti-cancer immune response; the merits of combination versus sequential immunotherapy regimens in the treatment of cancer; the advantages and disadvantages of murine models of cancer versus humans in order to evaluate immunotherapy; and whether or not mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy differ between different cancers. Discussion of these important topics are summarised in this report.

The offer of anti-cancer drugs has recently been disrupted by the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors on the market. Currently, one anti-CTLA-4, two anti-PD-1 and two anti-PD-L1 are authorized in the European Union, in seven different types of cancer. The clinical development of these therapies is still in full swing: in July 2017, more than 1 500 clinical trials were evaluating anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 drugs in about twenty different locations and this number continues to increase. In the short term in France, other immunotherapies, the CAR-T cells, will complete this therapeutic arsenal. These immunotherapies appear as a real revolution in the treatment of some cancers. Nevertheless, many issues are associated with these therapies, particularly regarding the identification of good responders, the proper use of these drugs including the management of therapeutic strategies and safety profile, as well as the organization of care. In addition, the expenses associated with ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab are substantial and almost tripled in one year, going from 120 million euros in 2015 to more than 340 million euros in 2016. This raises the question of the ability of the current healthcare system to maintain equitable access to innovation and best treatments for all patients. For all these reasons, the French National Cancer Institute decided to dedicate its thematic annual report on these innovative immunotherapies, targeting in particular checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cells, in order to produce an inventory of current data and an analysis regarding the different issues associated with these therapies., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anti-tumoral immunotherapy is currently the basis of a profound modification of therapeutic concepts in oncology, in particular since the arrival of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In addition to their efficacy profile, these immune-targeted agents also generate adverse events. With the increasing use of ICI for a growing number of tumor types, awareness of immunotherapy-related adverse events is essential to ensure prompt diagnosis and effective management of these potentially serious adverse events., Background: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) are two co-inhibitory receptors that are expressed on activated T cells against which therapeutic blocking antibodies have reached routine clinical use. Immune checkpoint blockade can induce inflammatory adverse effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which resemble autoimmune disease. Though severe irAEs remain rare, they can be fatal if not diagnosed and treated in an appropriate manner., Outlook and Conclusion: Additional studies are needed to better understand the clinical characteristics and chronology of these adverse effects and to clarify their pathophysiological mechanisms., (Copyright © 2018 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Recently, the emergence of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies called immune check-point inhibitors (ICPI) has modified the landscape of anti-cancer treatments. These therapeutics are associated with immune related adverse events that affect many organs, most commonly skin, digestive tract, endocrine glands and lungs. This review summarizes the main physiopathological hypotheses on the mechanisms of these toxicities. In most cases, the T lymphocytes hyperactivation induced by ICPI generates a specific response directed against tumor antigens, leading to anti-tumor activity in tumor tissues but also side effects in normal tisues called "on-target". The CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes-mediated cell lysis induces the release of neoantigens, tumor antigens and auto-antigens from normal tissues, respectively. This phenomenon called "epitope spreading" leads to diversification of the T cell repertoire and thus to reduced immune tolerance, which is exacerbated by inhibition of regulator T lymphocytes. Furthermore, the predominant activation of Th1 and Th17T lymphocytes mediated by ICPI induced an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ (IFNγ) and interleukine-17 (IL-17). These two mechanisms are responsible for the so called "off-target" toxicities. The roles of cross-reactivity with the intestinal microbiota, hypersensitivity and the specific effect of PD-L2 remain to be determined. Better knowledge of these mechanisms will improve patient care and help predict patients at risk of developing severe toxicities to ICPIs., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many advanced stage cancers. Preexisting immunity is necessary for a response to these agents, which are most effective in inflamed tumors since they principally act by reinforcing preexisting antitumor T-cell responses. An important goal of therapy is to convert the tumor environment from non-inflamed to inflamed in order to facilitate subsequent response to checkpoint inhibitors. Clinical trials are underway to identify checkpoint inhibitor-based combination approaches, which may help to achieve this goal. Areas covered: Anti-PD-1 agents are being assessed in combination with different treatments (e.g. TLR9 agonists, oncolytic peptides, oncolytic vaccines, LAG-3, HDAC inhibitors, GITR, recombinant human interleukin-2) with promising results. PD-1 agents are also being assessed in combination with other locoregional or systemic treatment modalities, including ECT, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, with promising results being achieved. Expert commentary: Emerging approaches based on combinations with anti-PD-1 agents seem to offer increased efficacy compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Such combinations also appear to be well tolerated, with safety profiles often comparable to those seen with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. These combination approaches are likely to become an increasing focus of research. There is also the potential for triplet anti-PD-1 combinations.

Thyroid pathologies are the most common forms of endocrinopathy under anticancer immunotherapy. Frequency ranges from 3% to 22% for hypothyroidism and 1% to 11% for thyrotoxicosis. Risk is higher with anti-PD-1 than anti-CTLA-4 treatment and higher again with associated treatment. Pathophysiology mainly consists in silent inflammatory thyroiditis, which accounts for the usual presentation of transient thyrotoxicosis followed by hypothyroidism. Therapeutic strategy usually consists in monitoring with or without symptomatic treatment in case of thyrotoxicosis, and levothyroxine replacement therapy in case of symptomatic hypothyroidism or TSH>10 mIU/L. Screening for dysthyroidism should be systematic ahead of treatment and before each immunotherapy injection for the first 6 months, then at a lower rhythm. It comprises clinical assessment and TSH assay. Onset of thyroid dysfunction should not interrupt immunotherapy, being mainly transient, easy to treat and mild. Teamwork between oncologists and endocrinologists improves screening and management, so as better to accompany the patient during treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immunotherapy is on the way to become the new standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. With higher rates of objective responses, and overall less side effects compared to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) immunotherapeutics will probably replace sorafenib from standard first-line treatment., Areas Covered: This review covers recent clinical data on systemic agents and ongoing trials in patients with advanced HCC focusing on immunotherapy., Expert Opinion: In unselected patients with advanced HCC immunotherapeutics, namely the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown promising efficacy in therapy-naïve, as well as pre-treated patients with advanced HCC. However, only 10-20 percent of treated patients show an objective and durable response to the indicated therapeutics. Therefore, combination therapies including different immunotherapeutics, e.g. PD-1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, or combinations of immunotherapeutics and small molecules, or bifunctional antibodies will be needed to improve response rates., Abbreviations: HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; TKI: tyrosine-kinase inhibitors; PD-1: programmed death receptor-1; PD-L1: programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Protein 4; CAR-T: chimeric T cell receptors; TACE: transarterial chemoembolization; SIRT: selective internal radiation therapy; SBRT: stereotactic body radiation therapy; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; NK cell: natural killer cell; TGFβ: transforming growth factor-β; OV: Oncolytic viruses; PFU: plaque-forming unit.

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 have led to improved survival outcomes for advanced solid-tumor malignancies. This report helps the reader gain a better understanding of adverse events in patients with ovarian cancer on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We describe 3 hypothetical case vignettes of patients with gynecologic cancer on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and discuss common immune-related adverse events. The typical presentation and onset of immune-related events are different from those associated with conventional chemotherapy. This report highlights the importance of early recognition and management of these events., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used for multiple cancer types in the past decade. ICIs include CTLA-4 inhibitors (e.g., ipilimumab) and the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Hepatotoxicity is not uncommon secondary to ICI treatment. It can occur 8-12 weeks after the initiation of ICI and presents with elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase. ICI-induced hepatitis is usually asymptomatic but may present with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. It is a diagnosis of exclusion after other etiologies are excluded based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. ICI-induced hepatitis might require discontinuation of ICI and/or treatment with immunosuppressants.

The novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors has only recently led to the characterization of cutaneous adverse events (AEs). This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat. Pruritus and rash are among the top five immune-related AEs reported in clinical trials for this class of therapy. Incidence varies between 35 and 50% for cutaneous AEs among the three FDA-approved drugs. Although only 2% are reported as grade 3 or 4 events, the quality of life impact can be significant for these patients and is best described in ipilimumab trials. 43.5% of ipilimumab patients have a cutaneous AE and, at our institution, 20% of them had a dose interruption as a result. This means potentially 9% of patients having dose interruption of ipilimumab because of their cutaneous AEs. In the following chapter, we will review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

In recent years, there has been dramatic expansion of the treatment armamentarium for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), including drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. Despite these advances, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for therapeutic interventions with novel mechanisms of action. The advent of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has led to significant changes in the treatment landscape for several solid malignancies. Specifically, drugs targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA-4) pathways have demonstrated considerable clinical efficacy and gained regulatory approval as single-agent or combination therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, aRCC, advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, urothelial cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma. In aRCC, the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was approved in both the United States and Europe for the treatment of patients who have received prior therapy, based on improved overall survival compared with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Other checkpoint inhibitors, including the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab in combination with several agents, and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, are in various stages of clinical development in patients with aRCC. In this review, current evidence related to the clinical use of checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of patients with aRCC is discussed, including information on the frequency and management of unconventional responses and the management of immune-related adverse events. In addition, perspectives on the future use of checkpoint inhibitors are discussed, including the potential value of treatment beyond progression, the potential use in earlier lines of care or in combination with other agents, and the identification of biomarkers to guide patient selection and enable individualization of therapy., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Checkpoint immunotherapy with agents targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 has transformed the landscape of oncologic therapy. Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), including significant pulmonary toxicities, have been observed in patients treated with these agents. The incidence, timing, clinical features, and outcomes of pulmonary IRAEs are quite variable, emphasizing the importance for clinical vigilance as these therapies become more ubiquitous in the treatment of a spectrum of malignancies. Outcomes are generally favorable when toxicity is recognized early and treated promptly., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The fight against cancer has seen major breakthroughs in recent years. More than a decade ago, tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting constitutively activated signaling cascades within the tumor inaugurated a new era of oncological therapy. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has started to revolutionize the treatment of several malignancies, most notably malignant melanoma, leading to the renaissance and the long-awaited breakthrough of immunooncology. This review provides an overview of the basis of immunotherapy from its initial concepts of anti-tumor immunity and cell-based therapy to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and discusses published studies and the perspectives of immunooncology for the treatment of endocrine malignancies., (© 2016 Society for Endocrinology.)

Cancer is primarily a disease of older adults. The treatment of advanced stage tumors usually involves the use of systemic agents that may be associated with significant risk of toxicity, especially in older patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are newcomers to the oncology world with improved efficacy and better safety profiles when compared to traditional cytotoxic drugs. This makes them an attractive treatment option. While there are no elderly specific trials, this review attempts to look at the current available data from a geriatric oncology perspective. We reviewed data from phase III studies that led to newly approved indications of checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer. Data were reviewed with respect to response, survival, and toxicity according to three groups: <65 years, 65-75 years, and >75 years. Current literature does not allow one to draw definitive conclusions regarding the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults. However, they may offer a potentially less toxic but equally efficacious treatment option for the senior adult oncology patient.

Background: Therapeutic monoclonal anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies are associated with immune-mediated enterocolitis. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed description of this entity., Methods: We included patients with endoscopic signs of inflammation after anti-CTLA-4 infusions for cancer treatment. Other causes of enterocolitis were excluded. Clinical, biological and endoscopic data were recorded. A single pathologist reviewed endoscopic biopsies and colectomy specimens from 27 patients. Patients with and without enterocolitis after ipilimumab-treated melanoma were compared, to identify clinical factors associated with enterocolitis., Results: Thirty-nine patients with anti-CTLA-4 enterocolitis were included (ipilimumab n = 37; tremelimumab n = 2). The most frequent symptom was diarrhoea. Ten patients had extra-intestinal manifestations. Most colonoscopies showed ulcerations involving the rectum and sigmoid, 66% of patients had extensive colitis, 55% had patchy distribution and 20% had ileal inflammation. Endoscopic colonic biopsies showed acute colitis in most patients, while half of the patients had chronic duodenitis. Thirty-five patients received steroids that led to complete clinical remission in 13 patients (37%). Twelve patients required infliximab, of whom 10 (83%) responded. Six patients underwent colectomy (perforation n = 5; toxic megacolon n = 1); one of them died postoperatively. Four patients had a persistent enterocolitis at follow-up colonoscopy. Patients with enterocolitis were more frequently prescribed NSAIDs compared with patients without enterocolitis (31 vs 5%, p = 0.003)., Conclusions: Ipilimumab and tremelimumab may induce a severe and extensive form of inflammatory bowel disease. Rapid escalation to infliximab should be advocated in patients who do not respond to steroids. Patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 should be advised to avoid NSAIDs., (Copyright © 2016 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: The advent of new immunotherapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma has resulted in various novel combination strategies. Because of their distinct modes of action, different immunotherapies have been investigated in combination with one another, as well as combined with targeted therapies and other treatment modalities., Areas Covered: Anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 treatments enhance antitumor immunity through complementary and non-redundant mechanisms. The combination of the anti-CTLA-4 agent ipilimumab and the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab has been shown to improve progression-free survival and objective response rate compared with either agent alone as monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. However, the combination was associated with significant toxicity, with around one-third of patients discontinuing treatment as a result. The sequential use of nivolumab and ipilimumab was associated with similar outcomes and comparable toxicity to concurrent therapy. Clinical trials assessing various combinations of immunomodulating antibodies are ongoing or planned. Ipilimumab and pembrolizumab have also been investigated in combination with the oncolytic virus, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), with promising results. In addition, immunotherapies have also been combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and electrochemotherapy., Expert Opinion: Investigation of combination approaches represents the start of a new story that begins with melanoma treatment and expands to embrace other solid and hematological cancers.

We have demonstrated that immunostimulatory therapies such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) and anti-CD40 (αCD40) can be combined to deliver synergistic anti-tumor effects. While this strategy has shown success, efficacy varies depending on a number of factors including tumor type and severe toxicities can be seen. We sought to determine whether blockade of negative regulators such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) could simultaneously prolong CD8(+) T cell responses and augment T cell anti-tumor effects. We devised a regimen in which anti-CTLA-4 was administered late so as to delay contraction and minimize toxicities. This late administration both enhanced and prolonged CD8 T cell activation without the need for additional IL-2. The quality of the T cell response was improved with increased frequency of effector/effector memory phenotype cells along with improved lytic ability and bystander expansion. This enhanced CD8 response translated to improved anti-tumor responses both at the primary and metastatic sites. Importantly, toxicities were not exacerbated with combination. This study provides a platform for rational design of immunotherapy combinations to maximize anti-tumor immunity while minimizing toxicities.

Oncolytic viruses represent a diverse class of replication competent viruses that curtail tumor growth. These viruses, through their natural ability or through genetic modifications, can selectively replicate within tumor cells and induce cell death while leaving normal cells intact. Apart from the direct oncolytic activity, these viruses mediate tumor cell death via the induction of innate and adaptive immune responses. The field of oncolytic viruses has seen substantial advancement with the progression of numerous oncolytic viruses in various phases of clinical trials. Tumors employ a plethora of mechanisms to establish growth and subsequently metastasize. These include evasion of immune surveillance by inducing up-regulation of checkpoint proteins which function to abrogate T cell effector functions. Currently, antibodies blocking checkpoint proteins such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) have been approved to treat cancer and shown to impart durable clinical responses. These antibodies typically need pre-existing active immune tumor microenvironment to establish durable clinical outcomes and not every patient responds to these therapies. This review provides an overview of published pre-clinical studies demonstrating superior therapeutic efficacy of combining oncolytic viruses with checkpoint blockade compared to monotherapies. These studies provide compelling evidence that oncolytic therapy can be potentiated by coupling it with checkpoint therapies.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) presents significant mortality risks, underscoring the urgency of timely diagnosis and intervention. Advanced stages of CRC are managed through chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Immunotherapy, while effective in bolstering the immune system against cancer cells, often carries toxic side effects, including colitis. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of colitis in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) undergoing various immunotherapy treatments. Through a systematic search of Google Scholar and PubMed databases from inception until November 2023, nine relevant studies were identified. Subgroup analyses revealed a higher incidence of colitis, particularly in patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated molecule-4 (anti-CTLA-4) and combination therapies compared to monotherapy with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand receptor-1 (PDL-1) inhibitors. Notably, naive-treated metastatic CRC patients exhibited elevated colitis incidences compared to those previously treated. In conclusion, anti-CTLA-4 and combination therapies, such as nivolumab plus ipilimumab, were associated with increased colitis occurrences in metastatic CRC patients, highlighting the need for vigilant monitoring and management strategies, especially in immunotherapy-naive individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incorporating GD2-targeting monoclonal antibody into post-consolidation maintenance therapy has improved survival for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. However, ~50% of patients do not respond to, or relapse following, initial treatment. Here, we evaluated additional anti-GD2-based immunotherapy to better treat high-risk neuroblastoma in mice to develop a regimen for patients with therapy-resistant neuroblastoma. Methods: We determined the components of a combined regimen needed to cure mice of established MYCN-amplified, GD2-expressing, murine 9464D-GD2 neuroblastomas. Results: First, we demonstrate that 9464D-GD2 is nonresponsive to a preferred salvage regimen: anti-GD2 with temozolomide and irinotecan. Second, we have previously shown that adding agonist anti-CD40 mAb and CpG to a regimen of radiotherapy, anti-GD2/IL2 immunocytokine and anti-CTLA-4, cured a substantial fraction of mice bearing small 9464D-GD2 tumors; here, we further characterize this regimen by showing that radiotherapy and hu14.18-IL2 are necessary components, while anti-CTLA-4, anti-CD40, or CpG can individually be removed, and CpG and anti-CTLA-4 can be removed together, while maintaining efficacy. Conclusions: We have developed and characterized a regimen that can cure mice of a high-risk neuroblastoma that is refractory to the current clinical regimen for relapsed/refractory disease. Ongoing preclinical work is directed towards ways to potentially translate these findings to a regimen appropriate for clinical testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: One-fifth of patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) develop platinum-refractory disease. Recent advances in the use of immunotherapy in solid tumors might have a potential impact on the treatment of these patients. The aim of this review is to elucidate the immune contexture of TGCTs, describe various immunotherapeutic biomarkers, and summarize the most recent studies of immunotherapeutic agents targeting this malignancy. In general, due to the rarity of this disease entity, a deeper understanding of its molecular landscape, combined with carefully designed biomarker-driven clinical trials, is needed in order to obtain a clearer view of the efficacy of different immunotherapeutic strategies in these patients. Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are cancers with very good prognosis, even in the metastatic setting, with high curative potential mainly attributed to the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, approximately 15% of the patients develop platinum-refractory disease and suffer multiple relapses. Therefore, there is an unmet need for novel therapeutic agents with improved efficacy and minimal long-term side effects. Recent advances in the development of immunotherapeutic agents, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have offered an opportunity to test their activity in various tumor types, including GCTs. This review aims to analyze the immune microenvironment of these tumors and present the most recently available data from studies that have tested immunotherapeutic agents against GCTs. The majority of the available knowledge derives from case reports or small cohort studies, particularly those involving ICIs of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Other immunotherapeutic targeted approaches, including antibody-drug conjugates, antibody prodrugs, vaccines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, have biological rationales and have shown preliminary activity or are currently being tested. Growing evidence on these and other approaches will assist in broadening the currently limited treatment armamentarium against platinum-refractory TGCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. In an era of breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, CheckMate 067 studies declared the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors a new standard of care for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). A significant limitation of the widespread use of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in routine clinical practice is the high risk of severe immune-mediated adverse events. Prolgolimab and nurulimab are a combination of fixed doses of original monoclonal antibodies (manufactured by JSC "BIOCAD," Russia) to the PD-1 receptor (prolgolimab) and the CTLA-4 receptor (nurulimab) (3:1 ratio). This paper presents the results of an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized, phase II OBERTON clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nurulimab + prolgolimab combination therapy with continued prolgolimab therapy compared to prolgolimab alone as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable melanoma (uRM) or MM (NCT03913923). Materials and methods. The study included patients with uRM or MM who were not previously treated for metastatic disease. The patients were randomized into two groups (1:1). Patients in group 1 were treated with a nurulimab (1 mg/kg) and prolgolimab (3 mg/kg) combination at a dose of 0.2 mL/kg (equivalent to 1 mg/kg of nurulimab and 3 mg/kg of prolgolimab) once every 3 weeks during the first 4 blinded infusions. Patients in group 2 received prolgolimab monotherapy at a dose of 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks during the first 4 blinded infusions. Starting from infusion 5, patients in both groups received open prolgolimab 1 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT05732805 and is currently ongoing, but recruitment of new patients has been completed. Results. One hundred seventeen patients were randomized and received at least one dose of the study therapy. At a median follow-up of 16.79 months, the median PFS was 12.2 (4.9; not achieved) months in the nurulimab + prolgolimab group and 2.8 (1.5; 4.7) months in the prolgolimab monotherapy group (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.90, hazard ratio 0.57). PFS at 24 months was 41% in the nurulimab + prolgolimab group and 25.4% in the prolgolimab monotherapy group. In both groups, the therapy was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 15.5% of patients who received nurulimab + prolgolimab, compared with 1.7% of those who received prolgolimab alone. The most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in both treatment groups were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase and asthenia. Overall, the safety profile was favorable, as expected for the class of immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Discussion. The results demonstrate a favorable safety profile in both the nurulimab + prolgolimab combination and prolgolimab monotherapy groups as the first-line treatment for uRM or MM. The assessment of the primary endpoint, PFS, showed the benefit of combination immunotherapy followed by switching to prolgolimab compared to prolgolimab alone. Conclusion. Combination immunotherapy with the CTLA-4 inhibitor nurulimab and the PD-1 inhibitor prolgolimab, available as a combination of solutions of two drugs in a single vial, with a further switch to monotherapy with prolgolimab, can fill an important niche in the treatment of patients with uRM or MM. Confirmation of the obtained data on the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of nurulimab + prolgolimab in comparison with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy is expected from the ongoing phase III BCD-217-2 OCTAVA study (NCT05732805).

Simple Summary: Cancer remains one of the leading killers world-wide. In recent years new drugs to treat cancer that exploit the immune system to attack cancer have been developed called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). As use of these potent anti-cancer therapeutics have grown, researchers have noticed an unsettling association with use of ICIs and cardiovascular complications known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This review discusses how ICIs work as a cancer treatment, how to clinically recognize and manage patients with cardiovascular irAEs, what risk factors may contribute to irAEs, and discusses some of the current theories of mechanisms driving cardiovascular irAEs. Cancer remains a prominent global cause of mortality, second only to cardiovascular disease. The past decades have witnessed substantial advancements in anti-cancer therapies, resulting in improved outcomes. Among these advancements, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising breakthrough, leveraging the immune system to target and eliminate cancer cells. Despite the remarkable potential of immunotherapy, concerns have arisen regarding associations with adverse cardiovascular events. This review examines the complex interplay between immunotherapy and cardiovascular toxicity and provides an overview of immunotherapy mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and potential biomarkers for adverse events, while delving into the intricate immune responses and evasion mechanisms displayed by cancer cells. The focus extends to the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, including CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 targeting antibodies. This review underscores the multifaceted challenges of managing immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Risk factors for immune-related adverse events and major adverse cardiac events are explored, encompassing pharmacological, treatment-related, autoimmune, cardiovascular, tumor-related, social, genetic, and immune-related factors. The review also advocates for enhanced medical education and risk assessment tools to identify high-risk patients for preventive measures. Baseline cardiovascular evaluations, potential prophylactic strategies, and monitoring of emerging toxicity symptoms are discussed, along with the potential of adjunct anti-inflammatory therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, have initiated a new era in the treatment of malignant melanoma. ICIs can be used in various settings, including first-line, adjuvant, and neo-adjuvant therapy. In the scope of this review, we examined clinical studies utilizing ICIs in the context of treating oral mucosal melanoma, a rare disease, albeit with an extremely poor prognosis, with a specific focus on unraveling the intricate web of resistance mechanisms. The absence of a comprehensive review focusing on ICIs in oral mucosal melanoma is notable. Therefore, this review seeks to address this deficiency by offering a novel and thorough analysis of the current status, potential resistance mechanisms, and future prospects of applying ICIs specifically to oral malignant melanoma. Clarifying and thoroughly understanding these mechanisms will facilitate the advancement of effective therapeutic approaches and enhance the prospects for patients suffering from oral mucosal melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the most promising approaches toward advanced melanoma. Here, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of all studied ICIs. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify the relevant publications (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023470649). Then we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different ICIs for metastatic melanoma. We used Cochrane's tool to assess the quality of studies. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Twenty reports of RCTs entered our systematic review, 18 of which were included in our data analysis. ICIs showed improved survival compared with control group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43–0.71; P<0.001). Using a meta-regression, we found a significant relation between patients' mean age and their OS (P<0.001, ${{\rm{R}}^2}$ R 2 = 100.00%). Also, our analysis revealed greater HR for CTLA-4 inhibitors than PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.63–0.79, P<0.001 vs. HR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.46–0.79, P<0.001). The effect sizes of different types of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were comparable Our results suggest that ICI-based immunotherapy is associated with enhanced OS, PFS, and RFS (P < 0.001) and will assist clinicians in choosing the optimal approach toward treating metastatic melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, improving patients’ selection for this therapy is needed. Gene expression profile (GEP) is a promising biomarker tool. We assessed the predictive value of 48 onco-immune GEPs in an NSCLC real-world scenario. Methods: Retrospective cohort of Brazilian NSCLC patients treated with ICIs in any line. GEP was assessed in FFPE tumor tissue using the nCounter PanCancer IO360 panel, comprising 770 cancer immune genes. Results: The median age of the 135 patients was 61 years old, most male (57.8 %), history of smoking (83.6 %), ECOG-PS 0-1 (88.7 %), clinical stage IV (91.9 %) and adenocarcinoma (65.1 %). First-line ICI in 40 % of cases, alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 28 months, overall survival after starting immunotherapy (post-immunotherapy survival – PIS) was 17.8 months, and real-world progression-free survival was 5.5 months. The GEP analysis was possible in 66 patients. We found that 14 different GEPs associated with PIS, namely IDO1, PD-L2, Cytotoxicity, Cytotoxic Cells, IFN Downstream, CTLA4, PD-L1, TIGIT, Lymphoid, Immunoproteasome, Exhausted CD8, IFN Gamma, TIS and APM. TIS and IFN-γ were the most significant GEPs associated with favorable outcomes. The median PIS for patients with high TIS expression was 29.2 versus 15.5 months (HR 0.42; 95 %CI; 0.17–0.67; p

Unraveling the complexities of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its correlation with responsiveness to immunotherapy has become a main focus in overcoming resistance to such treatments. Targeting tumor-intrinsic retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I), a sensor for viral RNA, was shown to transform the TME from an immunogenically “cold” state to an inflamed, “hot” lesion, which we demonstrated previously to be a crucial mediator of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). In this study, we focus on the chimeric oncolytic virus vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-Newcastle disease virus (NDV), comprised of genetic components of VSV and NDV, and we investigate its utility to support tumor-intrinsic RIG-I-dependent therapy with anti-CTLA-4. Overall, we demonstrate that treatment with VSV-NDV efficiently delays tumor growth and significantly prolongs survival in a murine model of malignant melanoma, which was further enhanced in combination with anti-CTLA-4. Although the direct oncolytic and pro-inflammatory effects of VSV-NDV therapy were independent of RIG-I activation, the synergism with anti-CTLA-4 therapy and associated activation of tumor-specific T cells was critically dependent on active RIG-I signaling in tumor cells. This work highlights the therapeutic value of utilizing an immune-stimulatory oncolytic virus to sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition.

Abstract Outcomes for patients with melanoma have improved over the past decade with the clinical development and approval of immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Combinations of these checkpoint therapies with other agents are now being explored to improve outcomes and enhance benefit-risk profiles of treatment. Alternative inhibitory receptors have been identified that may be targeted for anti-tumor immune therapy, such as lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), as have several potential target oncogenes for molecularly targeted therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Unfortunately, many patients still progress and acquire resistance to immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies. To bypass resistance, combination treatment with immunotherapies and single or multiple TKIs have been shown to improve prognosis compared to monotherapy. The number of new combinations treatment under development for melanoma provides options for the number of patients to achieve a therapeutic benefit. Many diagnostic and prognostic assays have begun to show clinical applicability providing additional tools to optimize and individualize treatments. However, the question on the optimal algorithm of first- and later-line therapies and the search for biomarkers to guide these decisions are still under investigation. This year, the Melanoma Bridge Congress (Dec 1st–3rd, 2022, Naples, Italy) addressed the latest advances in melanoma research, focusing on themes of paramount importance for melanoma prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This included sessions dedicated to systems biology on immunotherapy, immunogenicity and gene expression profiling, biomarkers, and combination treatment strategies.

Elena Simonetti,1 Serena Cutarella,1 Monica Valente,2 Tommaso Sani,1 Matteo Ravara,1 Michele Maio,1– 3 Anna Maria Di Giacomo1– 3 1University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Siena, Italy; 3NIBIT Foundation Onlus, Genoa, ItalyCorrespondence: Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email annamaria.digiacomo@unisi.itAbstract: Harnessing the immune system with immune-checkpoint(s) blockade (ICB) has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of advanced melanoma patients in the last decade. Indeed, durable clinical responses and long-term survival can be achieved with anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-Programmed cell Death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) either alone or in combination. Despite these unprecedented results, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to ICB-based immunotherapy, about half of metastatic melanoma (MM) patients neither respond to therapy nor experience durable clinical benefit or long-term survival. To improve the efficacy of ICB therapy among a larger proportion of MM patients, in addition to the targeting of immune-checkpoint(s) inhibitors (ICI) such as CTLA-4 or PD-1, several co-stimulatory molecules, such as Inducible T-cell COStimulator (ICOS), CD137 and OX40, have been investigated in MM, with initial signs of activity. Thus, a number of MM patients have been exposed to co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory mAb in the course of their disease. Being aware of the clinical outcome of such patients may pave the way to novel and more effective clinical approaches and therapeutic sequences for MM patients. Here we report a paradigmatic clinical case of a cutaneous MM patient who achieved multiple and durable complete responses, leading to an extraordinary long-term survival with sequential ICB therapies, suggesting the possibility to build a highly effective continuum of care with co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory therapeutic mAb.Keywords: immunotherapy, combinations, anti-PD1, anti-CTLA-4, CD137 agonist, ICOS agonist

Simple Summary: Melanoma has the highest mortality rate of all skin cancers and its prognosis is worsened by metastasis to the brain. Before discovering new treatments for metastases, the prognosis of patients was poor. Currently, research is being conducted on new drugs using immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4) and targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) to improve the prognosis of patients. In this article, we summarize the current state of knowledge about the effects of treating brain metastases with new systemic therapies. Melanoma is a type of skin cancer in which there is a strong correlation between its occurrence and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Although it is not the most common skin cancer, it has the highest mortality rate of all skin cancers. The prognosis of patients is significantly worsened by melanoma metastasis to the brain, which often occurs in patients with advanced disease. The formation and development of melanoma metastases to the brain involve a very complex process, and their mechanisms are not fully understood. One of the ways for metastatic melanoma cells to survive and develop cancer in the brain environment is the presence of oncogenic BRAF mutation, which occurs in up to 50% of metastatic melanoma cases. Before discovering new methods of treating metastases, the overall survival of patients with this disease was 6 months. Currently, research is being conducted on new drugs using immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4) and targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) to improve the prognosis of patients. In this article, we summarize the current state of knowledge about the results of treating brain metastases with new systemic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcomes for patients with melanoma have improved over the past decade with the clinical development and approval of immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Combinations of these checkpoint therapies with other agents are now being explored to improve outcomes and enhance benefit-risk profiles of treatment. Alternative inhibitory receptors have been identified that may be targeted for anti-tumor immune therapy, such as lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), as have several potential target oncogenes for molecularly targeted therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Unfortunately, many patients still progress and acquire resistance to immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies. To bypass resistance, combination treatment with immunotherapies and single or multiple TKIs have been shown to improve prognosis compared to monotherapy. The number of new combinations treatment under development for melanoma provides options for the number of patients to achieve a therapeutic benefit. Many diagnostic and prognostic assays have begun to show clinical applicability providing additional tools to optimize and individualize treatments. However, the question on the optimal algorithm of first- and later-line therapies and the search for biomarkers to guide these decisions are still under investigation. This year, the Melanoma Bridge Congress (Dec 1st–3rd, 2022, Naples, Italy) addressed the latest advances in melanoma research, focusing on themes of paramount importance for melanoma prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This included sessions dedicated to systems biology on immunotherapy, immunogenicity and gene expression profiling, biomarkers, and combination treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been well-described in the literature. The objective of our retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in patients with advanced melanoma who had achieved disease control with ICI in a real-life setting. Our study, which included 85 patients, predominantly rechallenged with anti-PD1 antibodies, confirms the efficacy of ICI rechallenge, with a best overall response rate of 54% and a disease control rate of 75%. Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs and 10 grade 3–4 AEs. Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a compelling therapeutic option. Background: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been thoroughly described in the literature. Patients and methods: In this retrospective multicenter national real-life study, we enrolled patients who had been rechallenged with an ICI after achieving disease control with a first course of ICI, which was subsequently interrupted. The primary objective was to evaluate tumor response, while the secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile, identifying factors associated with tumor response, and evaluating survival outcomes. Results: A total of 85 patients from 12 centers were included in the study. These patients had advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) melanoma that had been previously treated and controlled with a first course of ICI before undergoing rechallenge with ICI. The rechallenge treatments consisted of pembrolizumab (n = 44, 52%), nivolumab (n = 35, 41%), ipilimumab (n = 2, 2%), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 4, 5%). The best overall response rate was 54%. The best response was a complete response in 30 patients (35%), a partial response in 16 patients (19%), stable disease in 18 patients (21%) and progressive disease in 21 patients (25%). Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs in 14 patients (16%) and 10 grade 3–4 AEs in nine patients (11%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. Patients who received another systemic treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy or clinical trial) between the two courses of ICI had a lower response to rechallenge (p = 0.035) and shorter PFS (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with ICI after previous disease control induced by these inhibitors resulted in high response rates (54%) and disease control (75%). Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a relevant therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are cancers with very good prognosis, even in the metastatic setting, with high curative potential mainly attributed to the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, approximately 15% of the patients develop platinum-refractory disease and suffer multiple relapses. Therefore, there is an unmet need for novel therapeutic agents with improved efficacy and minimal long-term side effects. Recent advances in the development of immunotherapeutic agents, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have offered an opportunity to test their activity in various tumor types, including GCTs. This review aims to analyze the immune microenvironment of these tumors and present the most recently available data from studies that have tested immunotherapeutic agents against GCTs. The majority of the available knowledge derives from case reports or small cohort studies, particularly those involving ICIs of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Other immunotherapeutic targeted approaches, including antibody-drug conjugates, antibody prodrugs, vaccines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, have biological rationales and have shown preliminary activity or are currently being tested. Growing evidence on these and other approaches will assist in broadening the currently limited treatment armamentarium against platinum-refractory TGCTs.

Abstract Advances in immune checkpoint and combination therapy have led to improvement in overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma. Improved understanding of the tumor, tumor microenvironment and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. Combination modalities with other immunotherapy agents, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy are also being explored to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response. In addition, novel approaches such as adoptive cell therapy, oncogenic viruses, vaccines and different strategies of drug administration including sequential, or combination treatment are being tested. Despite the progress in diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, correct classification of patients, selection of appropriate adjuvant and systemic theràapies, and prediction of response to therapy remain real challenges in melanoma. Improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment, tumor immunity and response to therapy has prompted extensive translational and clinical research in melanoma. There is a growing evidence that genomic and immune features of pre-treatment tumor biopsies may correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers, but they have yet to be fully characterized and implemented clinically. Development of novel biomarker platforms may help to improve diagnostics and predictive accuracy for selection of patients for specific treatment. Overall, the future research efforts in melanoma therapeutics and translational research should focus on several aspects including: (a) developing robust biomarkers to predict efficacy of therapeutic modalities to guide clinical decision-making and optimize treatment regimens, (b) identifying mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors that are potentially actionable, (c) identifying biomarkers to predict therapy-induced adverse events, and (d) studying mechanism of actions of therapeutic agents and developing algorithms to optimize combination treatments. During the Melanoma Bridge meeting (December 2nd-4th, 2021, Naples, Italy) discussions focused on the currently approved systemic and local therapies for advanced melanoma and discussed novel biomarker strategies and advances in precision medicine as well as the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on management of melanoma patients.