Search

Importance: Clinical trials are the path to test and introduce new therapies in the clinic. Trials that are unable to produce results represent inefficiency in the system and may also undermine patient confidence in the new drug development process., Objectives: To survey the immunotherapy clinical trial landscape of breast cancer between January 2004 and April 2023 and examine what fraction of trials with primary completion date up to November 30, 2022, failed to report outcome, assessing the proportion of trials that yielded positive results and describing trial features associated with these 2 outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included breast cancer immunotherapy trials identified in ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial details and results were retrieved in December 2023. Google Scholar, PubMed, and LARVOL CLIN websites were also searched for reports., Main Outcomes and Measures: Trial outcome reported as abstract or manuscript. Reported trials were categorized as positive (ie, met its end point) or negative. Association between reporting and trial features were tested using Fisher exact test., Results: A total of 331 immuno-oncology trials were initiated in breast cancer by April 2023; 242 trials were phase II, 47 were phase I, and 42 phase III. By setting, 212 studies (64.0%) were conducted in metastatic, 94 (28.4%) in neoadjuvant, and 25 (7.6%) in adjuvant settings. Among phase II and III trials, 168 (59.2%) were nonrandomized. One hundred twenty trials had primary completion dates up to November 30, 2022, of which 30 (25.0%; enrolling a combined 2428 patients) failed to report their outcomes; 7 phase I trials (31.8%), 21 phase II trials (23.6%), and 2 phase III trials (22.2%) were unreported. Single-center studies were significantly more likely to be unreported than multicenter studies (19 of 54 [35.2%] vs 9 of 60 [15.0%]; P = .02). Of the 90 reported trials, 47 (52.2%) and 43 (47.8%) were positive and negative, respectively. Seventeen of 19 (89.5%) of the reported randomized trials (accruing a total of 4189 patients) were negative., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of immunotherapy breast cancer trials, the large number of trials yielded modest clinical impact. Single-center trials commonly failed to report their outcomes and many phase II studies have not translated into corresponding successful phase III trials.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy and now represents a standard of care for many tumor types, including triple-negative breast cancer. Despite the positive results that have led to the approval of immunotherapy in both early- and advanced-stage triple-negative breast cancer, pivotal clinical trials cannot address the myriad questions arising in everyday clinical practice, often falling short in delivering all the information that clinicians require. In this manuscript, we aim to address some of these practical questions, with the purpose of providing clinicians with a guide for optimizing the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of breast cancer patients and identifying opportunities for future research to clarify unresolved questions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Our phase I Hepatic Immunotherapy for Metastases (HITM) trial tested the safety of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell (CAR-T) hepatic artery infusions (HAI) for unresectable carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)+ liver metastases (LM). High neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios (NLR) predict poor outcome in cancer patients and we hypothesized that NLR changes would correlate with early responses to CAR-T HAI. Six patients completed the protocol. Three patients received CAR-T HAI in dose escalation (1 × 10(8), 1 × 10(9) and 1 × 10(10) cells) and the remainder received three doses (1 × 10(10) cells) with interleukin (IL)2 support. Serum cytokines and NLR were measured at multiple time points. The mean NLR for all patients was 13.9 (range 4.8-38.1). NLR increased in four patients following treatment with a mean fold change of 1.9. Serum IL6 levels and NLR fold changes demonstrated a trend towards a positive correlation (r=0.77, P=0.10). Patients with poor CEA responses were significantly more likely to have higher NLR level increases (P=0.048). Increased NLR levels were associated with poor responses following CAR-T HAI. NLR variations and associated cytokine changes may be useful surrogates of response to CAR-T HAI.