Search

Standard treatments for autoimmune and autoinflammatory disorders rely mainly on immunosuppression. These are predominantly symptomatic remedies that do not affect the root cause of the disease and are associated with multiple side effects. Immunotherapies are being developed during the last decades as more specific and safer alternatives to small molecules with broad immunosuppressive activity, but they still do not distinguish between disease-causing and protective cell targets and thus, they still have considerable risks of increasing susceptibility to infections and/or malignancy. Antigen-specific approaches inducing immune tolerance represent an emerging trend carrying the potential to be curative without inducing broad immunosuppression. These therapies are based on antigenic epitopes derived from the same proteins that are targeted by the autoreactive T and B cells, and which are administered to patients together with precise instructions to induce regulatory responses capable to restore homeostasis. They are not personalized medicines, and they do not need to be. They are precision therapies exquisitely targeting the disease-causing cells that drive pathology in defined patient populations. Immune tolerance approaches are truly transformative options for people suffering from autoimmune diseases., (Copyright © 2020 Carballido, Regairaz, Rauld, Raad, Picard and Kammüller.)

Introduction: Several diseases caused by the dysregulation of complement activation can be treated with inhibitors of the complement components C5 and/or C3. However, complement is required for serum bactericidal activity (SBA) against encapsulated Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, C3 and C5 inhibition increases the risk of invasive disease, in particular by Neisseria meningitidis. As inhibitors against complement components other than C3 and C5 may carry a reduced risk of infection, we compared the effect of inhibitors targeting the terminal pathway (C5), the central complement component C3, the alternative pathway (FB and FD), and the lectin pathway (MASP-2) on SBA against serogroup B meningococci. Methods: Serum from adults was collected before and after vaccination with the meningococcal serogroup B vaccine 4CMenB and tested for meningococcal killing. Since the B capsular polysaccharide is structurally similar to certain human polysaccharides, 4CMenB was designed to elicit antibodies against meningococcal outer membrane proteins. Results: While only a few pre-vaccination sera showed SBA against the tested B meningococcal isolates, 4CMenB vaccination induced potent complement-activating IgG titers against isolates expressing a matching allele of the bacterial cell surface-exposed factor H-binding protein (fHbp). SBA triggered by these cell surface protein-specific antibodies was blocked by C5 and reduced by C3 inhibition, whereas alternative (factor B and D) and lectin (MASP-2) pathway inhibitors had no effect on the SBA of post-4CMenB vaccination sera. Discussion: Compared to the SBA triggered by A,C,W,Y capsule polysaccharide conjugate vaccination, SBA against B meningococci expressing a matching fHbp allele was remarkably resilient against the alternative pathway inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysregulation of complement activation causes a number of diseases, including paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. These conditions can be treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to the complement component C5 and prevent formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). While MAC is involved in uncontrolled lysis of erythrocytes in these patients, it is also required for serum bactericidal activity (SBA), i.e. clearance of encapsulated bacteria. Therefore, terminal complement blockage in these patients increases the risk of invasive disease by Neisseria meningitidis more than 1000-fold compared to the general population, despite obligatory vaccination. It is assumed that alternative instead of terminal pathway inhibition reduces the risk of meningococcal disease in vaccinated individuals. To address this, we investigated the SBA with alternative pathway inhibitors. Serum was collected from adults before and after vaccination with a meningococcal serogroup A, C, W, Y capsule conjugate vaccine and tested for meningococcal killing in the presence of factor B and D, C3, C5 and MASP-2 inhibitors. B meningococci were not included in this study since the immune response against protein-based vaccines is more complex. Unsurprisingly, inhibition of C5 abrogated killing of meningococci by all sera. In contrast, both factor B and D inhibitors affected meningococcal killing in sera from individuals with low, but not with high bactericidal anti-capsular titers. While the anti-MASP-2 mAb did not impair SBA, inhibition of C3 impeded meningococcal killing in most, but not in all sera. These data provide evidence that vaccination can provide protection against invasive meningococcal disease in patients treated with alternative pathway inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]